Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

1223224226228229307

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Out of curiosity what media outlets do you trust yourself for your news?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,923 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    But we have no evidence that anything the IBA have said about the two boxers is true. It is clearly a corrupt organisation with strong links to Putin and the Kremlin and owned by the Russian energy firm Gazprom.

    It's a bit bemusing to see such a murky outfit being held up by western social media as a paragon of virtue and as a reliable neutral source about the status of these boxers. Russia is one of the most anti-LGBT countries in Europe and has a very strong anti 'trans' agenda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    I feel every sports body should clearly detail what the criteria is for competing in their sports and what tests they carry out to ensure those criteria are met. But at the end of the day the IBA don't have to do any of that, I do accept that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Who said the BBC or mainstream media were neutral?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,860 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    If Imane did the test, it would be cleared up if nothing to hide

    No matter what people tell you, words and ideas can change this World



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭erlichbachman


    People are so confused nowadays about what is a woman and what is a man, people are getting cancelled for refusing to use pronouns, posters on boards are saying "she" when referring to Khelif, and when asked why its said that Khelif was raised as a woman.

    I'm not surprised a sports governing body doesn't want to open a can of worms and come out and state the obvious, that science can actually very easily determine the sex of a species.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭erlichbachman




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 30,103 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    They should and they slowly but surely are. I fall down on the side of trans people, and those with DSDs that provide male advantage, should not be in female competition but I don't think it is a completely straightforward question as to how to align all this.

    This is basically a perfect storm in that the IOC have abdicated all responsibility on this matter while at the same time taking over control of Boxing because the IBA have been disaffiliated. The IOC have basically said "we don't think there is any issue here, but the sports bodies can make rules if they want", which is a bit of a cowardly position. Many sports bodies have made rules (and there is perfectly reasonable argument to be made on the exact details of those rules) but because the IBA were/are so corrupt the IOC happens to be in charge of one sport and they are flailing wildly about what to do when they have responsibility for it. It is an abdication of leadership across the board that has caused specific athletes to bear the brunt of the anger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,741 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    And so we await to see what happens next, when Imane Khelif & Lin Yu-Ting enter the ring again in the coming days. Will other boxers pull-out of the bouts or what?

    I certainly don't see any movement from the IOC, who seem to be doubling down on their position that the two DSD boxers are without question eligible to box in the women's catagory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,853 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    it seems like they should just decide the rules on XX compete here, XX compete there , if you have an "inny" or an "outie" who gives a shyte. there are a million other things you can do in life.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭crusd


    which is why it should be in a sporting rules thread not a trans thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭crusd




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭crusd


    xxy’s? xx males? I the cases of xx males the only difference with xy males is they tend to be a little shorter and infertile. Other than that they experience makes puberty and appear masculine and have fully functioning male reproductive organs. This thread will see them competing with women?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,497 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    As previous mentioned, Iran are the outlier. It is illegal in all other Muslim countries.
    Nobody referenced Iran. Not why you think that's relevant in this case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,497 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Your reading comprehension needs work. There is nothing wrong that sentence, it's stating a negative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    Calling her a she based on being raised a women is a lot better than calling her a he based on nothing.

    Seems strange that the IBA are happy to come out and state someone failed an gender eligibility test but refuse to give any information about how the process is carried out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭aero2k


    The very first sentence of the OP mentions "allowing transgender women to enter women's competitions". That raises the question of eligibility, which is a sporting rules issue. I think it took about 10 posts before average runner pointed out the advantages men have over women. The OP managed to find one example of a biological female beating a biological male and did some impressive extrapolation, and while not mentioning rules specifically, heavily implied the question of eligibility.

    Just because a thread has "transgender" in the title doesn't mean only strictly transgender issues must be discussed in it. The OP also discusses a swimming race, which is sport. Were we supposed to ignore that bit? 226 pages in and not a prompt from the mods (or anyone else) about staying on topic, until you arrived.

    You could always start another thread if you don't like how this one is panning out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭crusd




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭aero2k


    Even if you had bothered with punctuation, your statement would be ambiguous. In fact I'm really having difficulty understanding the point of your posts in general. Assuming you are referring to the two boxers, I don't think anyone has said they are transgender, and even if they were it would still be a question of sporting rules, which you don't seem to like. Regarding the rules the IOC have made in this area, I don't like them much either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,716 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Yes, the whole point is that males shouldn't be competing against females, whatever variety of male they might be. Looking at my history, I started a thread way back in 2018 called "biological males in women's sports". The problem is only becoming more prominent now



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,055 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Screenshot_20240802_172849_Facebook.jpg

    Why is it a problem when Trans females are just as weak or weaker that Cis Females? As noted above.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,741 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Yes I agree, but after tens of thousands of years of human evolution men are still men & women are still women. Boys grow up to become men & girls grow up to become women, most are hetro - many are gay & lesbian, some are born with DSDs and for 90%+ of humans this is the norm, same as its always been since the dawn of time, so business as usual …

    *Trans is another thing altogether, based on feelings and a belief system that you are what you believe you are, what sex/gender say you are, or what you want to identify as, and what "gender" you want to outwardly portray or display. This way a man can turn into a woman, and he will now be a she/her (and demand to be accepted as such). Those who don't comply sre deemed to be transphobes or terfs. Buzzwords include pronouns, cis, assigned at birth, misgendering & deadnaming.

    >That's my take on it all anyway.

    PS: The two boxers are not trans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,240 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    Interesting tweet just now by the IOC, basically saying that we are indeed looking at a case DSD athletes.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,586 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    That's one person who says they are weaker than the oldest lady in the yoga class on social media.

    It's as far from a scientific study as you can get.

    If someone posted something on social media saying they were a transwoman and had twice the strength of the cis women would you say they should be banned.

    Anyone can post anything on social media. That post may not even be true about the testosterone of a 6 year old girl and the yoga class and if it is that person has health problems if their testosterone is so low.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Well, both the IBA and the IOC have a long history of corruption so you can't really query the IBA's results while relying on the IOC's simple passport and document checking. Would the IOC accept a national team providing equivalent documentation to prove that an athlete was drug-free or do they insist on their own drug-testing regimen? We all know the answer to that.

    It's also a false problem for a more practical reason: it's perfectly normal when you have two incompatible test results, both potentially problematic for various reasons, to just do another test somewhere else. That's also the basis of the existing appeals process.

    Because both boxers had the opportunity at the time to appeal to an independent court of arbitration which would have done new tests and issued a final decision. They both failed to do so (one of them did actually begin the process but then withdrew it early on in the proceedings). That is what gives the IBA results their legal value - the absence of an appeal against them within the allotted time. That's a choice both athletes and their teams made.

    But more than that: they could do a new test now, at an independent laboratory of their choice. It's a 5-second cheek swab, not a strip search of internal cavities. 82% of the female athletes asked about whether or not to maintain the cheek swab sex test back when it was still the norm voted to keep it. (It was dropped anyway). If these two athletes are women, it's odd that even after all the controversy over their sex, they're so strongly against sex testing that they won't hear of it. Even though it would solve their public image problems immediately?

    Of course there's a very obvious reason why they might not want to do that. I'm not assuming that's the only possible reason, but I haven't seen any credible alternatives suggested, so I'm going with it being the likeliest for now.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    It was being discussed in the Olympics thread but the posts were removed and we were told to discuss it here. But thanks for the backseat modding all the same.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Indeed, but tell that to the BBC who put up TWO trans women to discuss the Khelif/Carini fight on Thursday's "The World Tonight" - not a single woman was consulted. (The "balance" provided being that one of them, an ex boxer, said women should absolutely not have to fight men, while the other, a so-called researcher who published a well-dodgy study some years back set up to prove that TW "lose" their male advantage due to hormone treatment) said it's all very complicated and we can't possibly tell.)

    AFAICS the trans aspect is being wedged into this by trans activists and "allies". Joanne Rowling for instance said right at the start that this has nothing to do with trans people and that the problem is that what we saw in that fight was a man beating a woman. Not that the BBC asked her or any other woman of course, not even a female boxer.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,118 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    That isn't true though, and a massive screengrab from an anonymous source doesn't make it so.😁

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭aero2k


    Indeed, at least the OP referenced a real case of a woman beating a man, that screengrab was just someone claiming to be weaker. Of course, if the poster in question had read the whole thread, they'd have seen all the evidence for the advantages that undergoing male puberty gives.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭Mr Bumble


    The IBA is controlled from Moscow by a Russian gangster and is not recognised by the IOC as the controlling body for boxing.

    Their "test" has no standing. They refused to provide any information of the nature of the test or the criteria.

    The tests were announced shortly after the Algerian beat a Russian.

    The entire story is about Russian disinformation and corruption.



Advertisement