Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clontarf to City Centre Cycle & Bus Priority Project discussion (renamed)

18384868889131

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    Westwood should be warned that they are in breach of their planning if they can’t manage their car park properly that they will tell them that they have to remove the carpark and it can only be used for blue badge, bikes and drop off only.

    Also can we not slap a big yellow box all over that area outside on that path and bike lane.

    WW is right on 3 main bus corridors and at the DART station, including the orbital N4 and soon to be great bike lanes. There is literally no reason to drive there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,229 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    DCC engineer said there will be section of the lane painted before everything f is finished, such as red sections at bus passenger crossing points. So yellow box outside Westwood is a good idea. Unlikely to be obeyed I’d imagine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,454 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    They seem to be considering every option instead of the Gardai doing their job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 766 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    The gardai hardly have capacity to manage every yellow box junction in Ireland. If it was a junction with a Luas line or a junction of two major bus routes, then yes they should, but it's an entrance to a gym. I don't think the guards give a damn and you can hardly blame them.



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I've brought my kids to swimming lessons in WW. I parked in the overflow, didn't block the bus lane, and walked the 60 - 120 seconds it takes to stroll from there to the gym, walking by countless cars blocking the path and road with drivers sitting behind the wheel glued to their phones while going absolutely nowhere and causing havoc for everyone else.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 766 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    They should create a booking system or gold pass for parking in the main parking area with a much higher level of accessibility parking spaces. If fit and able bodied people can't take public transport or simply walk those other extra 2minutes from the overflow, or God forbid actually walk or cycle to the gym, then there's no hope for us!!

    With all the improvements happening around the city, the area that is considered "city" will massively expand. There might be a psychological change there where people won't expect to be able to drive to Westwood. Let's hope.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I have cycled there with my 6 year old (also cycling) for swimming lessons.

    There is also like half a dozen bus routes within 3 minutes walk of there and the DART!

    Also there are plenty of other pools around North Dublin that do kids swimming lessons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,204 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    There have been some traffic measurement boxes around Marino the past 2 months, I wonder are they related to the work in Fairview? Anecdotally, I have seen a lot more traffic go through Marino while I have been home, some are really wild with the speed they go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    Issue with the DART this morning, couple of trains emptied at Clontarf and everyone walking to Fairview to get the bus instead. Busy enough on the new footpath through the park, so one sap decides to walk along the new cycle path and, of course, all the lemmings follow. Carnage at the end of the Malahide Road as bikes are joining the path which is full of dopes looking back towards Clontarf to see if a bus is coming.

    No matter how foolproof you make something, there'll always be a bigger fool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,475 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 50 ✭✭ Johnny High Flame


    Unfortunately still see idiots flying along on their bikes on the path - ignoring the new cycle lane less than a foot away. Add to them breaking red lights, as well as the cars doing the same (and driving on paths!) and it’s hard to see how anything is used properly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,440 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    I agree that the design of that part of the cycle lane is an absolute mess, it's a danger to everyone who uses it, and i'm surprised there's not more accidents there... The best way to have designed it would be to remove that tree and align the section past the footbridge... There's many who use that cycle lane as a two way lane and i don't blame them for it... And the reason why it's not properly designed by removal of the trees? chronic nimbyism! And by the same locals who will tell you the area is a mess..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,229 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    I’d hate to see more trees go myself. And I know the design team faced a lot of opposition to having any of them chopped. Engineers seemed oblivious to the idea that it’s a danger spot when I mentioned it to them.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    In an ideal world, they would be correct, as people should only be going in the correct direction and thus there shouldn’t be an issue.

    However that ignores human nature and so called desire paths. Hopefully people will stop going the wrong way when the outbound side is complete, however I fear that many will prefer to be on this side and continue to use it wrongly.

    That is why I wish they had designed it as a two way cycle path, they would have had to design for this then and it would have made for a higher quality cycle path. I hope they learn from these mistakes, but then they haven’t from the mess up on Griffith Avenue either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,440 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Trees regrow, and the whole debacle over residents almost chaining themselves to a bunch of trees has meant that what's built there now is a massive compromise on what the engineers/designers would have wanted... the safety issue at the footbridge being prime example and the fact that many people are using it as a two way lane...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    I thought it had come out that most of the people campaigning for retention of the trees weren't local, with most of them living on the Southside of the city? Or am I misremembering it?

    The outbound side was a nightmare for cyclists for years. The section from the optometrists to the footbridge was an absolute death trap; the perfect combination of crappy painted cycle lane, idiots swerving in last minute, more idiots opening their doors into the cycle lane without watching for cyclists, slower cyclists who insist on mounting the path to get in front of the queue only to hold everyone else up cos there's no room to overtake (only to repeat the process at the next set of lights which you were only stopped at because you couldn't overtake the slow fecker earlier) buses and taxis pulling in without checking, saps wandering into traffic on match days, crushed plastic pint glasses everywhere on a Monday morning after matches, lazy pricks legging it across the road instead of using the footbridge, schoolkids jostling at the bus stops.......

    If I'm going any further than the Malahide Road turnoff, I used to go through the park (especially if I got caught at the lights at the Fire Brigade station on the Nth Strand/Annesley Bridge). I don't blame anyone for using the lane on the park side of the road, the other side is like a meat grinder nightmare.



  • Posts: 50 ✭✭ Johnny High Flame


    Nah chopping down more mature trees because people don’t know how to use a cycle lane is not the answer. I’m sure they’ll figure it out in due course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    As far as I am concerned this area is now a "no go" if you are going by car. I was going to a match in Croke Park recently. Instead of going Howth Road to Fairview. I naively said to myself sure Clontarf way might be as good or better.

    There was a "stop/go" system at Westwood no movement. Really backed up for ages, people doing u-turns because of it. I did the same myself. Went the East Wall way, but everyone else had the same idea. Barely made the match on time, even though there was a much smaller crowd than normal.

    Also given the nature of the roadworks it is an extremely dangerous area for the elderly infirm or disabled, uneven paths, cones, dug up ground. A real "war zone" feel to it. Those with businesses in the area must be driven demented as well.

    I hope all this building work will be worth it in the end and it, but at the moment the area is a disaster to travel through. They might as well ban cars altogether from that stretch of road given the congestion/roadworks it is pointless.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,475 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    the outbound section in fairview, from where fairview grill is to the malahide road, has had basically no progress from what i can see, it's just dug up and exposed pipes. taking forever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,229 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    They cut down trees and people don't even notice. It's just something people latch on to as an excuse for zero improvement to the area.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,244 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Nah, it's an improvement for people passing through an area. Those who actually live there might actually enjoy having a few trees in their local area. I remember when they were building the port tunnel and as part of it they commandeered a large section of Fairview Park. They even knocked down the changing rooms under the pretense that new ones would be built. Yeah, that never happened.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,394 ✭✭✭markpb


    Both can be true. Trees are absolutely important for the city but they are also used as stalking horse for people objecting to a project. Trees are cut down across the city all the time for various reasons but you generally only hear people complaining about it when they are objecting to a housing or transport project.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,427 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    People cycling in the wrong direction on a cycle lane isn't a design flaw. The issue really is that the outbound cycle lane isn't available yet. Once it is, people should use that, choosing not to do so is abusing the facility and making what should be a safe space dangerous for everyone.

    I don't think two-way cycle lanes on the Park side would have worked as most people joining/leaving the cycle lanes will do so on the other side of the road. Two way cycle lanes could have worked on the other (i.e. outbound) side. To do that, it could have been left as one general traffic lane outbound instead of having a second from Annesley Bridge. It would be possible as the library on Marino Mart at least.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Hard disagree, cyclists have no problem crossing the road to get to a more pleasant and high quality cycle lane. After all people do it all the time on the Clontarf to Howth cycle lane, which is a major success. Plus such cyclists have to cross the road regardless with the current one way cycle lane!

    It would be pretty silly to suggest that the Howth cycle lane was built on the other side next to the houses and business of Clontarf rather than the more attractive sea side.

    The Fairview park side is certainly more attractive to any cyclist. A two way cycle lane on the other side would be a mess with far more interactions with pedestrians on the narrow footpath, coming and going from shops, buses, plus there are a number of extra road junctions on that side which don’t exist on the park side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,475 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,244 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    No, there’s a small compound there now for park staff. They never replaced the large changing room area that was there before the works.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,475 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    i think you're wrong, the big building opposite st joseph's is changing rooms as far as I know

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,229 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    I can't remember old changing rooms to be honest. But I didn't live in the area until after the port tunnel was built. As mentioned, didn't they build new changing areas?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,427 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    You disagree that people shouldn't be cycling in the wrong direction on a single direction cycle lane!?

    Having cycle lanes in both directions on the outbound side would facilitate local trips from homes to shops, cafes, school, etc. and back all on the same side of the road. If both cycle lanes were on the other side, such journeys would be less attractive by bike. Such journeys are the "low hanging fruit" in terms of getting people onto bikes. Longer journeys such as commutes to/from the city centre would require switching to the other side of the road in one direction regardless of which side the cycle lanes are.

    Ideally, in the not too distant future, the second outbound lane would be removed between Annesley Bridge and the library on Marino Mart (the left turn lane for Malahide Road would be retained), i.e. the right-most driving lane reaims, the left-most driving lane becomes the bus lane and the bus lane becomes cycle/pedestrian space. That would allow for cycle lanes in both directions for that stretch, with the inbound cycle lane remaining on the other side. It would be quite easy/cheap to do and would also allow for an increase in width in front of the businesses on Marino Mart.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,298 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You disagree that people shouldn't be cycling in the wrong direction on a single direction cycle lane!?

    How are people to know whether part of a of cycle lane is one way or two?

    What about someone sitting in Fairview Park having cycled there from Clontarf - are they expected to cross the road at either Annesley Br or over the metal bridge (depending on where they are in the park)?

    I'm not justifying travelling in the wrong direction but if we design ambiguous routes then don't be surprised when people use them any which way.



Advertisement