Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1816817819821822943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I don’t think many truly believe there is no demand at current prices. Theres of course some self interested lobbying going on to say otherwise but the evidence doesn’t stack up.

    There does seem to be a genuine exception around high rise apartments where supposedly they just cost so much to build that they aren’t economical.

    The other two demand side measures (HTB, FHS) aren’t in place due to lack of demand but merely giving a certain cohort (Irish tax paying FTBs) a head start in the race. The houses would still sell, just to different people if they didn’t exist. Pretty much every single new 3 bed semi d in Dublin and surrounding counties is outside scope of any demand side grant and they still sell instantly.

    Stepping back from above though, if there’s one sector in the country where we desperately need higher wages to try to entice more workers (either immigrant workers, or new young apprentices) its construction workers! So good to see them doing well after a horrendous decade for the industry.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I don’t think many truly believe there is no demand at current prices. Theres of course some self interested lobbying going on to say otherwise but the evidence doesn’t stack up.

    That could very well be the case, and if so I wish the self interested lobbying was called out for what it is more often.

    The other two demand side measures (HTB, FHS) aren’t in place due to lack of demand but merely giving a certain cohort (Irish tax paying FTBs) a head start in the race. The houses would still sell, just to different people if they didn’t exist. 

    Its the First Home Scheme that I particularly object to, so if the houses will still sell without this support, the viability of developments and hence the security of supply is not really in question.

    If the security of supply is not at risk, I really struggle to see any other benefit of the FHS other than a short term political one for the government. Short term political wins have a habit of turning into long term societal losses!



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    @DataDude actually thinking about it further I think the lack of calling out the self interesting lobbying about the viability of building might well be related to the valid point you made earlier!

    It’s another example of how hyperbolic media reporting playing into the negative Irish psyche means people have no perception of economic reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    It’s a fair point on the FHS. I’m on the fence about whether it’s good or bad, I can see both arguments. As a scheme however, I think it’s primary purpose is pretty clear - given Ireland has some of the highest rental yields in the world and some of the more restrictive lending limits from banks, we are extremely susceptible to the pitfall of

    ‘Sorry FTBer, I’m not letting you buy this place because you can’t afford the €1,700 mortgage (fixed rate), so instead this 70 year old person is going to buy it cash and rent it to you for €2,500 and increase it by 2% a year for the rest of your life’

    FHS primary goal is getting people out of a rent trap and into home ownership (at whatever cost)…because politically, once people own a home. They’re more likely to vote FF/FG - irrespective of how much debt they’re in (actually probably more likely the bigger the debt as they need to protect the economy at all costs then!).

    Agreed, but it’s par for the course with any lobby group. Law society, insurance Ireland, vintners association, farmers association…there may at times be small hints of truth buried in the spiel of nonsense…up to public (and politicians) to challenge sensibly.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I see the validity in all this, particularly the political value in converting a renter into a homeowner.

    I'd go far as to say that's the primary aim of the scheme, along with the value in soundbites such as "we've helped x000 people buy a home who otherwise would not have been able to do so."

    That's the root of my frustration with housing in Ireland. The problems and proposed solutions are political rather than economic or structural.

    And that is not going to change anytime soon.

    Because nobody who would be willing to ignore the political implications in favour of the economic by definition will never find themsves in a position to do anything about it.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think you are ill informed if you decide that only political decisions influence something like the house building sector, which has so many moving parts, and which can be influenced by so many factors. To think that way, would indicate that you think political will alone can solve the problem, without economic or societal influence.

    Maybe you have some idea of how political will alone is the answer, how do you think politicians could build 100k houses?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭Montys return


    What are the opinions on Sinn Feins leasehold scheme for affordable housing?

    Genuine critiques now of the premise, let's try and leave political allegiances to one side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Genuine, workable, creates a 2nd tier more affordable buying option. Affordability is retained in the home rather than recycled and lost in the private market

    Bit of a cave in by SF under pressure from FFG party of home ownersship narrative populism and magic money tree economics.

    We need to focus on affordable but profitable rentals as our young people are finding it impossible to start life here and are leaving hence the doubling to over 10,000 that have left for Australia in the last 12 months

    Its difficult and costly replacing 10k well educated with 30k whom may not speak our language



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think you misunderstood, apologies if I phrased it badly.

    I don't think political will alone is the answer. Quite the contrary.

    I think political will is both the cause of most of the current problems, and the political solutions are only exacerbating the problems.

    I believe the economic and structural problems in Irish housing are far less significant than the political problems.

    If it were possible to remove the politics from the decision making, the situation could be solved much quicker and cheaper to the benefit of all.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Compared to any other proposals I've heard, I like it - as Villa05 says it's a genuine attempt to create a second tier market that's purely focussed on the affordable.

    As far as I can see the only drawback from a buyers point of view is it limits your potential for enjoying the upside on capital gains on your property.

    For anybody who claims that they wish to buy a house simply to escape the horrific rental market, enjoy security of tenure etc, secure accommodation for old age etc etc it looks like it ticks all those boxes.

    Removing those buyers from having to compete with buyers who have one eye on long term financial returns can only be a good thing.

    As I've said above I'm instinctively against subsidising house purchases, but from the government/taxpayers point of view in this case the subsidy - the value of the land - has a long term impact on affordability for all. That is surely preferable than taking an equity stake in the house which is both inherently risky and only really benefits the recipient of the subsidy.

    The backlash against it is purely political IMO.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It seems reasonable given that it is aimed at those who earn too much to be eligible for social housing, and too little to afford current prices.
    But there are a couple of issues that jump out:

    • SF seem incapable of articulating any substantial policies, and the news cycle for this one seems to have run its course, they don’t seem to think that answering questions on details will be important to an electorate. This is one of the reasons their support has tanked, they appear no better than what is there, and may actually do more damage to the housing sector.

    • The owner never truly owns their home, the don’t own the land, they aren’t free to sell at market price. That makes the property somewhere in between ownership and renting, and it’s a lot of money for an “owner” to spend without having complete control of it.

    • I presume the owner is free to employ their own builder? Maybe not. But if they are, builders will quickly understand that the money which would have been required to buy a site, can now be spent on build. It doesn’t take a degree in economics to know if that is the case, it can be exploited. Maybe the state will employ the builders and the owners pay the State, again, builders will be in a great position to extract the max value for their work.

    • The sites will still face the usual planning frustrations, and the owners of these homes may well become the new “upper class” social housers, not everyone will want them next door.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    https://bpfi.ie/publications/bpfi-mortgage-approvals-july-2024/

    More positive, albeit somewhat confusing news. July sets the new record for FTB mortgage approvals* since 2011 (by a large distance too) and SSB at all time highs also. 3.3k FTBs vs previous high of 3k. Difficult to objectively argue that the trajectory here is anything but extremely positive.

    The average approval value also set another new record. Total value of FTBs mortgage approval was €1.01bn in the month. Previous all time high was €926m, and had never been above €870m other than that.

    Given the incredibly low levels of stock for sale, you’d wonder what they’re all finding to buy.

    *A mortgage approval is defined as a “firm offer” to a customer of a credit facility secured on a specific residential property. A mortgage approval arises when the lender issues a formal offer of mortgage finance to the customer (whether it be in print or some other durable form) for a specific residential property



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I understand the optimistic look at those figures unfortunately mortgage approval is the easy part (not talking about approval in principle). Myself and my partner would be considered in those figures to the region of €736k as we had approval for a self build in writing before the builder pulled out to do another job and couldn't find a new one to do it near the price the first one quoted. Mortgage approval then revoked due to new costings which were above our budget.

    Second mortgage approval after we were sale agreed on the property before the seller's own purchase fell through so agreement revoked.

    I understand that this is just one (well two) mortgage approvals but neither resulted in us owning a property and I can't imagine we were the only ones where this type of scenario occurred.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    This is precisely it, and it's the root of the problem. Building on the level required to house that many people is probably not even possible, and even if it were, why would we want to do that? The situation in the UK is getting to the point there the Green Belt around London is to be used for housing, and this comes from a government that claims to be concerned about the environment.

    If I may be indulged in some philosophical language, I will say that this globalist pipedream of infinite growth is going to destroy Europe. Ireland is not the property of people who are currently here. Rather, it is our responsibility to maintain this land for the future. What is happening here is that the country is being turned into a globalist economic hub that has as much identity as a Starbucks outlet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Thankfully there is excellent data to quantify this as the same source produces both approval and drawdown data. The optimistic view is only negated if the higher number of approvals is being offset by a lower conversion rate to drawdown.

    This is not the case.

    From 2017 to 2021, actual drawdowns are 83% of the mortgage approvals.

    From 2021 to 2024 the equivalent figure is 86%.

    So if anything the trend is even more positive than the approval data suggests. Not only are approvals increasing to record levels. Their conversion to actual drawdowns is also increasing.

    Always better to go to the data than anecdotes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    As far as I can see the only drawback from a buyers point of view is it limits your potential for enjoying the upside on capital gains on your property

     The owner never truly owns their home, the don’t own the land, they aren’t free to sell at market price

    This is the whole point of having a 2nd tier market.

    There's not much point in the state subsidising affordable housing, if it can be sold at market price and end up on Airbnb a few years later.

    Reduces the risk of boom bust housing policies. Look at @DataDude figures posted this morning. Mortgage approvals up 20% by value (if I'm reading it correctly). Would buyers take on this level of risk if there was an alternative less risky product. The scheme is a more prudent approach and in doing so, makes the private market less risky by pulling away demand

    The property appreciates at the level of wage inflation. This provides scope for an inflation linked investment product much sought after by pensions. This allows the market to open up to prudent investors rather than speculators that drive boom bust cycles



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    That makes the property somewhere in between ownership and renting, and it’s a lot of money for an “owner” to spend without having complete control of it

    I'd somewhat agree with this point a buyer may be more likely to sacrifice location and brand new for a 2nd hand down the country.

    That's why it should have been focused on rentals. That's where the real damage is being done on consumers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Rental situation predicted to get much worse.

    I'd question the timing of this report also. Limerick is cited as one of the better supplied rental markets. I suspect the survey was done while colleges were closed boosting the numbers. Population nearly doubles when students are back

    This would imply the problem is far greater than even this report suggests



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    On the question of timing, it is amazing that the Census appears to be timed to find the exact opposite.

    For instance in Monaghan, where the rental crisis is most acute the Census found 615 rental properties apparently available.

    But when Savills studied this they found only 16 available properties. Even allowing for the fact that many or most properties will be advertised off market by word of mouth, the difference between 16 and 615 does appear to be staggeringly large.

    Something very seasonal must be happening in April.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Theres not a hope of 615 rentals available in Monaghan

    Given the size of the county that would be an enormous amount of available stock. I do question how CSO finds out about "available" rentals



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Every county has the same unexpectedly enormous amount of available stock according to the CSO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Your theory works if you have secure housing, not so much if your renting

    The RPZ's incentivise selling up and buying a fresh home that can be rented at current market rates

    The path to ownership is now loaded with taxpayer initiatives through developer grants and waivers on costs and multiple grants for buyers. This deems all new supply as council housing by the back door without the state having any asset and only affordable to a minority. Effectively council housing is only available to the wealthiest.

    The economy has evolved to such an extent that your security of housing not your salary is the key determinant of your quality of life. This is the power that the system has passed onto 1 sector in the economy. It has the power to break us and it will



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Battle lines drawn and the full state apparatus is being gathered to fight any affordable solutions and maintain the bubble whatever the cost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 335 ✭✭gaming_needs90


    Definite pick up in the Daft ads for Clare this week. I was previously told by an EA in July that they were advising people to wait until September to list houses. Anything has to be better than the dismal summer for houses we have had.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Monaghan tops the table at having the most acute shortage of houses for sale as well:

    Screenshot 2024-08-29 at 16.12.55.png

    Monaghan is at the coal face of the housing shortage, the worst affected county in the country for scarcity in supply of both rental and sales stock.

    That is a surprising discovery, though I doubt there will be lobbying calls to prioritise new builds in Monaghan!

    Obviously 12.2 houses for sale per 10,000 is chronically low, but unfortunately they don't offer an opinion on what level per 10,000 would be acceptable.

    Given Leitrim is at 42.9 per 10,000 is it safe to assume at least that it is an acceptable volume for sale?

    https://www.savills.ie/research-and-news/savills-news/365792/which-counties-have-the-highest-and-lowest-number-of-homes-for-sale-and-to-rent-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I’m not really sure what this has to do with my post. I do wholeheartedly agree with your comment that your housing situation is more important than your salary in terms of your quality of life though.

    All I was saying is. Net wages are up almost 30% in 5 years. If cost of living (excluding housing) had gone up 30%, then peoples remaining income to spend on housing would also go up 30%….in reality cost of living has only gone up 20%….ideally this would improve living standards for people…but for those without permanent housing, their extra income is being soaked by housing costs which have gone up 35-40%.

    The maths seems sensible. House price & rent growth since 2018 are predominantly underpinned by increasing salaries and pushed a bit more by a lower cost of living burden (I agree this is a bad thing by the way. Real wage growth should be spent on fun stuff, innovation, or saving…not ploughed into housing which is just a further wealth transfer to the best off)



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Minister O'Brien seems to be trying to suggest there are security issues over mortgages for Sinn Fein's affordable housing plans. He's worried about who has first charge over the property - is it the bank or the state?

    Surely the exact same concerns could be raised about mortgages on FHS properties.

    I reckon the banks are on much shakier ground with the govt's shared equity scheme than they would be with the proposed SF scheme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,322 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Houses are expensive, but they are not that expensive.

    Single Median income to average house price ratio is approx 7.5

    HTB will give you 10% or up to €30k, so that would bring it down to approx 6.8.

    Not great, but not terrible, considering other parts of the world.

    A dual-income couple on an average salary can easily afford an 'average' house.

    The issue is that there are too few houses on average to buy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,620 ✭✭✭combat14


    unfortunately many buyers are not dual-income buyers and not everyone is buying new homes to avail of the HTB either - maybe houses are affordable if one is younger getting a 35-40 year mortgage but many FTBs are now getting on in age with smaller mortgage terms and far higher payments it aint cheap out there or easy for many at present



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,213 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    I wonder how many of those 615 properties are just flats above boarded-up shops.



Advertisement
Advertisement