Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings - updated 11/5/24*

18318328348368371031

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,761 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    One independent TD emailed me back about the EU migration pact and said and I quote "Mad Stuff"

    Of course the FF TD in my area hasn't responded…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 630 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    This migration pact is the final nail in the coffin of Ireland -complete no control after this.

    Why hasnt there been a referendum on this ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Because the government want this through so they can say they are no longer responsible for migration into Ireland. In the future they can respond to all questions with 'we are obliged to follow EU regulations'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭kabakuyu


    So FFG have taken a lurch to the right, they have brought in some measures to tighten up on bogus AS, seems like the limited support for right leaning parties in the recent elections is having an effect on current migration policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,561 ✭✭✭twinytwo




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,141 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Nice and handy that ER steps down on the day they plan to discuss EU migration law, will keep it out of the media and stop the hacks from asking tough questions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    No they haven’t, this is lip service

    Watch what they do with the migration pact and get back to me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    None of my TDs (Green and FGs) responded to me, of the 30+ senators I emailed I got one automated response that they had received my email

    Genuinely fairly depressing that that’s the standard



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,561 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Might as well clarify it does look like an update to the legislation. Supreme court previously took issue with various parts of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump


    "There's no implantation of men in Ireland and, most certainly, Ireland is not full."

    More gaslighting from Harris



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    There really should be more extensive discussion and debate as to what exactly is involved in the pact

    While I absolutely think we should retain control of our sovereignty on this, the fact that Ivana Bacik is very much opposed to it gives me pause that there must be some sensible provisions involved also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,062 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    boyd barrett is opposed to it so it must be somewhat beneficial to Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump


    I'd take no notice of his like, they oppose everything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    he opposed it because it allows us to fast track asylum seekers from safe countries like Algeria and he doesn’t believe there are any safe countries



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,096 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    If it went to a referendum, no one would vote for it. Far easier to just ram it through the Dail at warp speed with as little discussion as possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,141 ✭✭✭prunudo


    If Harris stopped going ice cream shopping on his trips around the country he might actually see for himself what the country he presides over is really going through.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,761 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Question with "Prime Time" and "The Tonight Show" on tonight was there any reference to the EU Migration Pact?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,529 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    The migrant pact got watered down a little from the more recent restrictive versions that's had for example tied foreign visas and funding to countries taking back their people now it's more of a review of visa free countries.

    During the negotiations Ireland along with Germany and a few others were against the application of the controls to minors or families with them (minor over 6), that made it in the end so the adults playing as teens won't get far. Ireland was against a good few parts of it.

    The reason I think they don't want to debate it is they can't, if someone else brought the aspects of it up in the Dail they'd be branded far right and shouted down. Being the best boys this time around is going to get a lot of flak from the NGOs and left.

    My concern is that Ireland won't take advantage of the good parts and just take on the bad, and this with the current arrivals continuing undeterred.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    They allowed discussion and dissent at the European elections. If the people of Ireland were so against it, they could have elected MEPs who were against it. But barring a smal number, the majority elected are in favour of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    As above, there was a referendum held on this only last week. It was called the European elections.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    That’s some twisted logic



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭buzzerxx


    Because when it comes to the big decisions, Irelands leading politicians (and all the worlds politicians) do what they are told to do and follow the agenda, they are all puppets of the Globalist and Megalomaniac EU and the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,761 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    883 migrants in 15 boats crossed the channel yesterday

    God help the UK and what's the betting alot of these illegals will be coming to Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    It’s ok according to Greens we need them to clean toilets



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭TagoMago


    Regarding the EU Migration Pact, for those looking for a decrease in IPAs (especially young single men from non-warzone countries), is the pact not a step in the right direction? Maybe I've misunderstood the analysis of it but it looks to be a more restrictive system that what we have in place in Ireland currently?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭Blind As A Bat


    I see that O'Gormless has confirmed that he's running for leadership of the Green Party. Next stop Taoiseach?? God help us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,258 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Even though this pact makes huge concessions to the anti-immigration movements around europe it seems they've turned on it.

    I suspect several different reasons for this.

    1. Knowing restrictive practices won't actually work to any great degree they need to draw their popular vote by always looking for something more extreme.
    2. It genuinely isn't extreme enough for some. Some might believe in actually trying for zero IPA/undocumented immigration and can see hard military approaches as the only way they might possibly achieve this. (Not that this would work, or ever happen)
    3. It's too pro EU. Pushing for individual national approaches is a great way of causing a rift in the EU and/or seeking an exit. Eg Wilder had to agree to stop looking directly for leaving the EU to form a gov coalition, instead he ratchets up calling for a national approach to immigration.
    4. Similar to point 3, it's part of their pro-Putin allegiances to cause division on immigration.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,096 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Please explain how this is a step in the right direction of being more restrictive?

    The government are looking to create a legal obligation for Ireland to take in asylum seekers from the rest of the EU. Not only that, but by abandoning our opt out, there are significant financial penalties to pay if we don't meet those new obligations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭Blind As A Bat


    You might think so but:

    It will take two years minimum to be up and running and knowing our track record of faffing and dithering and general incompetence, I can't see any government getting enough staff in place.

    We can't opt into the mandatory and very important verification of ID, criminal check etc. due to not being in Schengen. What do you want to bet that we won't hurry ourselves to get the mechanisms in place to do anything we're not obliged to.

    We still have to take a certain number unless we pay in lieu. This gives any government carte blanche to continue taking people whom we could refuse. At the moment our 'fair share' is 2.16% of an expected EU-wide 30,000 target relocations for the first year. But as time goes on the annual number of relocations will increase because the EU administration wants a certain number migrants. Ireland sees only the tip of the iceberg of those who are arriving illegally in the EU. This year Latvia, Lithuania and Poland alone have stopped 150,000 illegal crossings so far and plenty of them were on their way to the UK, from where many will end up trying to come to Ireland.

    Finally, we still have obligations under the Geneva Convention which dates from post World War II and is clearly no longer fit for purpose. What we really need is a new convention on refugees in keeping with the problems the world is facing today, not in the aftermath of WWII.

    https://www.dw.com/en/massive-increase-in-people-smuggling-at-eus-eastern-border/video-67270329



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Ireland one of the richest countries in the world, unlimited funding to take in the world but not enough money to provide cancer care

    https://www.irishtimes.com/health/2024/06/19/irish-cancer-society-calls-for-significant-increase-in-funding-for-national-cancer-strategy-in-budget/

    Patients are experiencing delayed cancer diagnoses, poorer prognosis and a lower
    quality of life due to a €180 million shortfall in funding for the
    National Cancer Strategy, a representative group has said.

    The Irish Cancer Society said there was a “real human cost” to cancer, and
    called for a significant increase in funding in the forthcoming budget.

    The National Cancer Control Programme’s annual budget for implementation of
    the National Cancer Strategy should have increased incrementally over
    the past eight years to be €110 million higher in 2024 than in 2016,
    according to the HSE. The actual incremental increase has been €65
    million. As a result the cumulative loss of investment in cancer
    services from 2017 to 2024 is almost €180 million, the Irish Cancer
    Society said.

    Speaking in advance of the launch of its pre-budget submission, Averil Power,
    chief executive of the Irish Cancer Society, said as a result of this
    “people are dying who shouldn’t be, and those who survive are having a
    poorer quality of life”.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement