Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

1102010211023102510261417

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Lansdowne said it was happening on their socials.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 7,336 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sheep Shagger


    Nothing on LRs though, so you'd have to be following the club they are visiting.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 7,336 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sheep Shagger




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,066 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    In the case of Lansdowne open training session I kind of get the radio silence from Leinster and I'd be one of their biggest critics about how radio silent they are (borderline disdainful to their own fan base at times)

    However Lansdowne is an extremely accessible club for a large metro population. If the open training session is advertised and picks up steam, we could easily be seeing hundreds and possibly thousands of people hopping on the dart or the bus hoping to go along to it - schools are off after all.

    Then it doesn't become a little open training session, it becomes an event, proper stewarding, possibly Garda presence and different insurance/ health and safety measures become factors.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 7,336 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sheep Shagger


    Couldn't agree more on all that.

    Have said it for years, season ticket holders especially, are really only appreciated at renewal time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 798 ✭✭✭durthacht


    It's such a dull and generic kit. Slap a Bath crest on there and it could just as easily be them as there is nothing distinctive about it.

    Maybe manufacturers want to keep them generic to keep their mass production costs down, but it's just a nothing effort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭Dillonb3


    Is there any major difference between the normal mens shirt and the pro shirt?

    Can't see any reason to fork out an extra 50 on it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,677 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It's just a tighter cut, isn't it? Might be worth it if you want to put on the gun-show. Could probably see your abs through it too.

    I would be going for the regular, nice and loose fit



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,066 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    I can't speak to the Castore cut but I've had a few of the Canterbury "test fit" jerseys over the years.

    They're meant to be skin tight. I'd be a pretty consistent medium in most things but these had to be a large non-negotiable. I'd need to be helped in and out of a medium haha.

    For training and general active wear they're great - even if it accentuates every part of my belly.

    For sitting in the pub with a few pints, they're absolutely awful. They ride up something fierce - and accentuates every part of my belly after a few pints



  • Administrators Posts: 56,268 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It's not just a tighter fit, it's a different material as well, I think they're stronger and better at dealing with sweat.

    I have a few of them, they are really not comfortable to wear as casual wear.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 7,336 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sheep Shagger


    Delighted the crest on the jersey is actually embroidered now and no iron on lettering for the BOI sponsorship etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,941 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    I'm okay with the BOI bit being iron-on. I scraped some of it off on my hoody and now it reads 'Park of Ireland'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,986 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I see Snyman pulled out of the Boks game with a foot injury. He's a great player, but I've no hopes for him making an impact at Leinster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭lonester99


    leinster only need him to make 2 or 3 impacts this season and thats in maybe 2 knockout games in europe off the bench to perhaps influence a semi or a finla in leinsters way, thats what hes being signed for, not to be a work horse Mike Trigg. Sprinkled in at the business end in a couple games is what they want. Granted a definite gamble but thats the one they made



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,826 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He only has to be better off the bench than Jenkins for a few games which should still be plausible.

    Still think it's a generally appalling signing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Appalling? Really?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,745 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Presumably you mean Hayden Triggs, but that’s exactly who we should have signed.

    Behind Ryan and McCarthy, both of whom will miss a lot of games, we have Deeny and O’Tighearnaigh. In that context, we needed a steady pair of hands who can do a medium job for 20+ games a season.

    A perma-crocked impact sub wouldn’t have been high on my list tbh.

    I presume when they signed RGS they didn’t know Molony would be moving on, but it’s a bad signing unless there’s a dramatic change in his performances and fitness next season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,141 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    a Hayden Triggs signing would be great, he was a good performer at league level, nice and steady. RGS was signed for a different reason.
    I remember you when Triggs was leaving someone suggested he would be a good signing for Connacht and one or two Connacht supporters scoffed at that level of signing. He was a solid player and signings like that add a bit to squads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    People calling RG a bad signing and he hasn't even played or missed a game yet. Jesus Christ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Wouldn't be using Jesus Christ as an example of a lad who's never injured / unavailable.

    Big loss to Nazareth RFC when he ascended into Heaven / retired. "Don't worry lads, I'll be back" (famous last words eh ?)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,941 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    I wonder what the prospects of buying Josh Murphy out of the remainder of his Connacht contract would be if Leinster find themselves a second row short.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Yeah that's not happening.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,424 ✭✭✭PMC83


    Would you put money on him staying fit for the season? Or even for the business end of it? People are right to be concerned, he has an absolutely horrendous injury profile. We don't need to see him play any more games to see that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,218 ✭✭✭Serbian


    I don't love the Snyman signing either for similar lack of depth for the general season reasons, but the reality of how rugby works, in both the league and Europe, is it barely matters where you finish — Glasgow came 4th in the league this season, Munster came 5th last season, Stormers came second the season before that. The team that has been the most consistent over the duration has never managed to win it. Toulouse winning the European Cup this season is the first time the top seed won it in three attempts (though I generally think Europe would be a lot harder to win without a top 2 finish).

    A team like Leinster are guaranteed knockout games in both Europe and the league. There are only 7 games that have genuine jeopardy attached to them and those are the games that Snyman will (hopefully) play.

    The main positive in terms of injuries for him is he has just come off a season where he has feature in 21 games. Yes, 11 of them were for South Africa, but the 10 he featured in for Munster which more than doubled his total appearances for the club. At least he was able to stay somewhat healthy for the most recent season.

    Post edited by Serbian on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭lonester99


    No idea where 'Mike' came from but ye Hayden,

    You dont have to agree with it but thats why they signed him, Leinster are confident of making the play offs but they want big players in big games with experience of winning big important knock out games and RG is that.

    Its a gamble but so are most signings, they couldve also signed a sub par journeyman that is of no use in the knockouts but can fill a jersey in the URC but i'm not sure thats a good decision either especially with Deeny and O'tiernagh sitting there who need game time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,066 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    The most amount of club games Snyman has ever started in his career is 14 for the Bulls back in 17/18

    In Snyman we have a player who we didn't sign to play a heavy number of games a la Fardy (22,22,17*,19* apps per season) but a player who will be there to give us that extra dimension in the big games when he's available. (* = covid season)

    Comfortingly, Snyman is just off the back of a season (or I guess most of the way through? Unsure when you count the RC in terms of a season) where he played 21 games (so far?) which is the highest number of games he's managed since that 17/18 season (22)

    People need to get it through their head Snyman was signed to be a Brad Thorn, not a Scott Fardy.

    "Appalling signing" and all the other hyperboles are just so tiring. He hasn't played a bloody game yet.

    In life there are enough things to get actually outraged about. Pre outrage has to be the most bizarre mindsets for people to have. It's so bloody Irish. "I wont be let down if I don't get my hopes up in the first place". All you're doing is dragging the tone down with you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,745 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    People need to get it through their head Snyman was signed to be a Brad Thorn, not a Scott Fardy.

    Snyman is not remotely on the same plane of existence as Brad Thorn was and tbh I have seen little enough evidence that he is even as good as Fardy was. You seem to be equating Fardy with journeymen like Triggs and Jenkins, that's not accurate at all, he was top quality.

    Pre outrage has to be the most bizarre mindsets for people to have

    I don't think anyone is pre-outraged, it just seems like an odd signing for what we need.

    Brad Thorn came in and was possibly the best player - not just second row - in an absolutely star-studded Leinster team in 2012. Maybe Barrett can be that sort of player but that is categorically not what we're getting with Snyman; it's unlikely he makes a first-choice XV, so we need him for depth, not impact.

    You cannot discuss RGS without discussing his injuries, it's hardly "hyperbole" to be concerned about a guy who played 20 games for Munster in four seasons.

    If he can stay fit, he'll be a good addition to the squad, but that's an enormous "if".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,066 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    Brad Thorn played 8 games for us. And made an impact in all of them in the business end of the season. That is what I was referring to. Fardy played 20 games a season.

    In terms of pre outrage. Just one page back you'll find one of our (ahem…) fine moderators call this an "Appalling signing".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,745 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Brad Thorn played 8 games for us.

    He played 8 games because he was only here on a three-month contract. Snyman is here for the season.

    And made an impact in all of them in the business end of the season. 

    The elephant in the room is that, despite finally getting a run of games, Snyman made zero impact at the business end of Munster's season.

    Just one page back you'll find one of our (ahem…) fine moderators call this an "Appalling signing".

    Well, if he performs to the same level, either in quantity or quality, as he did for Munster last season, it certainly won't be a good signing.



Advertisement
Advertisement