Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Irish politics discussion thread

1105106108110111263

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,220 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    This, if true is an awful look for a Taoiseach - three and possibly four attempts to tell the truth.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭Blut2


    False political donations declarations cheat us all, particularly when you're caught and have to cover your lie with another lie, and then get caught again..

    (with credit to reddit for that line, which sums it up perfectly)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,220 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The now routine circling of the wagons will see MSM doing it'd level best to totally ignore this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    Another week, another complete 180 for FG. I wonder what position they'll do a u-turn on this week? Given their, ans their supporters, initial reaction to the opposition asking them to support the SA jumping aboard the bandwagon now seems a bit strange. Going further left in Palestine but further right on immigration.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Water John




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,220 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭antimatterx




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,220 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If you pick arbitrary points, yes they are down from their 'peak'.

    Every party is 'down' from their peak.

    FG are 'down down down' from their peak of 35% - shock horror.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    But it's not arbitrary.

    It uses a local regression trend line to determine the peak and it's clear from that data that SF is trending down.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Difficult to say for sure but when the drop in support for SF being met by an increase in support for Independents my guess is that immigration is the driver in this poll at least. That sort of support, that SF would have gotten in the past despite being explicitly pro-migration, was always going to melt away as soon as they got into power. The disaster for them is that they're losing it before they ever even get into power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,220 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Poll in the IT today indicates there is trouble coming for all on immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    How do you think SF should react and what policy changes should they look to implement?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The last 4 years or so, SF hovered up all the anti-establishment votes.

    Now that they are closer to power, SF had to make themselves more palatable to middle Ireland, but in doing so threw that new vote under the bus.

    SF are no longer seen as anti-establishment by many, especially the working class.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Also, to the last point, yes. Amazingly, SF are losing support when the government have so many issues on the table.

    It's one thing for a government to have to make hard decisions and lose support. That is somewhat understandable. But for SF to lose so much support over the last 18 months when they have not decided at all? Crazy tbh.

    Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,220 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I'll be honest here, I don't know.

    And I say there are problems ahead for all on immigration because it is clear nobody has a solution to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    And that is why SF support is plummeting in the polls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,220 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes, I said that on the other thread. Others put it down to other things. I think SF need to listen and modify there position like any good responsive political party would.

    With 81% of the electorate unhappy with the government's handling of immigration what do you think the government should change policy wise?

    When analysed comments on immigration were overwhelmingly negative (81 per cent), with sentiment focused on our general inability to cope with the numbers arriving and on the Government’s policy responses specifically.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I am not a member of any of the parties in government so it is up to them.

    But if SF wants to lead the next government, maybe they should you know, lead.

    At the moment they are hiding, like a bunch of infants.

    Your response to the question is a perfect encapsulation to that. Afraid to put anything out there in case it comes back at ya.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,220 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Nor am I a member of any party.


    FG FF and the Greens are the leaders and 81% of the electorate are unhappy. Shouldn't the onus be first and most forcefully on the government to lead?

    Are you critical of government policy on this?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    No party in Ireland has a solution for for Immigration because it's a complex issue with no easy solutions and it's only going to get worse. You only have to look around at other countries where's it's also a massive political issue. It's dominating the headlines right now in the UK and USA. There's the Push factor of climate breakdown and cascading numbers of failed states happening in developing countries along with the Pull factor of increasingly sophisticated smuggling networks.

    I suspect that, in the long run, the rules around entry will have to be changed, but no party is going to touch that with a barge pole anytime soon. A bunch of independents will peddle a bunch of easy answers, which they know they will never be called upon to actually carry out and they'll clean up at the next election (both local and national).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is not just on immigration that Sinn Fein are showing a failure to lead.

    They claim to be in favour of reducing climate change but they have opposed every single measure designed to do so, without once offering a solution of any kind.

    On October 7th, they have backed and backed away from their support for Palestine to the extent that MLMD is going to Washington to seek the favour of Biden.

    They are completely afraid of taking a single decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Theres a very easy solution. Do what Denmark did, and introduce a stricter regime for asylum seekers. Their number of asylum seekers dropped from 20k a year to 2k a year after they started actually controling their borders.

    They did this while party to exactly the same EU and UN treaties and legal obligations that Ireland is.

    This isn't some theoretical "what could we possibly do" scenario. We have a real world example, of a well functioning, liberal, Northern European country, thats the same size as Ireland, reducing the number of asylum seekers they let in by 90% within the last few years completely successfully.

    And as a result the immigration issue has receded there, and their previously rising rapidly far-right party has lost all its support.

