Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1101010111013101510161796

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    100%. There's always a natural churn that happens after RWC. "enforced" or otherwise, it's still new caps. Just like with Kearney and Best after the last RWC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 738 ✭✭✭farmerval


    One of the things in the Irish system, is players are slow coming into provincial teams from under age. Every year there'll be comment how the French or English U20's have much more senior experience than the Irish players. Whether that's from the limited number of pro teams or what. Players only establishing themselves on provincial teams at 23 or 24 or more is common.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    We have 4 provinces, in France they have 14 teams in the Top 14 and 16 in Pro D2. French players do get more game time quicker, this was shown in the U20 game but we have to work with what we have



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    "Johnny who?? Crowley is excellent"

    "Ireland's new 10 looked pretty good. He didn't wilt under the spotlight."

    Texts from some nonIrish friends of mine. It's interesting to me how less equivocal their praise is of Crowley, while the narrative in Ireland (from Nugent's closing thoughts on commentary, through to posts on here, through to broadsheet coverage) is defining him in a much different tone, i.e., "in spite of his mistakes", or "showed character to rebound", etc.

    I don't know whether there is a disproportionate anxiety around replacing Sexton that is causing this. But in contrast, Joe McCarthy had at least two turnovers, but the narrative is only focusing on the positives. Rightly in my opinion.

    For me, two young players had excellent games. McCarthy had the greater impact and was deservedly MOTM.

    But in one case, Irish people are defining a player's contribution around his mistakes. In the other case, they simply praising how good a game he had.

    Is it because McCarthy, in many respects, is a bonus? I.e., we already have very good depth at lock.

    But the very existential issue of Ireland replacing its 10 is perhaps leading to scrutiny on Crowley that is perhaps not entirely fair.

    A 23-year-old out-half just went to Marseille, played 80 minutes, and we beat France scoring five tries. Something, I feel, we should be a lot more excited about (positively) than we seem to be....



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I think a lot of people are praising his courage through highlighting the mistakes he shrugged off before putting in some great passes and kicks.

    It would be very easy for a young player coming out of Sexton's shadow to play it extremely safe, especially after a couple of misfires but Crowley just seems to be able to put the odd glitch to one side and keep playing his game. It's exciting to watch and will only further speed up his development.

    McCarthy is not dissimilar, his propensity to give away dumb penalties is always highlighted to temper his gung-ho heroics.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You'd want to take this up with Farrell also who highlighted some of his poor decision making. That he didn't wilt under the spotlight despite the mistakes is credit to him.

    It's completely to be expected but it also clearly did happen. I expect he'll learn from it and improve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    As great as Farrell may be, no man who has ever used the phrase "We are taking them boys to the hurt arena" should be considered the sole authority on a narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Really? The media for the last 24 months are gushing about Crowley at every opportunity. Not sure the narrative that he isn’t getting praise holds water to be honest

    Remember the majority of the media telling everyone for the last 10 years that Sexton had to be replaced and should be dropped



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I presume its because he had a pretty rough start to the game and his first half was a mixed bag at best. We don't have to go overboard and call it brilliant if it wasn't. His second half was very promising and he's unlikely to be that nervous again, so overall its a positive performance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 396 ✭✭El Vino


    There was a point over the last year where this definitely not happening and the media, like the coaching group went all in on Sexton. Occasionally I listen to the Eggchasers podcast, this week they have some interesting comments on Ireland, Sexton, Crowley and McCarthy. I don't agree with everything they say and one is a self confessed Ireland hater but they were pretty complimentary on Crowley and McCarthy and bemoaned the decision not to sub Sexton in the ABs game at the world cup.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    For what it's worth he goes into detail here about how much he regrets using that phrase at the time and how much he has learned since.


    I think hes doing a pretty bang up job personally.

    Crowley made several mistakes that you would bemoan in a more experienced player. But he's not a more experienced player so that's fine and he'll learn from it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,739 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    It beggared belief, a 38 year old at walking pace shuttling the ball on. And a young 10 high on confidence after slotting crucial drop goals en route to winning the league, away wins in South Africa etc. left idle on the bench.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,942 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,972 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Crowley is doing well alright.

    Keeping things ticking over nicely til Prendergast takes over in a few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Crowley played the full 80, was 5/6 on place kicks, a try assist, 32 passes all to hand, 28 metres on the ground (thanks to a clean break and three defenders beaten) in a game we scored 5 tries and made nearly 400 metres on the ground. All in his first start in the Six Nations. In France. But for me, the most positive thing, was how he was literally available on every phase* for the pass from 9 or out the back door from the first receiver. Insane work rate on top of all other duties.

    Like, I dunno. Steering the narrative instead around his mistakes is just something I can't quite understand. As I say above, my theory is on the collective anxiety about replacing Sexton (something Farrell himself would be feeling more than most, to your earlier point).

    *provided he hadn't carried or cleaned a ruck in the previous phase.. I counted only a handful of these.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,224 ✭✭✭✭phog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'd like to watch it again, but on first viewing, I thought it was a brilliant performance, tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Really? The media for the last 24 months are gushing about Crowley at every opportunity.

    24 months? At every opportunity? Jesus, I dunno if that's really accurate tho.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Not convinced I even knew who Crowley was 24 months ago so it's definitely not true.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It absolutely should not be the narrative. The focus should be that he did well. Farrell mentions the poor decisions just to put everything in context.

    Trying to steer the narrative to what should have happened in the world cup or that it was a supreme performance is not right either though. It was a very encouraging performance from an inexperienced player at this level. In context I don't think it's overstating it to say it was an excellent performance but if he produced the same against England or Scotland I wouldn't be super thrilled. We've seen nothing to suggest he won't learn and rise to the occasion but you have to prove it on the field too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,972 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Listened to the match review podcasts from Second Captains and the 42. The consensus from both is we simplified our lineout from the approach taken in the World Cup and that played a huge role in winning the game.

    Proportionately, we use the lineout to launch attacks more than most sides, but it was taken apart in the games against South Africa and New Zealand. Getting that steady source of set piece attacking ball was a huge relief and a win for the coaching set up.

    One caveat is that France really didn't have their best jumpers on the pitch. We haven't really been tested yet on our own throw. But early signs are encouraging.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,538 ✭✭✭ersatz


    People are over reacting to Crowley's errors being pointed out. That takes nothing away form him in an otherwise excellent performance. All of his errors were just bad decisions and are easily fixed in a positive coaching environment which he has. And I think the main point many people are making is that his confidence and courage wasn't dampened by his mistakes. First 6N start away in France and he delivered a very accomplished performance. That is massive for Ireland going forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Just on two of Crowley's "errors" - the blocked-down kick and the chip through that had a little too much pepper on it.

    The immediate outcome in each scenario was a loss, yes.

    But what those kicks did was establish that Crowley is willing to dink and chip and that at no point could France be fully aggressive with their Edwardian linespeed if it sacrificed too much space in behind the defensive line.

    I go back to one of the most impressive things Crowley brought to the game on Friday - the workrate to be running lines as the backdoor option with most attacking pods, creating a three-part threat that's a nightmare to defend. Stay passive, the forwards will get momentum and gainline success (as we did). Rush up, forwads go out the back door to Crowley who can either shoot for a gap, pass out wide or dink in behind you.

    Those two kicking decisions lost immediate battles but helped us comprehensively win the war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,739 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    "It was a very encouraging performance from an inexperienced player at this level. In context I don't think it's overstating it to say it was an excellent performance but if he produced the same against England or Scotland I wouldn't be super thrilled" - is this not a complete contradiction?

    I'd imagine most people would be delighted if he played to that level again? I know I would.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,224 ✭✭✭✭phog


    If Crowley has a similar game again v England, we'll win it. No bother.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,219 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    I think we might need similar performances from a lot of other players more than Crowley. In fact, this Crowley hysteria is already getting silly.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I honestly think the mistakes crowley made are a bit overblown and the irish press are overstating how bad his first half was.

    Also, leaving him on the bench was ill advised in the world cup. The best time for him to play with his skillset is against tired legs.

    However, it wasn't perfect against france. I'd agree with that and expect him to be better going forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Pretty much to a man, nobody had a bad game in Marseille. In addition to Crowley, the particular standouts for me were McCarthy, Aki, Sheehan, Lowe, Doris and Beirne. Though only the former is filling the boots of a 120+ cap legend. So I wouldn't call it hysteria, more very enthusiastic optimism for what might lie ahead.

    We'll need everyone on song again to beat England in Twickenham.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,224 ✭✭✭✭phog


    To put the filling the boots of a legend with 120+ caps in context and how two legends themselves performed on the 6Ns debut

    From RTE

    1707177145155.jpg




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,219 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    The (not so) great, Crowley v Sexton debate begins..



Advertisement
Advertisement