Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1100010011003100510061853

Comments

  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,410 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Yeah look who has most line out steals. There a reason McCarthy is at zero, he's lifting Ryan.

    Plus, he's the best maul defender in the leinster squad



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    Yeah, that surprised me as I'd felt I could remember some lineout steals from him (but it's possible they were in Europe and then not in the sample).

    Leinster have stolen more lineout ball this year than in years past, and seem to be attempting to go after opposition ball much more aggressively. Ryan Baird has stolen a lot of ball this season, and James Ryan is always good for a few.

    One final point from me on McCarthy's ruck numbers: I think it shouldn't be overlooked that he is carrying a huge amount of ball, and being utilised as a carrier (and dummy runner) a lot by Leinster. Obviously when you're being gameplanned in that way, you're inevitably going to hit less offensive rucks.

    It doesn't speak to the effectiveness - that's more on exuberance and just inaccuracy (and something I think he can improve), but it does explain a volume disparity IMO. His defensive ruck hit numbers and effectiveness are good and comparable with the guys he's vying with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,479 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Looking at those stats it's hard to make the case for Ryan or Beirne starting over Henderson



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,410 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,380 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Don't be silly. The whole point of those stats being posted is to argue that McCarthy must be in the team. You're not actually supposed to look at them and ask wider questions or look at the broader context.



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,410 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Why can't you?

    Surely you can read them and analysis them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    It would be a mistake not to start both vdF and Beirne.


    France 27 v 6 Ireland. Colombes, Paris, 1964

    F.Keogh (Bective rangers); P.Casey (UCD), J.Walsh (UCG), K.Flynn (Wanderers) A.Duggan (Lansdowne); M.Gibson (Cambridge University), J.Kelly (UCD); S.Millar (Ballymena), R.Dawson (Wanderers), M.O’Callaghan (Sundays well); W.Mulcahy (Bective rangers) Capt; W.McBride (Ballymena); E.Maguire (UCG), G.Culliton (Wanderers), N.Murphy (Cork Constitution)

    Paul MacWeeney IT. Monday, April 13, 1964

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On the face of it, with five superb tries and a dropped goal from such a range as to be almost unfair, this might be rated as an outstanding French side but certain reservations can hardly be avoided. The principal of these was the weakness of the Irish tackling. Especially in the most important areas, around the fringes of the scrums and at the back of the line-outs.

    The most potent agent of destruction was Sitjar, capped for the first time against Wales last month and a flanker in the highest tradition of his country. This short, heavily built individual was a positive ball of fire. For whether in taking the short pass from scrum-half Lasserre after a set scrum or supporting the line-out catch by Dauga, he accelerated into top speed in a stride, tore past the Irish and having found the open country on the blind side veered out towards the open to link up with his immediate colleagues, Crauste and Lira.

    The inability of either Murphy or Culliton to check Sitjar was disastrous for with ever-surging drive the support widened the breach until the passage to the line was almost cleared. Sitjar might well have done some damage in the early stages but to allow him to continue his devastation almost throughout only emphasises the strange frailty of the Irish tackling. 

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    33:15 Check out the scrum!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,380 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    You can, but it's not worth hearing endlessly from Ryan ultras.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Regardless of selection this week, I think this is a great chance for us to get over the line away to France.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I spent a bit of time and used that website to compile top 5 locks in ireland using the rate stats for URC. The only **** thing is that ryan didn't play enough to be included i guess? He's not on there anyway. I did not include baird or ahern.

    Thanks @LordPalmerston again for the link earlier. Really fun site to play with.

    I just did rate stats instead of totals.

    Dominant Carry %

    • Jenkins 61.8%
    • Edogbo 55.6%
    • Joyce 55.6%
    • Moloney 55%
    • McCarthy 48.1%

    Gainline %

    • Edogbo 62.5%,
    • McCarthy 56.6%
    • Joyce 55.6%
    • Moloney 45.5%
    • Jenkins 44.4%

    Offensive Ruck effectiveness

    • Beirne 94.8%,
    • Treadwell 91.7%
    • Niall Murray 89.6%
    • Moloney 89%
    • Jenkins 84.4%

    Tackle %

    • Henderson 95.4%
    • D. Murray 93.2%
    • Edogbo 92.9%
    • N Murray 92.7%
    • Treadwell 92.1%

    Dom Tackle %

    • McCarthy 15.9%
    • Edogbo 9.5%
    • Joyce 7.9%
    • N Murray 5.5%
    • Jenkins 4.9%

    Defensive Ruck effectiveness

    • N Murray 40%
    • D Murray 33.3%
    • Edogbo 21.4%
    • Beirne 21.1%
    • Henderson 15.8%

    I'm sure there are some mistakes in my transcribing. Also some of these are obv sample issues but i didn't really feel like judging a min standard for each one.

    Edogbo is the star of this in the sense he shows up on 5 lists out of 6. It seems that that injury could have messed up his breakout season into becoming a star.

    Jenkins shows up on 4 lists. I get why south africa stuck a cap on him just to make sure given his age. Would have been eligible for ireland at 30. N Murray shows up on 4 as well.

    Joyce, McCarthy and Moloney show up on three lists.

    Henderson, Beirne, Treadwell and D Murray make two. In fairness to Henderson, he was .1% from making three and mccarthy making two.

    Anyway, i'll do a more meaningful list at end of season for more positions.

    Edit: i guess a better analysis of this would be to find the elite drop off points. Where there is a big drop off and then a big bunch of guys.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I still cant get my head around the "Offensive Ruck effectiveness". Whatever metrics they use its surely a very subjective bit of data. Much like the "Defensive Ruck effectiveness".



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    1 potential flaw of this is that its mainly showing impact effectiveness and not volume/work rate. Jenkins shows up well here but I wouldn't think his volume is great



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yea, the problem with that is that they seem to be totals or rates. The totals are impacted too much by minutes played and would require work on my part to adjust them for minutes. I agree though, if you really line someone up to do a ton of tackles or hit a lot of rucks, that sheer volume has value.



  • Posts: 186 ✭✭ Beckett Melodic Slipknot


    It's great to be in a position to have this conversation. Any starting second row pairing from Ryan, McCarthy, Beirne, Henderson, and Baird will do a good job for Ireland with plenty of impact from the bench.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    I had similar questions on this, and this is the best explanation I can find, from this site:

    In attack, an effective ruck is classed as either cleaning out the opposition or securing the breakdown. In defence, it is defined as either winning a turnover, winning a penalty or being a ‘nuisance’ – disrupting opposition ball by slowing down the ruck or causing the opposition to commit more players to the contact area.

    It should be said that ‘effectiveness’ is often skewed in favour of those who hit more attacking rucks, given that it’s generally easier to have a positive impact at these.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,881 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    For the craic I'd suggest adding Coombes to the data above. I did a post on the European thread and he features heavily and spent a bit of time at second row this season I think?

    On your point on offensive rucks - Coombes was 3rd most effective of URC players in offensive rucks whilst also being streets ahead of everyone in terms of carries. As I said above I'd have to check how long he spent in the second row but the point still stands I feel

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I didn't include coombes, baird or ahern because i couldn't isolate lock minutes.

    I'd guess if you value volume while still being at least good if not excellent at everything, you'd value coombes. Just a guess tho



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,410 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    "making a nuisance" must be very subjective because McCarthy is a proper bollix at almost all the defensive rucks he hit, to slow down opposition ball. its a patent tactic of leinster this year.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You'd imagine it's some combination of Time to the ruck (objective, quantitative) and quality of the involvement (subjective, qualitative).

    It's a difficult one to measure, would love to know a bit more about how they go about it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I take stats with a pinch of salt these days since I heard ‘statistician’ Derek McNamara on OTB rugby telling everyone how the data reveals that Ardie Savea isn’t actually that good how there was no way LAR could beat Leinster in the Heineken Cup final.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Stats in rugby are in the absolute dark ages compared to something like baseball.

    I find them fun more than anything. Or a reminder to keep a closer eye on someone during a game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I daresay any of the stats we see are very rudimentary alright, would love to know more about what the type of thing the players and management themselves have access to.

    I remember when reading Keith Earls autobiography, and as an aside he mentioned he was still at or near the top of some of the metrics like Counter movement jumps for leg strength, fastest time over 10m, fastest time over 30m, max metre's per second hit during games from their GPS trackers.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Those basic physical stats if they are correlated to game success are probably the most important stats. But usually only teams would know them.

    For example, in baseball exit velocity is obviously important for power, but they figured out that if you hit over a certain number once as a prospect that alone changes your power projection significantly. I hope i didn't butcher that, its been a while since i read it. i think it was 107mph.

    There are probably stats like how quick you can jump and how high that are very important for the lineout. I doubt they have figured out how important each one is though and where the 'cutoffs' are.

    The concept of empty stats as well is very well developed in american football and baseball, but less so in rugby.



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Counter argument would be south africa apparently massivly rate certain stats. Theyve one thats effective actions per min or something thats a bit of a gospel for them aparently



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'd say two things about that. Team stats they keep themselves will be better. Secondly, they are probably useful but stats used 20 years ago in baseball were useful and revolutionary, but we know now that they were often wrong and/or superficial. Basically, we are at the beginning of the journey in rugby.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Encouraged reading this.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/rugby/2024/0129/1429296-fogarty-ireland-have-learned-from-their-scrum-mistakes/

    Esp. these two quotes from Fogarty.

    "There's definitely a few pictures we can clean up on. We don't want to show a referee or touch judge an easy image. With our props, we're trying to show as best a picture we can, being nice and square in what we're doing.

    ------------------------

    "How we can control weight, post the 'set', is something that we've focused on, so we want to show tidy pictures to referees and want to work with them as best we can.

    __________________


    Proof will be in the pudding.

    Porter was asked about "Painting Positive Pictures" at the start of last years Championship - (Ref was also Dickson v Wales)

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/rugby/2023/0201/1353230-porter-painting-positive-pictures-key-for-irish-scrum/

    And also after 1st test v NZ (Dickson again)

    https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/2022/07/05/ireland-new-zealand-tour-2022-andrew-porter-scrum-weakness/



  • Posts: 186 ✭✭ Beckett Melodic Slipknot


    Specific stats like those where you understand how the data maps onto your gameplan are very valuable. When their video analysts clip their games they'll likely be categorising a pre-defined list of effective actions so they can drill down into the stats. Ireland and the provinces will have similar stats for their gameplans but we just don't get to hear about them.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Hard not to think that McCarthy is potentially a special talent.

    That has been evident to Leinster fans for a good while now, but he's getting the run of games in the Champions Cup to back it up.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭El Vino


    Delighted with McCarthy's emergence, also Ahern and Edegbo at Munster. Props, OHs and then 2nd rows are the hardest positions to get International quality in Ireland so having him emerge and a couple of more prospects in the pipeline is superb. He should definitely be in 23 for Sat. 6/2 split with Conor Murray and Frawley backs on the bench gives us resonable cover.



Advertisement
Advertisement