Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How hard is it to fire someone

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Are you avoiding the question about the stronger morals then?



  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    With your help, I've given numerous examples of how the greater sense of integrity and morals we see from private workers ensure a continuity of supply and service unmatched from public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So morals = continuity of supply?

    Perhaps you'd like to look up the dictionary definition of morals and we can pick this up tomorrow?



  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    Yes. As in you don't withdraw services from those who need it most in order to grease your own grubby paws. It's clear you prioritize nurses greed - despite being paid above average - over those with cancer says a lot about you, and your kind. The fact you are on here defending the worst from government employees shows you for what you are, a quack.

    Still no comment from you on one of your colleagues on another thread suggestion to defraud the state and claim uncertified sick leave in order to attend a funeral?

    Of course, nurses striking when ill won't affect you. You're the kind of coward singing the praises of all things great about government employees, defending their work and integrity but will take out private healthcare to cover your own ass, just as we could expect from a hypocrite.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    This might be bad news but 'morals' does not equal 'continuity of supply'. There is no definition in the entire world of morals that matches your petty, self-serving attempt to redefine a word to suit your agenda. There are lots of definitions of morals; here's one from; https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/morals
    "Morals are the prevailing standards of behavior that enable people to live cooperatively in groups. Moral refers to what societies sanction as right and acceptable."
    So no, morals does not equal continuity of supply, outside of your head anyway.
    You choose to ignore the questions of morality of entire sectors of private industry. You choose to ignore the fundamental objective of private industry being to create value for shareholders, nothing to do with morality there. You ignore the fact that many people switch between public and private sectors and back again over the course of their career. Do these people redirect their entire moral compass every time they change jobs?
    It's a nonsense proposition - but if you do want to go there, let's give it a shot. Where was the morality of the private sector Aer Lingus pilots, causing people to miss overseas operations, miss family funerals, destroying weddings that had been planned for years in advance? Where's the morality of the 27 pages of drug shortages caused by the pharma sector? https://www.hpra.ie/homepage/medicines/medicines-information/medicines-shortages/shortages-list
    Where's the morality in the strike by barristers, delaying criminal trials and leaving criminals out on the street? Where's the morality in the Jones Engineering strikers delaying works on the National Children's Hospital and important pharma projects? Where's the morality in the plumbers, fitters, welders and apprentices on construction projects striking and holding up housing projects at a time of the biggest housing crisis for a century? Where's the morality in the phone support staff at Kyndryl striking and stopping people from sorting out their essential gas connections and banking services? Where's the morality in the Tarbert Power Station staff striking at a time of critical and high cost energy supply for the whole country?
    Please explain how your simplistic 'strong morals = private sector = continuity of supply' principles apply to the real world in the light of these examples?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 246 ✭✭sudocremegg




  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    Thanks for proving my point for me!! All these isolated disputes and the general public at large unaffected by them.

    If private sector disputes behaved like those from government employees, retail would refuse people food, oil and gas deliveries would be halted in the depth of winter, those manufacturing and delivering drugs would prevent people access to them. People would be unable to leave or depart the country. None of which you manged to capture in your quite impressive list.

    It's almost like there's benefits in having distributed sources of supply so that one group of degenerates don't get to use their monopoly to specifically target the most vulnerable in society the way government employees have done and repeatedly threaten to do so. None of the drug shortages you refer to was a result of employees refusing to work.

    Of course, you know the dangers of relying on state healthcare and the people who work in it. That's why you take the coward's way out and purchase private healthcare despite all your grandstanding on this site.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    The 'general public at large' was unaffected by the Aer Lingus strike, but yet the general public at large was somehow affected by a small number of deferred medical procedures? Don't suppose you'd like to show your workings there. It's really funny to see you shifting your goalposts desperately as each of your nonsensical claims is pointed out. Where's the monopoly of medical services, btw? Presumably you've heard about the private medical sector, which for all it's faults, does actually exist? Oh yes, you mentioned private healthcare just two lines after you mentioned 'their monopoly', directly contradicting yourself within the same post.

    And how did you decide that morality was just about 'refusing to work'? You said that morality = continuity of supply, but there's obviously a huge amount of supply problems there. Where's the morality in hiking up drug prices to extreme levels totally unaffordable to all but the privileged few, and also milking money out of governments desperate to do their best for unwell people - in other words, an average day's work in the pharma sector. How come your beloved private sector staff of 'stronger morals' have no difficulty in creaming governments?



  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    Yep, there were plenty of alternatives the time of the Aer Lingus strike. Again, you are proving my point for me. If private employees behaved the same way as public employees, all air travel would have been stopped completely. But it wasn't. Because those working in alternative airlines continued to do their jobs just like they were paid to do and tried their best to assist the traveling public.

    For those relying on the public system and ill were indeed stuck there at the time of the nurses strikes. Not like they could pick up the phone and drive themselves to the nearest alternative hospital as they watched the nurses turn their back and walk off the wards. Are you saying those patients affected had a choice? Could you explain how they could have avoided being caught up as a result of that strike action? It wasn't a small number of deferred medical procedures.

    You're right, when governments enter contracts to buy drugs for a set price, the employees continue to work each day to ensure the demand is met and at that price. You can be sure if government employees were responsible for manufacturing all drugs, the supply would be impacted by strike action at any time.

    When governments enter contracts with their workers, it is unknown how much will be lost to strike action, fraud and generally waste (I refer again to your colleague in the other thread and the black hole that is the HSE greasing many grubby and greedy paws in the management layers)

    It's clear to me which group of employees is morally superior.

    Maybe you don't see that. Or actually maybe you do, because when it comes to YOUR health, you're not so quick to rely on the staff you jump to the defence of in the state Health System and instead rely on those who don't take industrial action in the private hospitals making your grandstanding on this site total hypocrisy.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    'Plenty of alternatives'? I take it you didn't see all the news coverage of people stranded, of people losing half of their wedding parties, of people who missed their appointments for life saving operations?

    What public service 'was stopped completely' btw?

    I presume you're just going to ignore the question of drug pricing creaming money out of governments for greedy pharma execs, just like you ignored the question of the finance industry leaders with 'strong morals' that bankrupted our country sending us cap in hand to the IMF?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    You're a hypocrite who condones fraud from your colleagues. I'm not explaining the differences to you anymore. If you can't understand, that's an issue with you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It didn't really stand up to scrutiny, did it? The whole 'morals = continuity of supply' nonsense?

    Untitled Image


  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    Why then do you trust your health with the morally superior private providers? Worried that you'll be caught out and denied healthcare in the public system, worried about the continuity of supply you could expect?

    The fact that you have covered yourself by private insurance proves the very point I'm making 🤣

    You don't have to explain any more, you have proven my point perfectly. Thank you!

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    The fairly obvious answer as to why many people use private health services in Ireland, about 50%, compared to about 15% in the UK, is because of backlogs and queues due to underfunding. People die waiting for access to underfunded public services here, so lots of people who can afford private health insurance will take it. It's nothing to do with the supposed morals or otherwise of staff on either side.

    I can imagine that you're quite keen that I don't explain any more, given that each of your claims has been exposed as nonsense. It's only inside your head that morals = continuity of supply. The real world is just a bit more complex than that, where your simplistic claims appear nonsensical and childish.



  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    Thanks for proving my point! Maybe I didn’t explain it very well, but you're the perfect example of the point I was trying to make.

    Public health is not underfunded. That leaves staff as the explanation. The very point I was making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Thanks for proving my point about simplistic claims that appear nonsensical and childish.



  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    I bet you you're not going to test out the simplistic claims and bet your health on public health staff though will you 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Look at all these dreadful low morals private sector plumbers and fitters leaving their essential sites with no continuity of supply.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 935 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,659 ✭✭✭Raichų


    that is a disgusting comment and you should be fcuking ashamed of yourself honestly.

    How dare you. Honestly. Just how dare you? Nurses took strike action after YEARS of begging and pleading for a FAIR wage for the work they do. They do not deserve the shite conditions and pay they get and when they finally had enough they’re met with attitudes like yours? They were happy to watch their patients suffer were they? Well what about the suffering those nurses had to endure?

    Give your head a shake and wake up. Disgraceful comment.



  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    Don't. You don't have to prove the point I'm making any further. Once again you have confirmed what I'm saying. Thank you so much!

    The general public have been protected from the affects of this dispute. The vulnerable in society are not targeted. Only for you linking to the RTE article everyone would be none the wiser.

    Others in the trade continue to work and provide their services to the public. I had a plumber in fixing taps the very day the protest was on.

    We don't see a widespread withdrawal of services to the public. Fantastic to see disruption was non existent. Fair play to the all those in the private sector workers keeping the show on the road!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,659 ✭✭✭Raichų


    I’ve never read such crap written with such a tone of righteousness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    No plumbing is happening on those sites, including the National Children's Hospital and new pharma sites. Where's the strong morals of the plumbers there in delaying services to sick children and delaying medication for sick everyone?



  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    Funny how the 'concerns' of nurses due to working conditions went away when given a pay rise in 2019. Walking away from cancer patients and directly impacting the general public - those in pain and discomfort - in order to force government into spending more on pay is disgusting when nurses are not badly paid in the first place.

    Nurses will spend the majority of their career earning significantly above the average salaries in Ireland. Including various allowances, their pay is even more than suggested by the salary scales.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,498 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    I never see you post anywhere on this site, except when it is in relation to the public service. This is going back 10 or more years. You have issues salon that might need to be addressed by a professional.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    AH yes, the private sector supply food becusse of their great sense of community and not for the profits. 😂 it amazes, and depresses me, as tonhow stupid some people can be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,002 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Would that be a public services professional, by any chance? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    You wouldn't be trying to shift the goalposts again, by any chance, now that your ludicrous 'strong morals' claim as been exposed as nonsense?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,659 ✭✭✭Raichų


    ah would you cop on to yourself. Let me tell you mate I work in the private sector because I get paid. I stop getting paid I stop working.

    My hours are cut? Gluck I’m way to the next place.

    Dont get the payrise I need or want? See ya I’m off.

    Please don’t act like public sector workers are just money hungry bastards when the majority are working much harder jobs than we ever will for pay you wouldn’t get out of bed in the morning for.

    And I cannot believe you’re seriously trying to argue that nurses get paid “higher than the average” in the entire country. They also have probably one of THE hardest jobs in this bloody country.

    I’m a chef and I get paid more than some nurses I know. Total fcuking joke frankly.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    Not exposed as nonsense at all, as evidenced by your lack of balls to practice what you preach and rely on public health staff for you and your family, staff who could target you as part of strike action when you are most vulnerable. Nope, you take out private insurance to get you into the private system staffed by private employees in order to cover your own ass.

    Not moving goalposts, I was responding to Raichų who first mentioned working conditions. I replied, pondering how those terrible working conditions magically went away when a pay rise was given.



Advertisement