Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

2024 F1 General Discussion Thread

18081838586110

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Lando signed a long term deal with a team that was at worst a midfield team for a couple of years, no doubt helped by the fact that he saw the investment in new facilities they had planned over the next few years.

    And really, there was no other top team that he could have gone to where he’d be considered the number 1 driver. That’s probably still the case - look at the trouble Sainz had getting a seat.

    They’ve given him stability in F1, loads of money and now a brilliant car, he’s not owed anything else. If he can’t win the championship with that unless the team ask Piastri to let him win a couple of times, he probably doesn’t deserve it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Whether you think he deserves it is irrelevant. If the team want to maximise their results this season they need to start issuing team orders. If they aren’t interested in maximising their results then why even bother competing in the first place. Nonsense phrases like “papaya rules” just makes them a laughing stock.

    Post edited by MadYaker on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49,264 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    My end point on the Lando/Piastri team orders is that: by not enforcing team orders to maximize Lando's points at this stage, they are effectively reducing their chances of winning the championship to 0. They have a SLIM chance with Lando, they have no chance with Piastri, they have no chance if Lando has to race a very good driver in an excellent car for every single point as well.

    You can argue the merits of deserving it or not, but the end result will be neither driver wins the title because they will 'cost' each other so many points. Early in the season, when you are establishing the championship i think it wrong to enforce a number 1. Half way through the season? When RB look to be faltering and there is a small chance you could pip them for both the Contructors and the Drivers? I think it is MADNESS to effectively give up on the drivers champ.

    I could see more of an argument for Piastri not giving up a win to Lando in second, but I really don't understand why you wouldn't ask Piastri and Lando to swap any other positions if they are driving in sequence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭bren2001


    I think you're making very different points to the original poster. If Piastri handed Lando the win and Lando went on to win the WDC, he would have earned the title and deserved it. You're going off on a completely different point (one I disagree with but outside the scope of what I replied too and what I've said).

    Lando, IMO, hasn’t done that. Ability wise there is very little between himself and Piastri

    44 points in the difference. Same car.

    Also, he hasn’t shown enough consistency to make his case that they should risk the team dynamic going all in on him.

    What team dynamic? There is none. There is no team. They've made that clear. There's 8 races left, of course you pick the guy who has a credible chance of winning the WDC and not say "we've two equal drivers". They don't. One has the potential to win. The other doesn't.

    Neither do with their current strategy which is stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,140 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    Dream team, or too many cooks? Time will tell I guess.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Dream team imo. Stroll catches a lot of flack but you couldn’t say he isn’t putting his money where his mouth is. I’d imagine Newey will be as much creative freedom as he wants. It will be interesting to see what Alonso does now. I think he will be gone after 2025



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,868 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    Yeah, he's become a shareholder in Aston Martin too according to various articles, whether that's just the F1 team or the whole AM brand, who knows



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    They are separate. There’s Aston Martin F1 and Aston Martin Lagonda that builds the road cars. Shares in AML are not exactly a hot commodity at the moment so I’m guessing Newey got a slice of the F1 team.

    It’s almost like Lawrence Stroll read Newey’s book and did the opposite of what Frank Williams did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    Wonder how much Eddie J is making out of this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Stroll is obviously sticking his oar in and choosing the driver. Otherwise Lance would be out if there. It's reasonable to assume he's interfering in ways that are best for him personally, but not best for the team. How far he's willing to go to interfere is the question.

    If he's willing to interfere with car design, then he's a gobshyte.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,990 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    So Newey and Co build a good car for 2026 but not quite there. Alonso retires after end of 2026.

    Stroll puts a youngster in the 2nd car for 2027 beside lance. The car is a masterpiece for 2027 and lance wins the championship as no 1 driver with help from team mate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It's possible but they'd need such a dominant car for that to happen.

    Perez finished second in one of the last 3 years, when Red Bull was dominant. Perez is a decent average driver. Stroll is below average. He'd probably need a car as dominant as the mclaren 1998 or Mercedes mid-2010s. It's possible, but unlikely.

    They'd need a car so dominant that most other drivers would win the championship handily, before Stroll could compete.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    I don’t think there’s much to choose between Stroll and Perez. Stroll could be a capable second driver in a dominant car imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,321 ✭✭✭✭klose


    It will be interesting to see who stroll replaces Alonso with when he eventually calls it a day, will he go big for Norris or piastri for example?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,140 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    Have you forgotten that they were team mates for two years? There was plenty to choose between them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Verstappen? He's got the Honda, he's got Newey, why not complete the set.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,727 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Worth noting that Mclaren don't necessarily care about the WDC, the aim for the constructor is the constructors championship. If "papaya rules" is "free to race but dont crash into each other", then it maximises constructors points for the team.

    They have a small chance of winning the WDC with lando, none with Piastri, but they have a large shot at the constructors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,990 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Constructors is a certainty surely.

    It was interesting to hear Newey say yesterday that some of the critical design features on the redbull for the last 3 years are not yet understood by the other teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,617 ✭✭✭NinjaTruncs


    I wonder is red bull one of those teams?

    4.3kWp South facing PV System. South Dublin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    AM REPORTEDLY have been talking to Verstappen about a 2026 move



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    It's amazing how short people's memories can be. Perez proved himself time and again to be one of the most capable drivers on the grid, he's just in the unfortunate position right now to be driving a really difficult car while people massively overplay how good it is because there is a once in a generation talent in the other seat.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 11,481 Mod ✭✭✭✭Andrew76


    McLaren to favour Norris over Piastri in the title fight - as long as they do it in a manner not to piss Piastri off too much then it makes sense. For sure the constructors title is theirs to lose now but hopefully Max can hang on for the drivers. 🤞

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/articles/c4gen1vegx7o



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,498 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I hope that if Norris does well they keep pushing him to compete for title but, if it's apparent the drivers title is gone, they revert to the "papaya rules" and let them race.

    It will be interesting to see if this has any affect on how Norris drives now..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,990 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    An obvious action taken multiple races too late.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Hopefully it isn’t too late. The papaya rules bs has already cost them points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Fascinating times at McLaren! Be interesting to see what sort of shape that priority takes. Presumably no more Monza type overtakes and allowing Lando to lead the 2 cars where appropriate. They must be hoping that Lando can be the dominant driver over the next few races to make this issue redundant.

    Of course I wouldn’t be surprised if Oscar starts looking to drive the wheels off the car to make team orders difficult to implement. Should make for great entertainment regardless!



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 11,481 Mod ✭✭✭✭Andrew76


    Hopefully! (From a Max fan's perspective ofc 😁)

    Seriously though, 62 points is not insurmountable with 232 still available. It concerns me that Red Bull seem to have no clue how to fix their current issues so even with no reliability issues or forced engine penalties, I'm not sure Max will be in a position to fight for wins anymore. The title run in is going to be nerve-racking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    To be fair to myself, I can’t forget things I didn’t know in the first place. That was before I really started watching F1.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,567 ✭✭✭niallm77


    They may revert to a pre-update version Of the car



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement