Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Hamas strike on Israel

1123212331235123712381579

Comments

  • Posts: 502 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So you think it "possible" that Hamas moved to the designated safe zones also. Why on earth would they do that and endanger their very own exhausted and terrified elderly parents, wives and children? And it can't just be because they banked on Israel to be more humane to the civilians than they were because Sinwar made clear that "necessary sacrifices" had to be made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,109 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    Few facts, prior to October 7th, Israel had killed 234 Palestinians in 2023. Again during a so-called ceasefire. Where was western media's outrage at that? Israel has thousands of Palestinian hostages, again held from well before October 7th. Where is western media's outrage to have them returned?

    Hamas have committed war crimes. That's known. Not all the ones that were reported and never retracted but they have committed them and I support the ICC's investigation of them and prosecution of the leadership of Hamas should they be arrested and tried. A war crime is a war crime, regardless of who committed it. Hamas are not guilty of ethnic cleansing and genocide however. Israel are and the west are complicit. Even Piers Morgan has stopped with the "do you condemn Hamas for October 7th".

    Do you support Israel returning hostages they've captured? How about being tried for genocide and war crimes? What about land they've annexed which is illegal under international law?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,109 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    You never answered the question. Do you think its OK for Israel to fire on populated areas under the assumption there "may" be Hamas operatives there?

    Do you think the British would have been correct in targeting Irish civilians under the assumption there "may" have been IRA present?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    Should IDF soldiers avoid public spaces in Israel now that they are at war? Like that is your argument, right? Civilians can be killed due to the irresponsible placement of their country's soldiers? That Hamas can bomb anywhere as long as they kill a member of the IDF?

    Save boards.ie by subscribing:

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419316/the-boards-ie-subscription



  • Posts: 502 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "May" have been evidence doesn't quite cover it in the present situation though does it? Rockets launching out from among civilians and militants with weapons clearly observed and add the tunnel network into the mix and that makes a lot more than "may".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,811 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    So, no condemnation of Hamas for their actions on 7 October from you. Unlike you, I don't take direction from Piers Morgan.

    As for returning 'hostages', including the ones convicted of murder? Those, too?

    I believe there should be trials for crimes across the board. Do you? Sinwar on trial?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,109 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    That's a negative on the answer so then yeah? You share Matt Miller's statement that civilians are fair game?

    Cheers bud!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    This is a genuine questions as I can't remember. Have you condemned Israel's actions pre-October 7th, and have you condemned their war crimes since?

    Save boards.ie by subscribing:

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419316/the-boards-ie-subscription



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,811 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Pre-october 7th: Nope, this thread is about the Hamas strike on Israel on October 7th. This was the first thread involving Israel I've participated in here.

    Post-october 7th: War crimes are alleged, I've consistently said trials and convictions are the right way to resolve them. Shouting about them here accomplishes nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,775 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    I suspect it depends on who the civilians are for Mark Miĺler. Mark Regev stated he wouldn't support a 2,000 pound bomb being dropped in a residential area of Tel Aviv to target Hamas fighters. "We would find another way"

    The only conclusion to be drawn is that's because Israeli lives matter more than Palestinians. This is why the recent rescue operation would likely draw criticism if it had been 100 Israeli civilians that were killed during a rescue operation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,109 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    It in a nutshell. Maybe if we redefine what civilians are the numbers won't look quite so bad?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,811 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    I have more than a shred. That wasn't the question I answered though, and as you know I've been on here discussing Oct 7 since it happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ”I condemn Hamas for their war crimes”

    “Aha! Hamas supporter!”

    IMG_5141.jpeg

    we’re back to people acting as self appointed witch hunters and demanding 3 Hail Marys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,905 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Just to clear things up.

    If Hamas are hiding amoungst civilians, it's a war crime.

    If Israel bomb hamas whilst Hamas are hiding amoungst civilians, it's a war crime.

    Hamas have, and still are committing war crimes. Israel have, and still are committing war crimes.

    I personally condemn both groups for their atrocities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    This seems to be a difficult concept for a lot of the far left (and few far right) posters here that both sides in this conflict are worse than each other

    So they jump down the throats of anyone who points at the naked elephant in room



  • Posts: 502 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Someone bringing up the North brought the priest Alec Reid to mind, the one who commenced the hard slog towards peace and how he said the only side he was on was on the side of the next person to be killed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,001 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    That guy's argument is f**king horrific.

    He says "let's be honest about 'civilian casualties" when what he is really saying is "let's make an assumption about where the sympathies of these people lie so that we can re-define the term 'civilian' to mean something that makes disproportionate or indiscriminate use of violence against them more palatable to the sensitivities of the modern world that otherwise doesn't tend to believe that achieving a good outcome (rescuing hostages) invariably means that all means are justified."

    It's 1920 and the Black & Tans are terrorising Irish people? Well tough **** Paddies, you guys harbour sympathies for the rebels. It's the 70s and the Provisional IRA has considerable support in West Belfast? OK, time for massive airstrikes on the Falls Road. This is all justified because — let's be honest about the meaning of civilians — these particular civilians had it coming.

    It's such a crap argument. Is this guy going to perform a case-by-case study of the 7 October Israelis who were slaughtered and ask how many of them were "ambassadors" for violence against Palestinians or where their sympathies lay on the topic, which — going by his warped logic — might somehow make them something-other-than-civilian-so-OK-to-kill?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    If you believe trials and convictions are the way forward, you must have an issue with Mossad's nine-year campaign to detail the ICC from prosecuting Israel for war crimes.

    Do UN investigations carry any sway or do you determine everything by court case? Have you formed opinions on Hamas's war crimes without court cases?

    Save boards.ie by subscribing:

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419316/the-boards-ie-subscription



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Russia started its war with Ukraine. Israel didn't start its war with Hamas.

    Hamas hides behind civilians. The Gazan health ministry is run by Hamas and is thus an untrustworthy source. I guess that you think that the 4 hostages should have been left there in Nusseirat and thus that you think that Jews don't count.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,605 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Back again to enlighten us all with your shrewd analyses. Hiding behind civilians isn't an excuse to kill those civilians, as had been stated above. I think it was pointed out to you before, but regardless, the Hamas Health Ministry's statistics are generally accepted as being accurate. The fact that Israel don't contradict them at any opportunity probably tells most people what they need to know about them, plus it also shows that the IDF don't seem to bother counting the numbers they kill. Throwing out casual accusations of anti-Semitism isn't analysis either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Ben-Gvir fled public speaking gaggle after a rescued hostage accosted him about “blood on his hands”

    https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/s/Xkyx6byRsv

    IMG_5143.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,017 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Really odd it seems in turn Israel changes the ceasefire plan, now Hamas. Hopefully that means they are closer to a plan that can be agreed by both sides.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    At least they talking and there’s diplomacy happening

    Meanwhile the thread favourite Trump is busy dealing with his pornstar issues



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Incidental killing of civilians in war is not criminal - it has also happened in British and American airstrikes that were aimed at ISIS. Hamas was in control of all of the Gaza Strip on Oct 7 and was thus responsible for the welfare of civilians in the Strip. I guess you'd expect that, if WW3 breaks out and Russia fires a nuclear missile that destroys a city in a NATO member state, NATO would not fire one in response.

    As for the Gazan health ministry's casualty numbers, there's no indication that Israel ever accepted them in this war or any previous war. The numbers have not been proven. Healthcare workers in Gaza could be either under duress by Hamas or are sympathisers with Hamas. For example, Dr Ghassan Abu Sittah is not allowed to enter the EU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,605 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    You've tried this before, it isn't incidental killings when the IDF are deliberately targeting them. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about and are just trying to parrot Israeli talking points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,109 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    Ah. Another who believes the world according to Israel only started on October 7th even though they've just celebrated their 76th birthday. Getting remarkably close to that cursed 8th decade.

    Funny you'd call into question the Gazan health ministry figures given that even Israel have relied on them. But you're right I'd be reluctant to believe them also, they have been stuck on 35k for well over a month now.

    Regarding the hostages, no I think they should have been returned to their families. Why would Bibi have turned down multiple opportunities to get them back? We know the going rate for Arabs is ~1027 to 1.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilad_Shalit_prisoner_exchange

    Who knows, maybe the Israelies didn't have enough in the bank? Maybe inflation had kicked in?
    Given that prisoner swaps and ceasfires are the most reliable form of hostage return, why would the Israelis have been so against them?

    So tell me. Is 68.5 dead Palastinians for each returned hostage a good ratio?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭CorneliusBrown


    you forgot that Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East and that they treat transsexuals much better in Israel than Gaza



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,109 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    It's probably been mentioned on the thread already, but if it wasn't so tragically ironic, the most antisemitic thing you can do is to murder semites, you know, what Israel is doing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Kay.

    IMG_5145.jpeg

    Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestine isn’t about bringing them democracy or trans rights.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,775 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Oh. You should inform the ICC prosecutor Khan of that. Who starts something determines if crimes have been committed.

    Also the conflict has been going on well before October 7th. You clearly don't think Palestinians count when you continue to pass off their deaths as incidental. I suppose Its easier to believe that than confront your own bias and hypocrisy. I will repeat it again for you dropping a 2000 pound bomb on a refugee camp that kills scores of civilians is not the incidental killing of civilians. Still maybe I am wrong and if a few IDF soliders were killed along with scores of Israel civilians in an attack you'd describe their deaths as incidental.



Advertisement