Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

17367377397417421425

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Yes it was but they still arrived there. Look at the link you posted. The influx of Zionist money and technology increased living standards in the region and caused a high level of inward migration.

    This is from the Jewish Virtual Library so I expect it is putting a positive spin on Zionism but the data and quotes seem to be accurate.

    Quote:

    A Population Boom

    As Hussein foresaw, the regeneration of Palestine, and the growth of its population, came only after Jews returned in massive numbers. The Jewish population increased by 470,000 between World War I and World War II while the non-Jewish population rose by 588,000. In fact, the permanent Arab population increased 120 percent between 1922 and 1947 to more than 1.3 million.

    This rapid growth was a result of several factors. One was immigration from neighboring states – constituting 37 percent of the total immigration to pre-state Israel – by Arabs who wanted to take advantage of the higher standard of living the Jews had made possible. The Arab population also grew because of the improved living conditions created by the Jews as they drained malarial swamps and brought improved sanitation and health care to the region. Thus, for example, the Muslim infant mortality rate fell from 201 per thousand in 1925 to 94 per thousand in 1945 and life expectancy rose from 37 years in 1926 to 49 in 1943.

    The Arab population increased the most in cities with large Jewish populations that had created new economic opportunities. From 1922-­1947, the non-Jewish population increased 290 percent in Haifa, 131 percent in Jerusalem, and 158 percent in Jaffa. The growth in Arab towns was more modest: 42 percent in Nablus, 78 percent in Jenin and 37 percent in Bethlehem.

    Jewish Land Purchases

    Despite the growth in their population, the Arabs continued to assert they were being displaced. The truth is from the beginning of World War I, part of Palestine’s land was owned by absentee landlords who lived in CairoDamascus and Beirut. About 80 percent of the Palestinian Arabs were debt-ridden peasants, semi-nomads and Bedouins.

    Jews went out of their way to avoid purchasing land in areas where Arabs might be displaced. They sought land that was largely uncultivated, swampy, cheap and, most important, without tenants. In 1920, Labor Zionist leader David Ben-Gurion expressed his concern about the Arab fellahin, whom he viewed as “the most important asset of the native population.” Ben-Gurion said, “under no circumstances must we touch land belonging to fellahs or worked by them.” He advocated helping liberate them from their oppressors. “Only if a fellah leaves his place of settlement,” Ben-Gurion added, “should we offer to buy his land, at an appropriate price.”

    It was only after the Jews had bought all this available land that they began to purchase cultivated land. Many Arabs were willing to sell because of the migration to coastal towns and because they needed money to invest in the citrus industry.

    When John Hope Simpson arrived in Palestine in May 1930, he observed: “They [Jews] paid high prices for the land, and in addition they paid to certain of the occupants of those lands a considerable amount of money which they were not legally bound to pay.”

    In 1931, Lewis French conducted a survey of landlessness and eventually offered new plots to any Arabs who had been “dispossessed.” British officials received more than 3,000 applications, of which 80 percent were ruled invalid by the Government’s legal adviser because the applicants were not landless Arabs. This left only about 600 landless Arabs, 100 of whom accepted the Government land offer.

    In April 1936, a new outbreak of Arab attacks on Jews was instigated by a Syrian guerrilla named Fawzi al-Qawukji, the commander of the Arab Liberation Army. By November, when the British finally sent a new commission headed by Lord Peel to investigate, 89 Jews had been killed and more than 300 wounded.

    The Peel Commission’s report found that Arab complaints about Jewish land acquisition were baseless. It pointed out that “much of the land now carrying orange groves was sand dunes or swamp and uncultivated when it was purchased....there was at the time of the earlier sales little evidence that the owners possessed either the resources or training needed to develop the land.” Moreover, the Commission found the shortage was “due less to the amount of land acquired by Jews than to the increase in the Arab population.” The report concluded that the presence of Jews in Palestine, along with the work of the British Administration, had resulted in higher wages, an improved standard of living and ample employment opportunities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 682 ✭✭✭Fr D Maugire


    Zionism did not start until 1897, by that stage the Muslim population had increased from 300k to 500k whilst the Jewish population had increased from about 10k to 20k, so Zionist Jews had very little to do with population growth. I asked before, but what is the evidence that Muslim immigration was a direct result of Jewish immigration?

    I also did not argue that Muslims were living in the area since antiquity, to me that is irrelevant. Christians had also lived in the area Palestine since the first century and in bigger numbers than the Jewish population. Trying to claim entitlement based on having lived somewhere 2000 years previously is not realistic or pragmatic to me. Yes the population of Palestine was small, but again that is pretty irrelevant as the whole place is not much bigger than an Irish province. Of course Jewish people had a right to emigrate to that region and they did so before Zionism, in most cases migration happens naturally. However, that was not the case with Zionism which encouraged and paid for people to move to the region with the stated aim on creating a new state there. That is a very different World to natural migration and I cannot think of anything like that happened elsewhere other than colonial projects.

    Palestine was not to be part of the Syrian mandate, the French wanted the Syrian mandate and the British wanted Palestine, they actually had a stand-off about this due to disagreements about other territories and the French were threatening to have Palestine as part of their Mandate, but they got it sorted out. The British wanted Palestine for proximity to the Suez canal and to enable the Zionists to carry out their project. When the crap started, they realised the mess they had created. Now the state the Arabs had been promised by the British was unclear, but there was an assumption by the Arabs that it would be all of Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan. But like I said before, promises were made that simply could not be kept.

    Zionism is not solely to blame for the current situation as the Great Powers of the WW1 period, in particular Britain and later the UN bear a great responsibility for the mess, but without Zionism, there would be no Israel in the Middle East.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Zionism didn't start until 1897 in that the official movement wasn't founded, but Jews were seeking to move there long before that and did so, with their money, following the Tanzimat reforms and the Ottoman Land Law of 1858 which allowed Russian Jews to buy land in Palestine and move there.

    I agree that historical ancestral claims don't give legitimacy to one side or the other, biblical claims even less so. That's the point I made in the post you quoted. Given the wars that took place in the region from 1900 onward, and continue to this day, do you really think that the presence or absence of Israel would have a material difference on the levels of conflict there?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Fair enough, but they are a far left organisation who publish conspiracy theories, are pro-Russian and support the authoritarian government in China and has been strongly supportive of the Syrian government and has been classified by the US Institute of Strategic Studies as  "the "most prolific spreader of disinformation" on matters concerning Syria".

    That's a pretty low bar you set for yourself.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    So he had to watch a horrific video and had a gun pointed at him, and Emily had to speak in a low voice.

    Remember, what we were told was capture would be fate worse than death.

    Meanwhile Palestinian kids the same age are having their limbs broken by Israeli security staff.

    I know people on here facilitate the eternal victimhood that Israel leaders and supporters have shown they hold above all else, but you have to acknowledge the disparity between what they said was happening, and what has been shown to have been happening.

    And meanwhile, the death toll for children in Palestine looks to have passed 7000.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 828 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    “So he had to watch a horrific video and had a gun pointed at him, and Emily had to speak in a low voice. 

    Remember, what we were told was capture would be fate worse than death.”

    With the greatest of respect until ALL of the hostages are released I think you, me, we should be cautious about being too optimistic about their ‘treatment’ at the hands of terrorists who wouldn’t think twice about killing them were it not for their value in the present context.

    There were other matters raised in previous comments as well, such as weight loss, withholding of medication etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 915 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    748 pages in and this thread is all about onemanupship at this stage. This side is worse than this side. Meh. Leaders and organisational structures on both sides are absolute scum with no regard for human life. I hope they rot in hell (if it exists) for eternity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    The Ottomans were a colonial power. The Arab Muslims were aa colonial power before them. The Romans before them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    "I'm not at all surprised that some hostages have reported being poorly treated. Around 15,000 Palestinians have been killed in the last month, how could there not be people guarding the hostages who react to this fact?" 

    Are you suggesting that the good people of Hamas would have behaved better if the IDF hadn't killed as many Palestinian Arabs during their ground offensive?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,604 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Lets not kid ourselves here, If he/she was truly consistent they would not post selectively condemning murder- nor would they use murders as an attempt to score points. Of course the poster will deny that's what they are at. Anyone who isn't biased will not be deceived by their shenanigans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,285 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Not trying to defend Hamas for a moment, but on balance, it seems hostages were treated far better than anyone anticipated. No indications of violence or brutality / torture or solitary confinement. I believe Emily for example was allowed to stay with her friend and her friend's mother for the duration of her captivity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Good people of Hamas are your words, not mine.

    How likely do you think it is that the death and damage inflicted by Israel would have had no impact on the mindset of Palestinians?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,419 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    No indications? I don't know how you can state that if you've been reading the thread for last 24 hours.

    For starters, there's a released witness saying that Israeli hostages were beaten with electrical cables.

    Is making a 12 year old watch executions videos at gunpoint an example of treating someone "far better than anyone anticipated" ?

    And if hostages were mis-treated very badly and abused, there is possibility they will be just be disappeared, so they can never tell their tale.

    Post edited by odyssey06 on

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,604 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Given the savagery that took place on October 7th, it's logical that the people who were capable of carrying this out would then also be capable of mistreating hostages. That said It wouldn't be a total shock to me if they are actually some individuals capable of acts of kindness, even within in an organisation whose ethos is vile. So I don't find it hard to believe that some hostages may well have been treated well, but i would expect most of them did not get a big bowl of Cornflakes and a couple of croissants every morning from their smiling and friendly captors .





  • While hostages have a value to their captors, they are generally treated well. When they lose their value; not so much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    You're really not good at answering questions, are you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Question got the answer it deserved.

    I'm not here to give you Yes or No answers so you can then treat them as categorical/unchanging/definitive for every instance of every individual within a now and in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,103 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    (67) 81 Palestinians killed in occupied West Bank since October 7, health ministry says (cnn.com)

    Are Israeli lives more important than Palestinian lives?

    Both sides are at it only the IDF have the better fire power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Yes suggested that there was a link between the treatment of the Hamas hostages and the civilian deaths as a result of the IDF's offensive in Gaza. I just asked you if you thought the hostages would have been treated differently if the IDF hadn't launched their offensive. I'm not asking for a yes or no answer, I'm asking for your opinion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Israeli lives are more important to Israelis, Irish lives are more important to Irish people, etc. That's just part of the human condition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,103 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I just asked you if you thought the hostages would have been treated differently if the IDF hadn't launched their offensive

    Which hostages are you talking about, the ones that were treated well, or the ones that were treated not well?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    All of them I suppose, as a cohort. I presume you were talking about all of them. Are you capable of just answering the question that was asked? It's not a trick question. I'm genuinely interested in your answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,620 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    He was also beaten by a mob when he was brought in to Gaza. A 12 year old. forcing him to watch videos of his community, which might have included people he knew, being murdered is actually psychological torture but not so bad according to you.

    Do you mean the child who had 2 functioning, unbandaged arms on release and didn't seem to be in pain, only later to go on camera bandaged up and hamas claiming his arms were broken? That one? Started out with just his hands bandaged and progressed over the hours to a full cast. Yeah I'm gonna take that one with a pinch of salt. It's not beneath hamas to lie about stuff like that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Palestinian kids the same age? Are you saying that Israel imprisoned eight-year old girls?

    I have heard and seen evidence that Israel arrested teenage youths for antisocial activity (the kind of people who were rioting last Thursday in Dublin) but I haven't heard of them imprisoning eight-year old girls or six month old babies.

    It seems that your posts are little more than regurgitated propaganda at this stage, repeating whatever lies are being spread by Hamas apologists elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,285 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I was genuinely fearful that hostages would be treated much worse than they seem to have been i.e. use of violence or torture against them or kept in solitary confinement in the dark. For example, the clothes that Emily was wearing on release had been given to her by her captors and not what she was wearing when kidnapped.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,620 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Other hostages have claimed they were kept in the same clothes they were wearing the entire time and only given new ones just before they were released.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Your post about a letter saying that Hamas are gentle lovely people..



Advertisement