Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

1224225227229230307

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,238 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    The Algerian wasn't disqualified after beating a Russian though, was disqualified after beating a Thai.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    The tests were announced shortly after the Algerian beat a Russian.

    Again, not true. There was no fight against a Russian, that appears to be deliberate misinformation. Where are you getting your information from?

    Khelif beat Thailand's Janjaem Suwannapheng and was set to compete against China's Yang Liu for gold in the Welterweight category.

    Lin beat Bulgaria's Svetlana Kamenova Staneva for bronze in the Featherweight category.

    They were scheduled to fight no Russian boxers in either one of their categories, and only one Russian boxer won a gold medal in the entire championship (Anastasiia Demurchian, Light Middleweight).

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/olympics/articles/cye0ex43k63o

    When your own information is so blatantly inaccurate, I don't think "But, but the IBA" carries much weight.

    Neither the IBA nor the IOC are free of corruption (the IOC offices were searched by the French police before the Games, over corruption allegations.)

    So the only sensible thing to do is for the athletes concerned to either appeal their results (which they chose not to do) and/or do new tests now at an independent laboratory (which they appear loathe to do.).

    In the absence of alternative tests which only they can provide, the legally valid test results are the ones the IBA carried out and which the athletes concerned chose not to contest. The IOC merely examined the documentation provided by the national bodies. Which would not suffice for a suspicion of doping.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭erlichbachman


    Thankfully we have such high profile names as Elon musk and JK speaking out here, otherwise the conspiracy theory that this is all a Russian plot would gather traction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,432 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    Do you truly TRULY believe someone got their testosterone levels below that of a six year old girl?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    And why SIX and not 5 or 10? I wonder what the data points are for such a comparison: how many healthy 6 year old girls even get their testosterone levels checked anyway?

    image.png

    Even for boys, levels before age 7 don't seem to be of much diagnostic use going by this table. I suppose age 6 or 7 will be the same, IOW past babyhood and pre puberty, rates will not be age-dependent so he's just picked the youngest possible age for which he's found data, when in fact at, say, age 10 it would have been exactly the same, but wouldn't have sounded quite so cute and disarming.

    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/323085#low-levels

    More pertinently though, I'm sure you're correct that the idea that a TW would be encouraged to have levels BELOW that of a pre-pubertal female is nonsense: I think almost anyone with thyoid insufficiency will tell you that doctors constantly "sub" supplement them in terms of comfort, IOW the person feels much better at a higher level of supplementation than the doctor is willing to allow them.

    This is for safety reasons: the doctor wants them to be on the absolute minimum supplementation possible for their own best interests, even if that means a significant loss of comfort in terms of symptoms.

    I can't imagine that HRT with the "wrong" hormone for someone's physiological processes can be any different: it would be madness to have someone aiming for levels way below those of a female adult of the same age. That's why I'm calling BS on that claim too. It's a complete fantasy.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,044 ✭✭✭plodder


    I was listening to Des Cahill on RTE Radio there. He says the British boxing team believe four out of their five defeats were called wrongly, and apparently two of the judges that voted against Daina Moorehouse were flagged as "susceptible to corruption" by the IBA. He was blaming the IBA for not telling the IOC, but I thought that was naive. Why would the IBA do anything to make the IOC look competent at running a boxing tournament?

    “Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubt” - Carl Jung



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    So, judges that the IBA had flagged as potentially corrupt and who would not have been judging had the IBA been in charge, have been used by the IOC, and multiple countries feel that wrong decisions are being made?

    And the IOC of course have themselves been under investigation for possible corruption in the run-up to the Games.

    Hmm. I wonder why anyone thinks this is just a question of IBA corruption??

    (Do you know how/when it came out that certain judges had previously been flagged by the IBA?)

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,844 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Hungarian Boxing Association calls on the IOC to reconsider allowing biologically male Algerian boxer Imane Khelif, to compete against female Hungarian boxer Anna Luca Hamori on Saturday at the Paris Olympics. The association is exploring the possibility of legally challenging Khelif’s prescence in the women’s boxing at the Olympics. Additionally The Hungarian Olympic Committee has been in talks with the IOC to protect “the right of female competitors to equal opportunities and fair competition”.

    Source: Guardian

    No matter what people tell you, words and ideas can change this World



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    Most chromosome tests take roughly a week, her taking the test does nothing for her now. You can argue why she didnt take the test before hand but she's has an up to date approved record book like all boxers that she has used for multiple boxing events in 2023/2024 (Eindhavon Cup) and for entering the Olympics. To actually force an athlete to take a test and not accept their record book a body would actually need something to justify it.

    Just to confirm this, here is a link to the Eindhoven Box Cup invitation that she fought in and you can see on page 3 that it requires up to date record books with yearly medical exams for all entries

    https://eindhovenboxcup.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Invitation-for-the-Eindhoven-Box-Cup-2024.pdf

    This is why the IOC calls the IBA decision 'arbitrary' because they claim they had grounds to believe the record book was incorrect based on a 2022 test but still accepted her record book at the start of the event and then backtracked during the event.

    And because the IBA was removed from the Olympics formally in 2023 their results are not grounds for justifying challenging her records book.

    I need to stress this there is a big fight going down between the IBA and new boxing federation World Boxing that is the big drama behind all this. The 2023 event was boycotted by multiple countries over actions the IBA had taken (attempts to ban the Ukrainian team and allowing Russian Boxers to take part) thats why the last time an irish/british boxer fought Imran was in 2022 and not 2023 because they all boycotted the 2023 event.

    The reason why Imran withdrew her challenge of the disqualification because World Boxing started running events in 2023 and is being openly touted to replace the IBA in the Olympics and when the Olympics officially kicked the IBA to the curb in 2023 it was made clear that IBA events were no longer relevant to seeding for the Olympics or arguably the future of the sport in general.

    And this is what needs to be stressed, the IBA has been using this pr nightmare to attack World Boxing, to push down their new rivals and force Olympics back to the discussion table with them if they want to keep Boxing an Olympic sport.

    This is a fight between big boxing federations about essentially the monopoly of Olympic Boxing,

    its all over money again




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,044 ✭✭✭plodder


    I don't know when this was flagged. I was just repeating what he said. By the way, Khelif is up in the next few minutes in her fight with Luca Hamori, who beat Ireland's Grainne Walsh in the first round.

    “Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubt” - Carl Jung



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Yeah I've been searching for it, but can't find it live among all the damn stations covering all sorts of games!

    But I have found this on the net:

    https://olympics.com/en/paris-2024/results/boxing/women-s-66kg/qfnl000200--

    I can't see the match but they're giving the scoring.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    watched the match, she clearly went in with a plan and it paid off throughout the fight. The hungarian boxer was quite good but ultimately couldnt break the pace she set throughout the fight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    So if it's all a spite match between the IBA and the WBO, what is the significance of the Vice President of the WBO saying they have had concerns about Khelif (and FOUR others) being male for 2 years now?

    (I realise he is also Hungarian, but if he reported this to the IOC in 2022, as he claims, then while his reasons for making it public now may well be nationalistic, that does not discredit it. Especially as he says there were five boxers who failed the sex tests at that time.)

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    Different organization

    he's vice president of this:

    https://www.wboboxing.com

    I'm talking about this:

    https://worldboxing.org



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    I will add its not universal support for Khalif at World Boxing, the captain CAITLIN PARKER of the australian team has also been reported (at least by the telegraph) to be against Khalif participating and she is on the world boxing committee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭erlichbachman


    was part of that plan not to hit the opponent too hard in the face?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    not from what I've seen, she got a few clean jabs in, but so did the other boxer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,238 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    Khelif easily won the fight. Won every round on every judges card. Punches were just more powerful than the Hungarian.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    That's where that bit about being a man helps.

    Something the IOC have accidentally confirmed by the way, when they said this:

    image.png

    Because he's now admitted it IS a DSD case (and not transgender) then that means that the athletes concerned have a DSD that is male-specific. Because if their DSD had been a female specific one, they would not have failed the chromosome test.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    It wasn't just pace. It was about the force behind the punches just not being comparable.



    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    And also: in case anyone harbours any notions of the IOC caring about women's safety, or somehow being even slightly "good guys" in all this:

    That was the generation of swimmers that Sharron Davies was competing against - the East Germans and the Russians. She, like Martina Navratilova and a number of other female athletes know what they're talking about.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭erlichbachman


    Olympics Womens pole vault competition is hotting up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,800 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    interesting seeing mixed relays in the running and swimming today….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Thanks. I see there are, IMUIC, four major organisations which sanction professional boxing. The WBA, (World Boxing Association) which has a history of corruption, wants to run future Olympic boxing & supports the IOC position, while it is the WBO which confirms that Imane is male.

    Is that correct?

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    I'm beginning to feel you are being silly now

    I gave you a direct link to World Boxing website

    https://worldboxing.org/about/

    You've gone now and grabbed yet another organization which you could literally put into google and see it takes you to completely different website

    https://www.wbaboxing.com

    And maybe think 'hmm maybe these are not the same organisation'

    I mean it's silly how many groups have taken on variant of World and Boxing.

    But I gave you a direct link. A simple google would have cleared this up for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    I've no idea what the relevance of that is to the discussion though. I mean, yes, obviously, I've already acknowledged that there is more than one "World Boxing" organisation - indeed I said there were four at least. But it's not clear to me what point you're making apart from that. You linked to another of them - what is its importance in the context of this discussion?

    And is what I said previously (quoted below) wrong?

    The WBA, (World Boxing Association) which has a history of corruption, wants to run future Olympic boxing & supports the IOC position, while it is the WBO which confirms that Imane is male.

    Is that correct?

    If so, can you correct it please?

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    Because as far as I am aware World Boxing Association doesnt want to run olympic boxing and is not in the running. World Boxing is (the one I linked) they're the ones who have it as part of their goals and were the ones setting up events last year and are currently at the olympics as observers.

    As far as I can find World Boxing Association has made no statement saying they want to run the olympics boxing events going forward. I cant even find any statement from them about 2024 olympics.

    I've found articles pre 2020 olympics where they said they wanted to be involved

    https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1079682/wba-throws-hat-into-ring-to-help-organise-olympic-boxing-competition-at-tokyo-2020

    and one in 2018 where they tried to position themselves as the centre of boxing

    https://fightnews.com/the-wba-opens-its-doors-to-olympic-boxing/25330

    But post 2020 they appear to have said nothing on the matter.

    I'll happily take a read of an article that says they are still actively trying to pursue the matter, but they're not the World Boxing group the IBA is picking a fight. So I dont understand the relevence of pointing this out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭whatever.


    It means they are not really women and are oppressing actual women



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Just trying to sort out in my mind who's who. I don't follow boxing as a rule (though I am interested in women's sport in general, and certain sports in particular, just not combat sports).

    The point that I'm now unclear on is whether another group than the IBA has also said that Imane Khelif is male or whether the IBA is somehow part of the WBO, in which case this might be just a repetition of the previous info.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,741 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    So many questions still swirling around re Khalif & Ting, are they this and are they that, are they even eligible at all for the women's catagory?

    I came to the conclusion early on that they are not Trans, but probably have DSDs, so I cut them some slack & have been waiting to see what comes out in the wash, so to speak. Still waiting …..

    However, after watching one news report I now have one New question (which may change my perception completely)!

    So "are they what you might call intersex"? Is that a term you might attribute to them?



Advertisement