Heavyweight Boxing

TBA is a busy lad lol

The whole fight rests on Fury , the last fight has thrown it all up in the air

Are his legs gone or was that a once off, ??? If he is anywhere near his best & fittest it wont matter what Usyk does,

If his legs are gone & he can't keep range & close distance quick enough when i's needed he will be beaten ,

I reckon within a round maybe 2 we will know how the fight plays out,

Great to have to get the chance to find out ,

How will you know his legs are gone? Simply because he loses? Seems it's an excuse.....the determining factor to say his legs are gone is him losing....?

Could his legs be "fine" and he still loses, and how will you determine that his legs are fine? It's not really some exact science, is it?

By simply watching him him move,Go watch the Francis fight his movement was shocking he couldn't move at all, His legs simply where not there, is it an age thing ? is he done ? or was it a once off ?

Yes he could be fine and still lose , it CAN happen But in my opinion if Fury at his best beats Usyk at his best

Why do you get so hung up on people opinions

Would you prefer if i sat on the fence ,

There is a reason behind every defeat anyone takes,

Not hung up at all...we debate boxing and views....

I simply asked you a few questions....couple other posters seem to also dismiss this excusing a loss based off "if this and if that."

You appear to be using the "if" query regarding Fury.....

Like a few have now said, the best man will win.

So, maybe the reason for a Fury loss will be because Usyk was just better.....

Your take: "The whole fight rests on Fury" is pretty much saying he cannot be beat unless 'this and that.' It's excusing, as well as being flatly dismissive of Usyk's chances

Yes in my opinion Fury at his best beats Usyk at his best times 10 times out of 10 ,

In his last fight he was very far from his best & if that happens again there is a high chance he is beaten

So seems you won't accept a Fury defeat without an excuse ("not at his best")...ok, at least that's cleared up. I am not surprised here.

I never said that

I said in my opinion Fury at his best wins 10 out of 10 but i'm a grown up so i'm fully aware that my opinion can be incorrect,

I don't "support" or "follow" any ONE boxer so i don't care who wins it doesn't change my life in any way,at all, Iv merely stated my opinion in who i think wins, Why would i need an excuse if someone who has nothing to do with me loses a boxing match, Bizarre mind set ,

But do you see any way you could say “well, Usyk was just brilliant, too good” should he beat Fury?

Just seems the way you’re talking that you don’t seem to want to even entertain an Usyk win, without some excuse.

I have no issue with anyone being very confident of a boxer winning. But find it odd to be so closed off to the possibility of the opponent being better on the night based off just being purely better, and not due to your boxer needing an excuse.

If Fury is looking mobile & sharp & Usyk beats him then yes of course i'll give him credit why wouldn't i .

All im saying is in my opinion Fury at his best or near his best is to much for him ,

What iv said is based around how bad Fury looked against Francis he really looked like a man who's legs where gone & he got old over night, Even though he was still to good for Franci he looked no where near the Fury we know ,

You’ll be a month late in March, pal

AJ has said he wants Fury even if Fury loses vs. Usyk

Even AJ's comments back what i was saying about are Fury's legs looking gone,

AJ has never said that about Fury before its always been when the time is right blah blah blah , Now he wants him after seeing the Francis fight m

AJ has said before that he wanted to box Fury. They were nearly set to box only for Wilder III getting in the way.

Anyway, I think he is more meaning it in terms of public interest. Folks don't want AJ-Usyk III....We want Fury-AJ, no matter what happens in February and March

He’s not contemplating losing.