Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

Certainly not a fan of Dick Cheney, but GOP voters need to wake up and heed the warnings. It is actually the most important election in Presidential history.

Another good article here that tries to identify just who are these undecided voters and just what their concerns are - taking lessons from Labours recent victory in the UK- again it’s not about labelling all undecided voters as “thick” or asking “why are they considering to vote for that horrible man Trump “- you won’t win this election if you don’t get to understand their perspective on things

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/sep/07/us-hero-voters-key-to-harris-win-say-ex-aides-who-plotted-labour-uk-victory

Is Trump going to stoop down to measure Harris's stilletos?

That's one thing that surprised me, WTF did he take off his shoes for in the first place?

I'd say his slip-ons (or maybe just one of them) fell off in the scuffle with the secret service agents crowding him.

Mzzz E. Jean Carrol ladies and gentle they/them

------------------------------------------

Warned: Trolling. 1 point + 1 day ban

How important can Trumps admission in the TV interview with Lex Friedman last week that he lost the 2020 election by a whisker be in any of the prosecutions being taken against him for attempting to steal the election from Biden? On the face of it, it turns his repeated claims that he did not lose the election, that it was stolen from him on their heads.

Can the entirely voluntary admission be added to and used by SC Smith in his new case against Trump as proof that Trump knowingly committed criminal acts in trying to prevent the truthful result of the vote being entered onto the record in Congress.

Is there any chance he can get SCOTUS to declare that his statement to the interviewer cannot be entered as evidence that he knew he had lost the election despite his repeated claims to the contrary over the past four years?

Three hours ago a story broke that Nick Fuentes is accusing Trump of betrayal by admitting to Friedman that he had, after all, lost the election to Biden in 2020. There are a few more comments from Fuentes about Trump in the article in the following link. EDIT: I've noticed that some of the comments made by others on Fuentes comments in the report are dated 04 Sept so the actual comments by Fuentes about Trump predate the date included at the head of the report so it's actual relevance might be in doubt. https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/world/nick-fuentes-is-now-accusing-donald-trump-of-betrayal-and-people-have-no-sympathy/ar-AA1qarNy?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=LCTS&cvid=0fc56277ba424913a7fade1ea43cd624&ei=62

So you're just not brave enough to come out and say you don't think she was raped?

I'm not surprised.

Want to know what blows my mind? That Trump is so loud and boasting about his innocence, so loud at press conferences where he said she made it all up, even though it cost him over $80 million dollars the last time and will probably cost him again after his latest outburst....

But the part that blows my mind is that when he was given the option to testify in a court of law, he declined. So, yeah. Only spouting innocence, where it's inconsequential.

Would you be trying to link or co-join this site with Trump in the defamatory statements he said about E. Jean Carroll?

The first reference I've found to this supposed tweet is from yesterday. Strangely enough nobody actually links to the tweet... It's a tad sad to be both so gullible and to be smearing a victim of rape. Bit sick really…

Trump supporters are thirsty for a drink in a desert for anything to try and stop Kamala with, of course they’d jump at every mirage

Afraid 😂 would I believe her story? absolutely not

She's a lunatic fantasist ….who also happens to be a Democrat supporter with TDS by coincidence

'Among several allegations that appear in her new book, What Do We Need Men For? A Modest Proposal, the writer E. Jean Carroll claims that Les Moonves tried to sexually assault her. As detailed in the upcoming New York cover story, Carroll says she was working on an article on Moonves for 

Esquire

 and that he followed her to an elevator after the interview and cornered her. “He steps into the elevator behind me,” Carroll writes, “and his pants bursting with demands, goes at me like an octopus. I don’t know how many apertures and openings you possess, Reader, but Moonves, with his arms squirming and poking and goosing and scooping and pricking and prodding and jabbing, is looking for fissures I don’t even know I own, and — by God! — I am not certain that even if I pull off one of his arms it won’t crawl after me and attack me in my hotel bed. Hell, I am thrilled I escape before he expels his ink.” Carroll adds that she did not include the experience in her 

Esquire

article,

Continuing to attack the victim. Now Enoch, would you agree the Manson tweet you shared last night wasn't real? On top of that a jury views her as far more credible than Trump on the rape. So you can attack all you want but you're attacking a victim of rape because you like the rapist.

What kind of dystopian hellhole are we living in, where this kind of utter and abject b0llox is listened to and doesn't immediately disqualify someone from any position of power, however small.

Honestly, it is like the insane ramblings of a drunkard, some sort of addict or someone who has suffered multiple blows to the head.

Whereas many parents have legitimate concerns about their kids being shot and killed when attending school. After all, far more kids are shot, killed, maimed or injured than are given gender reassignment surgery without their parents consent…

But y'know, as JD Vance says, "school shootings are a fact of life". (Unlike surprise gender reassignment surgery of course...)