Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ceiling height in habitable room ?

  • 22-01-2024 09:17PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 575 ✭✭✭


    I've searched but didn't find a definitive answer.

    Retention Planning drawing of cross section for a first floor bedroom ceiling shows 2424mm.

    I inspected the house today and found the height to be just 2333mm.

    I can see no reason why 2400mm could not have been achieved.

    So, is 2400mm is recommendation or a requirement ?



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,198 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    It comes from TGD part F. Section 1.2.1.7

    Its a “suggested dimension consistent with good room design”.

    What was the purpose of the inspection?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 575 ✭✭✭joebre


    Was looking at in in a pre-purchase inspection for a client.

    Architect has signed off "substantial compliance with Planning and Building Regulations.

    As he was seekng retention, why did he not dimension the ceiling height correctly ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,198 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Did he qualify why it was substantially compliant and not simply compliant. Specifically in relation to ceiling heights.

    If I was to give him the benefit of doubt, I'd suggest that the retention drawings were based on previous design drawings, rather than a specific detailed survey. If I was being cynical, a convenient typo obscured a element of blurry compliance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 769 ✭✭✭C. Eastwood


    The Construction Professionals and Builder are obliged to know that the minimum height from finished floor finished ceiling in 2.4 m for ventilation purposes as per TGD.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,198 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    It should be. I think even aiming for 2400mm exactly isn't very good. But wording of the TGD is broad enough to allow for considerable tolerance. It's, literally a suggestion, not a requirement. And as it's under part F, you'd have to establish that a lower ceiling wasn't achieving sufficient air changes. I suspect that's why is was qualifies as substantially compliant.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement