Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings - updated 11/5/24*

18188198218238241031

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,189 ✭✭✭prunudo


    So seems the machines have moved into Clonmel, shame to see the lack of people protesting this, but after the election I shouldn't really be surprised either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Yes they are and will increasingly be. We already see war refugees being encouraged to leave state provided accommodation and seek their own in the private sector. The state will hand over €800 tax free a month for a room to help them. We have asylum applicants given their papers and leaving to look for rentals likewise. Then we have what is an unquantified and undocumented immigration problem, those who have come in, ignored the authorities and working away, start staying with friends etc. then compete in rental sector.

    Now address this please. Not good enough to pretend there are no knock on effects on the rental market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I dunno about that - the winds of change are a blowin. The vote for Independents is well up and FF/FG can waffle all they like over who has the biggest d**k but they know too that there is deep dissatisfaction and it'll blow their way as well.

    Look hard at what is happening in France & Germany.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I don't hold much hope but it would be nice if the people behind these protests etc see now they don't have national support and we could stop wasting scarce AGS resources on these 'peaceful' demonstrations and arson attacks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    I do enjoy your posts I’ve seen on here and I think you make some great points. I don’t know if I would take people not starting threads on an issue as proof that they don’t care though. Besides some people are only realising recently just how bad things are. I suppose uncontrolled mass immigration and men in tents on the streets of Dublin is bringing some of those issues to light



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Now we have this :( https://www.rte.ie/news/europe/2024/0611/1454145-ecj-refugee-status/

    "The European Court of Justice has ruled that refugee status may be granted to female asylum seekers who have, over time, adopted the values of equality between men and women in their EU host countries.

    The ruling could have far-reaching implications for the granting of refugee status where female applicants in particular are at risk of persecution in their home countries."

    Just which tail is wagging the dog here?? This could be devastating for the survival of European culture, flood EU states with any woman who claims persecution in their own country of birth, to then invite over their relatives and so on.

    Someone will have to stop this rot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭Blind As A Bat


    I used to work in that area as well. Always used to think of Patrick Kavanagh, We may have to change the words of 'On Raglan Road soon' ……… there's a tradition in Irish music of giving new words to old tunes. After all Kavanagh put his words to the tune of Fáinne Geal an Lae -

    'On Raglan Road, on a summer's day

    I saw the tents and knew ……….'

    Anybody care to finish the stanza?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Change will have to come from Europe, where a move to the right will drive change to the EU's immigration policy which was set up decades ago for a very different Europe.

    The loss of seats for the European Green parties shows that people want Net Zero immigration not any other Net Zero..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Aw here we go — another session of shoving words into my mouth. Firstly, I don't think it's a "great idea" to have refugees / asylum seekers "rock up and get their papers". I've never said anything of the sort. It is simply the outcome of a global geopolitical reality that we have to find ways to manage and control as best we can — and most often is a pretty negative thing.

    To your other point, I live in a tiny one bedroom flat with my girlfriend as we save up for a deposit. But I'm not going to hide behind that — even if I had the space I'd be very reluctant to take anyone into my home. But judging the integrity of people's views on other people by a measure of "would you take them into your own home" is a cynical moral threshold that practically nobody could consistently attain. I watch the Derek Blighe-types on Twitter asking people this as if it were the biggest hole-in-one 'GOTCHA!!' of all time. They don't of course apply this same moral integrity threshold to themselves as regards the people they claim to champion and be terribly concerned about — the young Irish people stuck in financial limbo or indeed the Irish people on the streets or in crap temporary lodgings somewhere.

    Privacy and the quiet enjoyment of your property is a thing in life. If someone advocates compassion for the homeless, I'm not going to call them a hypocrite for simultaneously not wishing to take a random homeless person into their own home. So I don't know why you're throwing that moral standard at me as if I'm throwing it at anyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,189 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Ah yes, you'd prefer people who you don't agree with to be out of sight, out of mind. But I hate to break it to you, these protesters do have support from around the nation. There are plenty of people on their side. Just because they're aren't in a majority, doesn't mean that their opinions or views should be brushed away.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Yah fair enough. But if an argument is consistently advanced that the state must live up to it's supposed international obligations and that we must accept anyone who arrives on our fair shores, then the proposers of that argument must accept the consequences and the challenges of how we accommodate, feed, employ, service, pay these people.

    I've stated that I have self serving reasons why I'm opposed to the current situation and they are very good reasons. It affects us as a family and it has affected my business. Just like it has affected many voters who turned away from political parties who propose the laissez faire arguments you propose.

    So if you or others are going to defend the government policies and actions, then it's up to you and others to give sensible solutions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭zerosquared


    Oh no, we are about to see an increase in Middle Eastern young lads who suddenly identify as female now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,746 ✭✭✭celt262


    Thats a good thing there isn't enough ladyboys in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭LongfordMB


    It's becoming more and more clear to me that the correct approach to all this is to process asylum seekers outside EU soil in a range of third countries, burn the boats of the human traffickers, and return any asylum seekers who do make it here to those safe third countries for processing.

    Anyone who says we should deport is actually being too soft. We must know if they genuine refugees or not before they touch European soil, given the social and economic cost of their presence here. The key is to not have to deport anyone by going on the front foot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    I'd say if they've a phone and clothes that cost several months' rent of hard working people and they have a few grand to pay a trafficker - they're no more a genuine refugee than I am a Spitfire pilot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 557 ✭✭✭Marcos


    Now what do they think is going to happen when the next crash comes around? There will be more cuts and austerity but we won't have so much space to cut budgets, especially with the billions being spent on asylum seekers. Do you think people are going to be happy having their welfare, pensions cut, or tax increases while more and more asylum seekers are going to be coming in with their hands out?

    I hope it doesn't happen, but think if it does, it's going to be extremely ugly.

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I'm quite happy for anybody to peacefully protest. I just think this might be a good time for the anti-immigration movement to reflect on their approach around rioting, assaulting gardai, vigilante road blocks, intimidation and arson.

    I think it hasn't gone down well with the voters. It also looks a bit silly when you're all pretending to be concerned about security and shortages, yet take part in these protests, which are regularly dangerous and waste scarce Garda resources.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭Blind As A Bat


    "you're all pretending to be concerned about security and shortages, yet take part in these protests"

    Careful now, that could be libellous. I, for one, have never attended a protest of any kind in my life, nor have I assaulted or intimidated anyone, threatened them with physical violence or committed arson.

    I am very keen on knitting though so you can call me Madame DeFarge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,220 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    I agree.. voting for extremes and bringing US type left v right politics here is depressing . That is why centrist parties like FF and FG keep getting votes in Ireland . There is no appetite for drama in this country .

    Many of these elected candidates in the locals and EP are voted for on a personal basis so people will vote for what affects them personally and candidates they know .

    I don't think it can be classified as older , settled people vs younger, I and others of us have said we all have children/ young adults living at home, so all , young and old , have a vested interest in housing .

    The difference is that not everybody feels that asylum seekers and refugees , while it is a poorly handled situation , is the reason our children are still living at home . Most older people can see this problem has been developing over the last 14 years and the hands off approach by consecutive housing ministers along with no priority being given to its solution by government has led us to this .

    This is the main issue in the next GE and Simon Harris is very correct in noting that a good Locals and EP elections are not an indicator for a future GE . They cannot afford to be complacent . They will have to get the finger out now and try to pull off a pretty amazing turnaround somehow to affect change .

    If anything the electorate's very firm rejection of the recent referendum shows the nuanced and maturity of the Irish people and has given this government a good reason to be nervous .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I think there's some decent points there but I'd argue, firstly that we don't have a 'free for all' approach to immigration. Certainly in terms of IPAs I think we have an approach which is quite centrist in it's origins and in why it's been retained. If you look around you'll see we're broadly similar to the rest of Europe.

    I agree we need to look to why young people are moving to the far-right. I'd draw the line at admonishing people for being elitist and condescending towards them. Let's not forgot what far-right parties have historically done to their political opponent and other groups they disliked FFS.

    I think lack of education around immigration is a big issue. I think too many drawn to the far-right get their ideas about immigration from that same far-right and the 'border control' TV shows.

    I believe too that a lot of older centrist voters would love to do more on peoples struggles with housing (many will be struggling themselves) but feel just as helpless on the issue as those drawn to the far right.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    "I think lack of education around immigration is a big issue."

    That is the same old patronising Pat Paddy on the Head stuff. Same as uttered by our esteemed leaders in government, most of those in opposition and those who have skin in the game in terms of advocating for immigration.

    There needs to be a real and genuine acceptance that many citizens have real and genuine cause for concern over the direction of our society. Not just flaccid lip service as in 'sure we know there are concerns but it's like this, yous don't really understand what we're doing and why blah blah etc etc'

    There are many citizens who see & understand very well indeed. And who don't need to be patronised with claptrap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    When people are offering blantently incorrect ideas along the lines of 'we have a far-left free for all immigration system' I think it's fair to suggest they're poorly informed on the issue.

    By all means challenge how our system works, and present alternatives, but there's nothing far-left or extreme about it. The origins of today's asylum systems lie in the practicalities of dealing with large amounts of refugees after ww2. It's largely centrist governments who've retained these systems, for lack of a better alternative, and I believe because they also serve a function of keeping people from living undocumented.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,129 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    It's not even a lack of education, it's the constant lying about it all. Asylum seekers will pay for our pensions, they don't put a strain on housing or other services, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    And perhaps others need to reflect on their own biases and misconceptions. We are a sovereign state and like other every state have a basic right to control our borders and decide just who is allowed into the state and who should be refused entry. We work as a society to improve our own country and to support our own citizens who are in need of help in any way. We elect a government to spend our taxes wisely and for the benefit of Irish citizens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    We have decided as a state who to let in and who not to let in. We let in people seeking asylum, and turn away people who don't but only when they they don't meet other criteria, which again we have set.

    Nothing far-left about that, it's broadly the same as what the rest of the western world has done.

    Some political groups have suggested changing this but, as I'm sure you're aware, they've been widely rejected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,129 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    There are 6000 people who this government have granted to asylum who don't have housing.

    We could make a massive super human effort, spend about €1b to build accommodation and give them all a place to live.

    What do you think would happen then? Surely we would get 12,000 asylum seekers the next year all looking for a place to live, places that don't exist.

    Do we build places to live for them as well? What if we get 50k people the next year, maybe 100k the year after that? If you took the first 10k, or the first 20k, then you've got to take them too, right?

    It's too late to close this can of worms. There is no political will to even discuss putting some sort of cap on the numbers. Their only solution is going to be more government spending and more numbers.

    Eventually something will break, unfortunately we're a long way off that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,364 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    We let failed AS stay, which I think we should change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump


    They've been moved on, but more barriers are in place, this is has gone well beyond a joke.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    There's far more legal foreigners coming into the country than asylum seekers. A zero refugee policy is going to make zero difference to our need for housing. Is your next step to then ban all foreigners coming into Ireland and ask any foreigners here to leave?

    Post edited by Augme on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Why are you so permissive of our country being scammed by non genuine people?

    You always reply saying how stopping them isn’t going to solve the housing crisis without engaging with the main point that they shouldn’t be here at all, housing crisis or no



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement