Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Green" policies are destroying this country

1104710481050105210531118

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,240 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Industry in 'lobbying for deregulation' story

    I Am Shocked

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    no they asking for the stupid ban on new datacenter connections to be lifted and for the government to whom they pay massive taxes and provide employment you know do what governments meant to do and improve infrastructure

    Considering we share the same planet with everyone else, they will just move if we don’t offer the infrastructure and the net result to the climate be the same while Ireland and Irish people lose out due to yet more stupid green policies



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭gossamerfabric


    We won't agree and when Ryanair is only making about 8 euro profit per passenger your rounding up of your propsed carbon tax from dub to ace from 18.20 to 20 euro is offensive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,750 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    This is not a David versus Goliath story. eNGOs have developed a successful business model, one can build a career in this field (e.g. Greta Thunberg foundation), there are so many, that consultants are available to advise on how to raise money. Climate change™ is a $3.5 trillion global industry. On the other hand oil and gas industry products ($2.1 trillion) are just the raw material used for value add products that climate change™ industry depends on.

    There are revenues from taxes like Carbon tax, Emission Trading System (ETS), Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Vehicle Registration Tax (VRT), electricity tax and plastic tax, these taxes will be extended until the population revolts. There are billions floating around to be hovered up by the wealthiest in society all riding on climate change™.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Really! Ryanair made 1.3 Billion net profit in 2023! I think they can afford to pay a fair share of the cliamte change tax burden. Any even if it adds a few euro to your tickets so what.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,009 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Nothing to do with Ryanair. It's the consumer who pays. Like if I fill the car with diesel, I pay. If I take the bus, it's factored into the bus ticket. Aviation fuel shouldn't be exempt



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    What proof? I have consistently posted links backing my claims unlike others. Eamon Ryan's admission of defeat (technical impossibility) off offshore for one and the 200 Billion costs for another are claims that don't have any sources here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    You were given figures both here and in parallel thread you are active in

    37GW of offshore wind by 2050 on this side of 200bn is a fantasy

    I also note that you are asking others to do the work for you, while you have provided zero evidence that the above can be done in that time or budget



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Press release March 2024. Does this sound like an admission of defeat from Eamon Ryan. I did quote figures that indicated costs far less than 100 Billion which you ignore or don't accept. Where is the source for that 200 billion?

    Minister Ryan said:

    "Ireland is already a wind energy success story. We get
    35% of our electricity from onshore wind farms, which is more than
    anywhere else in Europe. We’re world leaders in integrating renewables
    onto our electricity grid, which often sees 75% of total electricity
    demand come from wind farms. For over 20 years we have built a thriving
    national onshore wind industry, but now we are looking to our seas.
    Ireland has one of the best offshore wind resources in the world and we
    are moving towards the delivery of offshore wind energy at a rapid pace.
    More offshore wind capacity entered the planning system last year than
    ever before and we have a robust, and growing, pipeline of projects in
    place.

    "We have already set out a clear pathway to achieving our
    2030 offshore wind targets and our new Future Framework for Offshore
    Renewable Energy, set to be published next month, identifies the key
    actions Ireland will take to deliver 20 gigawatts of offshore wind by
    2040 and at least 37 gigawatts by 2050. We have invested a lot of time
    and resources in building the necessary legislative and regulatory base
    to develop a sustainable industry that delivers for Ireland and Europe.
    We look forward to working alongside the leading industry figures here
    today at WindEurope conference as we move closer to Ireland’s future as a
    global leader in renewable wind energy."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 mammychicken


    This is excellent and deserves repeating, well said Sir.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    It's hot air! Glib dismissal of the Scientific consensus based on nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    nothing there you quoted gave any costings just the usual waffle from Eamon



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    No sources! Here is a 200 billion that is more believeable from an energy site..

    https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Offshore-Wind-To-See-200-Billion-Expansion-By-2025.html

    In short it summarizes

    'Declining costs, government incentives, and remarkable technology advances are set to boost the world’s offshore wind capacity 15-fold '

    Again Where's yours?



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,924 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    carbon as an energy source is this generations "horse manure"

    we will get rid of the problem as the did 200 years ago



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


     Mar 07, 2020 on that article and the graph in it shows higher prices than nuclear too 😂

    That’s long before recent 70% rises in offshore wind costs and likes of orsted verging on bankruptcy

    So once again show us the costing of the 37GW offshore by 2050

    All we have from Eamon is the amount, type of wind and date

    No costs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,750 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    That was written in March 2020, covering the period 2020 to 2025. How is it going so far?

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,584 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Are you just on here because you have so much time on your hands that you thought it would be a good idea to waste others time by posting the first nonsense that enters your head and then resorting to lying when it is shown as nonsense ?

    Two days ago on this thread I replied to you and posted a link (Page 1047 #31406) from BVA Associates, a U.K. company that provides strategic consultation in renewable energy, focusing on wind, that gave detailed breakdown on the cost of offshore wind capital costs. Eamon Ryan`s department have used them as consultants on this 37 GW proposal, but strangely do not appear to have asked them to price it.

    Not only did you completely ignore that, now just two days later you are lying as to you not being given the source.

    If you need any further proof of how expensive offshore wind farms are compared to your fantasy figure, then check out the Northland Mitsui contract that they jointly agreed last year with Taiwan to build a 1GW offshore wind farm there that Mike Crawley CEO of Northland Power estimates will cost $9.5 Billion.

    When it comes to costs for offshore I would have a bit more faith in BVA Associates and Northland Power that your two sources. A randomer internet post on Quora and Meithal Na Gaoithe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,476 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Did you read anything in my post? I've no idea what this rant is about. I never mentioned Eamon Ryan. Perhaps you are confusing whatever it is that you think you read on your C drive with reality?

    I work in the industry, have done for over 20 years and delivered a lot of the existing wind. There is no way we are tripling our current portfolio in 6 years given the global logistics and financial issues at the moment. Especially when 1-2 of those years will be wasted on planning applications and appeals. That's before we get to the problem of Eirgrid and Esb having no way to connect it and no way for the market to manage it. So yeah, I don't need the Minister for naps and empty promises to tell me everything is awesome. A quick read of his Framework and my own experience says otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    No costs breakdown for the 200Bn quoted earlier either. From what I can gather the cost per Mw currently is 1-2 million. So as a rough guide say 1.5 million per Mw. or 1.5 Billion per Gwatt. As a rough guide then 56Bn for 36GW not 200Bn. I don't know where that estimate came from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,750 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    There is a political row going on in the background about the role of Eamon Ryan and the CRU.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2024/03/03/eamon-ryan-accused-of-blocking-economic-activity-in-data-centres-row/

    Energy infrastructure takes years to plan and build, there is little building going on and no significant projects delivered under the current ministers tenure, we are experiencing the damage in terms of energy pricing, we are already on edge as regards energy availability, in no small part due to the current ministers intransigence (e.g. LNG terminal). These problems are not going away, none of the targets are releasable in the time-frames given, we need a reset now.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Basically you are saying, aside from the namecalling, that the Minister and his Department know a lot less that you. I see.

    I would trust his statements rather than yours, another randomer on the internat as you like to put it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,584 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Obviously you didn`t read that article before posting it. If you had you would have seen it for the B.S. it is. But then that hasn`t stopped you doing likewise in the past.

    It`s and article from 2020 that states " …capital expenditure in offshore upstream is set to stabilize until 2022 and then drop through 2025…" Capitla expenditure in offshore rose by 60/70% in 2024 resulting in companies who had recieved contracts prior to that pulling out of those contracts worldwide to avoid going bankrupt. The U.K. could not get a single bid for offshore offering in 2023 because of that 60/70% increase in costs.

    Even back as far as 2022 it was obvious where costs were going with many posters here pointing out where all the major wind turbine producers alone annual results for the year showed they were losing billions.

    As to your "where`s your`s" You have got mine now twice within the last two days



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    You are wrong! I see no link in that post!

    'Eamon Ryan has now admitted that it is not even technically possible and will not be for the next 20 years if ever. Not difficult to see why, the U.K. had two such arrays. First one turned to mush and the
    second,the Hywind array, in the North Sea is being towed lock stock and barrel to Norway this summer for "heavy maintenance" that would be unsafe to carry out in situ after just 7 years into a siupposed 27 year
    lifespan and Atlantic storm waves are on average 50% higher than those of the North Sea.'

    Admit you were wrong about Eamon Ryans supposed statement and about the Hywind array.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Again you show no sources! At least i do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 404 ✭✭Banzai600


    the reach of data centres into the economy is far reaching for jobs, logistics, investment, local business etc.

    also, curtailing airlines to fly in / out - this is also madness. Airlines wont run at a loss, these planes dont only carry ppl. they carry cargo, imports and exports. Again, thriving industries depend on them. Why base yourself in a country that thwarts your growth ? you think investors care , big companies etc could pull the plug at will, which they can do very easily across any sector.

    The Greens are like a cult, im sick of them. We do our bit, conserve water etc, recycle etc. Ireland wont save the world, we can participate to a limit, do our bit.

    But if we end up on our own, we have nothing to fall back on. Try pedal a sob story to the EU when we are on our knees , see where that gets us, with our out of control national debt spending and our new responsibilities and the endless money pit we have to keep topping up.

    government will only act when its too late - regardless who we vote in. i just hope it doesnt come to such a scenario. It will be barren lands from there on in, like mad max. fend for yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    The concerns are worldwide to the climate and resources. If the fossil fuels run out or become very expensive what do we do? At least with wind energy we have a home grown to aa large extent electricity supply and if done right something we could export.

    below is a link of how we are making real progress in spit of the naysayers on this thread..

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2024/0209/1431320-wind-energy-ireland-report/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    none of which is offshore

    And our electricity bills never been more expensive and only going up unlike France which has cheaper cheaper and 1/6th the co2 emissions of us

    Oh and they welcome datacenters and jobs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 404 ✭✭Banzai600


    ive nothing against wind or solar power. but get up and running before you cut your legs off at the knees.

    you cant have a society without enterprise and employment. and if there was the start of an exodus, you wont stop it.

    but you also cant tell companies to do less business and hang on until they are allowed to go back to full steam as such.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,476 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Believe what you like. In 6 years, you'll have to face that you were lied to by someone who is driven by an agenda and has to pander to his followers, when our portfolio hasn't tripled. Or worse still, it has tripled but our electricity prices are many multiples higher than they are today because the market design does not allow for the levels of curtailment in place, but we have to pay for the unused and unwanted renewables anyway.

    By all means ignore anyone from industry, especially anyone who was involved in the design of the market, wrote any of the policies, who operated the system or who connected much of the existing 5GW. They dont have a clue. Some genius in Leinster house, far from the action, that's who really has their finger on the pulse. Especially when that someone will soon be out of a job when the pragmatists take over...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,725 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    And they have a Nuclear industry! Not something we would like here.



Advertisement