Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General British politics discussion thread

Options
1384385387389390427

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,453 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Someone of May's standing probably would not be expected to contribute, particularly if she was a dead cert.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,631 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    The basic idea is to leave Labour with no options but to put up a major tax by a significant amount, since almost everything that might get a billion or two here and there has been "spent" on the NI reduction. For good measure Hunt has also already pencilled in a load of savings cuts to kick in after the election.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,494 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Hamas sympathizer slashing painting of Balfour.


    With the recent debacle in the Commons being described by the Speaker as being his response to threats etc,MPs resigning out of fear, Jihadi George winning in Rochdale. It appears that politics in England is continuing to head in a very nasty direction.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,966 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight




  • Registered Users Posts: 34,346 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I don't normally agree with that sort of thing, but all depictions of Bloody Balfour should be fúcked into a canal.

    Fingal County Council are certainly not competent to be making decisions about the most important piece of infrastructure on the island. They need to stick to badly designed cycle lanes and deciding on whether Mrs Murphy can have her kitchen extension.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,453 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The Balfour Declaration of 1917 legitimised Zionism which led to the vast number of ethnic jews moving to Palestine.

    These Zionists began the agitation for a Jewish state for the Jewish people. This led to the Jewish terrorists acting just like Hamas do since.

    So Balfour could be the instigator for most of the Middle East troubles and wars ever since. GB had the mandate for administering Palestine - and like most colonies administered by GB it went up in flames.

    'Leopards and spots' comes to mind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,631 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    This type of vandalism sounds like an excuse rather than a reason. Probably a hotheaded student doing some grandstanding.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,457 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Registered Users Posts: 18,279 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    In truth, the BNP would probably be more his stomping ground. How he ever became prominent in the Tory Party is a bit of a mystery : he never seemed to fit in with the usual Eton toffs, as a gruff north of England working class far right type.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,457 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Yup, it's his last refuge in a vain hope to hold his seat.


    He's polling in 3rd place to 2 as yet unnamed opponents so the future doesn't look too bright for him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 53,992 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    I was watching Sky News and had the segment with Lee and Beth

    Wow that Lee Anderson is some nasty piece of work



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,780 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Any polls since he made his islamaphobic remarks? That probably will boost him, depressingly enough.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,243 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Lee Anderson has defected to the Reform Party

    At long last — a scintilla, a tiny shred, of good news for the Tory Party.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,279 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    A strange individual. He was previously a member of Labour before switching to the Tories - it's usually only cranks and oddballs out on the fringes who keep changing political party.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,243 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    To be fair, not that many north of England Tories fit in to the Eton toff stereotype.

    The Tories loved Lee Anderson because (while a local councillor) he defected from Labour to the Tories in 2018, and went on in 2019 to win for the Tories a seat that had been Labour-held more or less since the Norman conquest. Nobody cared at that point what his views were like.

    His appointment as Deputy Chairman came in 2023, and in less dire circumstances it would have been considered an, um, surprising appointment. It was clear by then that he was being appointed not in spite of, but because of, his kneejerk right wing views. The party was in a dire place in the pools and had nothing to lose by trying surprising things. Like all the other surprising things they tried at the time and since, the appointment did nothing to solve their problem with voters.

    I said above that his defection is good news for the Tory party. This is because anyone in the Tory party who actually cares about the Tory party — and there may still be a few — is fully aware that, after the next election and probably after the one after that, the Tory party's route back to power involves reestablishing itself as a credible party of the centre-right. That means a shift sharply to the left from where they currently are, and that means purging the party of the likes of Lee Anderson. But Anderson, at least, has purged himself.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,780 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    I can't see them getting more centrist after the next election. Anderson may be gone but they'll still signal the same sort of message to the membership but it'll be a dog whistle rather than Anderson's fog horn. Sunak asks Starmer to define what a woman is at every PMQs and Suella Braverman's writing Telegraph articles conflating protesters with jihadis. They're responding to the appetites of the membership. Trying to get that back to a Rory Stewart style One Nation party seems like an impossible task to me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 34,346 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Yes, they're responding to the appetites of the membership. Problem is, they need to have a far wider appeal than that if they want to win any elections. The membership thought Liz Truss would make a credible PM.

    Maybe not after the next one, but after two or three or maybe even four lost elections, the penny will have to drop eventually

    Fingal County Council are certainly not competent to be making decisions about the most important piece of infrastructure on the island. They need to stick to badly designed cycle lanes and deciding on whether Mrs Murphy can have her kitchen extension.



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,652 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Ah well at least they're not dropping 2,000 lb bombs on children.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,494 ✭✭✭✭Danzy




  • Registered Users Posts: 51,652 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Someone in the Art Gallery was overcome with emulsion.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,836 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Well, the question for them after the election is whether they intend to chase after the likes of Anderson to bring him back to the fold or realise how close they have dragged themselves to his abominable ideology and correct course. Regrettably I think the former will come before the latter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,682 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    So Sunak had a secret meeting with the chairman of the 1922 committee Graham Brady which seems a bit odd.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,274 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    They can't move on until they give up the Brexit dreams of right idea, wrong implementation by not being hard enough. That in turn will require a whole new set of MPs who don't have that luggage with them which means they leave, get kicked out by voters or simply die off. Hence the next step will be to double down like it was a Nigerian prince offering oil and send more money for that great payoff in the future. Then they need to get a good kicking in the next election as well to actually start to see change, if not they will be back on the bandwagon as it proved they were right all along after all (even though it's more likely due to the economy doing badly etc. due to the mess it will be in).



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,243 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Yes. While the Tory party need to move back to the centre to have any chance of returning to power, they have purged the party of centrists — indeed, of pretty much anyone with a brain or a backbone — and the hard-right rump that remains will be very resistant to accepting this. So they'll start by doubling down on rightp-wing batshittery. But in the end the appetite for power will prevail, and coming up to the general election to be held in or about 2034 they will be trying to position themselves to attract the centrist vote.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,453 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Didn't work for the Liberal Party in the post WW II era.

    It wasn't until the Labour 'gang of four' rebels new party Social Democrats eventually joined with the rump Liberal Party to form the LibDems did they get any significant numbers into the commons, and then only as a protest vote party.

    A new centrist party might be formed away from the far right nutjobs and regroup to oust them from ever getting close to power. Perhaps they should remember the adage - Eton bred, soon forgotten.

    Labour has managed to oust the Militant Tendency from their ranks. It can be done, but STV would be much more effective.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,019 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The Liberal decline happened at a time of massive electoral change. The split between right and more right was never going to last as more and more became enfranchised.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,243 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Not really analogous. The Liberal Party in the post-WW II era wasn't one of the two established parties; it hadn't been in power for 14 years; it hadn't be lurching further and further to the right.

    The Tory party in the post-WW II era would be a slightly better fit, though still not great. They were one of the established parties of government; they did (to their great surprise) lose office in 1945 after 10 years in power and, while it might not be fair to accuse them of lurching to the right, the reason they lost was because they were too far to the right — i.e. the electorate had moved to the left, and felt the Tory party no longer represented their values and aspirations. The Tories responded by moving to the left - e.g. they accepted the establishment of the NHS; comprehensive state-run national insurance; the nationalisation of coal and railways; and a slew of other policies that would previously have been anathema to them, and did not seek to reverse them. Even then, it took two general elections before they were returned to office.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,453 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The Tories lost in 1945 because Churchill was seen as pro-war and after 6years of war, the voters said NO MORE WAR.

    The Labour Party were seen as a new start. The promise of an end to rationing was a plus, but unfortunately for The Gov, the 1946/47 winter was historically very cold, and coal had been taken off rationing but was in very short supply - very unfortunate.

    However, the establishment of the NHS was a wonder - allowing people to access healthcare free at the point of access. The Gov went on a massive housebuilding programme that replaced much of the destruction from the blitz.

    Another unfortunate fact was that the British Empire and the British Gov were utterly flat broke, causing a massive devaluation of the UK pound against the US Dollar (from US$4 = UK£1 to US$2.8 = UK£1). The UK were heavily in debt to the USA Gov.

    By the way on a point of pedantry, the wartime Gov of Churchill was a National Gov not a Tory one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,631 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Rationing was actually worse in the late-1940s than it was during the war.

    The swing from Labour in 1950 was not that big at a touch under 3% which was amazing given the circumstances, but it all but wiped out their majority.



Advertisement