Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1354735483550355235533690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    So what is your solution then as the US is not funding the war at present. The EU make up the difference and continue indefinitely. Keep poking the bear will have consequences.

    Haha, what is Russia gonna do? Invade Ukraine?

    I find it bizarre that I am some Putin fan because I do not display fanatic hate .

    Oh you absolutely are. Nothing bizarre about it. Dime a dozen in fact. One of the most repeated Russianbot bingo board points was and always has been "Why is the west fueling this pointless war?". A line which you parroted earlier. Ignoring the fact that Ukraine were fighting for years before a single american bullet showed up. Every poll shows overwhelmingly that Ukrainian people don't want to be Russian boot-lickers like you okay?

    It's probably one of the most boring and easily countered points for many reasons. You're boring. Stop being so boring. Maybe that'll help.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,475 ✭✭✭Zico


    This is a global conspiracy to give Óglaigh na hÉireann more funding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Homelander


    No it's not the reality. Ukraine is fighting for basic survival. The threshold for collapse is about infinitely higher than it is for Russia, the invading nation.

    Ukraine's economy being worse than Russia's is actually quite irrelevant in the overall scheme of things.

    The invasion was a titantic blunder, Russia is being bled dry, and there's only so long they can keep up their current effort, and their current effort being pretty pathetic, notwithstanding the horrific level of Ukrainian casulties.

    A $60bn army versus a $5bn army and Russia's only tactic is 1916 style human wave and artillery assaults. Of course domestically they have to package it was if they're fighting the entirety of NATO but we know where the truth is there.

    This is basic stuff. Russia is a laughing stock, the world knows it, Putin knows it, his generals know it. The only people who maybe don't know it are the Russian people, and even at that, a fair portion of them completely understand what's going on, but can't say anything.

    We're still at the very initial warfare stages two years in and Russia had made neglible headway while their economy is being battered. Ukraine's defenses are intact. Their army is intact. Their airforce, air defence...all intact. There's several stages Russia has to pass to even look like it's winning, and the idea that their economy could sustain each and every stage is laughable.

    Creeping forward metres at a time at enormous human casulties and equipment loss is a) not sustainable and b) not exactly a war-winning strategy. Russia has proved it is completely incapable of delivering any sort of knockout blow, time and time again.

    It's obviously crap for Ukraine, who don't want to give away land or lives, but at the rate Russia is going, it'd take them a decade to defeat Ukraine militarily, if even, while they're in a full war economy that will collapse in the near term. And even if that defeat was forthcoming - which it is not - they haven't the faintest hope of being able to occupy, pacify, and integrate Ukraine.

    Putin in 2024 is Hitler in 1944. Defeat is far enough away that you can keep the charade going in a propoganda blitz, you control enough territory on a map that gives an illusion of strength, but the eventual result remains inevitable.

    Like Hitler, for Putin there is no option B. He'll just keep hammering away at option A until he can't because option B is his head a proverbial pike; he has nothing to lose. He made a gamble in February 2022 that didn't work, a misfire for the history books of "worlds great military blunders" in the near future.

    But Russia is fighting an unwinnable war. It doesn't mean that Ukraine won't suffer greatly, and worse, but the war is ultimately unwinnable. There is zero scenario where Russia emerges from this as a winner, or stronger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,734 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Yes Russia needs powerful allies to achieve its aims. Just as they did in 1941-45. They had them back then. They don’t have them now.

    They are furiously trying to change the political landscape in other countries to change that situation.

    But by God they miscalculated this war so badly.

    They believed their own false narrative of winning world 2 single handedly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    And in case you may not know , the war was STARTED by Russia invading Ukraine for NON REASONS - even though he has proffered thousands of them



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Both sides miscalculated, You would have to guess that there were regrets in the Kremlin for the first year at least. As for the US and NATO, they thought Russia had fallen into a trap and had a free punch, destabailse Russia, unseat Putin with sanctions etc. Im guessing there are regrets in the US and Europe that they didnt try to push for peace when it started. At this stage its too late to give everyone's marbles back , and as of today if the war doesnt end with the borders as they are the next likely outcome is Russia taking more of Ukraine, Kharkiv or Odessa at a stretch while the likelihood of Ukraine taking back Crimea are lottery odds now.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • This content has been removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Deub


    Im guessing there are regrets in the US and Europe that they didnt try to push for peace when it started.

    eh? EU tried just before it started. It didn’t work because someone was not interested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,329 ✭✭✭Field east


    Work of AI again or how can this be verified as genuine. But the French??????? Would be more enclined to believe it if it was the Poles or the US



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    The yanks could only dream of having a President as young as Putin ;-) lol , I dont see a civil war as a likely scenario , that's a 1%er

    let me rephrase , in the first few months of it. My point was the West thought Russia had fallen into a trap. I was a kid during the Falklands war but I remember there was more interest in sorting it out before the British Task Force got down there than anything that has happened in this one which I see as a miscalculation by the US

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    I'm not sure if the EU would be particularly happy to have allowed a state to expand under the guise of a peace agreement. Historically that's resulted in states that will expand again when they feel like it.



  • This content has been removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,731 ✭✭✭macraignil


    "let me rephrase"

    So you are saying evil putin is not so bad because Falklands comparison blah blah and it was a mistake not to bow down to putin's terrorist acts and criminal behavior towards Ukraine. You do realise there was a peace treaty between Ukraine and putin's terrorist state where internationally recognised borders were agreed and putin has by his actions torn up that treaty. Why would it make sense for the people of Ukraine to trust putin to adhere to any future agreement when he now claims their country should not even exist? There are no countries that can order Ukraine to fall for the mistake of trusting putin.

    putin has made a huge blunder by invading Ukraine and allowing his army be demolished by his desire for conquest, genocide and terrorism. It would serve him right if his folly paves the way for a collapse in the state he claims to serve. Civil war would imply the russian federation is a legitimate country rather than a collection of states which were conquered by moskow and would be much better served breaking away from moskow now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    the only reason Russia could go into Ukraine at all was that it had given up its nukes, its the red lines of red lines. Im just of the view that something could have been hammered out in 22 with Ukraine left intact possibly with some self determination elections or whatever arrangement clever diplomats could come up with. Even in the least likely outcome that Ukraine falls apart and Russian troops take Kiev (and I dont think they could) Russia would end up leaving Western Ukraine after negotiations.

    My only sense of Russian opinion is that the Yeltsin years left a deep scar , so they will always go for stability in the end. At the current trajectory Putin comes out of this with a win that he can sell at home, which gives him time to hand pick his successor. Im not sure you can rely on history at this stage, demographics will tend to make countries like Russia more conservative, revolutions are something driven by youth

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • This content has been removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    I'm not sure if the Russian army being decimated can be considered a win for Putin. Plus they've destroyed the entire global perception of their military.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,439 ✭✭✭zv2


    And nobody is going to buy their combustible tanks any more. Ever.

    _______________________________________________________

    This is supposedly the conversation the Germans had about Taurus


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    How it's been sold to the Russian people(going by the ones I know and remember these are living in the West and have full access to all opinions/news) is, and brace yourselves the double think disconnect is wild:

    It's called a "special military operation" not a "war" because Russia isn't America, they don't want to destroy the country and wipe out Ukrainian civilians by mass bombing strikes like America would do. They could do that easily but instead are moving slowly and precisely to minimise civilian and their own troops casualties. Any other opinion is "western propaganda" and "russophobia".

    Yup. They're also convinced that this will end when Russia takes all of eastern Ukraine up to the Dnieper, and Odessa obvs. What's left of Ukraine will be the West bit as a demilitarised and "de-nazified" buffer zone and a consistent belief is Poland will take that over anyway. I've found Poland and the Poles live rent free in the Russian psyche to a degree hard to fathom for Western Europeans. As is how they interpret history of their country/empire/region. That rambling "history" Putin rattled on about for half an hour in the Carlson interview? That went over really well, while most non Russians watching including even Carlson as it turns out were eh wut?.

    That's just a sniff of the disconnect with extra howlers like the "nazis" in Ukraine are backing the "woke west with Gays and Trannies" in their military. When you try to point out that actual nazis are extremely conservative, very right wing, nationalist, jingoistic, militaristic with populist "histories" and myths and by their very nature and definition vehemently anti "Woke" the irony is completely lost and it seems that penny has a very long way to drop...

    Memory loss is another very prominent feature. The Wagner revolt has been completely memory holed(though it really rattled cages at the time). The "military strategic feint" from Kiev ditto, replaced by the "Boris Johnson/the West stopped the peace deal after they withdrew as an olive branch" spin that only came into being as spin a year after the events. The losses of Kharkiv and Kherson? Who, what? The latest their bots are pushing on the socials is Hostomel Airport was a Russian win.

    So no matter how this war pans out I'd not be anywhere close to confident that The Russian People(tm) will start asking questions never mind rise up, but instead are more likely to just buy the next round of spin, or just keep their heads down and if any change does come it'll come from some other "strong man" and they'll line up behind it, while it's happening. The Wagner revolt a good example. Tanks on Russian streets heading for Moscow shooting down Russian aircraft and their own men, oul wans handing out tea and biccies to the troops, cheering the Strong Man of the moment. Until he wasn't and that was over and memory holed, and business as usual.

    Now we could argue about culture/history/propaganda/the Russian Mind(c) until the cows come home, but imho it's a mistake to view it through our western lens too much. I agree it's an unwinnable war. Even if they took the entire country at best they face decades of sectarian unrest, but a "win" for them will be whatever they're told a win is and most will believe it or ignore it.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,009 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    My memory of the program (which could be wrong) was that it was a US official who said that it would be too serious a provocation. But, given the time taken to make the program, that would of been quite a while ago. I was expecting Ukraine to keep hitting it every time it got repaired.

    Oh the idea of France sending troops, surely any country can get involved providing they & NATO say that it's an individual action & not a NATO one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Well if I head west it's into the sea .


    A fair appraisal of the " dire situation " in Ukraine from the bastion of the liberal left The Guardian.

    A welcome change from dubious twitter posts .


    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/02/what-happened-in-the-russia-ukraine-war-this-week-catch-up-with-the-must-read-news-and-analysis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,604 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    That's exactly it. If Putin decided to give up tomorrow, declaring Russia has accomplished its goal in Ukraine a large percentage of Russians would either believe it or just stay quiet. The rest of the world would see it for the horse dung it is. As regards the fate of Putin, anyone hoping democracy will flourish with the demise of Putin is going to be sorely disappointed. The mafia/ kleptocracy culture he has created there will likely long outlast him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,969 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Back at the beginning, first no one believed that Putin would actually invade Ukraine. But then when Putin did invade, it was considered that Russia, with the 2nd mightiest army in the world, and with nuclear weapons to boot, would take Ukraine in a very short time, so no one was interested in discussing, never mind acting militarily. It was considered a done deal. What could anyone do? But then Ukraine showed their mettle, and the rest as they say is history. And so we are where we are.



  • This content has been removed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,018 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The Russians know they'd get their arses handed to them if they had to face off against any sort of competent western coalition. Take how Russia has struggled against a Ukrainian army constantly crying out for resources, and add in the direct involvement of the Polish or French militaries. Russian forces would be sent limping back to Moscow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭aidanodr




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭pcardin


    and when these are wasted, thats two clown states dry of shells.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Once again people fall for Russian Propaganda.


    They we’re discussing what targets could be hit if they supplied Taurus missiles, you know a sensible conversation to be careful not to escalate things.


    Germany have said they wing be sending them anyway.


    Why oh why do people still swallow Ruzzian propaganda and lies after all these years??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,609 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    How many of these will be explode the artillery pieces that fired them, or are duds ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,318 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Do you ever get the feeling that there's a propaganda war at foot. And Putin has a bag of air. Only this time bag of air by ten times the European Union.

    You'd be wondering is this bluff by China Belfast for the benefit of the dissenters in Russia to stop them getting their tails up against Putin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭pcardin




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement