Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

1141142144146147410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,127 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    Would love to see the referee screaming in Haaland's face like that after he missed an open goal in the first half.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 542 ✭✭✭crustyjuggler


    Haaland's explicit tweet warrants a lengthy ban . There was a lot of parents being asked what the meaning of Wt* when it was tweeted by their childrens hero .



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,885 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    He should have to pay for the years of therapy for those kids will need after being exposed to such horrific acronyms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭The Moist Buddha




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    I don't think the number of kids asking their parents what "fvck" means has ever been or will ever be all that high. Especially the ones who've been to a premier league football match.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,430 ✭✭✭✭Osmosis Jones


    If anything he'll get in trouble because his "Wtf" tweet is also sharing illegal stream footage of the match.



  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The poor little munchkins!

    Double avocado on toast for the affected children this week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme



    It's easily top 20, arguably it's second behind the offside that never was, amazingly the same ref as well. If the roles were reversed and it happened against Spurs people would be calling it corruption. There's just no justification at all for the ref to blow his whistle to award the free in that situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    To be fair, the one against Liverpool was entirely VAR's fault - he just acted on the information given.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,835 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I dont see any problem.

    Untitled Image




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭McFly85


    All I can imagine is that he assumed Grealish was offside so decided to bring it back for the free kick.

    But whatever way you look at it it’s a terrible mistake - either call the foul or play advantage. And it’s not like spurs stopped advantage accruing after the original foul, Haaland made the decision to play the ball.

    Its debatable as to what would have happened had play continued but I really can’t imagine any team being anything but furious at losing an opportunity like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme



    I know and I do think he was pretty mich blameless for the offside, it's just kinda funny he's the same ref for two of the most bizarre and unexplainable incidents happening this season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,045 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    The implicit bit is explicit.

    Expletives aren't liked by the EPL.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,294 ✭✭✭Ceist_Beag


    PL players and managers are getting worse each season. The rant by Arteta, the behaviour of Haaland yesterday, it's completely unacceptable and completely OTT. It should not be tolerated and if the PL are serious about respect for officials they need to come down hard. Of course their track record is far from consistent in this matter so I won't hold my breath.

    As for yesterday Haaland would want to take a look at himself as to why they didn't win the game. He made far more mistakes than the referee!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,835 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    And after a 5-0 tonking Heckingbottom heads for the unemployment office while Kompany buys a few more weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    As much as I enjoy seeing City get some decisions actually go against them there is no defending that call by the ref.

    He plays advantage and City use that advantage to generate a ball through the spurs defence - at this stage the ref has no business making a call on if Jack Grealish has the speed to go through on goal or not. Once the ball is played by a city player forward that is them taking their advantage and the game moves on.

    From there he can only stop play for another foul or offside - which did not happen. It's a shocking call



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,041 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    He can decide to play advantage and can still call it back if he thinks there is no advantage, I think he blew as Haaland kicked the ball and see 3 Spurs players around Grealish and blew then thinking there would be no advantage before the ball landed and Grealish was away.

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,693 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I see next manager to go manager has been pulled by the bookies. Heckingbottom must be on the verge of the chop




  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,885 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    Getting to December without a managerial change is unusual. A couple pre-season but currently every manager in the hot seat when the season started is still there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,944 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    it's nowhere near 2nd. Wolves have had 2 decisions worse in the last month.

    it was abysmal, but there is logic. if everyone just takes a step back, he clearly did not realise that the Haaland ball was going perfectly into Grealish's path, and he didn't want them to lose the advantage. whether he misjudged the flight of the ball, or whether he didn't see Grealish at all, I don't know.

    now, it was crap. he got it horrendously wrong. but it was nowhere near corruption.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,882 ✭✭✭TheCitizen


    I doubt Grealish would have scored it. He stopped and looked back immediately on hearing the whistle. I know he scored the 3rd goal when he came on but I didn’t understand that substitution of Doku for Grealish from Pep at the time. Doku is a far more productive player than Grealish I reckon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,944 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    the rumour is Doku got a knock.

    i will say, City's general reaction after the game to the terrible refereeing decision was excellent bar Haaland acting like a 10-year old. Bernardo rather blamed the team's performance, Dias said it was a bad mistake (and that's pretty much it) and Pep refused to say anything.

    so fair play to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,901 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Doku playing is not good for Haaland. Doku doesn't have the end product yet, he just wants to run with the ball and then cut back in and shoot. He doesn't play the early passes into Haaland like Grealish has done in the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,210 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    That happens often enough the ref blowing up when the advantage is in play. I'd hardly hang him out to dry over it.

    However the same ref made the highest profile error I've seen, the fact he is in charge of the PL game of the weekend is farcical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭Ottoman_1000


    If you a referring to the Spurs Liverpool game as the highest profile error, then to be fair, there was noting he could have done about that. That was all VAR and their massive f* up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    Ref made a poor call, this will happen regularly in other matches also, doubt if it was Sheff Utd/Burnley/Luton/etc that it would get much coverage.

    The bigger issue is what should be done to make it easier to be a referee; 2 easy areas that can be improved on are dissent and diving, both should be a booking and if you complain about the dive then you get sent off, it would make it so much easier to ref a match as the collective dissent from players winds the crowd up several levels and makes their job nigh on impossible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭McFly85


    The issue for the refs is that they’ll get piled on for being too eager to send players off - in that way, they can’t really win. Remember seeing Ashley Young getting sent off at Anfield this season for 2 pretty stonewall yellow cards, but Ally McCoist kept repeating that the referee ruined the game by applying the rules and should have used common sense.

    Wish they’d bring in(and enforce!) captains only conversing with the referee, though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,255 ✭✭✭eigrod


    Anyone know who Haaland brushed shoulders with when he was storming off, hair down? Looked deliberate by the other party and Haaland turned around (when he knew he was well past him) giving a mouthful.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 23,564 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kiith




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Yeah, way way too early to call it back for no advantage. At first, I thought the linesman must have flagged or something but no.

    Let the ball be played and if there is no advantage sure come back, but you can't call no advantage when the pass is mid-flight. After that, the game moves on and there is no reason to stop it unless Grealish is offside or another foul happens.

    The ref absolutely cannot make a call in that situation to say Grealish didn't have an advantage

    With VAR we have seen Refs let play continue on a bit more usually so I just can't get my head around what the ref thought happened that he had to step in. It's so poor.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement