Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War

1134135137139140208

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭Mike3549




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,068 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,068 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    All about controlling the means of production in Putin's drive towards the restoration of the Soviet Socialist Republic



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,422 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Putin has appointed his former lover as in charge of the military operation in Kursk. Alexei Dyumin, Putin's former security guard will be in charge of "the counter-terrorism" operation of expelling the enemy out of the region. There's no indication Alexei will be personally in Kursk. His role will be to coordinate all agencies in Kursk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭Roald Dahl


    Do you know if there has been an update on the attack on Lipetsk-2 airbase, greenpilot?

    Would be interesting to see exactly what was parked up there at the time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,036 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    What happened to the other “defences” that stretched all way to Belarus border and Ukrainians walked over



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭1percent


    Thinking of the gas metering station the Ukranans have now, rather than shut off the flow, would they throw the throttle open and say to us here in Europe to go fill your boots! Take the revenue from Russia and let orban and Co say no thanks ic thrg want to support vlad



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Supposed deadly enemies

    Hardly "supposed deadly enemies"

    Seems genuine enough to me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,947 ✭✭✭threeball


    Why would they fight the war on Russian terms. Russia thrive on static warfare where they rely on heavily mined areas and kamikaze waves to stay in the fight. Ukraine want to move quickly and rely on the element of surprise. That's only possible in Russia as it avoids the mined areas so hopefully they take as much as logistically possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,596 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Kind of embarrassing that allies keep adhering to them. Like what the **** will Russia do if a few storm shadows take out a few fighter jets at airfields in Russia. They'll relocate them further back. That is all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,947 ✭✭✭threeball


    They should hold it and charge a transit tax seen as it crosses their land. Syphon off as much as they want to heat Ukraine too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,167 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    I would love another €50 billion package for Ukraine to be announced out of the blue.


    Let’s give them what they need, they have the momentum again.


    They can actually finish this off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,036 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    I'd like to see a bit of progress on the key fronts within Ukraine itself… momentum is with them, so no panic if things don't appear to be changing any time soon, but for sure that's where the difference will be made. I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if Putin ordered the area in Russia held by Ukraine to be obliterated. He couldn't give two f***s about his own people, certainly not those outside the big urban centres.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,041 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, and by doing so will increase the logistics chain, and then Ukraine start hitting them in their new locations too. The fact that Ukraine now has long range capabilities, means that they can really disrupt any airborne Russian operations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,267 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    They already do charge the transit tax. That facility is the measuring station that helps calculate how much gas is being supplied and how much has to be paid for the gas to pass through Ukrainian pipelines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,947 ✭✭✭threeball


    Would this be classified as a "dumb on dumb" incident.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,267 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    Maybe a bit of wishful thinking on my part, but I reckon this incursion, as well as being an up-front taunting of The Master Strategist is also a deliberate distraction from … something else.

    Reference has been made to how Russia continues to make small gains on the active frontline further south, and how these troops are not being pulled back to help sort out the Kursk situation. Well, maybe that's exactly the point: have Ukraine manoeuvred Putin/Gerasimov into pulling troops from another area of little activity, with the specific objective of barging in there once the occupying force is sufficiently weakened?

    There's been some weird goings-on in and around the Kinburn Spit lately; wouldn't it be great to wake up one morning to the news that Ukraine had crossed the Dnieper estuary in force and was tearing up along the coast towards the "neck" of the Crimean peninsula?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,036 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭weisses


    If I was Putin I would do the bare minimum in Kursk. Let Ukraine use their manpower and other resources, which then cannot be used in the east, Ukraine cannot overstretch itself logistically, I doubt they have any interest in staying in Kursk long term.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,036 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Ukraine have much much shorter supply routes being on the inside of a semicircle

    IMG_5337.png


    And Russians in three years of their Three Day war have illustrated time and time again logistics is not their strong point, hell only this week we have MOD reporting that they can’t even supply enough drinking water

    At start of this Kursk special operation a week ago we had posts claiming Ukrainians won’t have the logistics to sustain this, yet not only the area continues to expand we have evidence of food aid being disturbed to civilians

    Meanwhile Kursk governor begging Putin to pull troops from elsewhere to help Kursk



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭weisses


    I used the term overstretch, It can happen when you are gaining momentum and you want to use the opportunity of facing little resistance to push forward. I don't know the goal of this Ukrainian incursion but I wouldn't be to worried from a Russian perspective. I was hoping they would go for the Nuclear power plant, encircle Belgorod, at least something that would warrant an immediate relocation of Russian troops from the Eastern front



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    "At the start of this Kursk special operation a week ago we had posts claiming Ukrainians won't have the logistics to sustain this…" What's your point? A week ago we also had people being berated for suggesting that Ukraine were looking to hold territory in Russia… what's your obsession with trying to discredit other good-faith posters? You remind me of another poster who used to do the same thing until thread banned a few months ago…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,063 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    So many Russians handing themselves over to Ukraine is becoming a logistical issue. What can they do with so many POWs on Russia's own land.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Avatar in the Post


    We've been here before, but if 100% applied things will get interesting in Russia.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cy54nn4v471t



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Avatar in the Post


    WOW! Maybe Putin is a master strategist after all. Who else would be smart enough to clog up the enemy logistics other than 4D level genius?

    🤡



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Avatar in the Post


    Ah, there's loads of reasons the Ukrainian SMO into Russia is worthwhile. It really doesn't take much thinking to be honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭rogber


    Poor woman sentenced to 12 years in jail for raising 50 dollars for Ukrainian war effort



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,267 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    Just came across this commentary on Russian logistics, and how the Kursk incursion could have (intended?) consequences for the more active frontline areas:

    https://twitter.com/Schizointel/status/1823737718582526037

    It's a long thread, but here's the meat of it (slightly paraphrased to make it more readable!) :

    another issue that Russia is going to face logistically in organizing a counter-offensive in Kursk currently [is that] Russian supply lines through the [Motorised Transport, as opposed to rail] Brigade will be stretched in order to supply the Russian FLOT. […]

    Russian forces currently engaged against the ukrainians will not have the most efficient and adequate supplies in timely manner which will likely result in more land being captured by the ukrainians which they can't afford […]

    if Ukraine gets too close to any of the areas that I highlighted such as Rylsk, Lgov, Chermoshnoi, Selikhovy Dvory, Oboyan, and Rakitnoe then logistically speaking, their lines to Belgorod and Kursk will be even further degraded and then it will become a siege and it will be a matter of time before Ukraine captures two major Russian population centers.

    […] they cannot afford to allow Ukraine to advance further and must Marshal necessary forces to counter-attack. The problem with that though is to rally the forces needed. They will need to strip the logistical resources from the front lines in Ukraine which will make those areas vulnerable to Ukrainian counter-attack

    This all sounds plausible, and the recent feck-ups - stationary columns being easy pickings for the Ukrainians, and Russian Air Force bombing their own supply trucks - are reminiscent of how they lost Kyiv due to their own 40-mile traffic jam.

    Incidentally, today's "Reporting from Ukraine" YT channel talks about how the Ukranians spread "get out now" information to the Kursk public, causing them to clog up the main routes into Kursk and bogging-down the Russian troops. I haven't heard any other accounts of this, but it sounds like something the Ukranians might do!

    In any case, I can see a scenario developing where Ukraine gradually eliminate viable supply routes for the Russian forces still in Urkanian territory. Blowing up the Kerch bridge would then create an almightly bottleneck on the few remaining corridors and be a prime target for missile and drone attacks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,683 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    They would obviously be brought straight back into Ukraine - not safe for them to remain near the fighting (and Ukraine has a duty of care to keep them out of harm's way).



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement