Vice President Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump 2024

Higher then any other sitting president are you sure about that.

Clue for you he didn't win the popular vote in 2020

So, to get this straight, when Trump and his acolytes deny knowledge or involvement with Project 2025, you're saying they're telling the truth?

Are you saying that the same man, who helped create and aggressively promote a massive far-reaching conspiracy theory about the 2020 US election or who promoted the Obama birther conspiracy theory has no form for lying?

I assume (or hope) you're not.

Obviously, he has form for telling massive lies with big banging bells on.

We cannot know what Trump would do in a second term, in the same sense that we cannot know if the sun will rise tomorrow. However, we can gather the data, we can look at previous form and rightly come to the conclusion that he has no particular respect for US democracy as it is.

But,

“Take me in oh tender woman,

“Take me in, for heaven's sake,

“Take me in oh tender woman,” sighed the snake.

are you still here flogging this dead one trick horse?

Yeah but im talking about the working men.

They dont want to be told theyre privileged aftera 50 hr week climbing on roofs and phone poles. I assure you they dont want to know about pronouns or dei on a Friday.

And they each have a vote.

I think you finally get it.

is she BLACK !!!!!!!!!!???????? Could she not ‘pass’ as an Italian ( most Italians have a very brown/well tanned loops about them) ; does she not have the look of a nicely tanned Irish lady. An awful fit of women of all nationalities and none are born with that skin tone but it DEFINATELY not a black tone.
what has colour of skin to do anyway with the job at hand. Anyone who does is to try and play to peoples biasnesses

@Redliketoast

But I am observant enough to realise that I cant blame him for things he hasnt done.

I hope you're also observant enough to blame him for the things he has done, like aggressively promote a completely baseless lie (thrown out of courtrooms with prejudice up and down the land) about the 2020 election and send a mob of his followers to the US Capitol to stop its certification. I'd hope you're observant enough to conclude that such a man has no interest in the peaceful transfer of power.

People do make judgements about others on past form all the time. For example, you wouldn't typically hire a person with an armed robbery conviction to be a manager at your bank. You wouldn't typically a person with a conviction for child molestation to teach at your montessori. Even though you don't know if they're likely to use their position to commit similar crimes in the future, you still take pause, and this has never been considered unreasonable, so why would it be unreasonable to conclude that a man who already tried to upend US democracy would pose a particular danger to it if once again put in charge of it?

Wow just coming right out with the blatant racist screed.

Well done?

Republicans are BEGGING their members to cease and desist all the racist nonsense as it’s devastating to their general election strategy but do go on. I wouldn’t mind this brand of MAGA republicans devastated in November one bit.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-harris-attacks-johnson-hudson-76f8e90d24004e49449087787ac031a5

Again, he has distanced himself from it. 

Has he? Why does he even have to pretend to? Methinks the orange manbaby doth protest too much. Was he lying then, or was he lying now?

It was a straightforward initial post.

A strategy and calculation that typically might come up in any political partys office, ... if we run a blue collar man we can get this voting block on board, if we run a single mother we can get that crowd on board.

But oh no, not on this site. Here it became like the Jehovah scene from life of Brian.

well guess what ... jehovah! jehovah! white male! black woman!

Hitler distanced himself from Mein Kampf in the early 30’s.
phuck Godwins law.

They tried to stop a political opponent from running?

Have they forgotten Trump demanding LOCK HER UP without any evidence?

Should a political opponent be able to break the law and get away with it when there's a material case against them - just because they stand for election?
Nope. No one would seriously be able to defend that proposition.