Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

1166167169171172410

Comments

  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Game management. I.e, time wasting.

    Let's call it what it is.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 23,564 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kiith


    No one gives a **** about time wasting when its their team doing it.

    And Martinez is a great keeper, who winds up the opposition, doing a pretty damn good job of getting in their heads. Every team wants a player like that.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,893 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    Time wasting is against the laws of the game. Game management is not. It's a skill to be able to just stay on the right side of that line.

    If your team is 1-0 up in the 95th minute and there's a goal kick, do you shout for him to get on with it? Do you fúck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,303 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Martinez has had a bit of a strange career, stuck in the doldrums at arsenal forever out on loan and never playing regularly by any means, his career only really "kicked" off when he signed for Villa at 27-28 years of age. Bit of a poster child for players "waiting for their chance" so to speak.



  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Teams are doing it for years, it's hardly a new thing! 😂

    To the losing team it's time wasting. To the winning team game management! I have no issue with it, but it's all time wasting to me.

    It's the same thing. It tactics to waste time. Some will get you carded, some won't.

    As for your last paragraph, of course everyone agrees with that ffs!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,018 ✭✭✭djan


    Amongst many other things, it's such a plague on the game. So easily removed as seen in the world cup when they started adding on high amounts of extra time. For throw ins, goal kicks etc. there should be time limits on these things same as the max 6 seconds for keeper holding the ball. Anything over and its a warning with the 2nd instance getting an automatic yellow.

    It's time wasting regardless of who does it but as its being allowed players will do it to eek out any advantage they can get.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,866 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Did he not get booked 7 or 8 times last year for time wasting, which is a fairly hard thing to actually get booked for?

    He could do with honing his game management a la Pickford/Pope if he actually wanted to perfect that skill. Martinez takes it too far being his panto villian character which is a shame as he is probably the 3rd best keeper in the league and simply doesn't need that gimmick.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,893 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    The time is added on at the end, hence all this extra injury time. It's up to the ref to manage that. It's only a plague if your team is losing. It's part and parcel of the game and it's not cheating, it's the same as putting 11 men behind the ball or playing a high line, it's up to the opposition to counter it.

    It's easy to blame time wasting but really there's 90+ minutes for you to achieve what you want to achieve. If you take Villa Brentford as an example, a lot of time was wasted by Brentford when they were 1-0 up and indeed the dangerous tackle by Ben Mee took up a lot of time for which he got sent off which you could argue was a factor in Villa getting back into the game.

    The whole Martinez thing was started by Maupay being stupid, he barged into Martinez when the ball had gone out of play, something there was absolutely no reason to do and it ends up giving Martinez an excuse to go down. Consequently Maupay throws himself to the ground shortly afterwards, and rather than leaving him roll around (and helping time waste) Martinez drags him to his feet.

    Is Maupay frustrated by perceived time wasting or is he frustrated he hasn't been able to get a shot on target in the 20 mins he's been on? Most of which he's been left in the lurch by his captain being sent off.

    My point as a whole being that Brentford had the exact same 90+ minutes to win that game of football, as do any other team in which the other team wastes time in order to hold a lead. It would be absolutely crazy to take a quick throw in, quick free kick or quick goal kick in those circumstances. There are laws in place to mitigate for time wasting and in this case 12 minutes were added on at the end.

    It's so easy when your team lose to point the finger at time wasting when in reality 99.9% of the time it's just because your team wasn't good enough.



  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Time wasting would be so easy to eradicate but there is no appetite to. When was the last time a keeper was called for 6 seconds? When was the last time someone was booked for taking too long over a throw? When was the last time a keeper was sent off for taking too long over a goal kick when on a yellow?

    Put strict time limits on these things. Otherwise the other team get the ball. Works in every other sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,866 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I think Troy Deeney used to count the 6 seconds with his hands up in the air plain to be seen. I'm surprised more haven't adopted this to put some pressure on.

    Russ Westbrook did it last year in the NBA during a free throw roaring down a 10 second count leading to Giannis getting called for exceeding it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,368 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Screenshot_20231219_125316_Facebook.jpg

    Sensible rule change, moreso the injury one, would likely reduce the number of feigned injuries in the late stages of games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭Deise Vu


    ^^ Good ideas in principle but I would reduce the substitution time even further. You are supposed to leave by the shortest route, how could it take a professional athlete 10 seconds to move an absolute maximum of 50 meters? The nearest point of exit is totally ignored it seems to me.

    On the second one, what happens when a player is badly injured? The opposition might get a yellow card and have a two minute sin bin in their favour. That hardly seems right. We want to get rid of feigning injury but we definitely don’t want to reward serious foul play either. An independent clock or the ref saying clock off like in rugby would be a better solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,368 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    If a player is badly injured then they will likely require additional treatment and / or having to come off. Opposition players cannot decide whether they are going to make a red or yellow card tackle so its highly improbable they would set out to deliberately do an opponent as they run the risk of being sent off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Time wasting is about alot more than time, it's about frustrating the opposition, changing the momentum of the game,as a spectator do you want to give two hours watching a ninety minute game?



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,893 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    Happily if my team wins, I'll stay there all night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,866 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Unless it includes a stipulation for keepers it wouldn't make a big difference. Outfield players may stop but keepers would just increase their "injuries" as they can't be removed from play after treatment as is, hence the amount of Lazarus style keeper recoveries the last few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,729 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    Steve Cooper sacked as Forest boss,to be replaced by Nuno Espirito Santo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭Deise Vu


    Looking at it again, it says the player is removed and assessed for a minimum of two minutes. Maybe a substitution can be made immediately and it is just the injured player who has to stay off for two minutes if he wants to come back on. That would definitely eliminate feigning injury but I would he more than annoyed if the opposition gained an advantage for a bad foul even if it was unintentional.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,893 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    I don't think that MLS rule is a good rule.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,866 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    It wouldnt be popular for those who enjoy watching the skill of game management alright.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,893 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    It would be popular with lads going in hard on people to try keep them down for 15 seconds to gain a man advantage, or lads getting up when they shouldn't and end up hurting themselves in order to keep to 11 men. We have injury time for a reason, it's to protect injured players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭POKERKING


    Terrible appointment but they should have enough to stay up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,866 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    They wouldn't be very bright in that case.

    Further reading of the MLS rules include stipulations such as

    "Exceptions include head injuries, goalkeeper injuries, serious medical events and yellow/red card fouls."

    So the idea of a player perfectly judging a foul to just injure the player enough so he is down for 16 seconds while simultaneously avoiding a red card to leave it 10 vs. 10 is both unlikely and also completely irrelevant anyway. They'd be sent off and the injured player can get his treatment.

    Which does actually make sense when reading what @El Gato De Negocios originally posted. If there has been an actual foul the referee will have already stopped play to award the free/penalty, thus not triggering these new rules as he isn't stopping the play for the injury but rather the foul.

    And any player leaving injured is exempt from the substitution timings as there is no time limit on receiving his treatment.


    So it seems the only way a team would end up down a player for 2 minutes is if an unfouled player is down injured for over 15 seconds causing the referee to stop play BUT is then found to actually NOT be injured bad enough in the eyes of his own medical team to need to be replaced immediately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,137 ✭✭✭jacool


    We were here, about a month ago, with a different team being seen as "upstarts".

    As I said then, I will say again - "Come back in May and we can look at the table then." Form, I've been told, is temporary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Terrible change IMHO.

    Cooper was doing ok there, had had problems recently but considering where they were less than 2 years ago..... short memories. Also, they took time to get going last season but once the coaching and organization started to work they survived very comfortably.

    Nuno did ok with Wolves but they were a front for the Mendes agency, he had some serious talent made available to him, and he was ran out of Spurs after a few months. Think Forest are closer to Relegation now than they were earlier today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,191 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Shouldn't have sacked Cooper, but as far as replacement's go, Santo is grand. That's his level, and he'll do fine there. Won't be pretty, but it'll be effective.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 58,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Half the issue at Forest imo is the crazy turnover of players since they got promoted. First season it was something like 20 odd signings and they didn't exactly slow down last summer either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    In fairness, they had to build a squad from a very low base, really overachieved by sneaking into the playoffs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,866 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    You can expect 6 or 7 Portugese arrivals in January now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,097 ✭✭✭Deise Vu


    I’m a tad confused at this stage. I would sincerely hope the ref doesn’t restart the match if, having issued a red or yellow card or blown for a foul, a player is still getting treatment. So are we only talking about this rule applying to players randomly dropping like flies off the ball? It does happen but it is nowhere near as prevalent as the players drawing a foul and then acting like they were hit by a sniper.

    The simple solution is a visible clock for added time. If this was started during every delay to the game, players would be able to see they weren’t running down the clock.

    They would still do it to break the rhythm particularly if their side was under pressure but it would eliminate some of the total shithousery like fellas getting fouled off the pitch and rolling back on to get treatment or a player about to be substituted going to the centre circle, lying down, waving for treatment and then limping off afterwards but able to high five the entire bench and backroom team through the awful pain.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement