Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

1373374376378379410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,900 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    It absolutely isn't.

    I've said numerous times in this thread it's a process issue. PGMOL were using an external source to the game to re-referee the game and have since switched tact to now just use it for extreme circumstances (after previously admitting they didn't want to do this as to not embarrass their mates).

    What happens in the match absolutely does matter what happens for that one tackle. Some referees are more lenient than others. Some let more things go, but are consistent throughout that one game. When an external source comes in then after 30/60/80 etc mins and says no I want you to change that one tackle but ignore the relevance to others. Players know what referees will allow/not allow after the first few mins. There is regularly games taking place where the players know that the referee will allow a certain type of tackle to and so they will do it. And vice versa.

    The fact you can't see that and can only see the name of the player used in the examples says it all. I bet if I used a different players name, with the same process and outcome, you wouldn't be disagreeing. You keep referencing the player and his club, I keep talking about the process. And I have said I have no problem with the outcome of that incident either which makes it even stranger.

    But the referee saw it in front of his eyes and he said that it was a yellow card in accordance to the other tackles he had allowed/disallowed in the game and somebody else overruled him and said no it's different so was overrule. You can apply that to at least one game every single week of the league this season. That's the process that needs to change.

    If not, then just get rid of referees altogether and let cameras decide everything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭pavb2


    Tend to agree the most entertaining teams I’ve seen at Villa Park this season (apart from Villa) were Liverpool on Monday, Chelsea 2nd half in the recent draw and Arsenal who played well up until they got in and around our penalty area.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,003 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Just on the referees, I just noticed a couple of weeks ago how these same referees are very good in Europe. So my opinion has changed, it's not that they are terrible it's that they are being badly directed in England.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    I think it might end up having the opposite effect

    If attackers have that extra advantage then defenses will have to adapt and they'll adapt by dropping deeper.
    You'll see very few teams pushing up high to squeeze space and instead we will be watching teams sit off each other a lot more



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,972 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,077 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    The idea that something could be clearly and demonstrably wrong and yet couldn't be changed because you are out of challenges doesn't sit well with me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,054 ✭✭✭✭L'prof


    Don’t make frivolous challenges and then you can make as many as you like



  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What's stopping someone watching the action on near real time screens, and then relaying to the coach whether it's worth challenging or not?



  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Also, if you have your challenge(s) remaining in the last few days mins, could you use them to waste time?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,446 ✭✭✭✭Mushy


    One would assume the clock would surely stop. Could easily be done to slow down momentum though



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,244 ✭✭✭golfball37


    There needs to be a punitive aspect to raising a challenge and getting it wrong. NFL you lose a time out for example



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It was a disaster in rugby when they trialled it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭TheRona


    The punishment is that you lose a challenge. You get 2 challenges per match, but if it's a successful one, then you don't lose it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭TheRona


    Rugby works much better, but still far from perfect. The Rugby World Cup final was decided by an intervention by the TMO outside the scope of what they're supposed to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,972 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    I think what it means is there'll be no VAR intervention until the coach challenges a decision. If anything it should speed up the current situation because VAR won't review everything.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,874 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon


    Surely it should be a captains decision to challenge. The manager can't see half the pitch or will they rely on the captain to advise him to challenge?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭TheRona


    There's too much money riding on the Premier League to have the attitude that the incompetent officials will do their best, and we should be happy with it.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,900 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    I don't think I'd be in favour of the challenge system.

    The referees and referee decisions should be impartial and having managers trying to influence that muddies the lines a bit I think. It's already bad enough as it is, even if the referees get too much protection.

    Was it the MLS or A-League that had a feature recently where the referee explains what he says, and why he reached the decision he did. He was mic'd up so people could hear it. I think it worked. Makes the referee stand over their decision, and it's a bit easier to accept.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,003 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    This is exactly what would happen. You'd have someone, probably a retired referee review it and tell the manager how likely it is that the challenge would be successful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,240 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Foden has been named Premier League's Player of the Season.

    A very underwhelming choice in a poor Premier League season.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,003 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    If it was going to be a City player it should've been Rodri. If it had to be an England international, which we often see, it should have been Rice imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,240 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    True, but Rodri isnt a very likeable player, he is a master of the dark arts which doesnt endear him to other players.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Though the decision was correct. But when rugby tried the challenge system it was a mess for the reasons people have already suggested in this thread - frivolous challenges to disrupt play etc.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 36,223 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    Foden wasn't even the best player in the City team. Rodri was imperious in the majority of games and very good in the others.

    Grain of salt needed for awards this time of year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,195 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    I think the challenge system is a stupid idea, especially if it is addition to how VAR currently runs, as they should be reviewing all instances anyway

    A challenge system will lead to further pressure or bias, as there will be pressure to confirm these challenges, that the club think they missed or got wrong.

    Although it would be interesting to see all Man City challenges upheld, and the distribution for the rest of the teams😊

    How many VAR officials do we need to just do their job properly and make the right decisions. I mean we are talking about obvious mistakes that are been made, not small debatable instances most of the time.

    Now if they removed VAR and only used Goal line, auto Offside, then maybe a challenge might work for other stuff then. But will the refs still let things go as they know the team can challenge?

    But what if you challenge and obvious foul, 1 min or even 2min from the Goal (with no change of possession), at some point they'll have to say goal stands but it was a foul and you keep your challenge?

    Also with penalties, a foul is a foul inside or outside box, and they need to stop this minimum contact (especially trips at speed, or kicks to the back of legs), and mutual holding, because most times it obvious who's doing the real holding.

    And if you block a short on goal, or a cross to a Striker,with your hand, it should be a penalty, even if accidental, unless the ball would have hit the body anyway.

    And then we have the independent VAR review panel, made up of 1 premier league, and 1 PGMOL official out of 5, seriously how is this independent, can we get their reviews without these 2 and the majority of the other 3. Would be interesting to see the difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,205 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Wait until you realise just how open to interpretation the very concept of "wrong" is.

    Just look at the many VAR decisions that are incorrect, that fans disagree with, that have to be apologised for.

    Lost your two challenges because of horrible VAR decisions and now you can't challenge the Henry handball, oh the outcry will be amazing.

    Or, they could take a step back and remember that forcing VAR into the game isn't supposed to be the mission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,699 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Not sure about Foden as player of the year. But maybe that’s as much to do with him being very unlikeable and being a City player. Saka, Odegaard, Saliba and Watkins all worth a shout. Rodri does too much fouling to be considered for it in my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,331 ✭✭✭The Rooster


    A challenge system would result in less VAR interventions and stoppages. Not sure how that’s going over a couple of posters’ heads.

    And managers having someone with a screen telling them whether a decision should be challenged or not is perfect. That would mean challenges would, generally, only arise where a mistake has been made. Of course there would have to be a short enough time limit for managers to make the challenge.

    People losing all their challenges due to poor manager challenges is good too. If that means a team has no challenges left for the second half (for example) that’s on them. And it’s not like it’s a massive disadvantage, it’s just the same as having no VAR (which is what many want anyway!).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Xander10


    De Zerbri leaves Brighton.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 436 ✭✭Patrick Mahomes


    Brighton confirm DeZerbi will leave at the end of the season.

    Regards,

    P.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement