Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sinn Fein and how do they form a government dilemma

13031333536391

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,951 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    If FF seat numbers collapse then the only viable option might be a SF/FG coalition.


    Vanishingly unlikely. If FF lose big in the next GE a big chunk of those seats will almost certainly go to SF and that will almost certainly push them over the line to forming their preferred left coalition, if not an outright overall majority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,659 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    There's a definite whiff of grapeshot about SF. A lot of voters over a certain age have clear memories of the events of the 1970s and the 1980s and will have very grave doubts about SF. That generation hasn't died off yet and, significantly, FF draws disproportionately on that generation for its own support. So there's a degree of risk for FF in entering a coalition that puts SF in government — a risk which I think is magnified if SF is the larger party and expects the position of Taoiseach.

    Everything depends on the electoral mathematics. If the mathematics are such that FF/FG and FF/SF both have the numbers to be a viable government, from FF's perspective FF/FG will look like both the electorally safer and the ideologically more coherent option. But if FF/SF is the only viable option then, yeah, FF will go there — not without some trepidation, but they will go there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,087 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If the mathematics are such that FF/FG and FF/SF both have the numbers to be a viable government, from FF's perspective FF/FG will look like both the electorally safer and the ideologically more coherent option. 

    Again, I think you are underestimating the desire to not go back into what will have been a toxic relationship for them. If their GE vote falls or collapses altogether that is, If they hold ground around +20%, then they have the choices you outline. Not so much if they are around 15/16%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,447 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Can't see a collapse either.ffg numbers are already weak. Also even if sf are in opposition again, they have had huge increases in support over the last few years, effectively its nigh on impossible to get more than they have now, maybe tiny increases, they will win the most seats next election. The problem then is, if they go into government, it will be downhill from there seat wise come next election. A credible fourth force in politics, would be fantastic for the Irish people...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,447 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    No chance.. the only way any one cleans up, is if they offer something different, speak the truth and are prepared to stir the wasps nest, zero chance of that with anyone currently in the dail...

    Has mm announced when he is likely to step down ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,951 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    If the mathematics are such that FF/FG and FF/SF both have the numbers to be a viable government, from FF's perspective FF/FG will look like both the electorally safer and the ideologically more coherent option.


    Things will get very interesting though if the numbers are there for FF and FG to form another government, but things are pretty precarious, possibly reliant on the Greens, SDs and a bunch of independents. Then we'll see where FF's true aspirations lie. I always thought for Martin, to paraphrase a former government colleague of his, the worst deal without SF is better than the best deal with them but ever since this 'wobble' I'm not so sure

    If in that circumstance FF do end up cutting a deal with SF 'stability' will obviously be the reason cited but I doubt it'll be the only one, or even the main one...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,310 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think you are right in that SF will get the most seats, not many will argue that point.

    But I dont see them getting enough seats for a majority, which means they have to join forces with FF, in order to form a govt.

    If MM is in charge of FF, that wont happen. But a new leader may be more receptive to the idea.

    My money is still on FFG returning to govt and locking out SF for a 2nd time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,087 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If MM is in charge of FF, that wont happen.

    Given his track record of saying one thing and doing another, I wouldn't be putting any money on that if you can't afford to lose it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,310 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    A coalition with SF will be viewed by many as more toxic than the current coalition with FG.

    If FF want to be in govt next term, they have no choice but to coalesce with either FG or SF.

    I think that trumps any notion of "toxicity" within the party, as far as FF are concerned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,310 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    As long as the numbers are there to partner with FG instead of SF, its an easy choice to go (again) with the former.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,087 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I'll rephrase that to the correct way of putting it;

    A coalition with SF will be viewed by many as potentially more toxic than the current coalition with FG which has definitely been toxic for the FF party.

    Of course there is also the possibility it may not be as toxic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Correct. S.F. is toxic to others: nobody wants to form a government with them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,447 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    When sf are given by far the largest support as a single party, for a second time. Even more dramatic the next election, almost definitely. Will it be tolerated, for them to be shut out by ffg , whom many deem to have actually brought sf to where they are support wise, because of ffg very poor governance... ffg have given sf this surge, sf hasn't really done squat diddly...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,310 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I am not so sure about that.

    I think most FF voters, who tend to be older or retired, would have real issues with the party governing with SF.

    I dont think those people see partnering with FG as anything like as bad. FG and FF are barely distinguishable from eachother anyway.

    Now sure, FF voters would like to see their party take on some defining policies that seperate themselves a little from FG. And they will campaign on that.

    But when the dust settles, FF policies will be much closer to FG than they are to SF.

    Same as they are today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,008 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    If FF seat numbers collapse, then a SF/FG is the only option that can be ruled out.

    FG/Labour/SD/Greens/Independents would come first, as would SF/PBP/I4C/SDs.

    However, based on the current polls, SF/FF is favourite, with FF/FG/Greens in second place. I would not rule out that reversing between now and the election.

    As for senior versus junior, some of the nonsense posted over the last few pages is best ignored for the rubbish propaganda that it is. FF and FG went into this government as equal partners. Any future SF coalition with FF will have to do the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,203 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    There's a vague possibility that SF might get enough seats to allow them to cobble together enough votes with a mish-mash of other parties, some or all of Labour, Greens, SDs and some independents. It's a long shot, but not entirely impossible at present.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,008 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Absolutely yes, it has happened many times before in Irish politics, 1948, 1954, 1973 etc.

    In all those cases, there was one party far larger than all the others, and a coalition government shut them out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,310 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Very much a long shot, though I think you are right that it cant be ruled out entirely.

    There would be some serious concession trading in those government formation meetings!

    I'd love to be a fly on the wall there :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,087 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think most FF voters, who tend to be older or retired, would have real issues with the party governing with SF.

    I think this is a FF voter base that doesn't exist tbh.

    And it will be those looking to the future on the one hand and at their own political survival on the other who will be the game changers IMO.

    FF will be at that crossroads I talked of earlier if they are down around where they are now in the polls in a GE result.

    Stay in what has been a toxic relationship or move in a new direction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,447 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Interesting, but did it happen back to back elections and were there really serious societal consequences at play, I.e the housing crisis that is driving sf vote surge now...?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No one gets "shut out" or "blocked" from forming a Govt. You just either manage to successfully form one or you don't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Therere may be some FF voters who would be willing to go in to government with SF, whatever the cost.


    However there are also voters ( some traditional FG votes, people who once voted PD etc) who are fed up with the leadership of FG, and who would vote FF if they could trust them not to go in to coalition with S.F.

    If FF wants to win more votes it needs to reassure the population it will not, and never, go in to government with the party unrepentant over Garda murders etc etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,008 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It very nearly happened in three successive elections, 1948, 1951 and 1954. The difference in 1951 was that the largest party was able to negotiate its own coalition with smaller parties and independents, regarded as one of the worst governments ever in Ireland. That is the challenge for Sinn Fein next time out, can they repeat the success of FF in 1951 while avoiding the tag of worst government ever. If they don't manage to get into government, they may also fail at the following one, sticking closely to the pattern of the late 1940s/early 1950s. In fact, FF might not have got back into government in 1957 if it wasn't for complete u-turns on policy:

    "Fianna Fáil had produced a major policy document in January, criticising many of its own policies in regard to the economy. While they did not know an election was imminent this became the backbone of their manifesto. The importance of free trade was played up by Fianna Fáil in a clear rejection of the protectionist policies they had advocated in the past."

    There are lessons in history for Sinn Fein, if they only would listen. I doubt that they are capable of that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,008 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is more than a vague possibility, the actual numbers last time made it possible.

    Sinn Fein (37), Greens (12), Labour (6), Social Democrats (6), PBP (5), Aontu (1), I4C (1), added up to 68. 12 out of the 19 independents would have given that grouping a majority.

    With Fine Gael holding their own at the moment, and looking to come in at more or less the same seats, but with FF down to 15% and losing 10-15 seats, the current polling makes this scenario realistic. What reduces it to a vague possibility isn't the numbers, it is the inability of Sinn Fein to lead such a coalition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,659 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus



    I don't really buy this "coalition with FG has been toxic for FF" line.

    If you accept that FF's overriding political objective is to be in government, then the acid test of any coalition relationship is how many votes the party gets while in that relationship, and what are its chances of retaining power.

    FF's low point was in 2011, when they secured just 17% of the vote, coming third after FG and Lab. At that time there was a real possibility that the party would disappear into oblivion. They've consolidated and rebuilt somewhat from that position; they got 22.2% and came second in the 2020 General election and are currently on about 20% in the polls.

    The real lose during this period has not been FF but FG. In 2011 they got 36% of the vote and came first. They were down to 20.9% and third place in 2020; right now they are more or less level pegging with FF in the polls.

    So, in a nutshell, FF have consolidated and modestly improved their electoral situation; FG have lost the huge lead they had. If this relationship has been costly to either party, surely it's FG?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,087 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They got 22% only because they were not FG IMO. Soon as they coalesced they lost support...trending down for a long time now.

    Anything below 22% would be a failure for them.

    And I say it again, FF TD's losing seats because of this relationship will have a huge impact on negotiations on a new government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,310 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If they (FF) dont coalesce, they dont get into govt.

    I think the toxicity thing is a little over egged.

    Their priority is to be in govt and they cannot do it on their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,203 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Couldn't see PBP ever getting off the fence and actually taking responsibility for governing. Lab and Green will be down on last time, though probably SF will pick up most of those.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,008 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Eventually, all governments change, this means that eventually the percentage of vote gained by parties in government has to fall. If they regain power, it is because their vote went up in opposition. If those things didn't happen, we would never see a change in government.

    So the rule of a working democracy is support for parties in government inevitably falls while support for parties in opposition inevitably rises. Those who paint this as something more significant as toxicity for certain parties or try to build more conspiracy theory-like conclusions on the basis of this are ignoring the basic reality.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,008 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The predicted 5% loss from FF has to go somewhere, and it is not going to FG or the Greens, so based on the current polls a SF-led pick-and-mix coalition is certainly possible.



Advertisement