Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration to Ireland - policies, challenges, and solutions *Read OP before posting*

1476477479481482557

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 330 ✭✭gerogerigegege


    The governments.of the EU want more people die to declining birth rate. Our 2040 programme states we must be prepared for one million extra people on this island.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    Not only that, but very few asylum seekers over a 10 year period will get a job that earns enough to pay income taxes.

    So its a total loss to the State. 14 billion euro over 10 years for each 20,000 cohort of asylum seekers. And that's also before family re-unification!

    It's also another case of misinformation from the government who say asylum seekers are only a minority of overall immigrants, which is true, but you can see from these numbers they are ridiculously expensive to the taxpayer compared to other working migrants on visas who pay their own way.

    It's just another reason why this farce of an asylum systems needs to be completely shredded and re-designed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton



    The difference being we have signed up to EU freedom of movement and UK common travel area! I don't recall having a democratic say on Ahmed from Pakistan having the same ability to move to the country and be put up by the taxpayer! When was the vote did i miss it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I've already said some coming here are likely economic migrants.

    I don't doubt that.

    But if you take away the asylum process as an option for that group, they'll have the option to either not come here, or to come undocumented.

    Based on what's happened in other countries, and how attractive we look as a destination, I believe many of that group will choose to come here undocumented.

    That to me is a bigger problem than people coming through the IPA process where most will go on to work, pay taxes, lead normal lives etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,563 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Elections, so you probably did!

    We vote in various governments, who enact legislation. These are all debated in the dail and published on their website. I'm sure you know how legislation is enacted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    No government passed legislation to let economic migrants who are abusing the asylum system come into the country legally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,384 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Grand you finally accept many are economic migrants.

    This is why the system needs to be changed. Either we loosen migrant laws on work visas or else speed up the deportation process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,563 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    No they didn't.

    They enacted legislation that allows for people to claim asylum and outlines the process those claims go through.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I don't know that many are economic migrants.

    I never denied that some were.

    I could guess take a guess but it would be just that, a guess.

    Tiresome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,384 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    It's not tiresome to take a guess. The rest of us have done so.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That 60% asylum refusal rate is from last year,. What is a “point of debate” is how much that rate had changed from the year previous to that, because in 2022 it was just 18%. That’s some jump. Why, or how did this happen?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭Gen.Zhukov


    Always good for a refresh on some things - Remember Leo's letter to the Sindo? - Newstalk's Barry Whyte handed Leo his arse within a few hours

    It included Leo saying:-

    The Taoiseach also says “International Protection applicants are photographed and fingerprinted on registration, and we check to see if they have already registered in another country. Checks are carried out against EU databases for certain crimes, watchlists and the European arrest warrant”.

    Barry's take on it was:-

    This is true; however, this only tells us if a person has a criminal record in another European country or if they have applied for asylum in another European country. But does it tell us if a person has lived or worked in another European country? I don’t think it does.

    Several IPAS accommodation centre managers have told me that many of their residents have lived and worked in the UK, Germany, or Sweden before arriving in Ireland. Are these people genuine asylum seekers? Surely, they are taking up beds that could be offered to people who are genuinely fleeing war and persecution?

    I'll side with Barry Whyte here and not with Leo the spoofer - Hopefully that will help in stopping the 'They're all fingerprinted and photographed so there...' shyte that gets rolled out every few months religiously, and generally takes up 2-3 pages of head wrecking scutter


    Much kudos to Mr Whyte I should add, it's a great article





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,083 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭Water2626262


    Re the passport destruction. Hard to believe there is a genuine reason. None of these people are flying directly from the countries they are originally from. So they felt it was safe enough to use their passport all the way to Germany and France and then only decide to destroy their documents on the way to Dublin. Clearly it is known that you’ll have less issues getting into Ireland if you destroy your documents.

    I also don’t like that the first interaction with the state is based on deception. Just encourages more messing and deception as they go through the process. If you are a genuine asylum seeker it seems you’d have a very good chance of staying here so why destroy the passport?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,581 ✭✭✭Cordell




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    So you want to loosen migrant laws on work visas, how do the rest of the anti-immigration brigade feel about that?

    Where are all these visa migrants going to live? How's it going to affect working Irish people if they've to compete for jobs with low-cost labor from around the world?

    What are you going to do with people who can't find regular jobs and stay anyway, working illegally or involved in crime etc? (I'm already hearing that this is occurring in Ireland) What happens when the next downturn comes, do you think all these people will just up and leave?

    As for speeding up deportation, even if you remove delays within Ireland, countries at the other end still won't take people or will delay. Certainly worth looking at, but I wouldn't expect that you'll be able to get large scale deportations going where other countries have failed.

    Ultimately this immigration issue isn't going to just 'go away' with an easy fix, despite what some chancer anti-immigration candidates might be promising. Whether we like it or not people are going to keep coming here as long as our economy is looking this strong. We urgently need to start building more houses and improving services and not believing in nonsense rhetoric about 'closing borders' and 'sending people back'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    Is "as long as our economy is looking this strong" a nice way of saying "as long as we continue to give extremely generous social welfare supports". We need to cut out incentives for economic migrants to come here then



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    It's a reference to our being the second wealthiest country in the world by GDP per capita. What are these incentives for migrants, €40 per week, you want people turning to crime, begging and working illegally instead?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭gym_imposter


    €40 per week is the lottery if you come from a third world country and tens of millions more from the same background will endeavour to come

    Doesn't matter if you turn every square metres of office block into residential and build a hundred thousand new units per year, the supply is incapable of meeting the infinite demand

    Do you even have a limit ?

    Is it two million?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,294 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Average length is 2 years in direct provision on e40 a week. After that it's full access to welfare, no one claims they come here for e40

    10 year ago it was over 4 years wait time n less were willing to wait it out.

    Roderick may go back tweeting in a few languages that the keys to their own pad in 4 months is a non runner!




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,405 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Many refugees don't have a passport to start with and have probably never held one (in some cases, it might positively be dangerous to apply for a passport in the country they are fleeing, as they would be attracting the attention of the authorities). For those people, they have no choice but to try and get hold of a false passport.

    I think I saw a figure that 40% of genuine refugees worldwide don't possess a passport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,255 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    https://www.economicsobservatory.com/asylum-seekers-in-europe-where-do-people-go-and-why

    Here's a summary of some research on why asylum seekers chose particular European countries. The findings show factors affecting decisions, outside of following where families and friends have, or have planned to move, are wealth in gdp per capita, low unemployment levels and cultural factors. Some relationship with welfare benefits but not very strong.

    I don't know what you mean by 'do I have a limit', I wouldn't be able to apply a limit anyway, no more than these chancer anti-immigration candidates promising to 'close the borders', 'turn people back' etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,409 ✭✭✭emo72


    And what use is that to someone gives a fake name and fake id? Or what use is they give no details? Disingenuous to the core.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    @MegamanBoo from your posts there is a certain air of ah sure no one can do anything about what's happening and it's going to keep happening anyway so no point doing anything about it. I don't agree. I might not have the answers, same as anyone else here on Boards but the people who are being paid lavish salaries to govern should and must come up with solutions. We cannot have situations like what is happening in Dublin city centre become the norm



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭gym_imposter


    It's a very simple question, do you have an upper limit?

    Turkey saw something like four million refugees from Syria in the past decade and more , would a million IP applicants arriving at Dublin airport ( or across the border from the north) over the next decade be a step too far ?

    No fuzzy answers now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,405 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    But even refugee agencies agree on this. They say it is totally inappropriate for the government to be using hotels to accommodate refugees and asylum seekers and that it should not be happening. This is totally on government mismanagement of the state accommodation sector and not the fault of refugees.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    Refugee agencies are the cause of this with their slavish desire to take everyone in with any manner of sob story.

    They may well disagree with the use of hotels but where exactly are the thousands of new arrivals each month to go ??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,384 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Well not everyone that wants a better asylum system is anti immigration. The problem lies with people coming here with no where to live and immediately causing the State problems.

    That's the main issue most people have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    When we have thousands of men camping on the street in the city centre surely at that point we can all admit that the situation has gotten out of hand



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,405 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Blaming refugees for being refugees seems a bit harsh. The problem is at our end : not having sufficient services and accommodation in place to handle an ever present asylum seeker situation and one that is not going to go away, given what is happening globally.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement