Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1713714716718719943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    A property crash would solve very little as builders would reduce output if it became uneconomic to build. At present there is a bit of a standoff. Banks are limiting lending multiples which is limiting the explosion in labour costs. Builders are refusing to increase subcontracting rates and are slowing projects down

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    If a property crash were to happen, it would be downstream from something else. For the prices to crash, there would need to be some sort of event that would quickly reduce demand. There are a few circumstances that could bring that about, but none of them are too likely at this point.

    I'm not one to wish for a crash, but I will say that I were working my backside off to pay rent with no hope of buying, I'd be more than happen to take my chances in another 2008 scenario...



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The unemployment rate went from 4.6 in Q2 2007 to 14.3 in Q2 2011, why would you be confident your employment/wage/ability to access credit would not be affected if a similar crash occurred?

    This seems to be a recurring theme, the crash will affect everyone except me, so I’ll be able to buy a house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I remember it well. I started my career in 2010, and it was hard. Would I be lucky enough to keep my job? I don't know. However, I would take my chances of an uncertain future if I felt that there was no future here.

    Again, I own a home so I'm just talking hypothetically



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    If your choices are the status quo where you can't buy a house and a economic crash and not being able to afford a house then the choice is irrelevant. It's no suprise the polarisation we are starting to see now in society and it's going to get worse given the demographics of those affected.

    So far it's those in their 20s and 30s affected who largely don't vote. Given another 10 years the effect on those in power could be huge. So the choice is not as binary as crash or no crash, the other option is build fast, pay over the odds with the state picking up the tab and accept that this is the consequence of poor financial management and planning since 2007.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What makes you think an economic crash wouldn’t make matters even worse, it’s hard to buy a home with no job/lower wages/no access to credit. Was everyone able to buy a house 2008 - 12 when rents and house prices tanked? Do you think developers will build during a recession, or that the Government will suddenly kick into overdrive at a time when there is a sharpe decline in tax receipts which would accompany an economic crash? Polarisation would become more pronounced between the have and have nots during a recession, in all probability interest rates would drop making life easier for home owners who keep their jobs, and more difficult for anyone who doesn’t own their home and is unemployed. Are you comfortable with life getting a lot worse for many of your fellow young home buyers, if it benefits you? Seems machiavellian, but you will at least have crossed your polar divide.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Ultimately I think it is a desire just to see the current system burned to the ground. A common thing when people have lost all faith in status-quo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,714 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The last crash was a big part of the reason why so much housing stock around the world is now held by institutional investors. They had the capital to take advantage of fire sale prices in the aftermath and could borrow huge additional sums for basically nothing.

    I’m not seeing how another crash like that will help anyone to own their own home. If you’re hoping for another one, it probably means you were still in school for the last one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    I don't recall stating that it wouldn't in my post could you point out where you think i did?


    To get back to my point when your options are between not owning a house and not owning a house it removes 2 of Maslow's hierarchy of needs both the ability to change your environment and the ability to provide for your own security. The idea that people will act rationally at that point is beyond belief.


    You can try to divert down the lines of what you would like me to mean as much as you like but it's still a major issue, the status quo does not appear sustainable and demographically we are at the start of this crisis. It will affect us all and not just those who do not own houses so owning one does not make you immune.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You appear to be discounting the fact that an economic crash may make the situation even worse. This isn’t a choice between two options, status quo and improving your lot, for some reason you don’t want to consider the third possibility.

    That is naive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,827 ✭✭✭ongarite


    The last banking housing crash lead to fall in house prices as there was massive oversupply due to 60-90K completions per year.

    I one was to happen again, there is no oversupply but chronic unsupply especially in urban & high employment areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I think you’re following a common misconception that no young people can buy homes anymore and everyone is despairing.

    2023 will set the new record for number of FTBers securing a home since records have been kept. By a country mile. Almost every single month this year broke that month’s record for most FTBers securing a home. The second best year ever recorded was 2022.

    Theres a big backlog due to the lack of housing built in the downturn and we do need to ramp building up more. But by every metric, things are going in the right direction. We even have wages going up faster than house prices for the first time in forever.

    Why would anyone want to go back to 2012 where far far far fewer people were able to buy homes, and far fewer homes were built creating much of the issues we now need to work through today.

    Don’t fall into the fatalist trap that things are hopeless. More people than ever are getting on with it and buying their first home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    During the last crash almost whole generation of young people had to leave due to lack of jobs

    those “hoping for a crash” could learn a bit from our miserable history



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    I asked the last time where in my post you think I am advocating for a economic crash because on review I do not see it. I am nearly stating that given non homeownership and non homeownership worsening is irrelevant for those affected.


    To me it seems you are twisting my words to (I assume) avoid a difficult conversation. I wish you the best of luck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Indeed. The supply side is sewn up. Thus, the only way a crash would happen is demand fell, which it would due to emigration, job losses and the general lack of credit.

    This is true. However, as has been said above, a lot of young people are already facing rather dismal futures. In Dublin, it's possible to be forced to shared a room with 3 other people and pay 500 euro a month for the privilege, if you can even get a place. This is continuously getting worse, and I'm not credulous enough to simply say "build more" as a hope that it will change. There's more to it than that.

    For a young man with nothing to lose, a change is a tempting thing to wish for. The 2008 crash was bad, but it also presented opportunities that were not taken. We could have reformed welfare, cleared out the civil service, tightened up spending in general and invested all those billions squandered on banks on things like power generation. This however, would require a mature population led by a ruling class that is not replete with self-interested compradores (my new favourite word). Instead, we decided to chase in infinite GDP genie, and here we are 16 years later awash with funny money and rainbow flags.

    Rant over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    Your rant misses the point that this person has a job

    unemployment is exponentially worse social issue than not owning a home and gaasp shock horror renting in your 20s

    be careful what you wish for, the last crash has wiped out precisely the person you described



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    What I do not get is where people think an oversupply will come from. From about 2006 on banks wete lending builders/developers 100% finance if they had a development site. As house prices were rising exponentially it seemed a sure thing to build all the house together and sell them after building to maximise profit.

    When the crash happened there was about 70-100k houses in oversupply as well as sites half developed. Add to that there was a substantial amount of houses build that investors had bought on 100% mortgages with a rental return of 2% or less.

    There is nothing similar happening now

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Anyone questioning the margins in building houses needs to look only at the prices paid by developers for land, either with zoning or with potential.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    You don't know any individual's circumstances and it would be a bit silly to think that people make personal decision, or design their preferences, based off the macroeconomic good of society as a whole.

    If a crash would affect me a lot less than the population as a whole, I might welcome it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    As opposed to now where a whole generation of young people have to move because they cannot afford to rent or even buy a house.


    Once again if the options are between no house and no house isnt a choice so it's understandable where the logic comes from.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭drop table Users


    CSO migration statistics don’t back your claim tho



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,620 ✭✭✭combat14


    Google likely to layoff 30,000 employees post new AI innovation

    The proposed restructuring is anticipated to primarily impact Google's ad sales department, where the company is exploring the benefits of leveraging AI for operational efficiency.

    looks like big changes coming to many businesses in the next few years how will workers afford over priced houses with AI replacing jobs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Are you falling into the misconception that FTB are young people with the average age increasing substantially over the years

    Are you also noticing that these purchases are further and further away from where they are required, repeating another mistake of the noughties. This is what caused the oversupply issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    The increasing age of FTBers is primarily due to the fact almost nobody was able to buy a home for about a decade from 2007-2014/15. The 40 year olds now who should have been buying 10 years ago had nothing to buy because there was no credit and no building.

    We are seeing the delayed impact of that disastrous period now and are trying (struggling badly) to catch up for a lost decade.

    For someone seeking more homeownership - yearning for a time of

    • no new building

    • no financing

    • no transactions

    during a time when all of those things are trending up (granted we need to touch further) literally makes no sense.

    We are seeing the delayed consequences now and people want to go back to the cause of it all just ‘because’. It’s beyond stupid.

    On point 2 - no, my observation is planning rules are being fairly rigorously enforced to prevent one off developments (much to some people’s annoyance) and building is now very heavily concentrated in high density, well connected locations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    People settling down much older now than even a decade or two ago too.

    They spend much longer in education and they go off traveling or sowing their wild oats more than people used to do before.

    Guilty of it myself. Ive got siblings and a few friends who didnt do what I did after they left school and they all own houses now. None of the group of us who went to Oz and then traveling for 3 years own a house now. Of the ones who stayed behind maybe 50% of them own a house now.

    I woudlnt chnage what I did for a minute, it was a great experience, but there is a price i have to pay for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Anyone concerned about the health of the Irish economy would recognise the importance of affordable housing with security of tenure (balanced of course with reasonable LL protection) in maintaining it.

    In such an environment, the economy grows and landlord/Tennant income grows and state finances are in much better shape.

    This will never happen with supply completely controlled by the private sector



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And yet our economy has shown an impressive recovery with growth in population and jobs over the last 10 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    "More people than ever are getting on with it and buying their first home."

    This is completely statistically incorrect. The rise in FTBs overall has to do with a steep rise in the overall Irish population, per capita the home buying rates are falling precipitously. These figures are from four years ago, and the figures have only gotten much worse since then:

    "Research by the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) found that the share of 25-34 year olds who own their own home more than halved between 2004 and 2019, falling from 60 per cent to just 27 per cent.

    Lower home ownership rates would mean a higher proportion of households in the rental sector and “the continuation of rental payments into retirement”, the report says. Reductions in home ownership of this magnitude would also raise the proportion of older people (aged 65-plus) living in income poverty, from 14 per cent at present to as high as 31 per cent."[1]

    The figures are very clear - FTBs are becoming much older, and much rarer.

    A society where a large percentage of people are going to reach retirement without owning their own home is just financially non viable, its not possible to pay private sector rent on a pension. This is going to be an absolutely huge issue for the Irish state in 20-30 years.

    The state either builds large scale housing now, or we're going to be building very large scale retirement housing then.

    [1]https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/2022/07/06/falling-home-ownership-rates-will-leave-future-retirees-financially-exposed-study-finds/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Driven in no small part by the correction in property prices, the mistake is to prioritise speculation over sustainable growth as has been the policy for this growth. This leaves us very vulnerable heading into the next recession



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    My biggest fear tbh at the moment is getting a mortgage before i am too old to get a reasonable length mortgage and then end up renting when im retired.

    When im retired i wont be able to afford rent. I wont get a house provided for me by the state. Or if i do i'll be on a waiting lit til 90 years of age.

    Rents will be sky high because there will be no landlords left by then, even reits.



Advertisement
Advertisement