Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The accelerating fall in Sinn Féin support

1444547495074

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭Relax brah


    no great surprise the armchair uneducated SF supporters who 90% of the time knew not of what they were speaking about probably didn’t even bother to go and vote

    wake up call from that mouthpiece Mary Lou and that horrible bully Pearse Doherty. Back in box



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,907 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Eoin O Brion is on newstalk now. He’s giving a fairly honest assessment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Possibly seeing his opportunity. Although I doubt he's popular with the inner council.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,907 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    well he’s given a better account of his party then some of the posters here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭ToweringPerformance




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It is a big issue, it just isn’t the only issue, hence why the far right didn’t do better. But the votes they did get, I suspect were mostly votes SF would ordinarily have gotten.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,093 ✭✭✭growleaves


    But Irish people don't want to vote for the far right - they want a legitimate Irish party to handle immigration properly.

    Hence SF's failure to act as a safe vehicle for immigration/refugee restrictionism damns them with people who would welcome, as in Denmark, a left party that put the lid on mass inward migrations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭coolshannagh28


    Simon Harris ate the SF backroom boys lunch ...he has comprehensively outmanoevered them in double quick time on Immigration and by recognising Palestine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,783 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    But if people who want radical change in immigration policy are just going to keep voting for the established parties regardless, then those parties are unlikely to institute that change…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭carfinder


    You are quick to dismiss other opinions as "nonsense" but you are very light onwhat you think are the causes of the slump I. Support. Simply saying that too much is made of the immigration issue and that its "more complicate (sic) that (sic) that" without actually articulating what the issues are is not adding anything to the debate. You're simply saying that I and others are wrong, without presenting an alternative



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭carfinder


    Indeed not entirely free, much to the annoyance of some of the hard core lefties. Paying €25 a week rent for an A rated house which cost maybe 300k or 400K is definitely not free housing but its not far off. Add another €5000 exceptional needs grant to furnish it as well - yep, no such thing as free housing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭tarvis


    let’s see if the changes continue when the count are over -



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,736 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon


    SF housing proposals would be disastrous if implemented. Eoin OBroins 'expertise' is hyperinflated.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What are the far right’s policies on housing, cost of living, health, education, justice, economy etc etc?

    A party that runs on a singular issue will appeal only for those whose concerns are limited to that issue, most people capable of critical thinking know that there is more than one issue to be considered when voting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,093 ✭✭✭growleaves


    It's not a stable situation long-term but yes for now the established parties can defy the electorate on immigration on the basis that there is no viable party to replace them at present.



  • Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If it was simple about immigration then we would have anti immigration local candidates elected and there wasn't.

    Some of the complications are: Too many left or left leaning parties, apathy, unlike the rest of Europe we always tend towards consences and the middle ground.

    Plus no matter how it's spun immigration is not the number 1 issue for the majority of the electrate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Grassy Knoll


    agree there is now a large floating vote which switches around, Labour picked it up under Eamonn Gilmore, Sinn Fein picked it up the last time, it may move again … Also agree re the hard right element, pleasing to see they didn’t make inroads, utterly negative, decisive and shallow narrative



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭Relax brah


    Simon Harris is a decent hard working educated man not a bully or racist like them SF councillors. The sooner the better that party is disbanded



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭Relax brah


    Scum Féin is what they should be rebranded



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭carfinder


    You seem to conflate, repeatedly, the electorate as a whole, with the 30 odd percent of it that, up until recently, supported SF. The thread is about the drop in support for SF but you keep talking about the electorate as a whole. The drop in support for SF was driven, in part, by their stance on immigration - you seem very invested in discounting this reason as contributing to their fall in support. There will, unfortunately, be at least 1 anti-immigration Councillor elected



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 11,173 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    They are not defying the electorate, they very much represent the electorate and most likely will continue to do so for a very long time.

    You on the other hand need to stop relying on UK/US style political analysis because it does not work very well in Ireland or Switzerland (where I now live). Both countries are unique in that citizens make strategic decisions about the direction of their country through constitutional referendum. And that makes most voters more knowledgeable on issues and multi issue voters. Most voters will accept there are issues in relation to housing, refugees, immigrants, healthcare and so on, but they will not accept the simpleton approach of blame it on the refugees, the banks, yada yada… they fully understand that the issues of state are more complex than that. And they want to see that in the parties the vote for. So yes they will vote a little left of centre, a little right of centre and that is about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Grassy Knoll


    I am not a Sinn Fein supporter or voter. However, I would give them credit for not tacking to the hard right on immigration as you would expect from a populist party. Turnout has not been mentioned much as a factor, but low turnout I would assume favour the more established parties…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,093 ✭✭✭growleaves


    You've been in Switzerland a long time is my understanding.

    The refugee issue here is a real concern for people. It has nothing to do with blame and scapegoating - hence why people won't vote for the far right (including me).

    People want an existing party, whether that is FG or SF, to handle the immigration and refugees issue properly.

    It has nothing to do, from the general public's point of view, with the populist rabble-rousing of Trump, Brexit etc. You are the one who is confusing the situation.

    Harris and FG have already started to recognise this in fact and pivoted their rhetoric and policy somewhat (though perhaps they are only feigning for votes?) but probably need to go further.

    Only a complacent person would think that just the establishment parties not losing to the most outlier fringe-elements is a stamp of approval to just continue piling in masses of people with little care for the details.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,093 ✭✭✭growleaves


    No one wanted them to "take the hard right" though but to act to restrict immigration and processes refugees in a safe and moderate way. If they can find some kind of a balance there they might be all right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,736 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon


    O Broin is regarded as a classic useful idiot within the top echelons of SF. In truth, so is McDonald. These people are pushed forward to fulfil and electoral function in the South, i.e. soften the image of the party and make them more credible from a policy/ social perspective. That makes them 'the smartest people on the room' within SF circles, which in no way makes them the qualified for positions where being actually smart counts.

    There have been numerous of this type tried by SF Young, idealistic, comic book republicans that are either very opportunistic or very naive. Forums like this are full of them and they dont even realise it. Tragic in a way.

    The party would love to be in a position to run a 'real' republican like Padraig McLochlainn as nominal leader but are afraid ge won't wash in Dublin.

    The softy SF types like OBroin will never wield any real power in the party however, because they have never got their hands dirty. You need the stripes, the years, the bodies. OBroin could have conceivably been seen as an heir to McDonald, but the big fact is that a catastrophic failure to covince people on housing will weaken his case. Either way, leader could change but leadership will stay the same.

    Brian Gillen, Spike Murray, Martin Ferris, Eddie Copeland, Gerry Adams, Tom Murphy, Tom McMahon. It doesnt matter if its OBroin or MLMD on the poster, you are voting for these dudes anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,783 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    It's hard to dispute that there is some degree of disjuncture between what the voters want on immigration and what they are getting from the government

     An overwhelming majority of voters (79 per cent) say that the Government should do more “to manage the issue of immigration

    But yeah if people are not going to shift their vote to parties proposing drastic changes to immigration policy then we have to accept that other issues are more important to them and that the established parties are by definition representing their voters in a broader sense…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Why would low turnout favour established parties?

    Have you not seen Sinn Fein on immigration? like every topic they are flip flopping alll over the place. Not sure why anyone would give them credit for that

    It's like every topic, they flip flop around like a fish out of water



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,093 ✭✭✭growleaves


    As another poster said in a different thread, even in these local elections we've seen a significant increase in Independents - they are now at 19%, not far off FFG.

    Political re-alignments take time, but if some supporters of SF have now rejected SF over immigration it isn't clear where those votes will end up exactly but the uncertainty over that also doesn't mean that the immigration issue has gone away definitively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Grassy Knoll


    simple statement , no judgement here, but FF / FG supporters would be more likely to be older, therefore with perhaps a mortgage, better established in terms of their jobs, perhaps wealthier, in turn more likely to vote, thus parties such as Sinn Fein could conceivably see a lower turnout of its supporters. General elections have higher turnouts of voters over second order local / EU elections, thus it could be argued SF is likely to have a better turnout of some of,its support when that happens. Of course there are a bunch of other issues which are in play e.g. policy, candidates, strategy etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    So in other words you think the low turn out was based on age :-)

    Some real noise been posted across the internet since it was figured that SF wasn't having the predicted win's but that has to be one of the best

    In reality the people who are doing just fine have little inclination to bother going to vote than the vocal group who have been shouting for years how they want to vote XYZ out.



Advertisement
Advertisement