Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Vice President Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump 2024

1211212214216217294

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,118 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    I suspect there is a significantly larger portion who support Israel, not wholly, but support nonetheless.

    Biden's policy has been support with criticism. Trumps policy is absolute support.

    Since it's a two horse race, these "abandon Harris" supporters would be indirectly enabling Trump's policy.



  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    When you have a Palestinian saying they would support Trump because at least he is honest about his intentions - there is no real way to work out what Arabs might do in this election.

    I state this having talked to my Palestinian refugee neighbour who said those very words.

    Unfortunately the Democrats have lost all credibility on this issue. They have sat back and watched the slow burn genocide for decades and applied no serious pressure on Israel - so why do people imagine they are suddenly going to become Palestinian advocates ? They are as captured by American foreign policy as the Republicans and neither have the will or power to change tack.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,788 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I very much doubt any or many serious leftists would vote for Trump. More likely their vote would go to a third party like Jill Stein.

    The only thing Dems really care about is votes. It’s the most powerful leverage activists have at the moment. Why shouldn’t they use it to try to pressure the party?

    Constantly insisting ‘vote for us or you’re enabling Trump’ isn’t exactly the most inspiring, sustainable strategy to build a reliable voter base. That’s been the status quo for three election cycles now. When there’s a humanitarian catastrophe unfolding under the Dems’ watch, pushing for change is a moral and worthwhile endeavour using the limited tools available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭valoren




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The thing is that I'm not sure there are enough voters nationally who want to push back on Israel that you could build a presidency-winning coalition out of them, so even if we say it would be better for the Democrats to take the L in this cycle and rebuild themselves into a party of more moral consistency, I don't think that an adjusted Israel policy would be enough of a vote getter. The youth vote may feel quite strongly on it, but I don't know if America as a nation does.

    And while the Democratic party attempted to rebuild, dictator Trump might have four years to help render Palestine a smoking crater and leave nothing of the Palestinians but the fillings in their teeth.

    If there is a way to address the suffering of the Palestinian people through American politics, I might suggest that it is through down ballot races because while someone like Harris has to attempt to span the chasm on the Israel/Palestine question, arriving at an answer not particularly satisfying to either side, Senators and Congresspeople do not - their views can be much more reflective of the people in their states/districts, and they can enact or stymie legislation regarding Israel with more impunity.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,967 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Agreed, Texas is not in play for the Presidential election, but Ted Cruz is definitely under serious pressure.

    No one likes him, not even the GOP and his opponent is extremely popular so he could win, which would be fantastic tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    A vote for a third candidate, is still a vote for Trump.

    If people want to hurry up the Middle East crisis and eliminate Palestine, vote for Trump or a third party. If you want to delay that, vote Dems.

    I agree with your main point about holding the Dems hostage with your vote, however, a presidential race between a man who has gone on record to say Israel needs to hurry up, vs a woman who at least recognises the Palestinian people are in a bad way, AND with the spectre of Project 2025 hanging over this election is not the time to play that card. The time to play that card is in 2026 with the house and senate votes.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,950 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I do not like that man Ted Cruz,
    I do not like his nasty views

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,901 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    In fairness, I suspect Kamala Harris is no fan of Israel or Netanyahu and is secretly on the side of Gaza and the Palestinians. To say so in public though would be a catastrophic blunder in the US election context, so she has little choice but to play along with this 'both sides' nonsense. Also, many Democratic politicians probably share her views on Gaza (some of course have come out and openly said it and accused Israel of genocide).

    The fact that the Trump heads are calling her a Communist and Marxist would suggest they don't believe for a moment she has any time for Israel - they weren't making these claims about Biden.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ✌️ ” undecided voter” ✌️

    IMG_5903.jpeg

    his panel comments were so weird like ‘I’m just not sure if she’s ready yet maybe in four years’ like OK so you’re saying you’re voting for Trump and project 2025.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 812 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    I know more about American politics than the average person in Ireland (and most likely the average American) but I don't know the history of American-Israeli relations. What is stopping Biden, Harris and the Dems in general from forcefully condemning the Israeli response. Israel has the right to defend itself and respond to the attacks last year, but bombing the crap out of Gaza, killing children, and deliberately targeting hospitals and refugee camps is totally wrong and barbaric. What is stopping the Dems from saying this? I get that American-Israeli relations is complex and has a long history, but surely strong criticism of an ally is appropriate when that ally is so clearly in the wrong on a basic humanitarian level.



  • Posts: 832 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    She has almost said so, without saying so. Her absence from Netanyahu's appearance is more telling now following the arms deal under Biden and in her acceptance speech she made it very clear that there was a distinction between the atrocities associated with Hamas and the suffering of innocent Palestinians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,041 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    I don't think anyone is expecting them to win Texas but it's a state that could very much so flip in a few elections time.



  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    AIPAC would crucify them with negative campaigning if the seriously condemned Isreal in any meaningful way.

    Jews also have a bigger share of Congress and the senate ( 6% compared to 2% in the general population) which means that they have a strong say in what bills effecting Israel can pass the house - they also leaverage this advantage with much more sizable christian lobby who generally will not pass any legislation that sanctions Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,808 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Can we not discuss this on this thread? Because you're wrong on a number of fronts, and I don't want to argue it here. There really needs to be 'facts and myths about Jewish influence' thread elsewhere, since so much scutter is scattered over various threads (Israel/Hamas for one.)

    Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,729 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    The US an Israel have had a long standing security partnership, basically the Americans saw Israel as a useful stabilising force against various governments they didn't like in the region

    Ironically this wasn't always the case, for example shortly after Israel was formed they were buying fighter planes from the Soviet Union via Czechoslovakia which were actually knock offs of the German ME109 used in WW2

    So you could end up with demobilised American pilots who emigrated to the newly formed Israel flying fighter planes built by the Soviets and designed by Nazis. Needless to say, bit of an odd one

    The thing with partnerships like that is that walking away from them carries pretty significant consequences in terms of foreign relations

    The US has many alliances and security partnerships around the world which afford it considerable political power. If it was proven to be an unreliable partner then other nations wouldn't be so quick to support the American viewpoint on the international stage

    So to some degree their hands are tied, however there is a good faith argument as well where the Israeli government is leveraging their protection from the US to conduct a war of retribution against the Palestinian civilians without fear of retribution from neighbouring countries

    I suspect that any future US president could use this to force Israel to negotiate for a ceasefire. However it's worth remembering Hamas has also recently walked away from negotiations and wars don't end without some sort of mutual consent

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,572 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Same reason Israel didn't condemn America when they killed 10s of 1000s of innocents.

    It's chess not checkers.

    Interests, security and more often than not profit.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,389 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/24/donald-trump-mental-fitness-campaign?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

    not that it's going to happen, but i wonder how many in the GOP are looking at the boost the Dems got by changing candidate and thinking 'we'd like some of that'.

    just curious - is there any mechanism for them to eject their candidate? because he wouldn't go willingly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Hi new poster.

    Have you given any thought to the fact that people really don't like your party or the type of people that follow that party?

    Of course. The world doesn't work with everyone agreeing. I really don't like the Republican party, or Tories, or all right wing/conservative governments. So of course there are people that don't like Democrats/Labour/etc.

    The best assets of the Dims is to say "we're not trump!" but leaving Trump aside there voters are generally fairly extremist in the views they hold as well just more socially acceptable extremes.

    What views in your opinion are fairly extremist? What are the socially acceptable extremes? What IS a socially acceptable extreme? If it's socially acceptable, what makes it extreme?

    I can't defend a point if I don't know what I'm meant to be defending.

    I mean look at the anti Trump/Dems supporters on here and the utter drivel they regurgitate on a daily basis…

    Now you're being rude, and posters that post rude posts don't last long around here.

    I can see why people would want to vote for a 3rd party!

    Care to share then with the rest of the class?

    Harris's stance on Israel is completely self serving one, the real kicker they the "Inclusive" party silenced a Palestinian American from speaking at the DNC alla Boards.ie Moderation style. A level of hypocrisy not seen in a while hilarious stuff all things considered! A real own goal!

    I don't disagree here. They absolutely should have had a Palestinian Speaker there. At least there was calls for a ceasefire, which I don't remember from any other convention.

    Refresh my memory, can you remember the name of the Palestinian Americans that spoke at the RNC? I can't for the life of me remember who that was.

    You seem to have been a lurker here for quite a while if you can comment on boards.ie moderation. Care to introduce yourself? Which way would your political allegiance lie yourself?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,808 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    The football match I'm watching is incredibly boring…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,319 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    You're right to say that it won't happen. Not only would it be a technical impossibility at this point, but also maybe half of Trump's voter base would be apoplectic and many would pull their vote. It would be a risky proposition, to say the least, to think that if, say, Nikki Haley got parachuted in, all these supposed disenfranchised moderate Republicans would come back into the mix. Besides, if they're out there, their influence wasn't really felt in the Republican primary.

    In Trumpland, there are two parties. Not the Democrats and Republicans, but MAGA and the 'Uniparty', ie an alliance of Democrats and RINOs. They won't tolerate anyone but Trump.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,098 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    There is none, just to save the pointless next few posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,281 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    You seen Haley's numbers with GOP voters? She is not liked whatsoever and never really was. They can win with Trump or get massacred with Haley. Although, even if Trump was to pop his clogs which is the only way he drops out, then it would be Vance for better or more likely worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 812 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    I finally got a chance to watch Harris' acceptance speech. She looked very presidential which goes a long way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭scuba8


    it has been now shown by Midas Touch Network that the guy who claimed he would vote for trump is a known Trump supporter. They found his twitter account with loads of posts in support of trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,451 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    She invoked "faith" (God) in the American democratic destiny or whatever bollocks Americans tell themselves.

    Bonkers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,319 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Was this the first ever speech you’ve watched from any kind of politician in America?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement