Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

1144145147149150237

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,695 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Bren, let me refresh your memory - it was you who weighed in on the timings of negotiations, when you made some big statement about negotiations not happening in September because "Ministers are too busy before the Budget" and "July /August being too early" because of possible changes to inflation.

    I, amongst others, pointed out that negotiations on new deals always start before the current deal expires, but you don't seem to want to accept thisd.

    So, to be pedantic, you're making a huge deal out of the negotiations last year being on 29th /30th August - so close to September, that it's literally ridiculous that you're arguing over it.

    I'm also confident given your self-confessed limited knowledge of the Civil Service (and that you didn't seem to know that the Dáil is in recess from mid-July to mid-September each year) that you are not as familiar with ministerial functions and budget preparation as you think you are.

    But, to get to the actual point, your bone of contention which led to all of the above seems to be "why would they start negotiations when the current deal hasn't even expired yet?"

    Well, following your logic, the negotiations shouldn't be starting until January 2024 at the earliest.

    Yet they have already started. Why?

    The answer - because it is normal that negotiations on a new deal begin well in advance of a current deal expiring. Which is all anyone tried to tell you.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,503 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Let's not rewrite history. I know when the dail does and does not sit. I said (or was implying) the relevant Ministers are busy preparing the budget in September to negotiate a new pay deal. The pay deal is a massive drain on their resources. That is obvious. Whether the Dail is sitting or not is irrelevant. You don't want to accept that.

    The current pay deal HAS NOT EXPIRED. You won't accept that.

    Negotiating a new deal before one is over is normal. 6 months before one is over in the middle of a strange inflationary period makes no sense from either side. You won't accept that.

    You're argument that 'they negotiated it in September last year' is wrong. They didn't. It was concluded by then. That timeline is important because you know what the minister(s) was doing in September? Preparing the fuxking budget. Negotiating an extension to a pay deal because there was a review clause was triggered by the Unions meant the government had to renegotiate. The situation this year and last year were different. You won't accept that.

    You're casually avoiding that a review clause was activated last year. That makes this year andast year very different. You won't accept that. I'm assuming you didn't know or forgot it was because of a review clause.

    The pay deal was set to expire December 2022. There were no negotiations for a new deal at the point you indicated. You won't accept that.

    The Unions are the experts. It's not bad planning or bad work, there are reasons it's happening now. You won't accept that.

    I have limited knowledge of how grades in the civil service work. I'm willing to admit what i do and don't know. I like how you started by not giving your experience... You work in the civil service. You have no knowledge of the other side. I am assuming you've never worked in a union, i have. You have never worked for a TD or Minister, i have (only in the summers and a long long time ago when I was young). You have absolutely no idea what these people do. You have no idea how the talks work. You understand the pay talks effect people outside the Civil Service?

    You're fixated on belittling other posters because you know more and everyone else is wrong and inexperienced. It's arrogance, not intelligence or experience. Point out where I'm factually wrong. Argue the points. Otherwise it's just opinion and other people can have a different opinion to you. This isn't a forum for those that agree with Ezeols opinion only.

    I've never said when I think the negotiations should have started. You're taking a quote out of context there but for clarification, negotiating a new deal 6 months before the current one expires at a time when inflation is rampant, and right before the budget when the relevant department is very busy preparing for the budget, is bonkers. It's not going to happen. It makes no sense for either side to do that. You won't accept that.

    Let's get to the point, bashing unions because they didn't start 6 months early is bizarre. They have started a month before the end of the deal. They might have a new deal agreed before the current one expires. You won't accept that.

    I've never once in this thread seen you accept someone else's view. If you can provide your logic and rationale as to why, I'm happy to change my opinion. You don't debate like that. It's your opinion and everyone else is wrong.

    Post edited by bren2001 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,695 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Honestly, you're just boring me now.

    You're now reduced to inventing arguments where there were none, until you weighed in and embarrassed yourself.

    And then dragging them out ad nausem.

    No one was arguing about whether the current deal had expired or not or was putting a specific number on how many months before it does should negotiations start - only that they could have started sooner. The rest was all YOU.

    Spare me the personal insults also. I've been on this thread since it started, I don't seem to remember you being here last time around and everything I predicted last year has been proven correct so far. You need to accept that it's not always an opinion, or a debate, some thing are just fact, and I work off facts.

    As I said to you before, you should stick to what you know - which you said is the education sector and not the Civil Service.

    Also a deal isn't done until it's balloted on and accepted by the members and if you think they can do all that in one month from negotiation to ballot box then you're deluded.

    You have a nice day now. I'm going christmas shopping. 🎅🎄

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    anywhere that is designated a rent pressure zone at this stage should be included in RPZ Salary..


    the problem in this country is not pay .. its inflated property prices/ rents, inflation and taxes


    but pay will have to rise now to keep up

    Post edited by combat14 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,503 ✭✭✭bren2001


    I didn't realise my job was to entertain you.

    And that's what you do every time. "I'm too good for this" and walk away. Move goalposts ad naseum.

    Do the government do anything during the balloting? No. Talks concluded on August 31st. Negotiations are done. Nobody is arguing with that....except you. You won't even accept that one. Incredible.

    Irrelevant if i was here last time or not.

    I didn't realise the Grinch celebrated Christmas. Enjoy your shopping. Must be hard handing over the cash with the injustices that you see everyday.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    Talks going on now, I think they want them to be short. Hopefully then hammer out a deal asap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 305 ✭✭BhoyRayzor


    Can the union come back with a deal and recommend it be rejected? As in this is the best that is being offered but we don't think it is good enough but it has to be put to a vote anyway. Or if it's not deemed good enough they just recommend industrial action as the response?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    Yeah they give their opinion on the deal to their members.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,756 ✭✭✭CZ 453


    Did these talks run through the weekend? Any leaks yet?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 119 ✭✭spark_tank




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭Indestructable


    TBH it's a bit of a crap article. The only upper hand the unions have is the timing coming into an election cycle (according to the article), which may mean a sweet short term deal.

    The article then goes on to describe why the Government shouldn't go too far-slowing inflation, economic uncertainty and lower corporation tax take.

    It's a short piece of fluff really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,695 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Despite the headline, its basically its making all the usual arguments for why civil and public servants should be stiffed again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭Indestructable


    Thinking more on it, I think the author has it wrong. The longer the delay, the more the Government can point to the deteriorating economic climate as well as reducing inflation and say sorry, the money isn't there or is gone and you don't need it anyway.

    In reality, it's in both sides interest to get it done quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 119 ✭✭spark_tank




  • Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 2,446 Mod ✭✭✭✭Nigel Fairservice




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    Tolls charges set to rise again e.g 9.52% on national toll roads



    its like death by a thousand cuts, hope the unions are negotiating hard



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Employees are service providers. Why can other service providers expect AND GET inflation matching rises, from government, but employees constantly expected to take far far less?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭MrRigsby


    Pay is always an issue. The whole country is practically an RPZ with costs nothing like somewhere like Dublin . I’d stick to the major cities. In UK it’s called London Weighting and is worth between 5 and 7 grand per annum . Definitely not to be sneezed at and very hard for the government to argue against



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭Pogue eile


    A proper decentralisation plan was/is surely the more logical answer. UK is London centric because that's exactly the way the Tories and their cronies want it, no need to copy a failed model. New blended working and the real possibility of a 4 day working week make it even easier to implement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    Ireland will always be Dublin centric. Governmemt wont be able to change that to any great extent.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭Pogue eile


    It would be a massive task and the lack of adequate infrastructure etc. a problem but there is a big difference between changing it and actively encouraging it to grow, which is what the creation on a 'Dublin' Allowance would do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2023/1205/1420351-public-sector-pay-talks/ Id have preferred a short term deal. Id imagine a lot of union members would have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,032 ✭✭✭Sultan of Bling


    Unfortunately you have a***hole managers who want everyone back in the office so we can all "collaborate", together.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,032 ✭✭✭Sultan of Bling


    Does this mean the possible end to the pension levy?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,205 ✭✭✭bailey99


    Where did you jump to that conclusion? I would say absolutely no chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,032 ✭✭✭Sultan of Bling


    Wishful thinking on my part just because it was introduced under FEMPI.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,695 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Wonder how long it will take them to actually get around to repealing that legislation?

    Probably about three years. 😑

    Personally not interested in a 3 year deal.



Advertisement