Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

19919929949969971853

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Everleigh Freezing Oasis


    I agree with this but Farrell is very consistent in his selections and I do not see how both can make the 23 after POM has been named as captain. There will almost certainly be 7 players (5 starters + 2 subs) in the matchday squad who cover the back 5 of the scrum.

    POM is a locked in as captain, VDF is locked in as the only openside in the squad, Doris is locked in as he's Doris, Ryan and Beirne are locked in because they have been Farrell's pairing for years and both are playing well.

    That leaves 2 from Conan, Henderson, Beirne and McCarthy to be selected. Henderson started the QF against NZ and he had an excellent RWC. I'm not really convinced Farrell cares about provincial form. Conan's place might be vulnerable as he's not as established as the rest, but assuming everyone is fit I do not see any realistic prospect of both McCarthy and Baird making the 23. Who does he leave out? And we're talking here about what Farrell will likely do, not what we'd do.


    And for the record, Farrell has the overwhelming benefit of the doubt at the moment imo.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,894 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He had a setback after the squad was announced.

    I mean the alternative was an out of form Stockdale. Yes he deliberately played the frontline more than was to be expected but ultimately it made no difference. Hansen got injured in a game he would have been playing anyway, not against Tonga or Romania.

    I don’t think it tells us he cares more about what a player brings off field. The on field options were just meh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Earls was a 35 year old winger who couldn't stay fit and total minutes the previous calendar year summed to less than 6 matches. For a squad player that you intend to use only against some of the poorer sides, one of the top things you need is their availability and Earls showed he was a complete liability in that regard and it came to pass during the tournament. If they wanted him there for 'vibes' they could have brought him as backroom staff.

    Disagree on the rest making no difference.

    We lost the QF by the tiniest of margins with a team that looked completely out on their feet towards the end of the match. My feeling is they wouldn't have been quite as tired if we'd rotated more earlier in the tournament.

    We'll never know if it would have made a difference but Ireland were an outlier in the minutes used of their starters by the teams that made it to the semis, everyone else rotated far more than us.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,894 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    They were an outlier but it was both a deliberate choice and I think not that big a deal. If anything sexton is to blame with his ban - we played our first team less in the warmups.

    But the most important players had 50-60 min if rugby in a 3 week period. I just don't think it was an issue, but we can go round in circles on this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,319 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Ireland are a better team than South Africa.

    This is a take



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,436 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    South africa have tougher fixture list every year than us tbh so is it a surprise theyve a worse rrcord than us and id take their record in world cup and if we dont have the ability to do better to overcome attrition of a world cup then we need to totally change things up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I'd have agreed with you maybe up until the last World Cup. But since 2019 SA have mostly played Foster's pre-Schmidt All Blacks, and a Wallabies side in serious decline. Throw in at least two tests against Argentina and an EOYT where they can play the likes of Wales, Scotland and Italy, I'd say our schedules have been comparable.

    In World Cups they definitely have the horses, and really do seem to build to peak in that tournament. But would Irish fans be happy with a single Six Nations in the last ten years?

    Human nature to want what you never had, and it's all well and good to prioritize the RWC, but I do wonder how quickly fans would turn on an Irish Head Coach if he all but sacrificed the 6N each year to do it...?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,571 ✭✭✭✭phog


    You don't need to sacrifice the 6Ns but you certainly should be more experimental during the "friendlies", if for nothing else it gets more guys in camp and into the system so that there isn't a huge learning curve if they're ever required because of injuries.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Well just to clarify, I'm talking about a (wildly hypothetical) scenario where we try replicate SA's more direct (brutish) game with a view to keeping performances more consistent in the highly attritional RWC context.

    Aside from this hypothetical scenario being practically impossible for genetic reasons, it would come at a cost. Yes, power and size will get you deep in tournaments, as other teams fatigue and lose their precision a small bit. It's why NZ struggled to win it for so many years, usually with the tournament going to SA or England.

    But the limited gameplan will cost you games outside of the RWC pressure cooker, when opposition will be fresher and able to play better rugby. I'm just wondering how long Irish fans would tolerate that. My hunch is they wouldn't.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    Farrell was largely experimental in the "friendlies", and I'd expect him to do similar over the next 12 months. As the RWC got closer, he naturally settled on a squad and the era for experimentation was over.

    But from his first games in Feb 2020 through to the RWC, he gave debuts to all of:

    Caelan Doris, Ronan Kelleher, Max Deegan, Hugo Keenan, Will Connors, Ed Byrne, Jamison Gibson Park, James Lowe, Billy Burns, Shane Daly, Eric O'Sullivan, Ryan Baird, Craig Casey, Gavin Coombes, Rob Baloucoune, James Hume, Tom O'Toole, Nick Timoney, Paul Boyle, Fineen Wycherley, Caolin Blade, Dan Sheehan, Mack Hansen, Michael Lowry, Jimmy O'Brien, Jeremy Loughman, Jack Crowley, Cian Prendergast and Joe McCarthy.

    That's 30 players. Of that group, 8 went on to amass over 20 caps, and 14 went to the RWC. We only have c. 160 or so pro players in the whole country, so I don't know how there's a credible argument that he wasn't experimental.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,371 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Flament and Jelonch are both out of the 6N opener and there's serious doubts about the availability of Meafou and Cros. That's a lot quality players missing at lock and the backrow.

    France still have strength in depth across those areas. But losing the former two players is a big loss regardless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,571 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Yes and I would agree with you. But there are a few posters who seem to only want us to focus on the RWC as if that's the bread and butter of rugby.

    If I was ever to sacrifice a 6Ns it would be the one in the year of the RWC but even then I'd find it hard to agree that we should sacrifice it.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    Do you mean sacrifice the one preceding the RWC or following it?

    I wouldn't agree with 'sacrificing' any of them, but the only one I think where there's an argument to take more gambles is the one following it. Even that cost us a lot back due to RWC rankings etc in previous tournaments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,328 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    when should we seriously worry about our International Ranking for the world cup draw?

    Before then concentrate on winning 6 nations ....

    and blooding new players in the summer and autumn.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,894 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    when should we seriously worry about our International Ranking for the world cup draw?

    I'd argue never frankly. Outside of dropping out of the top 8 I don't think it ever mattered. With the new RWC format I think it matters even less.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    The draw for the 2027 RWC will take place in Jan 2026. This is a departure from previous, where only one year post RWC was given to change seeding (and last time effectively no time was given as even though the draw took place in Dec 2020, it was based on Jan 2020 rankings because of COVID).

    So the next two 6 Nations, the summer tour to SA, wherever we tour in summer 2025 (during a Lions tour, so likely a softer tour, with minimal ranking points to be gained) and the 2025 Autumn Internationals are all in the window where our ranking can be disrupted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,207 ✭✭✭Dillonb3


    Meafou confirmed out of the Ireland game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,976 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    And Jelonch

    Did Ollivon and Cros also pick up knocks?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    It's still quite far out from the tournament at about 20 months. Why not the Jan of the year of the tournament? Football can do it that close, why can't rugby.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    The argument you hear is they need the maximum time period to sell tickets. You've only got a few countries really in the world who are contenders, and they're on opposite sides of the world. Therefore travelling for European sides for example to SA, Aus or NZ for a RWC is a pretty big financial commitment, and vice versa. Allied to that - the tournament takes a long time.

    World Rugby seem to think giving more time to get fixtures / cities etc gives people more opportunity to plan and increases the likelihood people will buy expensive packages to travel to games.

    Rugby doesn't have the global popularity of football, so the tickets can be harder to shift.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,894 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    This is particularly important somewhere like Aus where you could be based thousands of km away depending on where your matches are.

    I think the argument is a bit silly when its 2 years out, but the upcoming tournament does seem to set a more reasonable timeframe.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,319 ✭✭✭TRC10


    If you think there's any chance that POM (barring injury) won't be starting, you're living in cuckoo land.

    In fact, the 6 jersey Is his now until he decides to retire. Which is unfortunate because Baird, Ahern and Prendergast are all outstanding players who deserve a shot, but that's just how Irish rugby works.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,495 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Have you ever considered supporting Italy, TRC? There's no end of misery to mine there.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    POM is definitely starting at 6. They don’t typically pick guys with any doubt of starting.

    I don’t really see the point of starting someone over him (or any other player) before they actually win the job. Maybe, 2 years before a world cup i’d think about that, maybe.

    I’d be in favour of stuff like having larger training squads, capture capping guys who could leave, and other relatively small things. However, you actually have to win jobs. That’s fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭flatface


    The mental side of elite sports is as or more important than the physical. I would imagine Farrell’s warmer approach to the team and rewards fosters respect and loyalty.

    the show no mercy, all business approach works for fans but is it the way to get the best out of players who are people after all?

    I don’t know if Pete as captain is the right decision but I respect the call and hope Ireland 2024 build into a new formidable beast.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    How does one win the job? We have a number of 6s in brilliant form



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In camp presumably. At least with this ireland team, provincial form seems less important than before but still a thing.

    You win a spot in the squad, and then in camp you win the job. Or the guy in front gets injured and you play so well they don’t get it back.

    The one small thing i’d change is dial back how much the starters play a tad. I’d probably rotate more in summer and autumn games.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭typhoony


    It's frustrating that Baird probably won't even make the 23, for any of the other nations he'd be starting considering the back row weaknesses of the current squads except for Ireland. I'd like to see Frawley at out-half for one of the games.



Advertisement
Advertisement