Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings - updated 11/5/24*

Options
15245255275295301031

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,916 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    Would love to know why my post was deleted on the sly.

    I stated that we should not be accepting refugees from outside of Europe, giving the example of people from Africa coming here and to Europe when they should be going to other African countries nearby.

    Yes, we should not be accepting these people who are so removed from us culturally and educationally that they will never offer anything to our society apart from taking a few more euro from your pocket.

    I did not receive any warning or contact as to why my post was deleted, so the only reason I can think of is that it didn't break any rules but someone didn't like it so decided hey ho I'll remove it anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    I have never heard of those being sent back returned again can you provide a link ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    How do they board an aircraft using a passport be it fake or real .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Again I repeat I am posting about those turn up at airports with no documents only .

    I am struggling with what you on about with that garbled sentence .Where did I say that we should take asylum seekers. We cannot even accommodate them now .

    Yes for you I will try to keep it simple .They are sent back by the airline to the country they departed from it may not be their county of citizenship .Unidentifiable countries!! They have advanced passenger information or do you think they came from space .

    Those who turn at the asylum application center with no documents should be fast tracked .There should not multiple appeals , deported and should not be able to remain in accommodation.The option of assisted return or self deport is there .Those who feel an empathy for their plight could take them in .hint .

    Post edited by rgossip30 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    So you want to talk about people who turn up at airports with no documents and ignore the fact that most of these people are seeking asylum?

    After that it seems you want these people sent back to the country of their flights origin, despite that country having no obligation to take them?

    In practice a very small minority of people do go back on return flights, presumably where they agree to do so.

    Expecting the airlines to deal with everyone else is not without consequences.

    We could do as the US does and have rigorous pre-clearance checks to try ensure asylum seekers don't attempt to enter via airports.

    How that would work with the CTA and EU I've no idea, I'd also imagine it would add significantly to the cost of flights.

    Will it do anything to lesson the numbers arriving here? I doubt it very much considering people can just walk across the border up North, or be trafficked in by ferry.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    An arrangement could be made with the UK for the return of those who came there on visas or overstayers and are now claiming asylum . There is at present no return of those who claimed asylum there !

    There will be those coming from Gaza in the future so the the future looks bright .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭rgossip30



    Another pull factor to seek asylum if he is listened to . This minister does not even mention if their claims are genuine. Bring in more to build houses and then more again !

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41344643.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    What exactly is this arrangement we could make with the UK?

    Will we sign up with their Rwanda plans?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭tom23




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Are you suggesting the UK take steps and invest resources to take back illegals residing in Ireland that entered Ireland via the UK?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Presumably we'll have to pay the UK for this service.

    I wonder what they'll charge us, considering their Rwanda plan is currently coming in at £2 million, plus a yearly fee, per Asylum Seeker. And they haven't actually managed to deport anyone yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Indeed. There isnt a snowball in hells chance the UK would take back illegals, for any price.

    They are trying to stop them coming in, so they certainly wont put in steps to increase the number of illegals being returned to the UK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    That’s mad Leo…if only there was someone in a position to…actually do something about this???

    WTF is going on, genuinely, how the hell are they allowing this to continue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Send back those asylum seekers who have claimed there and likely failed if not , just deport them self or assisted return to the home country .I thought that was obvious .You do ask some dumb questions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,213 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Who doesn't want controlled immigration though?

    I don't know how many times we have to be treated to yet another "I just want controlled migration" as if this were some amazing revolutionary concept that is entirely at odds with some faceless majority of the so-called left who appear to want immigration to be entirely uncontrolled. It's a nonsense narrative where you're shaking your fist at phantoms.

    Pretty much everyone wants controlled migration, your objection is that some have different views over the extent to and the means by which that control is exercised.

    So we get it — you are absolutely not a racist and all you want is controlled migration. That's great. But maybe you also need to de-escalate your views of the "other side" as being advocates of uncontrolled migration — wouldn't that be fair?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I can't imagine the UK will be in such a hurry to take them back given their attitudes to IPAs.

    Besides won't they just walk back across the border if they want?

    After that how do we deport them to the home country if we don't know where it is, or that home country won't assist?

    Other countries with a harder approach to border control struggle to deport between 60 and 80 per cent of asylum seekers. Why do you think we'll be any more successful?

    Apologies if it's dumb to ask why we wouldn't face the same obstacles other countries already have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,081 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Reduce money from overseas aid budget for any country not accepting back asylum seekers. Should also make it harder for legal migration from any country refusing to take back citizens.

    Failing that, make it clear to the asylum seeker that they'll get nothing in Ireland and pull funding from any group aiding illegal asylum seekers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    It's been done, both the US and EU have already linked overseas aid to accepting deportees, to what looks like little success. Plus you still have to know where the person is actually from. I think the link has also been made with accepting legal migration.

    I'd guess what happens in a lot of cases is that countries in the global south wouldn't have the same record keeping systems around issuing passports and births and deaths. So if they can't be sure the person being deported is definitely from that country they won't be in a hurry to accept.

    As for getting nothing as a deterrent, how far are you willing to go with that? Australia sent people to absolutely horrific conditions in offshore camps and people still kept arriving. Thankfully it seems they've now abandoned a lot of those policies. I'd imagine the fact that we have the second highest GDP per capita in the world is going to attract people here in the hope they or their children will be accepted at some point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think what will happen eventually is that passenger air/sea travel will become more intergrated and passengers will become a line on a manifest, similar to US border control.

    People wont be able to travel to first world countries without their ID and country of origin beind identified and established, pre-departure.

    Shared database reconciles all passenger travel and country of origin declaration is pre-requisite to boarding at ports.

    If anyone loses passport details they can then still be returned to country of origin.

    Its not something I hope to see, but I expect it will happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Its not something I hope to see, but I expect it will happen.

    What solution would you prefer to see?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Well if they are already deported and on the system they have zero chance of being accepted for asylum again .They could stay but without any benefits

    . There is only a small number that the home country won't assist cut accommodation and welfare .They should also cut the aid to that country



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭tom23


    I’d love to see it? What’s wrong with that system? Why would you be against it? Genuine refugees if they can prove their case have nothing to fear. Economic migrants won’t have a leg to stand on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Hopefully it won't come to that.

    In the US where they've introduced stricter controls, there's been a number of side-effects.

    The number of visa overstays has increased dramatically, https://cis.org/Vaughan/DHS-Reports-Record-Number-Overstays-2022

    The number of unauthorized immigrants overall in the country increased, as people stay longer if it's harder to get back in. And people turn to traffickers where other paths are restricted, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/BadActors-Hansen-PapademetriouFINALWEB.pdf The problem with people turning to traffickers, aside from the individual suffering, is that people can end up being forced to work for crime gangs to pay off trafficking debt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I agree with the principal of it, but wouldnt look forward all the delays around air/sea travel as a result.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,081 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Id be going as far as providing them no assistance or money, doing immigration checks on companies that could have them working for them (Deliveroo etc), and making it clear to any of the charities and NGOs that state funding is pulled if they're helping people residing illegally in the country. You make them feel as unwelcome in the country as possible and they'll hopefully feck off.

    As for the country, they boarded the plane with a passport and they're claiming they're from a country anyway. Whatever those countries are who funding gets pulled from unless they accept them back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    A simple collection of passport data forwarded on to the destination airport should not be that complicated. Any passengers without physical passports on arrival can be matched up with their electronic copy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Yes, as I outlined, I think that is the way it will go in time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    30,000 people died trying to cross the Mediterranean in the last ten years.

    You think they'll be put off by having to flying into Belfast instead and getting a bus into Ireland?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Your plan then is to drive desperate people towards crime and a shadow labor market. We're the second richest country in the world on paper, people are still going to come here.

    As for reducing aid, the EU has been trying this for 20 years. It hasn't worked to any great effect. Why would it work for us, and especially when we only think the person is from that country?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    This is like saying "Don't bother with a lock for your door as burglars will only break the windows to get in".



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement