Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cork Area Commuter Rail (CACR) [Old archived version]

11314151719

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 828 ✭✭✭Round Cable


    Glounthaune to Middleton double tracking work to start on the 23rd of September, BAM Ireland have been awarded the contract.

    https://www.c103.ie/news/c103-news-and-sport/works-to-twin-track-glounthaune-to-midleton-rail-line-to-start/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    How in god's name are BAM still winning government contracts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    BAM is broad-ranging group, and it has multiple, independent divisions in Ireland. I guess you’re referring to the Children’s Hospital, on which BAM Buildings is the primary contractor. This rail contract was not awarded to that division; it was awarded to BAM Civil Engineering, a separate division, whose rail work includes the Luas Citywest extension and extensions to the Red Cow and Sandyford Luas depots. All of those projects were completed on schedule and on budget, so there’s no reason to not award the company this one.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    In fairness to BAM Building, other than the Childrens Hospital (which isn't all BAMs fault), they have a long history of delivering state projects across all sectors on time and on budget.

    The NCH gets all the headlines due to the cost, but the government (with the open ended contract they offered) and the HSE (constantly changing plans during the construction process) have as much responsibility for the delays



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I see they aren’t going to bridge the level crossings.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I think only 1 will remain really in the long-run. Waterrock will be getting a bridge as part of a future dev phase, and the level crossing will be for pedestrian/cycle only then. Waterrock has houses up out of the ground too now by the way, right at the level crossing, they're flying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭OisinCooke


    BAM also building the new Waterford railway station and in charge of the enormous Ceannt station redevelopment, both of which are still on track and as far as I’m aware, on budget for their early 2026 openings



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Grey123


    Are there any plans for lift installs at stations similar to what they did at Little Island in the last year?


    It’s hard to believe we still have busy stations that are total inaccessible by people in wheelchairs or with buggies.

    Glounthaune has no bike parking despite being next to a shared use path. Pedestrians also need to share a car entrance, basically give way to cars entering the car park. I see a good few people arrive by foot there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    IÉ has an ongoing programme to install lifts at stations - Cork Kent should currently be underway now, with the work finishing at the end of September. The current project only goes to 2024, and does not include Cork Commuter stations, but there may be a follow-up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭Grey123


    Thanks.

    I see work’s going on in Kent. I presume it already had lifts so this is just replacement? That should be a different program in my opinion.

    I would expect that upgrading the network to be fully accessible would be a condition of further investment in the network. I wonder is there EU money involved.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    It’s for greater accessibility - I have never used the lifts at Kent, but I believe that not all of the station platforms were accessible by lift. This is to fix that omission.

    The lift programme is ongoing, but will end at the end of this year 2024. The new works at Little Island station opened in March, and as well as (finally!) a proper exit to the north side (i.e., actual Little Island) of the station, there are now two large lifts in place for a new overbridge. That’s the standard of improvement that will be implemented elsewhere.

    I would imagine that when the current (2020-2024) programme ends, another will be started. It has been a very popular programme, and we’re due an election soon…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    No, there's lifts to all Kent platforms now alright. Glounthaune has no plans for lifts that I know of: they were focused on building up Little Island for commuters, that's why it got prioritised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Does anyone know what the plan is for the Little Island footbridge over the N25? I don't know much about County Council jobs. Also, does anyone have any update on Kent Platform 6? I looked at the drawings before but I couldn't understand how you access it. Will it be outside the building, on the Horgan's Quay side, or within the building but further east of Platform 5?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    As of March, Little Island station has a direct entrance from the N25 Little Island junction, here:

    image.png

    Adding a dedicated footbridge over N25 at this point would be very, very expensive, for only a slight improvement in access overall. A cheaper approach to Eastgate access would be for the various businesses to chip in for a couple of shuttle buses to meet the trains as they arrive. (If it were my transport policy, I’d let the business park operators offset the cost of providing this bus service against a levy on parking spaces)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,444 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    The footbridge is part of the plan but long term. In hindsight it should have been done as an additional add on with the interchange upgrade.

    It'll be on the same level as the extended platform 5. Just the opposite side. Access via the subway as is currently for platform 5, but a second ramp will be put in place.

    Screenshot_20240901_155503_Chrome.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,095 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    All train and tram stations are best named to reflect their location.

    Cork Central is something which would be better and likewise Heuston, Connolly and Pearse would be better off having more appropriate names.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    You've answered your own question, there. Dublin is only "special" in that it has three mainline stations, so you need a way to distinguish them, so that's why you hear "Heuston", "Connolly", "Pearse".

    If another city had a second mainline station, then the same thing would happen.

    I think it's actually a good idea not to use the honorary names at all: mistaking "Ceannt" and "Kent" is something that's easy to do, and very, very annoying to undo once you're on the train.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,199 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Its a potentially a bit confusing when you are told that the Train's destination is "Heuston".Why not "Dublin Heuston", a minor addition to the needless stuff in the automated announcements.

    Some American visitors might wonder if they are in Texas 😎



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    I guess my issue is more that for Dublin it’s just Heuston and not Dublin Heuston in the stations. Meanwhile for Cork, it’s generally just Cork or Cork Kent. There seems to be an assumption everyone knows Heuston means Dublin and no one knows Kent means Cork. For example, when I got the train to Dublin on Thursday, it said “this is the X hours train to Heuston from Cork stopping at Mallow, Thurles, Portlaoise and Heuston”


    I agree with Zebra, Cork Central makes more sense. In that instance, Heuston could be Dublin West, Connolly could be Dublin Central and Pearse could be Dublin East. When Blarney and Blackpool are added, will it say “Heuston to Cork stopping at Mallow, Blarney, Blackpool and Cork”? I understand not having it just as Kent, but then it should be “Dublin Heuston to XYZ and Cork Kent”. I don’t know. Again, minor things. But it just gives me this vibe that Dublin is recognised as a real city and a big capital city, while Cork is this tiny town no more important than Banteer or Templemore


    Obviously there are much more important things for Irish Rail to be focusing on..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,503 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Good to see it will have a bi-directional cycle track for the whole length of the bridge, and not just another shared space treatment!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,709 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Renaming stations away from those involved in the 1916 rising is not going to happen. You would be opening a HUGE can of worms with that.

    That being said, "Dublin" should precede Heuston and Connolly in announcements and on signage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Not sure if this was already mentioned, but the dedicated footbridge was put through planning and the initial design was done by Arup. It's definitely being progressed somewhere. If only because the TII and NTA couldn't be dragged kicking and screaming into sorting out a pedestrian and cycle entrance to Little Island that doesn't involve dashing across roundabouts. They want to signalise the Crompán roundabout too. And there's a Co Co plan for a bus gate into Eastgate from the West. No idea where any of these plans are currently at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    You didn't dream that bridge, it's somewhere going through the system:

    https://www.corkcoco.ie/en/resident/planning-and-development/public-consultations/closed-public-consultations-other/notice-of-application-to-an-bord-pleanala-for-approval-proposed-n25-little-island-pedestrian-and

    Post edited by spacetweek on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Aha, you got there before me. No idea where it is now though. That and the bus gate into Eastgate from the West.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭Ireland trains


    https://www.corkindependent.com/2024/08/28/bam-wins-e29-5m-rail-contract/

    https://www.irishrail.ie/en-ie/news/next-phase-of-the-cacr-announced

    Does anyone know why the Midleton twin tracking is quoted as €29.5m in first article, but as €90m in the second. Is there more works not included in the contract to BAM?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I am not strong in the area of trains, but know the local area. There's more than double-tracking planned: BAM seem to clearly have the double tracking piece, including crossovers and sidings, but there's no mention of the planned new stations at Waterrock and Carrigtohill West. Could two new stations and extra rolling stock and drivers etc take up the difference maybe?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,709 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There are clearly several contracts for the project.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I would have to say that I disagree strongly here. Not only for the 1916 patriots after which the stations are now named, but naming a station ‘central’ ‘east’ or ‘west’ just feels very boring and is something done in essentially no cities in Europe. It makes far more sense having the stations named after a street or part of the city, or in this case, after a person, is done very commonly in mainland Europe.

    However I do agree that all intercity trains should announce their Dublin terminus station as ‘Dublin Heuston’ ‘Dublin Connolly’ or ‘Dublin Pearse’ in common with the rest of the cities around the country and also just to make it easier for tourists getting around.

    Finally though I don’t think you’ll ever have to worry about announcement discrepancy between the different Cork city stations as the trains from Dublin will only ever stop at Mallow and Kent!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Just to add I agree with keeping the 1916 names (although I don’t get why Galway and Cork both have Kent but in different languages - unless it is two different people?). However, my issue is the lack of use of Dublin before its three stations, which it seems everyone agrees with. It’s the same how TII told me they don’t want to use City Centre at Dunkettle as it will be confusing, but everywhere on and near the M50 and a lot of the M1 say City Centre instead of Dublin (generally much further from the city centre than Cork’s city centre, and with multiple destinations in between, while the N8 only goes to the city centre). It’s kind of the same how the government uses North East Inner City or South West Inner City. Sometimes it’s as if Dublin is this huge metropolis of international significance, and Cork is this little town off the beaten track…

    But anyway, I’m going off topic now. Glad to know we all agree



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement