Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

18258268288308311443

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,057 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I asked the above question a couple of day ago, and was specifically interested in the views of Israel supporters. It looks like no one has responded to this so am pointing to it again, with an added angle.

    If you think that Hamas is likely to be able draw on greater recruitment resources as a consequence of the last 10 weeks, would you say that this means that Israel's approach was flawed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Palmach


    Naturally they don't state it. https://bdsmovement.net/call

    "3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194." In other words using demographics to destroy Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 682 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    Look down that same wikipedia page and you will see population of Ottoman Palestine is more or less what I said, this might depend on which source is used but the McCarthy one is much more detailed as it gives yearly figures whilst the one you are quoting are less detailed and says estimated underneath.

    Zionism started in the 1890s, so that was when the idea of a Jewish state started and Jewish people were encouraged to move to Palestine. The area was under Ottoman rule, so the chances of a Jewish state were pretty .minimal. It was the Balfour declaration that promised the Zionists a Jewish state in the region after the break-up of the Ottoman Empire after WW1. Following WW1, a Commission of Enquiry was set up during the Peace talks to figure out how to best break-up the Austria-Hungarian, German & Ottoman Empires. That was primarily at the behest of the Great Powers, Britain, France and to a lesser extent Italy with the US overseeing things. The Commission looked at the feasibility of the creation of the various new states and made recommendations on what should happen. In most cases, they were listened to, but on Palestine they were ignored due to the interests of Britain & France. The British wanted control of Palestine as they had wanted to fulfil the promises they made in the Balfour agreement.

    So this is very much the fault of the Great Powers as they ignored their own commission and put their own self-interest ahead of the wishes of the local populations. The whole theme post WW1 was self-determination, were the Palestinians afforded that right? Of course not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Palmach


    None of this is true. Israel has said no such thing. No one knows what will be the end of this after Hamas, are hopefully eradicated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,698 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I didn't see your post before, but TBH I think the urgency for Israel now is to prevent more attacks such as already happened on Oct 7th. I mean, I don't really see how the risk of more supporters in the future can make the problem significantly worse than the existing crowds cheering as the brutalized corpse of a young woman was paraded through Gaza that day.

    Hamas have said they plan more Oct 7th attacks. I think Israel has decided that they need to deal with that immediate threat, and that any future potential threat has to come second to that. Especially as people saying that this will increase support for Hamas never seem to have any practical suggestions for reducing support for Hamas - other than for Israel to stop existing.

    But maybe you're an exception, and you do have alternatives to propose that will ensure that there isn't another Oct 7th in January or February? Or next year?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,698 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Israel should obey international conventions on civilians in war zones, right?

    Or do you think they should obey other rules that you think would be better than the Geneva Convention and whatever other agreements exist?

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,039 ✭✭✭scottser


    I think Israel's reaction to Oct 7th played into Hamas's hands. Israel is becoming increasingly isolated internationally and a huge swathe of Israeli citizens and Jews alike are becoming disgusted by the actions of Netanyahu's government. The most sensible, logical and beneficial thing Israel could do is agree to a ceasefire but they're obviously too far gone for that.

    It really is horrible to watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I'd still argue you're implying it all started post WW1. It didn't.

    I would agree that the Arabs / Palestinians got shafted. Arab revolt etc. That betrayal certainly was planned and deliberate by the great powers after WW1. They did the same after WW2.

    That certainly is what led to all this. So the idea of us looking at this from a western point of view and applying our opinions to them, is ironic and hardly surprising it's gets short thrift.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,057 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    In other words using demographics to destroy Israel.

    You mean, 'In your words'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,039 ✭✭✭scottser


    'Who was here first' isn't really the point. The point is that now, Israeli law protects the civil rights of Jewish people only. It is by definition an apartheid state.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,380 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Absolutely. They are heading towards apartheid era South Africa status at this rate - a pariah state that nobody will want any dealings with. Anyone can see they are aggressive in the extreme and are not 'defending' anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 682 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    Well the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine was not really likely until it was given the official stamp under the Balfour declaration. When the British mandate was created post WW1, it was with the express idea of encouraging foreign Jews to move there. If there had been no Balfour . declaration, it is highly likely there would be no Jewish state. Maybe Zionists might have still moved there with the aim of creating a state, but it would have been much less appealing without the security of the British in Palestine. Would the Jewish people have lived under Arab rule?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Palmach


    Any objective assessment would conclude that is the end goal. Allowing millions of people to flood into another country will change the demographic makeup of that country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Palmach


    This is a lie. An egregious one at that. Israeli law is crystal clear. You cannot discriminate against a person on the basis of religion, skin colour sex or sexual orientation. It has been that way since they brought in legislation on it in the 70s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Perhaps people think it pointless to engage when you've already typecast any opinions other than your own with a leading question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    There's no maybe about it. The figures clearly show significant demographic changes prior to it.

    Even Arabs don't live peacefully under Arab rule. Look how much infighting goes on, with no small cost to the people living there. As Brian learnt to his cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,225 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Israel obviously felt that it was more important to target the civilian population and kill as many women and children as possible to settle old scored before turning their attention to Hamas. This just proves how they value Palestinians and why they referred to them as human animals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 699 ✭✭✭batman75



    You have chosen to defend Israel which is your right. You are morally on the wrong side of the fence. What Israel is doing is immoral. If you support Israel's actions you are supporting genocide and ethnic cleansing. The Palestinian people have a right to exist and a right to a homeland. Israel since it's formation in 1948 has played fast and loose with international law.

    The holocaust as horrific as it was doesn't give Israel the right to ethnic cleans another group of people. What Israel is doing is indefensible. Equally the United States President has brought great shame to the country by backing Israel and worse still arming it to commit genocide. That will be Biden's legacy.

    Israel does have a right to exist but so do the Palestinian people. Israel doesn't get to play judge and jury on an ethnic group's right to exist. They have clearly learned no lessons from history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,141 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Have you ever been there, spoken to an israeli, or read their laws? It's a secular state by definition.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,616 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    As has been said numerous times, Hamas and the current Israeli Goverment have one thing in common: they don't care about the Palestinians. Hamas knew what the response to the attacks would be yet went ahead anyway. The more Palestinians that died the better for their propaganda purposes. Israel does have a right to defend itself,but

    this is where I depart from those who try to frame opposition to Israel based purely on political ideology and race because of their own political ideals. Using their logic any country in the pursuit of what it deems to be self defense can get away with doing just about anything, and sure look it bad things happen in war -until its the side I support that are on the receiving end then I will abandon that argument rather than be consistent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,225 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Hamas will not be eradicated. Hamas or whatever other organisation replaces them will have their numbers swollen by the relatives of the people they have murdered in their attempt to make Gaza part of Israel. That is what they are attempting. Israel will be worse off after all this. Their actions will guarantee that their enemies are even more aggressive in the future and Israel will never have the peace the population crave for. They will always be looking over their shoulders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,616 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    I was saying this to a friend of mine recently. Social Media has made Mark Regev's job much harder. In the past he had it much easier in the absence of Social Media. He is still to his credit is a slick performer but his spin can be more easily debunked in this day and age.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Can't think it will change much.

    There will still be unrest with a two state solution. But perhaps life would improve for more ordinary people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,057 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Cool, it's not that difficult to refute the point being presumed.

    Something tells me that you'd have done that if you had a genuine answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,616 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Less people if they have good prospects will be drawn to radicalism anyway. That is how you truly weaken the likes of Hamas long term. Unfortunately normalisation of relations horrifies the likes of Bibi who has no interest in a two state solution. He wants to see the end of Hamas to save his own skin, but long term he will want another radical group to take over in Gaza to maintain the status quo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Don't shoot the messenger. It reads as an insincere question. You've basically confirmed it with this reply, and attacking me for some reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,057 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    There was a time when people thought that about Northern Ireland, and common sense prevailed. Eventually. Don't get me wrong, but that is a more likely outcome than the removal of one of the parties in its entirety.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Does seem like that. Both sides seem to want to keep the conflict alive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




Advertisement