Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1752753755757758943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 347 ✭✭chalky_ie


    You honestly seem to live on another planet 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The figures have gotten even worse since I made my last post, so - then it was 68% at home up to the age of 29. Up to 34 is even worse, two thirds of adults in Ireland living in their parents homes in their 30s... Thats an utter failure of the state. Both for the 500k+ adults living at home, and for their close to 1million parents. Together approximately 40% of our adult population in the country.

    And, just to point it out on a new page, the comparable number for the EU as a whole up to age 29 is 42% - and that includes lots of countries that are much poorer than Ireland, and countries with much higher youth employment rates. And that percentage would be even lower if it stretched to 34 years old. We're an extreme outlier.

    The comparable number for our closest peer in most national characteristics (wealth, size, economy, education levels, population spread etc), Denmark, is only 4.4% of adults living with their parents. And again thats for adults living at home only up to age 29. It would be lower to 34.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    I suppose you mean youth "unemployment" rates



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In the 18 - 23 age group, wouldn’t a huge percentage of those living at home be in school and third level?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    That would equally apply to other countries in EU, and yet we are the outlier by all metrics



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    It's amazing how many stats relating to housing that we're an outlier.

    For instance overcrowding - we have one of the lowest % of people living in an overcrowded household in the EU. The EU average is 16.8% yet we're at 4.3%.

    600px-ILC_LVHO05A_values.png

    Apparently we simultaneously have the one of worst housing shortages in Europe and one of the lowest % of people living in overcrowded houses.

    Seems legit!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    That one was done before on this thread I believe - the overcrowding metric is ratio of people in household to all rooms excluding halls?

    So apartments with kitchen-diners-living rooms and open plan spaces score worse, paddy houses with ensuites score best.

    No coincidence that we have lowest % apartment dwellers and also 2nd lowest overcrowding. The criteria are questionable



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Here is the definition:

    The overcrowding rate is defined as the percentage of the population living in an overcrowded household.

    A person is considered as living in an overcrowded household if the household does not have at its disposal a minimum number of rooms equal to:

    • one room for the household;
    • one room per couple in the household;
    • one room for each single person aged 18 or more;
    • one room per pair of single people of the same gender between 12 and 17 years of age;
    • one room for each single person between 12 and 17 years of age and not included in the previous category;
    • one room per pair of children under 12 years of age.

    I suspect they don't count bathrooms or ensuites as rooms!

    Yes it's not surprising that we have the lowest % of apartment dwellers given that we have the lowest % of apartments.

    Obvious answer is we need to prioritise building apartments - the data indicates we have enough houses and not enough apartments.

    But it seems there is little appetite to build more apartments from either the supply or demand side.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    If more people live in tiny apartments then it's a lot easier to supply housing. If everyone expects a three bed semi as their starter home, as most do in Ireland, then it gets a lot more difficult.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Perhaps other countries don't give people free 4-bed council homes and let them stay in them for life even when the kids are all grown up. There are probably plenty of 60 or 70 year olds close to you in 4 bed council houses. Perhaps downsizing of private accommodation is also more common in other countries for older people when they don't need their bigger houses any more. A state would have tools like property tax available to it too. That is not really utilised in Ireland as a policy tool.

    And perhaps other countries don't run schemes were elderly people can go into nursing homes heavily subsidised, while leaving their own houses unoccupied and vacant.

    And perhaps other markets are not dysfunctional to the stage where a person can get a relatively low interest loan, outbid others to buy a derelict house, and rather than renovate it, can just sit on it and let it deteriorate and be fairly confident that they will get a sizeable return.


    "Overcrowded" should not be something the state is striving for. So I'm not sure of the relevance to anything.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭shoegirl


    It was absolutely impossible to get a mortgage between 2009 and about 2014 unless you had a well paid state paid salaried job. That's one of the reasons why homes were so cheap.

    And one of the reasons why mortgages here are still expensive & lending restrictive is because the ECB still imposes a higher level of reserves on lenders than nearly every other country in Europe.

    As for new v older homes, where I live its still considerably cheaper to buy a 2nd hand home, but some of that is because locally they basically stopped building apartments except as part of an overall development (NIMBYs block the remainder) & literally all the 2 beds are sucked up by part V social & affordable element. So all there is for sale is 3 and 4 bed "family" low rise sprawl homes, 3km from town center. But they are also A2 or A1 rated & pretty big. The prices basically tend to be roughly the gap between how much you'd pay to bring a BER E property to an A2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭shoegirl


    Census 2016 indicated if I remember right, that only about 30% of apartments are owner occupied. Read an old newspaper report from the late 90s about the various Bacon reports which mentioned that 90% of apartment sales at that time were to investors - they got considerable tax breaks for certain areas at that time.

    I've noticed that apartments, esp 1 beds, in my area do take longer to sell (& are sometimes even taken off the market) than houses so I think it is fair to infer from that there is considerably less demand from owner occupiers for apartments. But its also true that most lenders won't lend to an apartment buyer unless they have a 20% deposit, which might make buying a 2 bed easier to save for than a 1 bed.

    Census does have good info on this overall but if you go back even to 2016 or so when there was very low levels of institutional investment in the market here, I think its fair to assume that there is low demand from owner occupiers for apartments - unfortunately they are a highly stigmatised form of living because of the association with private rentals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    1 bed apartments are subject to more stringent lending conditions, I believe a FTB needs a 20% deposit if their property is a 1 bed apartment. This would also dampen demand



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I would imagine most newly built 3 and 4 bed semis would only have 2 adults living there, and 1 or 2 children. Not overcrowded by any measure.

    Makes sense that most of the country was able to get by working from home during lockdown



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The relevance is related to exactly the points you make.

    We're an outlier in this, as in so many other things, entirely due to the difference in government policy here compared to other countries.

    As long as government policy's only answer to the problem is to build more houses and not address some of the root causes of the problem we'll remain an outlier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭shoegirl


    Actually that's partially because part V disproportionately takes apartments more than homes in mixed house/apartment developments because 2/3 of social housing waiting lists are single person households. They desperately need 1 bed apartments in particular so often these are almost entirely sucked up by part V allocation. In my area the council is even buying up 1 beds second hand on the private market to try to plug the gap. You might say "why don't they build 1 bed apartments themselves?" - if they even tried, there would be pitchforks outside the council at dawn, such is the hostility to apartment building.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Ah fair enough. I misread your post as if it was trying to imply that the comparably low overcrowding stats were showing that there wasn't a housing problem!


    (I have seen posters on here complain that younger generations don't want to be packed in like sardines into their 30's because the boomer did 3 months one Summer working and drinking in a packed house in London when they were 21)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,620 ✭✭✭combat14




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Dining rooms, living rooms, etc all count - whereas a kitchen diner would only be a single room. Hence higher % of apartments = higher % overcrowded, even if you had the same ratio of people per bedroom.

    Many apartments have kitchen dining and living space all as 1 large room. 2 and 3 bed houses would have at least 2 separate rooms (usually kitchen/diner + living room separate).



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I totally understand why a higher % of houses vs of apartments would result in a lower % of undercrowded homes, I'm not disputing the logic in that.

    But is there an example of a common household in ireland that would you would consider to be overcrowded yet the EU criteria would consider normal? Eg 5 single people in a 3 bed semi?

    I'm struggling to think of one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    5 people in a 3 bed semi would be one case.

    Eurostat requirements for non overcrowding are:

    1 room 'for the household'

    1 room for parents

    1 room for 18yo child

    1 room for 16yo male

    1 room for 14yo girl


    So a 3 bed semi with separate living room and kitchen is not overcrowded. (5 room house by their defn)

    A 3 bed apartment with combined living room and kitchen is over crowded (4 room house)

    By rights they should both be overcrowded, if you don't have the bedroom space you don't have the bedroom space.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    yes, agreed by the criteria, but I wonder how common that scenario is relative to all households.

    I suspect our housing stock is skewed more to the undercrowded 2 or 3 people in a 3 bed semi than 5 people to a 3 bed semi.

    That also would explain why our % of overcrowded is so small.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    But yet our rate of adults living at home is so high - which supports the latter case. It certainly doesn't point to under occupancy if you have adults not flying the nest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    So.. Tell me, how did you end up living in a skip?

    A quote that could capture the 2020's when reeling in the years gets to cover the decade

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,699 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Tempted to post the Monty Python four yorkshiremen sketch



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast




  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Good man Trump, calling a spade a spade. Unfortunately nobody likes the truth.

    I just heard a news report on the radio about the 10s of millions of unpaid rent owed to Dublin City Council and South Dublin County Council by social housing tenants. Handed the keys to accommodation for a paltry sum per week and they won't even pay that. They should be evicted and the property given to somebody who is grateful and will pay.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭lordleitrim


    Is it an absolute fact that no social tenant ever gets evicted for rent arrears in a local authority property no matter how long they refuse to pay? If so, no wonder there's no incentive to pay such rent....



Advertisement
Advertisement