Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1805806808810811943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Comical indeed, worth a listen.

    First up is a professor of Economic policy at TCD saying the idea LLs leaving the market in droves has always been nonsense, it wasn’t true when first raised, and it isn’t true now, finally we have irrefutable data to show it.

    Then a FG spokesman has his say, gamely trying to claim exodus was true, citing Joe Duffy callers et al.

    Finally Chairperson of Irish Property Owners Association getting quite irate saying the same thing, clutching at straws, ignore the data, private landlords are leaving the market in their droves.

    Interviewer does a good job of exposing policy being influenced by lobbying of vested interests rather than hard data. FG spokesman and IPOA chairperson had nowhere to go really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I heard an interview on the radio yesterday. I think it was Sarah McInerney. It was comical. She was quoting the official numbers which showed an increase and the lobbyist fella kept insisting that the "evidence" shows the number had gone down even though she repeatedly repeated the number and pointing out it was higher.

    It was comical. Your man insisting black was white and saying there was evidence that black was indeed white even though the evidence showed the opposite. It reminded me of the posts on these threads.

    The funniest bit was the lobbyist repeatedly claiming there were no tax breaks for landlords. McInerney pointed out multiple times one of the tax breaks. He insisted there was no tax breaks for landlords. She read it out for him. He then said something along the lines of "Yes. But that's not for landlords. Because they have to stay as landlords to get that. So it's not a tax break for landlords"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    We don't really live in a world where what is clearly true is easily accepted by many people.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Anyone actually looking at properties for sale on the market can see how many are ex rentals



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Yes a lot of apartments are for sale at the moment.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    The problem is that as the RTB figures can't be compared to historical figures by the RTB s own admission, the current figures tell us nothing about how many landlords are leaving or joining the residential rental market. By the RTB s own admission the increase is in at least partly caused by sampling bias. We don't have comparable figures for the last few years.

    Anecdotally landlords are leaving the market, the fact we had a ban of landlords selling properties over the winter a few years ago is testament to that. That's before we even talk about the second hand property market and talking to landlords themselves.

    Now some of these landlords could be replaced by new institutional landlords with new builds, but these properties will be let at market rates unlike older properties who's prices are restricted by rent pressure zones. Again not good for tenants long term.

    You talk about the FG spokesperson ignoring the data. The fact is the people who are publishing the current data are telling everyone it's not suitable for historical comparison. The Irish times pointed out during the week that number of people renting per the 2022 Census was wildly different than the RTB figures. So it's been a known issue.

    It does highlight the mess the property market is in that accurate data about fundamentals like no of people renting etc is not available.



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hi Blut, would you have the link to that article available please? I can't locate it on the link you posted. Cheers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/more-than-half-of-landlords-had-rental-income-below-10-000-in-2019-1.4731212



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Well if we don't have comparable data between now and then, lets assume that when the anecdotal alarm bells rang that small private landlords were leaving the market in their droves was true back when it started, the good news is it appears to be no longer true.

    Even it is still true, it is no longer the disaster story it was billed as originally.

    The reason it was a noteworthy narrative is obviously it was deemed evidence that rental supply was falling.

    The new data from the RTB is comparable from RTB data at end of Q2 2024 and it shows rental supply rising across the board -

    Screenshot 2024-08-11 at 20.12.05.png

    For instance, despite the large number of eviction notices, the total number of private tenancies has increased from 213,177 at the end of June 2023 to 230,006 at the end of March 2024.The total number of landlords linked with private tenancies has also increased from 96,702 to 103,035.Dublin recorded the largest number of private tenancies in the first quarter of 2024 at 99,630, up from 91,860 in the second quarter of 2023.In Cork, private tenancies rose from 23,548 to 25,041, while rental housing supply in Galway and Limerick also increased in the period -

    https://www.businesspost.ie/news/analysis-are-landlords-leaving-the-market-potentially-is-rental-supply-in-free-fall-definitely-n/ .

    Something odd about housing in Ireland is that across the board it is a race to the bottom to interpret anything in an apocalyptic fashion as possible, even when the data doesn't support it.

    Any data that counters the doom and gloom is dismissed as the data is wrong, look at the anecdotal evidence. The FG guy in the radio interview was a prime example - he was citing jOe Duffy callers!

    It slightly calls to mind 2006, just a role reversal. Back then the narrative was unbridled optimism, and when anybody cited data that questioned this optimism the reaction was similiar - ignore the data, look at the anecdotal evidence!

    In other related news, according to an article in the UK times, institutional LLs are about to leave the market in a big way.

    https://www.thetimes.com/world/ireland-world/article/10000-apartments-to-hit-dublin-market-as-funds-sell-up-5m9xz5khk



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Thank you!

    Easily achieved if the mortgage interest is deductible from the income, along with other allowable expenses.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    10k is a pretty good net return on top of what is likely leveraged inflation protection. Property is generally a good hedge against inflation over the long term, and tends to beat it when there is a growing population and economy.

    If you had 50k of your own money, borrowed 200k. Bought an apartment and rented it out. Having a net 10k + 5X inflation on what you put it is not to be sniffed at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    But you've only given me a years worth of data. It doesn't say a whole lot. And again remember the RTB themselves say that their data cannot be used for historical comparisons. This suggests a reason for a significant part of the increase is sampling bias. The narrative about landlords exiting the market predates the figures you have provided by years. So the figures you have provided by the RTB s own admission don't tell you a whole lot to prove or disprove that question. And that's before you look at detail.

    And when we talk about landlords leaving the market we are generally talking small landlords. It's obvious that large institutional landlords are coming into the market. Anyone living in Dublin can see the apartments being built.I acknowledged that in my post.

    That's not a bad thing per say and definitely good long term as they are less likely to sell up. The problem is we have a housing crisis and the issues with landlords selling up is that owner occupied houses have a lower housing density when compared to rented. It's been discussed plenty of times in this thread and forum.

    If landlords were not selling up in significant quantities we wouldn't have had a winter eviction ban, we wouldn't have measures in place to help tenants buy houses off landlords. There is plenty of anecdotal data to suggest significant numbers of landlords are leaving. Again it's important to remember we have a housing crisis so even a a few percent of landlords leaving is a problem.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    There is no doubt there is anecdotal evidence that small LLs are exiting the market and selling up. Principally the spike in notices to quit because of an intention to sell.

    But where is the data that backs up the anecdotal evidence?

    We have not seen a corresponding spike in second hand sales transactions in the same period.

    We have not seen a corresponding spike in second hand supply advertised on the market. Quite the opposite. Second hand supply has been on a downward spiral.

    So if there is no data that shows these properties that were intended to be sold, were not sold, or even advertised, where is the data that confirms this.

    And if there is no data to back up the anecdotal evidence, why should we be so in thrall to anecdotal evidence. In most other fields anecdotal evidence is dismissed out of hand if there is nothing concrete to back it up.

    And now we're seeing data that is showing rental supply is increasing. This is good news

    If we are only talking about a few % of LLs this is not as a big deal as it is made out. It's part of normal functioning market.

    If an LL sells his 2 bed apartment and it is bought by another LL, no big deal. Rental supply stays the same.

    If it is bought by an FTBer, then it is one less FTBer to worry about, and they have moved from another property, freeing up at the very least a bedroom in a house share, or potentially a similiar rental property, or moved out of their parents house. These are all problems we're trying to improve.

    The claim that RTB themselves say their data cannot be used for comparison does require a little context:

    The new data, according to the RTB, is not comparable to that formerly released and the drop in the number of registered private landlords when the first quarter of this year is compared to the equivalent figure for 2023, should “not be attributed to landlords leaving the sector”.

    “The reduction should primarily be attributed to the improved verification processes and the introduction of the requirement for landlords to register tenancies annually, which has removed inactive tenancies and duplicates from the register,” said the RTB in a statement accompanying the release of data.

    So in a nutshell, the RTB say "We've improved our data and it shows that rental supply is increasing and small LLs are not exiting the market en masse"

    And rather than people recognising this for the good news that it is, the reaction is "That's bull, look at the anecdotal evidence"

    The point I am making is to place such a high value on the anecdotal evidence that it continually overrides the hard data seems a bit silly to me. This is just one example of many.

    At some stage we have to accept at least the possibility that the data on housing is correct, even if it contradicts the anecdotal evidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭Grey123


    I was aware of that happening back in 2017. Landlord didn’t want it. It was also common for people to bid a hundred or two extra back then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    10k a year net after deductions is only part of the story too in terms of income from the investment. The property price appreciation is worth a substantial amount yearly on average on top of that.

    My point wasn't that it isn't a good return though, it was in response to a poster who claimed that "most landlords" in Ireland have a yearly taxable income of over €100k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Capital appreciation is the reason for the 5X hedge I talked about. I just realised I didn't make that explicit in the post although I felt it was implied.

    The reason why many LL's want to "cash out" is that after a decade or two, they are no longer leveraged to the same extent (if at all). Because there has been a transfer of wealth from the tenant to the LL in terms of paying down the capital owed. That is coupled with the increased equity from the capital appreciation. The lack of leverage is what makes the returns feel less now. But they have to remember that the lack of leverage has also greatly reduced their exposure and risk.

    Any landlord who wanted to "leverage up" again, could simply release equity from their house and go again with multiple properties. Now I'm not suggesting that as a strategy - I would imagine that most ignore or are completely unaware of the additional risks. Although it can often be the case that people are more in tune when they have more to lose. Most people have a stronger risk aversion when they have more to lose. It isn't linear (or symmetric)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭AlanG


    Many landlords wont advertise because of the rules on HAP refusal and other regulations. A simple word of mouth or notice in a local school, hospital or company and they can have their pick of fully employed tenants without dealing with hundreds of emails / applicants. It may not be right but it is the easiest way to let a property now for many landlords.

    On top of that most decent tenants moving out will know someone they can vouch for that wants the place, again this is often viewed as a safer option for a landlord than going on DAFT..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Yep. There are so many people looking for places that if your rental is in an average or good area of Dublin, you wouldnt need to go near advertising it to rent it out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    TL:DR - This is a graph of new rentals or newly reported rentals?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    It would make sense to assume it's some combination of both



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    It would make equal sense to assume it's the latter rather than the former.

    Anyone who's looking at the lower end of the market (as I am) will have noticed the uptick in ex-rentals coming onto the market in the last 12 months. Have a look yourself at houses for sale in Dublin in the 250k-400k range and see how many ex-rentals there are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 645 ✭✭✭J_1980




  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    If there is an uptick in supply in the price range you're looking for, which is presumably same as most FTBers, surely at least that's pretty good news from your point of view?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,756 ✭✭✭tigger123


    The Argentianian economy is no template to be following.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,807 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    The latest CSO Residential Property Price Index figures for June are out.

    Key Findings

    • The national Residential Property Price Index (RPPI) increased by 8.6% in the 12 months to June 2024, with prices in Dublin rising by 9.3% and prices outside Dublin up by 8.2%.
    • In June 2024, 3,563 dwelling purchases by households at market prices were filed with the Revenue Commissioners, down by 11.5% when compared with the 4,025 purchases in June 2023.
    • The median price of a dwelling purchased in the 12 months to June 2024 was €337,500.
    • The lowest median price for a dwelling in the 12 months to June 2024 was €169,000 in Longford, while the highest median price was €630,000 in Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown.

    Commenting on the release, Niall Corkery, Statistician in the Prices Division, said: “Residential property prices rose by 8.6% in the 12 months to June 2024, up from 8.5% in the year to May 2024. In Dublin, residential property prices saw an increase of 9.3%, while property prices outside Dublin were 8.2% higher in June 2024 when compared with a year earlier.

    Property Prices by Type and Region

    In the 12 months to June 2024, house prices in Dublin rose by 10.0% while apartment prices increased by 6.6%. The highest house price growth in Dublin was in Dublin City at 11.7% while Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown saw a rise of 8.5%.

    Outside Dublin, house prices were up by 8.0% and apartment prices increased by 10.0%. The region outside of Dublin that saw the largest rise in house prices was the Mid-West (Clare, Limerick, and Tipperary) at 12.0%, while at the other end of the scale, the South-East (Carlow, Kilkenny, Waterford, and Wexford) saw a 5.6% rise.

    In June 2024, 3,563 dwelling purchases by households at market prices were filed with the Revenue Commissioners, a decrease of 11.5% when compared with the 4,025 purchases in June 2023.

    Households paid a median or mid-point price of €337,500 for a residential property in the 12 months to June 2024. The lowest median price paid for a dwelling was €169,000 in Longford, while the highest was €630,000 in Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown.

    The most expensive Eircode area over the 12 months to June 2024 was D06 'Dublin 6' with a median price of €773,000, while F45 'Castlerea' had the least expensive price of €139,000.” 

    Residential Property Price Index June 2024 - Central Statistics Office



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 335 ✭✭gaming_needs90


    The market is as awful as ever unfortunately. Its extremely bleak in Clare and the prices are astronomical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Interesting, but it could be apples and oranges. Supply is low here because there are too many people here. I don't mean to be so blunt, and I'm not making a judgement one way or the other, but that's just an objective truth. Is the same true in Argentina?

    On the matter of rent controls in general, they don't work. Supply and demand will always set the price, and the state cannot pass laws to make this different. History is littered with examples of this, and it never has worked. If a commodity is in short supply, the price will rise. If it is in abundance, then the price will fall. One cannot pass a law to prevent this anymore than they can prevent leaves falling off trees in September.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    Yes, good for buyers, not so good for renters, although an increase in ex-rentals may still be a decrease over all.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Sure it's bad news for individual tenants if they're evicted to facilitate a sale, but it is not necessarily bad news for the rental supply as a whole.

    Buyers and renters don't exist in entirely different ecosystems. Most of the ex-rentals will be bought by FTBers who are vacating a rental, or by landlords who retain the property as a rental. Rental supply will stay broadly similiar.

    Irrespective of any uptick in the number of ex-rentals on the market now, it is a tiny % of tenancies, and it is normal to expect that at any given time LLs will turnover stock.

    There is simply no data to suggest a catastrophic decline in rental supply due to a mass exodus of LLs leaving the market.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If we had as much emphasis on supply controls as we have on rent controls, we might make some progress

    Either way it will never be fixed under FFG as price must be protected at all costs. They will feel that this view is reinforced by the outcome of local elections



Advertisement
Advertisement