Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1113411351137113911401796

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Cause Loughman and Cooney going would be so much more forward thinking 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,195 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Eh, taking Loughman would absolutely be more forward thinking. Don't agree on Cooney but I never argued for his conclusion.

    Anyway, I'm not the least bit surprised. Ireland don't give guys a go unless the incumbent retires or gets injured. That's just how it is and anyone who expected that to change is silly. So before anyone says I'm whinging. I'm not. I'm just acknowledging how things are.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Loughman is 28 and shown no signs of ever being good enough. Taking TOT to see if he can cover LH is clearly more forward thinking.

    If not Cooney then who exactly is it you think should go?

    There are three uncapped players in the squad and multiple low capped players. You are acknowledging how things are in your own head, but that's about it.

    Eben Etzebeth is about to play a match with more caps than the entire opposing forward pack.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    I wonder what it is that Loughman lacks in Farrell's eyes. He looks good to me; strong scrummager, and useful in the loose. I was looking forward to seeing him on early so Porter only had to play 60 minutes. Does Farrell think he doesn't have the right mentality?

    I don't really see the point in including Larmour. He's topped out below higher end international rugby, and is too suspect defensively on the right edge. I suppose there aren't a whole lot of other options unless you included more of a development player who wouldn't actually be expected to play (Kilgallen, maybe). Shane Daly is more of a left wing/fullback, and Baloucoune hasn't played for quite a while as far as I'm aware. Could they have had a look at Stewart Moore as a playmaker winger? Farrell likes creatine wingers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Jesus Christ can we not do this again



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Other than the loss of JGP I'm pretty happy with the squad, the introduction of Prendergast at this stage is why I love Andy Farrell as our head coach. Any other Irish coach and he'd be waiting until the autumn at an absolute minimum.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    i'm not convinced on any of these leinster 10s including prendergast. I feel like he should have expanded that contest to guys like healy and another chance to burns years ago.

    Prendergast should be on the EI tour and spending all this summer adding muscle. He's shown nothing in any game that was in actual danger of being lost.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Crowley will, rightly, play 150 minutes barring injury so whoever is going alongside him is emergency cover getting experience with the national team.

    There might be a couple of surprise inclusions in the match day 23 but it'll mostly be business as usual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,384 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    My own stab at a 23 from that squad, however my selection looks very out there compared to the usual selection:

    Porter, Sheehan, Bealham
    Beirne, McCarthy
    O’Mahony, Doris, Van der Flier
    Murray, Crowley
    Stockdale, Henshaw, Ringrose, Nash
    O’Brien.
    Bench: Herring, O’Toole, Jager, Ryan, Prendergast, Casey, Frawley, Larmour.

    To explain some of my reasoning;
    I think Furlong is in a rut, really don’t think he’s shown anything above average lately, and Bealham deserves a shot. I’d even prefer Jager as impact sub as he just brings a more powerful size into it with 20 to go.
    I think Murray is still better starting than Casey.
    Lowe has been up and down lately, Stockdale is due a shot. I’d also favour Larmour on the bench to cover wing/fullback for his pace and flexibility.
    I prefer Herring to Kelleher, just an all-round better hooker, better pace, better throws and has a better nose for the try line.
    It’d be a huge call to put O’Toole in ahead of Healy, but no better opportunity to test him.
    I really like Prendergast and would love to see him get an opportunity, he has been consistently outstanding for Connacht, and love his work rate. Izuchukwu and Baird are probably better locks than back rows, but Prendergast is definitely a better back row than either of them in my opinion.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    I think I disagree with 75% of your reasoning here. Furlong has actually played pretty well of late, unlike the guy you’re proposing to replace him with, Bealham, who is on an awful run of form and on his last outing got completely exposed by Ed Byrne.

    James Lowe is still playing great - was one of a handful of Leinster players who played well on Saturday and I’d be shocked if he wasn’t starting for Ireland if he’s healthy.

    Disagree on Larmour being flexible - just don’t see it with him. He’s really only a winger I think at this level, especially if Frawley is in the squad.

    Would squarely disagree with Prendergast being a better back row than Ryan Baird - there’s simply nothing to back that up. He’s a good player, but that’s a big statement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭thePigeon_


    Did you mean to say Izuchukwu and Baird are better back rows than locks..? Baird is definitely a better back row than lock and Izuchukwu is only going because of his swap to 6.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,223 ✭✭✭✭phog


    The squad was announced about 5 hours ago, I've been offline since then but I can't get my head around Coombes not being in the squad.

    Was it Cave that said his face didn't fit, Coombes must feel the same. His stats are unreal but he's not getting a look in for Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,887 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    One year left on both Coombes and Hodnetts contracts. You’d imagine both would have more money on offer abroad, especially Coombes, who would be a great fit for Top 14. Obviously it depends on their priorities but neither is anywhere close to the Ireland squad based on these selections. As a Munster fan I’m very worried.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,223 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I just said as much here at home, he's played some great rugby and can't get a look in for a summer tour. I hope there's something else that will keep him at Munster as there isn't much hope of international caps for him ATM.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    5 of his last 7 matches he has been on the bench…

    At the end of the day Farrell clearly doesn't rate him. I don't necessarily think he is above reproach or anything, but he has made this clear so it isn't a surprise. For me Coombes lacks the top level pace and strength to be effective at international level. Cian Prendergast has had a great season for Connacht and Izzy is very exciting for Ulster and they and Timoney have been chosen over him for various reasons. I would never be worried about Coombes having to play a match for Ireland, but I'd put him in the same basket as someone like Rhys Ruddock who just lacks a bit at the very top end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Coombes probably falls down in acceleration and open field speed. How much have you seen him running in the open and showing a good turn of pace? Timoney is way ahead in that regard.

    Maybe if he went and got some training in doing block starts and 60m running it would be good for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,223 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Starting from the bench or not being in the match day team hasn't hindered other players, his stats are very impressive even with starting from the bench.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,384 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    I think they are covering lock in this squad but Prendergast is purely covering back row, and I rate him higher than the other two.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,384 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Being frank, I see Ryan Baird as a show pony, he’s grand if the ball bounces just right for him to go on a gallop, but I’d rather Prendergast anytime, just a better back row forward, much tougher and better at the graft required, much closer to O’Mahony’s Style.
    And I did preface my post by saying it is out there compared to usual selections.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,811 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    and i think most munster fans would argue that, while it worked well in SA, not starting coombes (and RG) on saturday probably didnt work out. i dont think it worked all that well against ulster either tbh but we got away with it



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Coombes is a way better player than ruddock.

    Farrell is an intensely system based selector. More so than any other international coach imo. Coombes would have been given more rope by almost any other major country and their coaching team.

    It worries me a little the new dissonance between leinster and ireland style wise. Ireland was built on that synergy imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,070 ✭✭✭accensi0n


    I'm really looking forward to the tour. Love watching Ireland play.

    Oh sorry, I'm doing it wrong. All these selections are wrong! Why haven't all those amazing 19 year old promising players who might have a high ceiling been selected! Ridiculous!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,739 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Interesting squad, I'd have left Healy at home, maybe POM too but then not sure who steps up to the leadership plate in that environment. Murray could have been left at home too but he's had a good season and still has plenty to offer and once JGP was out there was no way he was being left out. I've always liked Blade so happy to see him in, not his best season but he's a good 3rd 9 to have and won't let us down if he does end up on the pitch.

    Prendergast, not sure what he's done to get on a squad like this so soon but it'll be a good experience for him. He could get eaten alive defensively if he makes it on the field but I don't think that's why he's there.

    No idea what Coombes and Hodnett have to do to get a look in, baffles me completely. Glad for Izzy, exciting prospect. Loughman is unlucky from a Munster point of view but don't think the others taken instead are miles ahead, tight enough call that I'm not too pushed about.

    Larmour, love him going forward in terms of x-factor but I don't see him improving his positioning or aerial ability at 27 at this stage. Willie Le Roux had a field day down his wing. Hope Nash starts as he's just a better player.

    Big tour for Casey, he was poor the last day but that was the exception rather than the norm. Good chance to lay serious claim to the back 9 jersey.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 351 ✭✭VayNiice


    I was ridiculed for saying this before but I've heard numerous times now that it's not his physical capabilities, skills or on field performances for munster that are lacking..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,139 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    The only surprise for me , is that with JGP not going , Cooney not given a go as backup, assume its his age, given Johnny no longer involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,739 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Bench is just a convenient new excuse imo… Conan being on the bench constantly doesn't seem to do his chances any harm. Murray also has spells on the bench. Leinster rotate their 10s every week.

    Pace, yeah maybe, if that's what you want your 8 doing. But strength… are ya mad! He's one of the most powerful rugby players on the island. A lot of his tries highlight reel is him barreling through players in the tight. He's an absolute ox. He also covers lock, and I'd say he'd make at least similar or better stab at it than Izzy or Baird. Handling is very good also.

    Genuinely don't know how a player regularly posting the level of carries/tackles/rucks/tries that he does is not worthy of more of a look in. But there ya have it, them's the breaks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,942 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Clearly he isn't, given Ruddock put in motm performances for Ireland, and actually made squads



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I mean, if how you judge how good players are is by looking at who was picked and who wasn't, and not watching them and forming your own opinion…. then you do you.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'm aware bench players can make it, I'm just saying Munster have chosen to bench him for a reason. Maybe the question should be why JOD isn't there rather than him?

    In terms of strength, yeah I get he is strong but I don't think it is as easy to overpower people at international level - I phrased that poorly. I don't think he can rely on his strength as much to overpower people. My point with the reference to Ruddock is just that there are people who are very good at a certain level who just aren't quite at the level to go above it. I could be wrong on Coombes, much like Farrell, but he has been in squads a number of times so Farrell has seen him. Potentially he just thinks that his game wouldn't translate well to international level. It's worth at least asking why he was benched for Munster, perhaps his stats weren't translating to a performance the team could use.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Farrell is an intensely system based selector.

    Even if this was true (and I don’t think anyone really believes it), isn’t the inability of a player to adapt to the team’s systems a massive black mark against him?

    Like, why can Timoney and Prendergast - aka the guys keeping Coombes out of the squad - manage it and he (according to you) cannot? They don’t play for Leinster either.

    That’s not the fault of the coaches, that’s the fault of the player.

    But again, that’s your theory, not mine.



Advertisement
Advertisement