Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dairy Chitchat 4, an udder new thread.

17967977998018021115

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,310 ✭✭✭✭whelan2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭alps


    It's an absolute disaster. I see the amount of time they spend measuring the lumps, every which way, when the first day was just a casual squeeze is a mockery of accuracy. Passing a severe interpretation test is like trying to hit black on a roulette wheel 5 times in a row. If those cows go clear on the blood and kill out clean in the factory, your restriction should be lifted, or at least go clear after one more rest. Trying to pass 2 more with that severe interpretation is just a farce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon


    They can have TB without showing lesions in the factory. If you have lumps, there's TB in the herd. It's an exercise in denial talking about confirming the problem by lesions.

    The main problem with the skin test is false negatives, not false positives.

    It leaves behind more infected animals (1 in 10) than it takes false positives (1 in 5000). So if you have 2 or 3 showing its guaranteed there's infection there.

    On the bloods, there will be a higher rate of false positives but that's not the point. These will be collateral damage to clear the infection, harsh as that sounds. The main reason is to find infected animals that the skin test missed.

    Good luck to anyone struggling with TB.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 987 ✭✭✭daiymann 5


    If u have a cow with positive on skin and blood could both be false positive.Do bloods ever give false negatives



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 987 ✭✭✭daiymann 5


    Couldnt agree more this could be the reason for increase in tb as well as other factors has this severe interpretation only started this year did our farm orgs agree to it



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭alps


    The severe interpretation is an issue. The measurements done on day one in no way reflect the accuracy of the measurement on day 2 if any lumps manifest. A reading incorrect to the tune of 1mm on day one, can result in an wrong determination on day two.

    You will question this when you're at the butt end of these results with animals always clear on bloods and in factory and each incidence hitting the pocket to the tune of 5 figure sums.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon


    False positive rate on skin is very low. Chances of a false positive on skin and blood combined are more than 5000 to 1.

    False positive rate on bloods as a standalone test is higher than skin, that's part of the reason it isn't used as the annual screening test.

    The problem in the testing structure is false negatives, so missing the infected animals by the skin test. That's down to the test but also lax testing and reading. Severe interpretation and 6 month testing helps.

    If you have a TB problem your main worry should be false negatives, believe me I know how that goes.

    The increase in TB rates is down to better detection rates not more TB in the country. Lesion rates from clear herds in the factory have dropped a lot- that shows more are being caught early in the skin tests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭cjpm


    The Dept are 60 years trying to eradicate TB and in the year 2024 still don’t have a test that’s 100% accurate.

    You’d have to wonder if it’s a fool’s errand at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,310 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    THis was the first year here tb test was done right. An Australian vet did it. Every animal was put through the crush for reading. Measured or felt no eyeballing. We are paying for it to be done properly and great we all want a clear test but it's no use if it's not right, only prolonging the situation



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭Neddyusa


    There's no need to wonder.

    Despite its name, its not an "eradication" programme.

    It's simply an indirect subsidy for large animal vets.

    It's the sole reason that it's easier to get a vet than a doctor in this country.

    And for that reason, I can just about stomach the nonsense that goes on with it.

    The other mini-industry of pen-pushers and hangers-on it supports, I'm less tolerant of...but sure I suppose those people need a job too. That's scant consolation to the farmers suffering the brunt of it though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭Danny healy ray


    say that to someone that locked up for a year or longer that had to keep every calf them lads are in a awful way and all they pray is that they go clear



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,310 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    So would you prefer that they get a false clear test by not being tested properly and prolonging the situation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,310 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    We had a terrible time here with tb years ago. Testing constantly, in the end it was a cull cow we sent to the factory that never tested positive thst was rotten with lesions she would have been tested loads of times and no reaction. Department vets did the testing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭Danny healy ray


    if the department took the farmers calves that he would normally sell and compensate him accordingly it would relieve an amount of stress from genuine farm families



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭cjpm


    That’s precisely the point. The test is absolutely useless in this case.

    Know of a guy who lost 50 cows between the blood test and 2 skin tests. The day the last bunch were being collected the Dept vet asked him if he had any other poor performing cow he wanted to send. So he sent one more old cow. And it was her that had the worse lesions of them all after passing the tests. Says a lot about the efficiency of the whole testing regime



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭older by the day


    You may have lumpy first calfers, they have no lumps the next ten years and kill clean in the factory as a 12 year old. The blood would have probably picked up something as a first calver and she would be a goner.

    Finty the system is broken, 70 years on and good cows been killed and good farmers been locked up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,972 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    Your bang on there alps ….I’m reasonably confident the 3 I have will kill out clear …bloods will be negative I’ll get compensated well for value of my cows as I have good ebi ,milk records pedigree regrestiration etc…..what I won’t be compensated for is the loss of milk for these animals …fact 2/3 are in calf to sexed semen to calve next January and the hassle and inconvienence of been locked up till at least December ….it’s just one more kick in the hole for 2024 to throw at anyone restricted

    There is an active badger set in a fort in a neighbours farm just over ditch from me …we’re reasonably confident these are healthy badgers but we don’t know ….dept laid traps to try catch and vaccinate or put down badgers few years ago….they gave 2 weeks at it …caught nothing and last we saw of them ….they even left one trap behind and no monitoring done beteeeen Thursday and following Wednesday of Easter weekend 🙄🙄🙄

    My neighbour who is down and beside a wood had set guys out last week to go look for sets ….they didn’t go too far into wood because it was tough going and overgrown …they don’t care

    I last tested in march all clear and think only 2 with lumps were measured ….both of them had nothing this time other neighbours around us all tested in last 2/4 months all clear ….beteeeen end of march and Christmas this year I will now have 4 tests (in 9 months)…..that’s too many tests in such short time frame in my view and could affect results ….I’d love to have double sided or second crush so they ain’t getting jabbed so many times on one side….tb testing is big business now for Dvo and vets ….they are so far out of there depth as regards trying to eradicate or control it we really need a change in approach and personnel ….only ones to carry the can is the farmer and there is nothing we can do ….anyway rant over



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,310 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    OOur cow was skipped she was that bad. A big red cow



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 987 ✭✭✭daiymann 5


    Does that not tell u the whole programe is a joke what difference wud it make ig there was no testing only on sale animals what harm is it selling calves from restricted herds theyll be dead in 2yrs anyway the current dairy cows average not even 3 lactations



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,310 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    This Was 30 years ago. I do wonder have we advanced much since then



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,206 ✭✭✭straight


    A fella pointed out to me once that everyone is paid the day of a TB test apart from the farmer bringing all the cattle in and putting them through the crush.

    I've been lucky with TB so far here but there is a good bit around lately. Alot of lads opting for blood test and losing alot of stock in the process. One of my neighbours calves tested positive.

    I thought alot of cows have past exposure to TB and they have an immunity to some degree. Alot of my cows have lumps on their skin especially the autumn on their neck and legs. Vet said it looks like skin TB. Passing away the herd test anyway.

    As they say..... There is no accurate test for TB - just vaccinate the cows and forget it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 987 ✭✭✭daiymann 5


    We havent advanced ive never had tb thank god but can someone please tell me how bordbia can only send a inspector 2 times and never if u know them.while ur local vet who u drink pints with can test u 4ever



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭cjpm


    When the cows go through the factory there’s no bullshitting about TB. The dept trace the positives straight away. So they wouldn’t be long knocking on the vets door to ask him/her a few questions.

    Also the vet has to notify the Dept prior to the test anyway so they can arrive in unannounced to check what’s being done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,310 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    One of our vets was suspended from testing so they are monitored



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 987 ✭✭✭daiymann 5


    Look at bvd carry on and no one saying anything



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,310 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Bvd was prolonged as lads didn't have to get rid of positives earlier on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 987 ✭✭✭daiymann 5


    Wouldnt u think our highly intelligent boys wud havev taught of that when they first designed the scheme



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭raindodger


    its a big issue bringing them into parlour and milking themn to keep them right and correct for valuation .Consider spraying stalls or mangers with disinfectant.Soon as they are valued into a bare field and dry them



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon


    Yes, false negatives are the problem.

    Not false positives



Advertisement