Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War

1139140142144145208

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,552 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Not to mention the biggest thing. Which is as most people suspected: That the Russian red lines are simply fashioned from whole cloth. We literally have Marders and Bradleys rolling around capturing internationally recognized Russian territory and Putin hasn't even declared war yet!

    No nukes, not even a threat of mobilization. The drip drip escalation management strategy is now completely redundant.

    Still it's incredibly frustrating to see Bidens administration still not allowing ATACMs and even the Brits not allowing Storm Shadow on Russian territory. Just imagine the great things Ukraine could be doing if they were actually let off the leash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭rogber


    Yes it should be full licence to use all weapons in self defence, which means no deliberate targeting of civilians, but everything else is fair game, including on Russian territory.

    This is a war, every day people are dying and suffering horrible injuries, it needs to end asap and letting Ukraine play their full hand is the best hope of that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,665 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Zero chance of Russia accepting any responsibility. I can't think of many countries apart from Germany post WWII that accepted responsibility for what happened. And that only happened after much of their country was destroyed and under the complete control of the victors who were able to get the guilt trip going.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_collective_guilt

    Even if this ends well for Ukraine, there's no chance of Russia paying reparations and I hope the sanctions remain in place until at some point in the future it fractures into its constituent republics, only capable of acting the bollix with each other and let the rest of us get on with our lives without their interference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭scottser


    A real long term worry indeed but that's only if Ukraine get caught in another situation where their forces are under attrition. Ukraine has shown that fast counter-offences behind enemy lines yield far better results and if anything, you might see Russia imitating them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,589 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I have my doubts it crashed like this due to a fault. Personally I think the Ukrainians managed to take it out but Russia will never admit that unless it's absolutely obvious and even then sometimes they'd deny it.

    In other news I see a HIMARS system was taken out by an iskander missile. It's incredible that in 2 and a half years of this war only 2/3 of them have been taken out. At that rate they're easily replaced and I believe one of the others taken out was sent away for repairs so not fully destroyed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,621 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    What? I'm not trying to catch anyone out.

    I simply said that those lads who refused to fight and are been sent to Kursk, will fire off a couple rounds then surrender.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    I don't understand why they don't just privately tell the Ukrainians that they can use those long-range weapons whatever way they want within the limits of the Geneva Convention. And then just pull a Putin and gaslight/ deny when the Russians start complaining.

    There's no need to play the whole thing out in the world's media - we don't need a press conference with Biden/ Starmer announcing that those weapons can no be used.

    Let Putin start shouting when it happens, and then just kind of "oh, we've no report of that… are you sure?… we'll investigate"…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭weisses


    Dont you follow the war ? Ukraine's forces are under pressure in the east with Russian forces gaining ground every day.

    RE offensives, Russia did exactly that at day one of this war…. Broke through Ukraine's border defence with ease. It is what happened after that is interesting, because Ukraine might face the same issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    The Russians have shown zero capacity to be able to conduct fast, effective mobile assaults to date. I'd almost like to see them try it, because I'm pretty sure they'd be dispatched without much trouble by the Ukrainians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,340 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Just let them use what they want.

    It's very clear at this stage that cowardly Putin isn't gonna back up all this talk provocation and escalation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Can we deal with facts for a second - the 'day one of this war' you're referring to is the worst possible comparator as it was literally the opening shots of a lightening invasion which Putin had promised the world was not happening… just military exercises in Russia he said. Of course they were going to have a huge impact. But all it demonstrates is that even with every advantage conceivable, the Russian army is a relative shambles. And it's only degenerated since then.

    There is almost no grounds to compare that event with this incursion by the UAF. The Ukrainians drove the Russians back through use of speed and adaptability. When have Russia shown any capacity for that in this war? They rely solely on (a) overwhelming numbers and (b) artillery firepower. As soon as that looks to be the threat to the Ukrainians in Kursk they can just withdraw to whatever defensive lines they've set without losing as much as a single metre of Ukrainian territory. Rinse and repeat.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    I never suggested Russia collapsing or having a coup. My point, which was formed based on an assessment of factors which support it as set out above, is that this is not an existential war from Russia and, despite claiming that it is, they know it is not. You think to the contrary, but haven't really explained why. I guess we are at an impasse so!



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    The land itself is not that significant. The important point is that Russia are weak there and Ukraine have been able to successfully attack there causing a lot of Russian casualties and surrenders. It also allows Ukraine to exercise their advantage - in mobile warfare.

    So I think you are assuming, incorrectly, that this assault is causing more Ukrainian casualties than Russian casualties, for which there is no evidence of. The price of attacking where Russia is weak is far lower than the price of attacking where Russia is stronger, so it is an ideal strategy if the intention is to cost the Russians more than it costs themselves. Together with the other benefits of attacking on Russian soil.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Square kilometres gained per day in north

    Square meters lost per day in east

    As per ISW daily reports

    But most importantly unsustainable personnel and equipment losses on Russian side which we now see manifest in Ukrainians just walking across border and no one to defend

    At rate Russians are advancing in east it will take 150-200 years just to regain what they captured and then lost in 2022



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    we’ve gone from 1000 troops that Russians boasted to have stopped 8 days ago

    To 10-12000

    according to the guy who repeatedly lied to Irish population on our media



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,617 ✭✭✭swampgas


    "Still it's incredibly frustrating to see Bidens administration still not allowing ATACMs and even the Brits not allowing Storm Shadow on Russian territory. Just imagine the great things Ukraine could be doing if they were actually let off the leash."

    NATO and Russia are still pointing nuclear missiles at each other, and scanning the skies for any sign of a first strike by the other side. Having large, advanced missiles entering Russian airspace at high speed is inherently more dangerous than a column of tanks heading to Moscow. There's the risk of automated response systems triggering a nuclear exchange. If you are a paranoid Russian leader, you might suspect NATO might attempt a first strike using the cover of Ukranian attacks. I'm not surprised at all that there is considerable caution being exercised here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,340 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    3 years into a 3 day war they stop an 8 day invasion on the 1st day 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    A war the same ambassador told us repeatedly before it started would be “insane”

    I guess he was right about that

    Days before the war began, Yury Filatov branded the suggestion that Russia would invade Ukraine “insane”.

    https://www.kentonline.co.uk/news/national/russian-ambassador-denies-lying-to-irish-public-over-ukraine-57130/

    This guy has the credibility of a used condom in a whorehouse trash bin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    That works both ways tho

    We’ve seen both missiles and drones traverse NATO on way to Ukraine, and just yesterday chemical attack on couple NATO bases water supplies

    And an interesting point was made on Ukraine the Latest podcast, while Ukrainian hands are tied when it comes to long range weapons the Russians are daily lobbing missiles full of western microchips



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,621 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    whatever way you try to frame it this Kursk thing will Peter out and its probably damaged Ukraine's chances to hold on to all their lines, I dont see the Russians being in a hurry to negotiate

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,031 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    What evidence do you have to make such bold predictions?

    If you look back at history of this war, the last two times (Kharkiv and Kherson) Ukrainians rapidly captured large amounts of land the Russians were only able recapture back tiny fractions of those gains

    Why do you think this time it’s different?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,589 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Reading this headline made me realise the obvious. Russia was never going to negotiate on any reasonable terms while they controlled large parts of Ukraine and Ukraine not none of Russia. This changes things. Maybe Ukraine over the next year will aim to claim more of Russia.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c8dpgeq01n0t



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,843 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    if this mass surrender of troops spreads then the war ends, they are going to die anyway why not surrender/ overthrow the people sending you out to die in a field



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭amandstu


    You think they are "claiming" it. I just think they are controlling it.

    Who,with any sense wants any of Russia? Could they just stew in their own juice until such time as they are fit to meet the public?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,621 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    What we think, true or they just panicked?

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Whatever. Your mind is once again clearly made up before the fact and you've no interest in discussing the nuanced points various posters have made.

    I'll counter your reply with, "whatever way you try to frame it, Russia's invasion of a sovereign nation, committal of countless war crimes, disintegration of its military prowess, appropriation of Western assets in Russia and hobbling of its economy has definitely damaged Russia's chance of retaining its position at the top table of global nations and I don't see any major economic block being in a hurry to do business with them afterwards". Case closed, may as well close the thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,589 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    It feels like Russia claims this every month. Eventually they will be right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Avatar in the Post


    Ukraine attacking Russia is the new "Sanctions aren't working". 🤦‍♂️



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    One seems the inverse of the other, the Russian pulled back when they were out on a limb , this Kursk affair is the Ukrainians out on a limb , they are the ones exposed in an un-defendable position, seems obvious to me looking at the last 2 years

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement