Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1806807809811812910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 641 ✭✭✭J_1980




  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    If there is an uptick in supply in the price range you're looking for, which is presumably same as most FTBers, surely at least that's pretty good news from your point of view?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭tigger123


    The Argentianian economy is no template to be following.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,677 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    The latest CSO Residential Property Price Index figures for June are out.

    Key Findings

    • The national Residential Property Price Index (RPPI) increased by 8.6% in the 12 months to June 2024, with prices in Dublin rising by 9.3% and prices outside Dublin up by 8.2%.
    • In June 2024, 3,563 dwelling purchases by households at market prices were filed with the Revenue Commissioners, down by 11.5% when compared with the 4,025 purchases in June 2023.
    • The median price of a dwelling purchased in the 12 months to June 2024 was €337,500.
    • The lowest median price for a dwelling in the 12 months to June 2024 was €169,000 in Longford, while the highest median price was €630,000 in Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown.

    Commenting on the release, Niall Corkery, Statistician in the Prices Division, said: “Residential property prices rose by 8.6% in the 12 months to June 2024, up from 8.5% in the year to May 2024. In Dublin, residential property prices saw an increase of 9.3%, while property prices outside Dublin were 8.2% higher in June 2024 when compared with a year earlier.

    Property Prices by Type and Region

    In the 12 months to June 2024, house prices in Dublin rose by 10.0% while apartment prices increased by 6.6%. The highest house price growth in Dublin was in Dublin City at 11.7% while Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown saw a rise of 8.5%.

    Outside Dublin, house prices were up by 8.0% and apartment prices increased by 10.0%. The region outside of Dublin that saw the largest rise in house prices was the Mid-West (Clare, Limerick, and Tipperary) at 12.0%, while at the other end of the scale, the South-East (Carlow, Kilkenny, Waterford, and Wexford) saw a 5.6% rise.

    In June 2024, 3,563 dwelling purchases by households at market prices were filed with the Revenue Commissioners, a decrease of 11.5% when compared with the 4,025 purchases in June 2023.

    Households paid a median or mid-point price of €337,500 for a residential property in the 12 months to June 2024. The lowest median price paid for a dwelling was €169,000 in Longford, while the highest was €630,000 in Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown.

    The most expensive Eircode area over the 12 months to June 2024 was D06 'Dublin 6' with a median price of €773,000, while F45 'Castlerea' had the least expensive price of €139,000.” 

    Residential Property Price Index June 2024 - Central Statistics Office



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭gaming_needs90


    The market is as awful as ever unfortunately. Its extremely bleak in Clare and the prices are astronomical.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Interesting, but it could be apples and oranges. Supply is low here because there are too many people here. I don't mean to be so blunt, and I'm not making a judgement one way or the other, but that's just an objective truth. Is the same true in Argentina?

    On the matter of rent controls in general, they don't work. Supply and demand will always set the price, and the state cannot pass laws to make this different. History is littered with examples of this, and it never has worked. If a commodity is in short supply, the price will rise. If it is in abundance, then the price will fall. One cannot pass a law to prevent this anymore than they can prevent leaves falling off trees in September.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,164 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    Yes, good for buyers, not so good for renters, although an increase in ex-rentals may still be a decrease over all.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Sure it's bad news for individual tenants if they're evicted to facilitate a sale, but it is not necessarily bad news for the rental supply as a whole.

    Buyers and renters don't exist in entirely different ecosystems. Most of the ex-rentals will be bought by FTBers who are vacating a rental, or by landlords who retain the property as a rental. Rental supply will stay broadly similiar.

    Irrespective of any uptick in the number of ex-rentals on the market now, it is a tiny % of tenancies, and it is normal to expect that at any given time LLs will turnover stock.

    There is simply no data to suggest a catastrophic decline in rental supply due to a mass exodus of LLs leaving the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,885 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If we had as much emphasis on supply controls as we have on rent controls, we might make some progress

    Either way it will never be fixed under FFG as price must be protected at all costs. They will feel that this view is reinforced by the outcome of local elections



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,885 ✭✭✭Villa05


    @gaming_needs90

    Easier win an all ireland hurling final than get a home :-)

    Kerry was identified as one of the most unaffordable regions in the country.

    Rural Cork, Clare and Kerry were the ghost estate capitals of the last bubble. A mature approach to short term lets would go along way to fixing issues in these areas



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,885 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,164 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    Sure it's bad news for individual tenants if they're evicted to facilitate a sale, but it is not necessarily bad news for the rental supply as a whole.

    Buyers and renters don't exist in entirely different ecosystems. Most of the ex-rentals will be bought by FTBers who are vacating a rental, or by landlords who retain the property as a rental. Rental supply will stay broadly similiar.

    How can any of this be true? Rental properties being bought by FTBs will decrease the rental stock, you're surely not arguing otherwise?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    If a rental is bought by an Ftb owner ocuppier yes it reduces the rental stock by one.

    But if the buyer is vacating a rental it also reduces rental demand by one.

    Hence there is no catastrophic impact on rental supply.

    None of this happens in a vacuum. LLs move in and out of the market, owner occupiers move in and out of the market, people trade up, down, sideways.

    It's called turnover and is a necessary part of a functioning market.

    Current figures do not suggest anything other than normal turnover of LLs.

    Certainly not a mass exodus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    A headhunter today was asking me if I would relocate to Dublin (lived there prior to Covid) and I reckon that I would have to budget €2,500 to get an apartment in the city. I'm amazed renters in Dublin are not an endangered species..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    But owner occupied house have a lower housing density compared to rented property. So a rented property sold to an owner occupied reduces the housing. Obviously it's great for first time buyers but it's bad for anyone renting as it reduces supply. They are not one to one. It's been discussed countless times on the forum. And remember we have lack of rental accommodation so any sale that reduces this supply is a problem for renters. For FTB it's obviously good as it adds supply to a tight market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    If we had a lot of things, it would be different. However, when we have a "society" replete with hyper individuals, we get what we have now. You are correct that it will never be fixed under FF/FG, but it would not be fixed under SF, Labour or any other party currently in place. The housing crisis is a symptom of a systemic problem that affects every western country. Voting in another collection of bought and sold suits will not change that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,183 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think its generally couples or people sharing, so more affordable then.

    But nevertheless, prices are crazy alright.

    Is the sharing thing applicable to single, social welfare tenants?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,183 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    How would we define too many people living here? Could it not equally be the case that there just arent enough homes?

    I wouldnt have thought the population density of ireland is very high at all, even by european standards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    Agree 2.5k is a lot to be paying each month. However,it would be interesting to see how much HAP is underpinning Dublin rents. Very often it is folks working in lower paid jobs who are in receipt of support. This in turn IMHO contributes towards setting a rental floor.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 439 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    Agree 2.5k is a lot to be paying each month. However,it would be interesting to see how much HAP is underpinning Dublin rents. Very often it is folks working in lower paid jobs who are in receipt of support. This in turn IMHO contributes towards setting a rental floor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    They're not mutually exclusive.

    The population density is not high, you are correct. However, it's a matter of what resources and services are available. People cannot live in empty fields, they cannot be treated in hospitals that do not exist, they cannot travel on roads that have never been built and they cannot be educated in schools that are not there.

    Could all these things change? Yes, but it would take time and resources to change this, and neither of those things are infinite. If the current level of available services do not meet the demands placed upon them, which at least with housing they clearly do not, it may be said that demand is exceeding supply; ergo there are too many people.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Leaving aside the the fact that lower average household size is supposedly a good thing we are striving for, fine, if the argument is any sale by a LL is a bad thing, then obviously some sales are taking place, and to many that is a bad thing.

    IMO we need more turnover of stock, not less, and if that causes issues for individual renters so be it. Banning LLs from selling with vacant possession would cause more problems than it solves.

    So there are definitely sales by LLs taking place. I am not disputing that. The point I was making is there is no data to support the theory of a mass exodus of LLs taking place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,183 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Yes, I understand your point.

    I think the caveat is that there are too many people for the available infrastucture, rather than simply, "too many people."

    We do indeed have a long way to go for infrastructure to catch up.

    Metrolink looks to be delayed again; a current example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    For arguments sake I assumed nose-bleed 50% of earnings going on rent but even that would require a salary of €93,000. Think even the MNCs would balk at that.

    Prefer not to think about what the equivalent market rate of social welfare is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,183 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Not so much the social welfare rate, but the management of assets. If a local council rents 5 x 2 bed apartments in Clontarf, would they be used to house 5 x single folks with no dependants or 10 x single folks with no dependants, in the latter case, the 10 strangers are sharing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 272 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    Without government intervention, house prices would fall quite a lot and I think there are too many people that would be unhappy with this occurring given it would impact their own wealth accumulation. Therefore, in order to see less government intervention voters would need to vote for parties that do not want house prices to keep climbing. Essentially, homeowners want and need government intervention whereas non-homeowners should want less government intervention.

    The big swindle has been to convince people that government intervention leads to more supply and lower prices when the opposite is the case. Ireland has big problems with its bloated quote unquote Government and State encroachment in people’s lives more generally but particularly in the property market which is not a properly functioning and fair market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,302 ✭✭✭Blut2


    This is mostly correct, but its worth noting that as of January a majority of the population (69%) would support a drop in home prices of almost a third tomorrow. 63% of Irish people polled said they would like to see property prices fall even if it meant their own home depreciated in value. [1]

    So a strong majority of the public, and even of homeowners, are actually OK with home prices dropping significantly. Its not a case of homeowners all wanting an increase in prices vs renters wanting the opposite.

    Even if they themselves aren't directly impacted most homeowners these days have children, or relatives, or friends, who're meaningfully impacted by the housing crisis. Or they're business owners/managers who can't get staff because of the housing crisis. Or they just care about the negative impact of the housing crisis on the country in general.

    The core problem is our government's political parties care more about the property industry than what the public wants or needs.

    [1]https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/poll-public-backs-mary-lou-mcdonalds-call-for-300000-average-house-price-in-dublin/a1386646140.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,183 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    What are you suggesting the govt do though? Relax planning laws so we can get to 70k new homes per year, rather than 40k?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    We'll never catch up to anything with things as they are, but that's its own kettle of fish.

    Regarding the metro-link, I think it will never be built. Just look at what happened with the children's hospital, and no one will face consequences for that.



Advertisement