Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1110011011103110511061803

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It's a single game. Sample size.

    It's also entirely possibly they selected Healy for the opener because Crowley was going to be gone for the EI tour, because of cohesion.

    And we know how you feel about cohesion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    …and who Munster felt was their starter at the time.

    Where was it said Munster felt he was their starter? Or are you just inferring that from 1 start?

    I think it's fair to say at the start of that season that Healy was probably still ahead of Crowley, otherwise I think Healy would have toured SA.

    Fwiw, I don't think provincial pecking order necessarily comes into Andy Farrell's thinking, so I don't think we can infer this either. (JGP being the most high-profile example),

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    It's a figure of speech - it means he wasn't consistently started or playing at 10 until that Sharks game realistically in Europe.

    It matters because as a 22-year-old player with barely any rugby behind him, he could hardly expect to be playing 10 for Ireland if he wasn't playing there for Munster.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    Where did I say he wasn't going to get Ireland caps?

    Why are you constantly looking for things to get outraged by?

    Crowley was obviously a really talented player, but we only were really able to see that when he started to play. He wasn't going to make the RWC squad in the centres (where we were very settled with 4 top class options).

    If he hadn't gone on the EI tour, then by the time the 6Ns rolls around, he'd have likely only had a tiny handful of games at 10. There is no way based on that Ireland would have picked him.

    But, crucially, the point of all this discussion is that we did have the EI tour, and on the back of that, he was capped for Ireland shortly afterwards and then picked for the subsequent 6N and RWC. Once again, Jack Crowley is probably the best example of why the EI tour worked really well, despite your repeated attempts to claim otherwise.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    It's a single game following a season where he was clearly behind Healy.

    It has been widely reported that the provinces had the ability to pull guys from the EI tour if they felt they absolutely needed them during that window, and the player most frequently cited at the time in relation to this was Ben Healy, who Munster felt they needed as their first choice 10 during that window. If Munster saw Crowley as their first choice 10 (ahead of Healy, given Carbery was injured) then Crowley wouldn't have gone on the EI tour and Healy would have.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Why? He had played a lot of 10 just off the bench. like our backup 10 for several 6 nations games this year is 26 and only has 12 starting games at 10. Plus in this scenario he ends up provincial starter so adds up more

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    No, I'm also inferring it from the previous whole season where Healy played more than double the minutes of Jack Crowley.

    The rumour at the time of the tour was the Ireland wanted to bring Ben Healy on the EI tour and Munster pulled him out because they needed him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,732 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It's a single game. Sample size.

    Munster also played two preseason friendlies, Healy seems to have started both with Crowley benching in both.

    I'm sure Crowley got decent minutes but if Rowntree had big plans to make Crowley the man at 10, he was keeping his cards close to his chest.

    It's also entirely possibly they selected Healy for the opener because Crowley was going to be gone for the EI tour

    Surely then it would be even more important to give Crowley the game time at 10? Your anointed 10 is going to be missing, so you pass up the only chance to give him a run?

    I mean, you pulled the other poster up on "inferring" things but you seem to be doing the same, even when all the facts point in the opposite direction.

    I don't really care btw, we all ended up in the right place and it was inevitable Crowley would overtake Healy at some point, he's a vastly superior player, I'm just amused at the lengths people will go to deny any credit to the Ireland coaches here.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    He hadn't played a lot of 10, even off the bench at that point. I've made the point about three times now and you're consistently ignoring it that he'd had less than 550 mins at 10 coming into the season, and then only a handful of additional minutes there coming into the 6N. He'd played the majority of minutes that very season at 12 and 15.

    He was 22 years old and had a tiny body of work in any position at that point. Ciaran Frawley is a pretty different scenario coming into this 6Ns (where once again other players are injured) given he's demonstrated a strong body of work over the past 5 seasons or so. FWIW, I don't agree with him being in the Ireland squad as a 10 either (and think he's there mostly because of his versatility).

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Im not outraged im trying to understand your logic. Which dosent really make sense. Double digit caps are not enough but 4 vs poor opposition made him? What are we talking about here. He as a 21 year old started away to castres who won the top14 that year and won but a game vs the windhoek draft griques made him as a player?

    He was either good enough to start or he wasnt the goalposts that get moved for players is frustrating

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,136 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    probably the best thing about the tour is triggering yet another round of I’m not wrong your wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The previous whole season where we had a completely different coaching ticket?

    The rumour was that Ireland wanted to bring Ben Healy as well.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Why would a coaching staff trying to bed in a system build around a guy whos immediately gone for 2 months?

    And why does starter vs backup suddenly matter because it dosent elsewhere



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    If you dont agree with frawley then thats fair enough but just go with it instead of suggesting a 22 year old maby being a starter is worse than a 26 year old absolutely not being.

    Youd mentioned he likely wouldn't have played the 6n or wc warmups/wc hed have gad a lot more mins by then

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    …played 2 pre-season friendlies after the EI tour had been announced, right?

    I think it's fair to say we've absolutely no idea on way or the other whether it was Rowntree favouring Healy, or Farrell favouring Crowley.



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    There was an error displaying this embed.

    And it dosent matter anyway



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    My logic is simple - but I'll lay it out here again for you:

    At the start of the 2022/23 season Jack Crowley wasn't on Ireland's radar. He was third choice for his province, had a tiny handful of starts at 10. He clearly looked talented but he was very young, and I don't anyone anywhere including Jack Crowley would have said on Sept 1st 2022 that 12 months later he'd be in Ireland's RWC, including Jack himself.

    What changed that?

    Undoubtedly a few factors, one of the biggest being Mike Prendergast came in, changed Munster's attack to a style that suited Crowley's game. But even with that, he needed games at 10 to show that.

    If the EI tour doesn't happen, I think he remains backing up the other two and being asked to deputise in other positions because of his physical talent. I supremely doubt he'd have been capped against Fiji and Australia, and without that, and having hardly played at 10 for Munster over the next few weeks, he definitely wouldn't have made the 6N squad.

    The thing that massively changed this in the eyes of the Irish coaches was when he went to SA with the EI squad, started 3 games and played well. They saw him up close and likely saw his talent, his combativeness, his aggression, his leadership and his composure. I strongly suspect the report from the Irish coaches back to Andy Farrell following the EI tour was gushing in its praise of Crowley, and on the back of that he was the bench for the Ireland A game, and following a few injuries, made his debut against Australia.

    I don't think without the EI tour there is anyway he starts that game, and without starting that game (and generally acquitting himself well) he doesn't make the 6N squad either (given how he barely featured at 10 for Munster in the lead up to it).

    It's still not a given he wouldn't have been picked for the RWC anyway given how well he finished the season, but I'd say it was less likely if he hadn't been around the squad environment for the 6N.

    I've laid my logic on this out now, quite clearly, about 5 different times. I have no idea what point you're trying to make, other than just taking pot shots at the Irish coaching team.

    As I said, about 20 posts ago now it feels like, Jack Crowley is probably the best example of how well the EI tour can work.

    Now can you try and clearly explain your position on this please?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    No, it wasn't. That would have made zero sense - they were actually thinking Ciaran Frawley was their first choice 10 going into the tour, and he got injured on the eve of it, so they were initially picking two players to back him up. Jake Flannery at the time was always likely to tour as he was expendable for Ulster (they had Burns and Madigan).

    But even if we take your point - that Ireland wanted to bring both Healy & Crowley - the likelihood is Munster lobbied for a guy to stay. If Munster lobbied to keep Healy for that period, and Healy had played double the minutes of Crowley the previous season and started ahead of Crowley in the one game of that season so far, then of course it's fair to assume Healy was ahead of Crowley in the pecking order at that time. We'll never know this definitively but that's the best info available to us.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    2 months?

    This is the latest fairly wild and entirely incorrect assertion around the EI tour - the players had a 3 day camp, and then played 3 games in a 10 day period.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    My position is hes an incredibly talented player thats been highly touted for 5 or 6 years that played senior rugby and big games early and likely would have bee starter or backup 10 for most of a season under prendergast as well as filling in other spots (and we know this coaching staff values versatility)

    if a coaching staff cant see the ability without taking them away for two months with an assistant coach not even andy farrell the its a bad sign and suggests were missing out on some world class talent elsewhere because they havent gone on a tour with irish coaches

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    No, he wouldn't have.

    We've already laid this out - of the 12 Munster games leading to the 6N that year that he was there for, he started 2 games at 10, and in the second of those, he was moved to the centre and Ben Healy was moved to out half early in the second half. The vast vast bulk of his minutes in those games were coming at 12 or 15 - he started one game at 15 and was moved there in 2 other games, and started 4 games at 12. Of the 5 games where he wore the 22 shirt, he came on at 10 once, and in the others was always at 12 or 15.

    There is no way you can claim he'd have been picked as one of three 10s in the Ireland 6N squad based off this.

    If you go back through the threads on this very forum you'll see multiple posts where people were frustrated at how little time at 10 he was getting at that time.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    What are you on about by repeatedly claiming two months? FFS - it was a three day camp and a 10 day tour. It was barely 2 weeks, never mind 2 months.

    He had looked good in a truncated U20s campaign and had played a handful of times for Munster, where he was clearly third choice coming into the season. The idea that they'd just elevate him based on the perception of his talent (which was entirely unproven at that juncture) is utterly nonsensical.

    The EI tour is one of the best things that ever happened to Jack Crowley. Given his unquestionable talent he'd have made the breakthrough eventually, but I really doubt he'd have made the Ireland squad for the 2023 6N and the 2023 RWC squad without the EI tour.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    and started ahead of Crowley in the one game of that season so far…

    This isn't accurate. The EI tour squad was named before the season opener. It absolutely would've been a factor in the selection at 10 for that game.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Breakthrough In this case meaning he had to be starting most games in a specific position to be considered right?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,851 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    It's even higher than 4.5 times

    14 provinces x 40 players approx + 200 players playing abroad that they can select from = a playing pool of about 760 players.

    We have approx 160 professional players in Ireland.

    We absolutely do not have "incredible depth"



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Does more players dictate more depth of talent? Odd that kleyn got in there but not here then isint it? Rassie must be a bad evaluator of talent



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    Yeah, if you consider the context that it was a RWC season, and it was a really settled squad that won a Grand Slam in 2023.

    Don't get me wrong, summer tours or Nov internationals further away from a RWC, the bar for breaking through into thw Ireland squad is lower and we've seen the coaching ticket take chances on guys without as much experience, but if you take the context of that particular season into the mix, there is no way Jack Crowley would likely have made the 6N and therefore the RWC squad.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Why would you stop trying to get new talent in in a world cup year?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    You don't, and obviously Ireland didn't, given guys like Joe McCarthy, Jack Crowley, Mack Hansen, Jeremy Loughman and Jimmy O'Brien all made the breakthrough into the squad in the last 12 months before the tournament.

    But, unquestionably as the tournament comes closer the squad is getting more and more settled and the ability to break through is diminishing as that time progresses.

    I still don't understand what your point is here with all of this - setting aside the unquestionably frustrating timing of the EI tour, it's still something the Irish coaches are to be commended for and it worked very well for us.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    I dont think it made or should have made a difference in selection and it absolutely didnt change rowntree and prendergasts opinions

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


Advertisement
Advertisement