Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

1235236238240241309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    That's the IOC whose president said at his press conference both that "there is there is no way to see who is female - it isn't possible. Please, if you know tell us" and also that Lin Yu-ting and Imane Khelif are "definitely women".

    So how should they have tested, and how can they possibly tell anyway?

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Nothing ridiculous about that when you realize that any english speaking outlet daring to publish something like that would risk immediate accusations of *phobia and cancellation attempts. English speaking western society is in firm chokehold of wokeism and gender ideology.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭plodder


    I noticed it on Saturday as well, and the same was happening this morning, except <edited> this post seems to have fixed it. Very strange.

    “Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubt” - Carl Jung



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    We've never seen Lance Armstrong's failed tests, we've not seen Ben Johnson's steroid levels, we certainly didn't see the positive cocaine test for Dan Evans.

    The governing body made the tests, and saw them. Good enough for me.

    Incidentally, those opposed to sex testing on the grounds it is "intrusive" - in 2021 I attended Wimbledon. On three occasions (flight in, before entry to the stadium, flight back) I had to undergo a nasal swab test. A buccal swab for sex testing is way less to handle. There's another reason why someone's word is all that is needed and it is clear what that is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    I’ve no idea, although I presume in a male adult with DSD the genitalia are unlikely to have become completely normal, even after puberty. But nor would they be absolutely female genitalia either, so either way, that is not what the doctor would have been saying.

    In any case, what matters is whether or not Khelif has male advantage. Being “raised as a girl” and “having female sensitivity” but “chromosomal and hormone problems” means a person with male chromosomes and testosterone, ie someone who should not be fighting women in a boxing ring, however they want to dress and live outside the ring.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,099 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    They could publish that they had read the test results. But that hasnt been leaked to them so they havent. Fox news, Daily Mail many other outlets are not in the chokehold of wokeism and gender ideology.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,099 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    True but the accusation wasnt made by the IBA with all its baggage. And the test results of Lance Armstrong and the others were not disputed by another sporting organisation at the same time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,470 ✭✭✭randd1


    Does she have a vagina? Can she have children (even if IVF is required)? If the answer to those questions is yes, then that's a woman, unequivocally.

    From what I've read, both boxers in the Olympics were born with vagina's, and while both can't apparently conceive naturally they can have children via IVF.

    So having a vagina and having to potential to give birth no longer makes you a woman.

    There you have folks. The right have become woke.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,164 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I wouldn't disagree on your second point. But it does look like Khelif was born with the body of a female and as a consequence identified and raised as one.

    Incredibly, a large amount of the social media commentary appears to be under the impression that Khelif is an actual man with a male body who has somehow cheated their way into women's boxing by pretending to be a woman.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    The likeliest scenario seems to be that Khelif was born with indeterminate genitals, in which case parents were traditionally advised that an absence of a penis would make life disastrous for a little boy, so that the best course of action would be to treat the child as a girl. It doesn’t mean they had a normal female reproductive system either though.

    Another possibility is that in a rural village in Algeria with little professional healthcare, the baby was genuinely believed to be a girl, as the visual inspection may not have been done by a professional.

    Either way, Khelif would most likely have grown up wrongly believing herself to be a girl.

    That doesn’t negate the effects of the Y chromosome and the SRY gene and since her feelings about being a woman are not what makes a woman less physically powerful than a man, none of that is relevant to boxing.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,099 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    The English media are picking up the Cazorlas statement now. Unless Khelifs team come back with something to dispute this then I would conclude now she has XY chromosomes.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/olympics/article-13733607/Imane-Khelif-gender-boxer-olympics-chromosomes.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Quite apart from the reality of this claim, Khelif is not being asked to get pregnant, so reproductive capacity is not why people have concerns about boxing. This is a combat sport and anyone with male physical advantage should not be fighting women.

    And anyone who thinks there’s some sort of gotcha around periods or a vagina that allows someone with male strength to beat up a woman for sport is promoting male violence against women.

    It really is that simple.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,164 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    But such a person would in no way be eligible to compete in men's boxing, so the Twitterati are wrong to say "Khelif quite clearly is a man".

    Also, there have been cases in the past of people with predominately male chromosomes and male hormones who have even given birth to children. This subject is extremely complex, with no easy answers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭plodder


    Interesting other detail in there

    Now Spanish national coach Rafa Lozano has revealed that Khelif was considered too dangerous to pair with women at a boxing retreat in Madrid ahead of the Olympics.

    'They were doing a retreat at Blume and we couldn't put her with anyone,' he told Radio Marca.

    'We put her with Jennifer Fernandez and it hurt her. Whoever we put her with was injured.'

    He said coaches only found a match for her after pairing her up with Jose Quiles, one of Spain's leading male boxers.

    'I don't see it as fair,' he said. 'Everyone can think what they want, but that's how I see it.'

    “Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubt” - Carl Jung



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    The casual sexism used by those to defend Khelif has been abhorrent "she has a typical female sensitivity, she cries". FFS.

    Incidentally Khelif made this statement the other day: "I am sending a message to all people in the world to uphold the Olympic values ​​and the Olympic regulations and stop bullying all athletes because this bullying has big effects,” she said in an interview over the weekend"

    Olympic values ? Like fairness ? Zero self awareness there.

    The sooner Seb Coe takes over the reins of the IOC, the better for female competitors - I just hope it's not too late.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    What exactly do you feel means that a person with the physique formed by going through male puberty; with a longer reach, denser muscles and stronger bones - is "in no way eligible" to compete against other boxers with the same body type and chromosomes ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,164 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    For the simple reason that they wouldn't have a man's body or male genitalia….however you want to categorise such a person, that is clearly not a 'male boxer'. Also, such people would be legally identified as a woman on their birth certificate and current passport, which again would presumably totally disbar them from competing in a men's competition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Again, I don't know that. Even men don't box with their penis. Why do you think having undescended but functional testes would make someone less physically powerful? Do you have any evidence of this?

    (And anyway, even if that were true, it would NOT be a reason to have them fight women. The female category is not a "weak males" category. A different solution would need to be found IF males with DSD are too weak to fight healthy males. Maybe some sort of alternative Olympics could be set up for people with health issues that mean they can't compete against the able bodied?)

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,470 ✭✭✭randd1


    But people with vagina's and who can give birth to babies are women, aren't they? Unless I was mistaken in biology class. That would seem very pertinent in a conversation about womens sports.

    Now, I'm not so blind as to assume nature doesn't throw out an odd one now and then. Being born a woman with internal testes that provide you with more male hormones than normal is certainly one of those odd cases.

    The only thing disputing these women as men is the IBA test, the IBA being a notoriously corrupt sporting organisation run these days by a country (Russia) with a known history of targeting LGBT people, with a long and corrupt history of dodgy doping, political and financial corruption, and targeted testing. In this case, testing was requested by opposition coaches, mostly from it appears coachers of fighters from countries with pro-Russian political stances. And they also fought for years, and lost fights, without their ever being a problem as to them being women, and were likely tested during that time as well without problem.

    So what have we got so far?

    Two people born with a vagina who can give birth to children raised form birth as women, and a test from a sporting organisation so corrupt and mired in doping and testing scandals that the IOC (and that in itself says something) has kicked them out of the last two Olympics. And said test has been claimed as flawed, and has not been clearly explained and motivated by competing parties.

    This isn't a Lia Thomas situation. These two boxers were born a bit weird, but are nonetheless women.

    Now, the IOC needs to determine it's parameters with regard to hormone levels given we know these days that nature does throw out odd ones.

    But in the absence of the IOC not doing that yet, these women have every right to fight as they have done for years, and have done nothing wrong. They've broken no rules, and are women.

    And it's women violence against women. And yes, I'll support that, as long as it's organised and sport and fair under the rules. Which it is.

    This isn't trans issue no matter how much people want it to be. These fighters are women.

    It really is that simple.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    A man's body in terms of boxing is not about his genitalia. What matters is whether the person went through male puberty, and therefore has acquired male advantage in terms of strength. Not the size of his penis or testicles.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    Genitalia do not fight in a ring - muscles, bones and fists do.

    How can you say they "wouldn't have a mans body" ? That is a very naive comment.

    And please don't bring "there's an F in the passport" Bach-esque "logic" - we're past that now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    It's amusing to see how the claims that "but women can have a penis" disappear all of a sudden when it no longer suits.

    As I understand it, the scientific definition of a male or female is actually about having the potential to produce large immobile gametes or small mobile gametes. This is not specific to humans or even mammals - this is how there are male and female plants too.

    Everything else (vagina or penis for example) is a shortcut which correlates in the vast majority of humans, and mammals generally, but not all. XY or XX chromosomes also works well for humans, but can't be applied directly to other species - for instance birds' sex chromosomes are ZW vs ZZ.

    And importantly, in this particular case, we aren't talking about normality, but about genetic anomalies. Babies are frequently born with extra or missing digits - but I don't think anyone would deny that the number of digits in a human should be five per limb, nor would they say that someone with four or six is less human than someone with five.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,923 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Looking more towards the long term, and more generally, It's good to see that Bach will not be extending his term as IOC president, since this mess is very much on his watch, and he seems to be standing over the mess as acceptable.

    Seb Coe has expressed his interest in going for the role, which would be great. He has been very strong in protecting the female category in his role as head of World Athletics, including trying to sort out the tricky area of competitive fairness for athletes with DSDs.

    Coe, 67, was also asked about the controversy in the women’s boxing tournament at the Games and said the IOC’s policy needed to be clearer and that biology had to be the most important factor. “You have to have a policy and it has to be clearly communicated. And you’re never going to satisfy everybody. But the reality for me is very simple.

    “I have a responsibility to preserve the female category. And I will go on doing that until a successor decides otherwise or the science alters.”

    And that's exactly what we need… clear policies which are well communicated. If the IOC had done that before this Olympics we wouldn't have had the mess around eligibility issues, and the unfortunate athletes wouldn't have had to go through such a storm of controversy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭plodder


    Especially when the gender flag in some countries' passports doesn't refer to anything objective at all.

    Bach is responsible for this mess. I'm surprised he's toughing it out until 2025.

    Screenshot 2024-08-12 at 11.09.15.png

    https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/passports/need-passport/selecting-your-gender-marker.html

    “Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubt” - Carl Jung



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,923 ✭✭✭Enduro


    But such a person would in no way be eligible to compete in men's boxing, so the Twitterati are wrong to say "Khelif quite clearly is a man".

    Can you back that up with a reference to the rules please. Otherwise that is just your opinion, and if so, quite frankly, is meaningless in the broad context.

    Now I'm not going to try to counter your point by referencing some boxing rulebook since the major issue here, from what I can see, is the absence of precise rules and regulations due to the complete mess around governance in the boxing world. The IBA is corrupt, the IOC would prefer not to be regulating individual sports, but have ended up doing so for boxing, and seem to have taken the "do nothing" approach and hope for the best. And then we have the alphabet soup of all the other boxing bodies. It's an area where a strong IOC could do a lot of good if there was a willingness to grasp the nettle.

    But other sports have grasped the nettle and have laid down rules. Going back to the original thread topic World Aquatics is one such organisation. And under their rules, if Khelif has gone through male puberty then she could not compete in the female category, but could compete in the male category, or the open category where it is available. Boxing is likely to end up with similar eligibilty criteria when the rules and enforcement of rules are sorted out.

    https://resources.fina.org/fina/document/2023/03/27/dbc3381c-91e9-4ea4-a743-84c8b06debef/Policy-on-Eligibility-for-the-Men-s-and-Women-s-Competiition-Categrories-Version-on-2023.03.24.pdf



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,923 ✭✭✭Enduro


    You're making an assumption there, and in other sports that assumption would be incorrect. For example, Caster Semenya would have been eligible to compete in the male category irrespective of her external genitalia, legally identified gender on her borth certificate and passport, and her self-identity as a woman. From an athletics rules for eligibility to compete in 800 meters she is classified as male.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    And Lance Armstrong was not punching women to win races, so the urgency of finding a definitive answer to the queries over his wins was not comparable. In this case, the two boxers concerned can answer the question today if they wish to.

    That they do not wish to, and instead have actively tried to prevent the results from being made public by others, in itself means that the question needs to be answered ASAP. Because of the risk of women being subjected to male violence by stealth/gaslighting.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,164 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Given that boxing is a one to one combat sport, there's no way that any boxing federation would allow anyone who is legally a woman enter a men's boxing competition (for the very health and safety reasons our right wing 'GB News' type friends claim to feel so passionately about).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,205 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    About this:

    Being born a woman with internal testes that provide you with more male hormones than normal is certainly one of those odd cases.

    In what way is someone "a woman" if they have functioning testes and a normal level of testosterone for an adult male please?

    What definition of "woman" are you using there? "Assigned female at birth"?

    And this:

    Two people born with a vagina who can give birth to children raised form birth as women,

    Again, where is your evidence for this? (And indeed your evidence that they were born "with a vagina"?)

    and a test from a sporting organisation so corrupt and mired in doping and testing scandals that the IOC (and that in itself says something) has kicked them out of the last two Olympics. And said test has been claimed as flawed, and has not been clearly explained and motivated by competing parties.

    Well the problem here is that, whatever you think about the IBA, the two people concerned chose not to appeal the results to an acknowledged independent appeals process, CAS, which means that by default, those results are the official results. Why they chose not to do so is, in itself, indicative of what those results found, but in any case, there is enough of a doubt for it to be important to solve that question with an independent test now. And the people involved are choosing not to do that.

    And anyone who thinks that women should just put up with that doubt because Khelif's feelings are more important than any of the women who lost to her in the ring recently is condoning the risk of male violence against women.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    And the IBA's "baggage" is simply that they would not disqualify fighters simply for being Russian and would allow Russian fighters at the World Championships to hear their anthems and raise their flags.

    It was a knee jerk reaction to the Ukraine invasion, badly thought out as were most of the reactions at the time (not mentioning RUS after Andrey Rublev et al's name at Wimbledon - that'll hurt Vlad. Not.)

    FYI - the swab doesn't know who is leading the governing body and the lab has no political axe to grind and so I have absolutely no concerns about accepting the test results that resulted in the ban for Khelif. To say that particular fighter is eligible to fight woman because of a passport is insane at best and physically harmful at worst.



Advertisement