Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Near Misses Volume 2 (So close you can feel it)

1143144146148149159

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,068 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    And if they apologise, it shows they understand that something they done wasn't correct. They start shouting at you like it is your fault, they think you are too blame and that view is reinforced, whether right or not. I don't need an apology either, I want them to understand that no one was hurt this time but that what happened was not appropriate or acceptable. Personally if they had a way of showing that they understood they got it wrong and would learn from it, I'd sooner not interact with them at all. Same reason that I am more understanding when someone looks panicked and apologetic, holds up their hands and mouths they are sorry. They know they have done something wrong, we don't need a conversation, they know the issue and there is a better chance they won't do it again for awhile. Same reason when I f*ck up, I always turn to them, raise my hands and shout sorry about that or my fault, no need for them to inform me or have a follow up.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,454 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    I think in Ireland we generally need to speak up more. Whether that is calling someone out for littering, bad behaviour on public transport or the examples in previous posts.

    As a society we are way too meek and prefer to mind our own business. The new phenomenon of being labelled a "karen" also hinders people speaking up.

    If you do not speak up then no one will. The Gardaí won't do it neither will the councils. I would like to think that someone who you had a go at would think about their actions later which might change what they do in future if for no other reason than having someone have a go at them again.

    I understand people not getting involved but I think it shirks your responsibility as a citizen.

    In Germany it is normal to pull people up on bad behaviour. You even see it if you don't wait for the green man at pedestrian light. "Es ist röt!!!". It normalises good behaviour whereas saying nothing normalises bad behaviour.

    maybe I am just naïve

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,454 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    I am sure you would and it proves my point that bad behaviour is normalised here. You are doing something wrong and when pulled up on it you react with aggression. That is the story of many of the posts on this thread.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    See where you're coming from but its difficult because at the end of the day, lots of things are subjective. Everyone has their own view of what happened, what should have happened, what's right, what's acceptable etc. If anything we're becoming too policing of each other's behaviour. And it most definitely should be for government/ local government to implement policies and legislation and for the Gardai to police unlawful behaviour. The fact that they don't or that there's been massive under resourcing/ neglect of the Gardai is another issue for another discussion.

    I'd love if people could just become a little bit more tolerant of each other, accepting of the fact that we all share public spaces (how you/ I want to see them used isn't necessarily how others do), and yes, certainly, considerate of others when we're in public.

    I'm married to a German and spend plenty of time over there. German culture has its good points, but god they'd also try your patience and some days the place just seems full of cranks. I don't mind because its a novelty and I'm only there for short periods, but my wife often can't wait to get out of the place.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,344 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Even when they don't apologise, even when they're roaring at you, there is merit in intervening. If you ignore bad behaviour in any context, family or workplace or on the street, the bad behaviour persists.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Even objectively speaking there are blurred lines between what is unlawful/ dangerous and what is simply ignorant/ selfish.

    Then you have to factor in the issue of subjective perception. Scientific studies have shown that even people who witness the same event will have different recollections of it even a short time after the event. How much of that is down to memory and how much of it is down to perceptive bias I don't know - driving too fast, driving too close, pulled in/ out too early/ late… we'll all have slightly different tolerances in the absence of real time data.

    Then you have the issue of what is considered 'reasonable' or 'polite' confrontation. Will a female driver perceive my dialogue through a closed window to be threatening or aggressive simply because of our genders, whereas a male driver would view it differently.

    Few of us (in my experience anyway) are masters of language and communication skills. So the further away from plain dangerous/ illegal and the closer to 'inconsiderate' driving we go, the muddier the waters and the more difficult it is to objectively determine fault and degrees of fault etc.

    Beyond an exasperated look and throwing of hands to the sky, 9 times out of 10 I just couldn't be bothered taking inconsiderate drivers/ cyclists/ pedestrians to task.

    I firmly believe that people's behaviour will only change when something becomes socially unacceptable, and generally things only become socially unacceptable when the authorities take action to confirm that to be the case, whether through legislation or advertising campaigns. Drink driving, seat belts, plastic bags, smoking, discrimination in the workplace etc etc. Attitudes have changed hugely in those areas in my lifetime. Unfortunately in other areas (fly tipping/ littering, general road safety) the government has shown no real interest in fixing issues, and so they persist. So while I'll appreciate efforts by individuals to try and educate other road users as to how to be less of a d!ck, I'd much prefer the government to take a long overdue proactive role.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,893 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    That is exactly the irish mentality. Do something wrong and lash out by shouting.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Don't see what's particularly Irish about it at all to be honest.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,344 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I don't think you have the right definition of social acceptable. Social means people, not authorities.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,068 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    I am just saying that once it starts, there is nothing to gain but making you feel better. Not saying don't do it, but if a person jumps out of a car to deck me for calling him out for poor driving, he isn't going to learn unless he gets arrested for assault and truth be told, as much as I care about road safety, I ain't being a martyr. Chances are that they will still believe themselves in the right.

    As someone else said, until enforcement breeds culture, then for a certain contingent, nothing will change.

    Hands up though, there are times where I don't practice what I preach and I fully engage. It achieves nothing but make me feel a bit better but it doesn't actually achieve anything.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Quango Unchained


    Has anyone seen @cyclingmikey on YouTube?

    He's a vigilante cyclist who goes around London filming bad road behaviour and sending it in to the police.

    He's got points, fines and bans for many many motorists - including a few celebrities.

    I'm not sure he'd survive an hour in Dublin.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    It wasn't a definition, it's a concept. The fact that social apparently means people not authorities has no relevance on what is deemed socially acceptable or not. If the authorities bring in a law aimed at changing people's behaviour for the general good of society, and that law gets public buy-in (see further - plastic bag levy, smoking ban, compulsory seat belt wearing), then it becomes socially unacceptable to be seen to be, for example, using plastic bags like they're confetti, smoking in a selfish manner in non-designated semi-enclosed public spaces, driving without a seatbelt etc.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    He's been discussed loads of times on here before. TLDR; opinion amongst cyclists is divided as to how much his modus operandi benefits other cyclists. I think he's been discussed to death on here… it's certainly not a debate I want to get into again 😂

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,344 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    He's the exact opposite of a vigilante. There's quite a few people doing the same thing in Ireland.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Quango Unchained


    Obviously depends on which definition you use. He does stays within the law himself but he is a private citizen undertaking law enforcement without authority from any public body.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    I might not entirely agree with his modus operandi, but there's no 'enforcement' in anything he does to be fair. Enforcement is arrest/ detention/ fining/ charging/ prosecuting/ sentencing. Private citizens are perfectly entitled to present evidence of law-breaking to the appropriate authorities where it affects them.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,344 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    He's not undertaking ANY enforcement. He's reporting people to the relevant authorities, same as any of us do when we see someone being burgled, or someone being assaulted. Enforcement is done by the police in all cases.

    What definition of vigilante are you using?

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 53,208 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    funny one today - not a near miss, dunno what you'd call it.

    heading west along the runway towards st margarets, the traffic was all backed up (spillover from the M50 which was at a standstill). there's a hard shoulder lasting maybe 100m near the end of the road, so i swung in there to overtake the stationary traffic; but the 'hard shoulder' is delineated with traffic cones. i popped back out into the main lane about 5 or 10m in front of a stationary artic beside one of the cones, and i felt something impact my foot or pedal, an immediate tearing noise and then a loud hissing noise; although still with something heavy on my foot. ****, i thought, puncture; but i'd actually managed to hook a sandbag (which was sitting on the base of the traffic cone) onto my pedal and had dragged it maybe 5m up the road with me. it was the noise of it dragging along the road which sounded like a hiss.

    to be fair to the lorry driver, he thought it was funny and sat there till i extricated myself, returned the sandbag, and got going again. gave me a friendly beep of the horn.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 476 ✭✭munsterfan2


    When there's a solid white line on a bend, no problem, just undertake on the house entrance…. https://streamable.com/ypxkj5

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭Wildly Boaring


    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 476 ✭✭munsterfan2


    Yup, this morning between Carickmacross & Ardee. I have the reg plate from the video… is there any point reporting ?

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    I didn't need to watch the clip to know that it was either a BMW or an Audi with fancy wheels and blacked out windows.

    Appalling stuff. We had one yesterday where the big BMW SUV driver decided to overtake on a solid white line and a bend. He had to jump on the brakes, stop dead on the other side of the road, because sure enough a car came around the corner towards us. He got a good blast of the horn for his troubles. Pure brainless stuff.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Edit: double post

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Definitely. That's too much of a disregard for so many rules of the road, not to mention criminal reckless driving offence, to let it go. Hopefully he has a few other notes on his record and the powers that be might actually crack down on him at some point.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,068 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Coming home in my car yesterday and there was a group of cyclists ahead. Small group, enjoying the fine weather but the road was too windy for an overtake. Anyway, I sit in for maybe 2 minutes (if even, probably only 1), road straightens up and widens out. Once it is clear, I overtook but the Merc SUV behind me, does the same but then starts blasting the horn and shouting (so it looked like in my rear view mirror), out the window at the cyclists. Not sure what the point was, their formation wasn't tight but it really didn't change anything as you couldn't safely have overtaken anyway. I took the reg but doubt it is worth my time to even report.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭Steoller


    Bandit country. Thought I recognised the road. Once you pass the Carrick roundabout on the N2 heading north, all bets are off on the driving you'll see.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Surely a public education campaign on the point of cycling two abreast would help to alleviate a lot of the grief and stress on the roads. Even for drivers - presumably a good proportion of them would relax a bit more if they understood that the cyclists in front of them weren't just being ignorant asshats?

    1. If they were to single out, they'd single out more or less in line with the outermost rider (in other words, you'd still have the same space for an overtake). Why? because that's the safest line to ride a) so as not to be run into the ditch, b) so as not to invite dangerous overtakes, and c) so that you're not cycling in kerbside detritus likely to increase your chances of a mechanical.
    2. If 6 cyclists two-abreast were to single out, you'd need to cover approx. 20 metres for an over take instead of just 10. The opportunities to make such a pass on secondary roads are much lower.

    Like, its been done to death on here - countless posts over the years trying to talk sense into someone who comes on for a rant. We all understand the logic, but try having that reasonable, calm conversation with the likes of your Merc SUV driver above… pointless. I know from experience, most family and friends who don't cycle are oblivious to the reasoning for two abreast in groups.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,479 ✭✭✭VonLuck


    Question about close passes and cycle lanes. If I am cycling in a cycle lane with dashed white lines (I think it's officially called a cycle track?) and a car is driving past, do they still have to give 1.5m distance from me legally speaking? I'm not sure if it's considered overtaking as they are technically in a different lane, but the risk is still the same.

    It happens all the time where people see the dashed line and then drive tight to it.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 53,208 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    they don't have to give you 1.5m as it stands, unfortunately - the proposed change to the law to stipulate that was not passed, and it remains a guidance only.

    if it's not actually considered an overtake, i suspect the law is silent on it.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,756 ✭✭✭CR 7


    Crossing a narrow bridge(on foot!) yesterday evening, the SUV coming from behind just couldn't wait for me to make it the less than 50m to the other side and just had to squeeze me into the stone wall to avoid the oncoming van that had stopped(due to the narrow bridge). All in a 50km/h zone.

    He then happening to be driving back out of my estate when I got there a few minutes later so I flagged him down and tried to have the polite conversation with him.

    "You should try to leave a bit more space when overtaking pedestrians."

    "I do loads of cycling and I thought I gave loads of space, I consider myself a very good driver."

    "I could have put my hand out and touched the car as you passed."

    "You know, I'm actually a cop..."

    "Then you should have even more awareness around more vulnerable road users."

    He drove off then, obviously had been expecting me to apologise for daring to question a "cop"...

    I know I was jogging and not cycling, but there's no equivalent thread and it's the same basic issue anyway, a lack of care towards anyone not in a car. It's a narrow bridge I have to cross if I want to run from home without driving to start somewhere. There's no footpath on the bridge, but it's only wide enough for one modern car at a time anyway so traffic generally waits at either side to give way and that leaves enough space for pedestrians/cyclists. The footpath is only on one side of the road either side of the bridge so you have to go on the same side of the road in both directions.

    I'm still undecided on whether I'll bother to report it, he didn't seem like the type to accept there's a better way to behave around pedestrians/cyclists.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


Advertisement