Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1810811813815816910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,254 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    So we develop another form/version of Ballymun flats. Government policy is to integrate social housing with all other housing. It's trying to get away from gettoisation and the social problems it causes. It .ay not work bit they are not going to build dedicated social housing schemes especially in large urban areas

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,602 ✭✭✭fliball123


    At least people will have a roof over their head ghetto or no ghetto which is the worst of 2 evils housing cant be built quick enough 4 to 1 ratio with the increase in population vs new housing and no matter how this is dealt with we are going to have areas that have anti social issues or in your words some form a ghetto as has always been the case so there is no escaping that we may as well do it at a cheaper price point and at a quicker pace to quell this issue. The ballymun flats and other areas like Kilbarrack etc could of worked if proper policing and enforcement of rules as in if you mess around you get phucked out and no more social housing for you and you can hit the street we need more stick here not carrot. The current way we are dealing with it isn't working and has not worked for the last decade. When we were building housing and adequate social housing to meet the population needs things were a lot better but as pointed out we still had areas where you wouldn't dare walk down the street and now we cannot build to scale needed so modular homes is an option that really needs to be contemplated.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    We've sort of come full circle on the social housing integration thing.

    If councils, AHBs etc are buying entire developments then it is essentially the same as the old style concentrated social housing.

    Only difference being they are at a higher cost.

    Similar with the Oscar Traynor development in Coolock, built as 40% social housing, 40% cost rental, and 20% affordable purchase.

    Welcome back by the way, seems like quite a while since I last noticed you posting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    There you go, and that's just one example.

    Many jobs have all sorts of contractual conditions to prevent conflicts of interest. The days of brown envelopes are long gone. Today's politician seemingly uses his position to push for policy that will fatten his wallet. Of course, it would help if political and civil servant positions were consistently NOT filled by the most avaricious, self serving and worthless people in Ireland….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    Slightly different now as in the past who estates were wholly council owned. In above there is only 40% and remember council houses now come with a 25 yr tenancy.

    If after 25 yrs the property is bigger than your needs you will have to move or most likely pay a higher rent for the ability to have spare rooms (similar to the bedroom tax the UK tried to introduce.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,885 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Immigration policy was/is killing the SF vote and FFG were/are well aware of it.

    Let's see where the votes went to gets us, your getting hints on both sides of the pond.

    Remember FFG are party first, country.......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    YEs. I think that SF will never see power for this very reason. Working class people are feeling the brunt of the immigration policies of the state, and no one who is not wearing ideological blinkers can help but see that SF are just another coven of globalists. Even if SF were to achieve power, nothing would really change.

    For a good example of what could happen here, let's look over to the UK. Labour has just achieved a majority in the House of Parliament, and to absolutely no one's surprise, they have continued with the policies that the Tories followed for 14 years. Does this mean that in 5 years, the UK electorate will vote in the Tories again under the mistaken belief that they will be different?

    I'm not really of the opinion that voting will change much as the apparatus of the state is now replete with globalist ideologues. However, if a party that is a genuine opposition to this system rises, then we will know all about it because a genuine threat to the grift will be met a near psychotic reaction from the established media and persons of power. Look at how Trump or Farage have been treated (not a fan of either of them), and neither of them are radicles.

    Interesting times.

    EDIT: That was a bit of a rant, sorry :)



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Yep fair point re Oscar Traynor, and I am not sure who owns the cost rental portion, but irrespective of total ownership of the estate I suspect the medium term reality is a development consisting of 100% social welfare and low income residents - i,e exactly what Part V when first conceived was designed to avoid.

    And there are many cases of councils buying entire developments - here is a request from Meath Co Co:

    Housing Developers in Meath are being asked to consider offering under construction or recently completed new Turnkey Residential Developments and Uncommenced Residential Developments with planning permission to Meath County Council, under an advance purchase turnkey arrangement.

    https://www.meath.ie/council/news/we-wish-to-purchase-housing-developments-for-social-affordable-and-mixed-tenure-housing

    Point I am making is whilst the desire to move away from sink estate type social housing has a lot to like about it from an ideological point of view in theory, in practice the unintended consequences have resulted councils being forced into much the same outcome at a vastly higher cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,254 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    HTF do you police getto's no cou try has managed. With national type parties now targeting these area there is not a hope they can be policed with out a heavy ha d type law enforcement. It very unfair on ordinary people to force them into that situation.

    Ya maybe a roof over there head but anytime they look for a job they will be last in the que. So they become anti government and establishment.

    IMO the housing situation is improving fast and we will see a more normalised housing inflation rate over the next while. Yes we are seeing 5+% at present but as house numbers come on stream over the next 18 months housing inflation will normalised

    They are generally no buying complete estates. AHB are carrying development/redevelopment but these are mainly cost rentals or affordable housing. Generally AHB are not doing social housing

    You are young, you will see what I mean in 20 years time. I came from a rural background where people form LA housing were not stigmatised, but in large urban areas the issue with gettoisation is a serious issue and policing will not solve the issue

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,620 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Generally AHB are not doing social housing

    AHBs like Cluid etc do social housing. They take people off council housing lists and house them. Many have no fixed income



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    Thanks for the compliment but I am in my early 50's. The vast majority of these people are the most decent, hard working nicest people you will ever meet.

    Deal with the anti social issues and the profile of any area will improve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    With the political will anything is possible. Remember the vast majority of housing was social housing. My Dad who is 86 regularly tells me what it was like growing up in a council house.

    Failure to pay rent, anti social behaviour etc and you were evicted to a disused army barracks in Inchicore.

    One experience of this was enough (in most instances) to change behaviour.

    Unfortunately we don't seem to have any meaningful deterrents nowadays for this type of behaviour.



  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Political will is not enough, there are other influencing factors, social and economic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student




  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The situation is not the same as when your Dad was growing up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    I am aware times change but suggesting reasons why something is different without elaborating defeats the purpose of a conversation and differing view points.

    Not all changes have necessarily be positive which is why a reasoned discussion might help.



  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Posters look back on the way things used to be and say they were better, it’s a type of selective nostalgia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    Everything in the past was not bad nor was it perfect but to simply dismiss what was done in the past completely out of hand adopts a very narrow view.

    Trust me I am not viewing the past with some rose tinted glasses despite your suggestion that I am. I personally remember the 80's when I started working and Ireland was not in great shape.

    What we are currently doing is obviously not working.



  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So you understand the same conditions do not exist where people were evicted and moved to army barracks?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    Yes I do that was an example of what happened in the past. I did not advocate that this should be introduced. The point I was making is that currently there are no meaningful deterrents of any sort.

    Are you not of the opinion people should be held accountable for their actions or is it the States rather than the individual to be responsible for the actions of the individuals?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,186 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    It would be 80% owned by the council as they are the landlords for the cost rental portion also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,186 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    A lot of new build estates will have a large portion of social housing, in addition to the part 5 requirements, because the local councils buy or rent additional homes in order to reduce their housing lists.

    I think the councils should be doing a lot more for cost rental and affordable purchase properties.

    It would be interesting to see the perentage split of these types of housing.

    If we want to avoid ghetto housing estates, we need to make them mixed tenure. Social, cost rental, affordable purchase.

    I guess the issue is that only the first group (social tenants) appear on the councils waiting list and so they get prioritised.

    Coucils exist to serve all of the community, not just those on low or no income, so they should be made provide accomodation for all groups in their constituency in need of a home.



  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I am of the opinion that the same political, social and economic conditions do not exist today as existed in the 1960s, anymore than they did it in your grandfathers forefathers did in the 1900s.

    No government’s policy is going to include easy evictions, not even SF, PBP, SP. It’s pie in the sky stuff.

    I



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    So then nobody is willing to grasp the nettle so because its an unpalatable political stance.

    It's ironic you reference economic conditions now compared to the past. In the 1980's and before Ireland did not have a pot to p*ss in.

    Has political correctness gone to far so?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,186 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If you mean evicting tenants who break the rules in council housing, the first question is, where would you evict them to?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    Read the following specifically the reference to the low number of individuals responsible for the majority of the issues.

    Deal with those and alot of the issues will improve.

    https://villagemagazine.ie/estates-of-fear/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,186 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I dont disagree with you that its a tiny minority that cause the majority of the problems.

    And I think if people were threatened with being moved from say Dublin to Mayo because they were consitent trouble causers and living in social housing, that threat would be a real deterrent.

    But the houses dont exist to move people into; that's the first practical problem with that approach.

    Replacing benefits with food/clothes vouchers might be another option. No spending social welfare as you choose, basically, but without taking away the necessities for people to live.

    But no govt in ireland is anywhere near that stance. FG is as right wing as we get here and FG would be a centre left party in the UK.



  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nothing to do with political correctness.

    Part of of the difficulties which exist today, ironically, is the proliferation of well paying job, thus higher price housing does not go unsold.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    The houses could be found. We are supplying modular homes for the refugees are we not?



Advertisement