Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1736737739741742915

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    You said:

    Developers did not bankrupt the country as has already been suggested to you.

    Read the link to the FT article.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,634 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    " Do you think an untrained labourer adds more value to a construction site than a second year apprentice? Because they earn well above minimum wage."


    Yes I do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Blut2


    You've made multiple posts attempting to justify the current state of affairs, and current pay rate for apprentices. Which would suggest you very obviously think the current rate is 'good'.

    "if the pay is not attractive then get employment in a sector that pays you what you want."

    Are you being intentionally dense? This is literally the entire exact problem that I brought up in my initial post on the subject. People aren't becoming apprentices in high enough numbers, largely because the pay isn't high enough. Which is why we need to raise apprentice wages. So that we can recruit more of them.

    Its really not rocket science.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,386 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Yes holidays and B/H's apply to all staff, however apprenticeship spend nearly another 20% of there Time on block release. The employerhas to co er this cost.

    A student in college is not only paying fees to attend but most are working part-time adding 10-20 hours to there college week. Apprentices are paid from day one. there rates are linked to the craft rate.

    Y1= 33%

    Y2=50%

    Y3=75%

    Y4=90%

    Taking the block release period into account the rates are fair IMO.

    On the labourer. A labourer is working g from day one they have no block release except for statutory H&S training ( safe pass) which most will have to have completed before they are employed

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,337 ✭✭✭The Student


    You don't appear to understand how business works. If pay is not enough people won't go into the industry, developers can't develop so they make no money.

    Yet again you are interpreting something that I have not even said. Try actually reading my posts rather than seeing something I did not post.

    Solution - increase wages to attract more into sector. It's the developers who need to realise this is simple supply and demand remember economics 101.

    On a final note if you want to personalise comments bring it on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Blut2


    So you do in fact agree that we need to increase apprentice wages to attract more into the industry then. Thats a complete 180 from your initial posts. Its good to hear you've admitted the error of your ways.

    A completely untrained labourer on day 1 is adding far less value to a building site than a mid-year 2 apprentice, yet gets paid far more per hour. Anyone whos ever worked on a building site would tell you that.

    Most white collar workers regularly attend professional training, up to and including entire academic years away from the work place, on their employer's dime. An MBA for example is almost always employer funded, to the tune of €40k+ fees and an entire year away from the work place.

    Paying for employee training is completely normal and good business sense, which is why its so common.

    I note you've not given any source for your dubious claim that "an employer only breaks even on an apprentice by their 4th year". Presumably that means you have none?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    There are multiple issues in the drop in numbers taking up apprenticeships paticularly in construction sector

    1 poor employment terms and conditions throughout your career

    2 we are fast approaching the most of the sale price of a home going to people who never got there hands dirty on site

    3 Traditionally a sector that have little regard for customers, does not attract employees

    4 Better pay and conditions in MNC at starter level, progression opportunities are greater within and funded by company in many cases. Many MNC are snapping up apprentices as there skills are heavily sought after

    Again we need to get kids disillusioned with the academic system into this pathway as early as possible. The skills they obtain will always be in demand, be it in construction or elsewhere



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The sector has effectively returned to what resembles a pyramid scheme as more and more tax payers money is looted to give to tax payers to afford accommodation. The more that's looted the more price increases and the more taxpayers money needs to be taken

    The political rational for this is the illusion that the government is helping you to get a home. The more they "help" the more price increases so those that purchased in the past get the "feel good factor"

    Nail on the head. And now we've reached the stage that the first featured property on myhome.ie homepage is not using a picture of the house to grab your attention, but a graphic highlighting how the taxpayer helped out their fellow taxpayers Max and Andrea by funding 25% of their house purchase price.

    Screenshot 2024-02-05 at 15.37.49.png

    Have we jumped the shark?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Pulling pints and stacking shelves gets you a 400kish house!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Hmm. What would also be of great assistance to middling income families would be if houses were to simply cost less.

    But I think it's must better to pump more funny-money into a system already drowning in cash. We have to keep those pension funds afloat!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,925 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Been following the whole Evergrande thing on and off for a while. It is a whole lot worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 641 ✭✭✭J_1980


    It’s much worse. Ireland was just a funny money bubble. China under Xi with his “common prosperity” agenda is going back to socialism, ie abject & absolute poverty. Won’t happen in a day but the Yanks/Cia etc will be gleefully laughing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Given the state of the USA, I don't think that they should be laughing at anything. :/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    My God that ad is so cringe

    Downpayment of less than 2% of the home

    Tick all the boxes for "political correctness"

    Never ever use a broker recommended to you by a selling agent. They talk


    Very 06'ish



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    If we weren't living in this globalist nightmare , it would be perfectly possible for people with rather ordinary jobs to afford housing without state-created funny money. Back in the 60s, the house beside my grandparents was owned by a single-income family of five. The man in question was, I believe, a postman.

    Incidentally, the same house today is owned by an investor who rents it out. I have little doubt that my grandmother's house will end up the same way when she passes on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,634 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    That first home scheme is honestly disgusting in how it's marketed.

    They're effectively giving a second mortgage to people who can't afford a home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,386 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Just another fact on there wages they would not have received 30k in a tax rebate. According to my calculations it just shy of 20k

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,925 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    More like old fashioned corruption with Chinese Characteristics. People taking out mortgages for apartments that had not even been built. Suppose there is similarity with the way revenue from building is/was some provincial governments' major/main source of revenue..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Well, this is what happens when money is printed in the trillions; asset markets will hoover it up. The lockdowns weren't free, even though they were literally throwing money at people, but I digress...

    More seriously, things like this are what made me opt to buy into the market. I don't like that we're in this situation, but anyone holding on to cash hoping for prices to come down would do well to consider their options. We're not exactly at Zimbabwe levels of inflation, but with interest rates probably coming down in the near future, I think that more and more currency is going to be injected into the market. Sometimes, I feel it would be better to be paid in MTG cards....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,634 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Sold in November 2017 for 800k.

    That's a nice markup. Nearly 80k profit a year if it sells for asking. Why would you bother working?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Likely any property bought today will be up 30-50% based on its pre-lockdown price. There are derelict rural cottages up for sale here in Wexford for 150-200k that could have been purchased for 70k or so only a few years ago. I'm not sure where this is going, but I don't see a reversal in prices anytime soon.

    This is what happens when those in charge are insulated from the consequences of their decisions or indeed, when they actively profit personally from what they do. But hey, why care as long as I get my pension, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,627 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It's a large house with a decent garden in south county Dublin, a 5-minute walk to Dun Laoghaire village, right beside a DART station and right beside the sea.

    It's a lot of money but by no definition is that a 'bog standard' house



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Where is Vincent Browne when you need him?



    That said, the one in the Irish Times link is far far closer to "bog standard". It shouldn't merit needing someone on a 250k+ salary to buy it. It's probably a house that a mid-level civil servant was buying when it was built.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    It's a fine house, no doubt about it, but in the grander scheme of things, it's rather ordinary. There are houses like that all over Dublin that were built in the 20th century for people of the lower middle class. My grandparents owned a similar house in Stillorgan, and they were a single income family with my grandfather holding a rather ordinary civil servant job.

    Property like this was perfectly within the means of people on average incomes not that long ago. To afford such a home today, one would need to be well above average in terms of income.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In the context of the economy a civil servant would have been far higher up the food chain back then versus now though. People also forget that we had huge unemployment, its easier to buy a house when 1 in 5 of your mates doesn't even have a job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Don't think there's been much discussion here about IRES REIT and their latest shareholder woes.

    If Vision Capital (Canadian fund)'s motion is approved at EGM next week, they will move to have IRES liquidate its entire property portfolio. Whether that will be sold tenants in situ or not is unclear, though a sale of this scale almost certainly will be looking at bulk buyers (other REITs or corporate).

    Either way it's hard to see it as good news - one less landlord in the market, even if best case the total rental stock is the same. It will lead to less competition in rental market and higher rents, one way or another.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,627 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    250k is not a massive income for the sort of families who will be viewing that house.

    Two professionals in their mid-30s earning 125k each? There is nothing exceptional about that, at all.



Advertisement