    Circa 80% of the population of Ireland wants fewer asylum seekers taken in now. And its the #1 issue for voters in the country according to the Irish Times' poll today. So either our mainstream parties do it or soon, or far-right parties who promise to do so will start taking those votes.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,946 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ireland has never had close to 20k asylum seekers a year. Until 2022 the number was far closer to the apparent Danish figure of 2k. Yes, it has spiked since then, but the real strain on accommodation has been the admittance of so many Ukrainians fleeing the war. Personally I think that's the least we can do considering we give them no military support, but people should at least acknowledge that that is the real problem.

    People seeking international protection are not the reason we have a housing shortage and if we completely abrogated our responsibility towards them tomorrow the housing issue would not be solved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭Blut2


    We're literally projected to hit 20k asylum seekers this year, according to our government. We've had close to 15k the last number of years.

    Accomodating asylum seekers is costing the state billions of euros a year (the projection is €3bn for last year, significantly more than was spent on public transportation for the country).

    And the numbers of both asylum seekers, and the cost, are only going to go up every year as the climate crisis worsens.

    Sooner or later we have to control who enters the country - and Denmark shows us its completely possible to do so.

    20k a year (and increasing) of asylum seekers arriving require circa 7500 new housing units to house them, or almost 20% of the total houses being build in the state this year. Having 18k fewer people entering the state this year (if we managed a Denmark style reduction of 90%) would make a massive difference to our housing crisis.

    This isn't touching on Ukrainians at all, who're a completely separate issue.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,946 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    We do control who enters the country. Clearly with the large increase in applicants we need to fund the system that makes decisions as it is not making enough a year (only around 6000 last year I believe). Less appealing to some, but effective.

    There are various issues with our direct provision model, but ultimately asylum seekers are not taking up housing as we know it. They are predominantly in essentially disused hotels. They are not being put in semi-Ds or even apartments.

    Also Denmark did not reduce by 90% in general, they reduced by 90% from a one year outlier high which has since snuck back up slightly.

    I am all for processing the applications quicker and removing those who need to be removed. But our housing shortage is not caused by asylum seekers. It is caused by not building enough housing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,926 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    The promise I remember was to take in 100k refugees which is an order of magnitude above the 13k in emergency accommodation, and by a government whose policies deliberately fuelled the housing crisis. Making what at best is a tone-deaf unkeepable promise was begging for trouble.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,946 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ukrainians are not technically refugees, nor did they "promise" to take in a specific number. There was (and is) no perfect alternative - turning our backs has its own problems.

    The housing crisis is fuelled by not building enough housing, it largely is that simple. The government has plenty of blame, as do all local authorities all over the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Tens of thousands of people are turning up at our border every year, approx 60% last year with no passport or official documents, and they're entering our country. Anyone who shows up at the border with no passport is allowed to claim asylum and stay. Thats not controlling who enters the country.

    The decisions, and how long it takes to make them, are quite irrelevant. Only 248 failed asylum seekers were deported from the state in 2022, 285 from Jan-end of Nov 2023. Thats a tiny % of the total, the vast vast majority of people who arrive here illegally are being allowed to stay.

    Asylum seekers don't stay in direct provision for decades, they sooner or later end up in the normal housing market, taking up housing. The idea that 20,000 people arriving a year won't put any additional pressure on the housing market is just completely at odds with any grasp of reality. Thats the equivalent of a new Sligo town sized town needing to built every year, just to house these people.

    And, again, theres the fact that all of this is costing the state literally billions of euros a year. And that 80% of Irish people say they want numbers reduced. Both extremely relevant facts, you'd think.

    Denmark's number of asylum seekers was increasing by 20-40% a year, every year, for multiple years on end in the early 2010s. A situation similar to the one Ireland is in right now. They then introduced measures to restrict this, and their numbers dropped by 90%. We could do exactly what they did tomorrow, if our government wanted to. Theres literally nothing stopping us.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The Council of Europe isn't as blase as you are about Denmark infringing the human rights of refugees.

    "Following the intensification of measures aimed at ensuring that rejected asylum seekers and other foreigners without a residence permit cooperate to ensure their own return, the Commissioner finds particularly problematic the fact that individuals who cannot be returned, including families with children, may find their lives suspended and left in limbo for years. Considering the impact on mental health and wellbeing, as well as the potential to have life-long negative consequences, she encourages the authorities to reconsider the use of return centres. Regarding administrative detention of rejected asylum seekers and other migrants, the Commissioner calls on the authorities to ensure that alternative measures are prioritised, and that strict, prison-like rules and regimes are not implemented in this context."



Advertisement