Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

19559569589609611796

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,195 ✭✭✭TRC10


    The players "given a shot" is nonsense to be honest, they should be able to perform to a level for their province and then perform in the national setup. 

    Many players have been performing to a level for their province, only to not be included in favour of players not playing to that level for another province



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I’d say there is less connection between provincial performance (especially in big games/europe) and ireland call ups than ever before.

    Not saying it is good or bad but its true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,942 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Farrell is going to pick players who can do the things he wants them to do, simple as. Performance for the provinces is probably secondary to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    What do you mean by call ups?

    Getting in extended squad or getting game time?



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Extended squad I can maybe see it - again it depends how you're describing 'performance'. In the past you'd get into extended squads purely for existing in the 23 of certain provinces - I'd argue the fact of simply playing in games doesn't equate to 'performance'.

    I dont think there is any case to claim that there is a bigger break 'than ever before' when it comes to provincial performance and getting into the ireland 23. There were years in the past where players were playing outstanding for their provinces in huge European games and couldnt get an opportunity ahead of the guy who had the jersey. I can't think of any cases where there are such big gaps in the last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    Hansen is 25 now, made his Ireland debut at 23. Frisch is 27. There are a lot of younger centres at a similar level who I’d say are more likely to be involved than Frisch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    Murray is arguably the best line out operator in the world atm, particularly defensively and hes fairly rapid for a lock but he isn’t ready for test level.

    He either needs to add 5/10kg to be an effective carrier and to be able to impact the breakdown or become similes level jackal threat as Beirne.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,195 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Murray is arguably the best line out operator in the world atm

    Ok



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41 inbloom427


    @Akrasia "Hendy is done"... is he ay? Fairly showed his class compared about your young Munster bucks tonight haha



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    17 line out steals last season, 3 already this year in 120 minutes of rugby. They are world class numbers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Certainly Osborne. Unless he is moved to another position. Tom Farrell has been very good and never got a look.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭SqueakyKneecap


    Tom Farrell is very similar to Gavin Thornbury in the fact that when they're absolutely tearing it up for Connacht and knocking on the window for international selection they pick up long-term injuries at the worst imaginable time.

    I was very impressed with young McCann in the last two weeks. We're a few very decent prospects coming through in the second/back row positions over the coming years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,972 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I'm more convinced now than ever that Cian Prendergast is Ireland's long term 6. He's a workhorse that also makes the 'big moments' plays too. Wonderful player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭Wegians89


    Still needs to tighten up on his discipline but there’s a huge amount of potential with him



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    You didn't answer the question. You provided a list of players who played well at their province, got into the squad and then into the team based on their performances which is the point I made, so I guess we are agreeing then. The likes of Hansen ripping it up v Leinster and was taken quickly into the squad and team from nowhere would show to me the ability to escalate the ranks quickly with your performance at provincial level.

    Hodnett v Penny, was that in a November series? I can't even remember. Neither made it into the WC warm up and Penny hasn't been capped? so what exactly is the Penny v Hodnett discussion?

    If you wanted Hodnett into the World Cup warm up would it not be Hodnett v Treadwell?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I very clearly did answer the questions tho. Your questions...

    Probably easier to name the players you think didn't get included? Also who should they have replaced in the squad in your opinion

    My answer:

    To be clear, I'm not saying [the selected players] shoudn't have been in

    But I'll remind you of your original point:

    they should be able to perform to a level for their province and then perform in the national setup. Farrell hs shown that he has no issue with putting players into the team when they meet those targets.

    The point is, all the players I've listed all had fairly limited degrees of Provincial experience, particularly at Europen level, when Farrell selected them. That's just objectively true. In JGP's case he was 2nd choice provincially.

    And on this:

    Hodnett v Penny, was that in a November series? I can't even remember. Neither made it into the WC warm up and Penny hasn't been capped? so what exactly is the Penny v Hodnett discussion?

    Which is why I specifcally prefaced this point with "Even in broader squads...". At the time, Penny had 10 minutes European experience. Hodnett had much more, playing well against the likes of Toulouse.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


     In JGP's case he was 2nd choice provincially.

    He was, but he also had pretty extensive experience, even at European level. That is just a case of different coaches rating players differently. He played in 51 matches, including 15 European ties, before Farrell took over the Irish coaching job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Fully agree but think you're actually underplaying his experience there - from my count he has 93 games for Leinster and 35 games for the Blues before his first Irish cap (which wasn't even as a starter).

    The JGP example is simply an extremely poor one if a person is trying to make the case on limited degrees of experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Yep, fair enough (Part of the point is also provincial pecking order tho).

    Point still stands for the list of other players tho.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    My original point was just about experience. It was about:

    Provincial form or exposure 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Your full paragraph from the post Podge quoted:

    The point is, all the players I've listed all had fairly limited degrees of Provincial experience, particularly at Europen level, when Farrell selected them. That's just objectively true. In JGP's case he was 2nd choice provincially.

    You keep either trying to shoehorn JGP into arguments where he doesn't fit or need to be careful where you're throwing his name into. JGP has absolutely no place in the discussion about experience before he was getting Irish caps, as he had a huge amount - far more than many players before they get a look in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Fair enough, look, I've clarified by position, and it doesn't change that with regards the other 7 I gave as an example.

    But... you do you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    My original point: The players "given a shot" is nonsense to be honest, they should be able to perform to a level for their province and then perform in the national setup. Farrell hs shown that he has no issue with putting players into the team when they meet those targets. 

    All of the players you listed performed at their provinces and moved up into the squad and then into the team. A number of the players you listed can claim to be in the top 5 in the World so honestly I have no idea what you said you disagree with. I don't think you are but it sounds like you want some sort of number of minutes in URC and Europe before a player can get into the squad and into the first team for Ireland.

    The original post I responded to was dropping experienced internationals to swap in young players for no reason apart fro age. Now you seem to want to only move players into the Irish squad if they are performing well but also based on the numbers of minutes/caps. This would be a disaster for Ireland with the likes of Crowley/Hansen etc

    Now I could be taking you up wrong but that's how it reads to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    To be absolutely clear again on this, no, this...

    I don't think you are but it sounds like you want some sort of number of minutes in URC and Europe before a player can get into the squad and into the first team for Ireland.


    Now you seem to want to only move players into the Irish squad if they are performing well but also based on the numbers of minutes/caps.

    ...is not at all what I'm saying. My point is specifically on your following quote:

    they should be able to perform to a level for their province and then perform in the national setup

    "to a level" to me, implies vs high-calibre opposition? (Or maybe I've taken that up wrong?). The majority of the players I've mentioned had limited enough high-level and/or European experience before getting capped.

    That doesn't mean I'm saying Farrell was wrong to cap them. I'm not. (And in many, he was very clearly proven right).

    But that's different from saying Provincial form or exposure had very much at all to do with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,739 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Interesting thread from Sam Larner who collates stats and combines them for a "Stuff Score". Shows a player with a rounded game, not just a carrier... or only a tackler or rucker etc.

    Cathal Forde is shooting the lights out, being a back (!) and top of the pile where traditonally this is a forwards patch.

    David McCann has been putting his hand up for many on here and is in 2nd and Coombes, who I've read comments along the lines of "isn't playing like he wants to be an international", is in third.

    The comments raised a wider question around wondering will we see more backrows being tried at centre. Think there's a degree of merit to that if you can get the handling skills up to speed


    IMG_20231113_194349.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Interesting read, linked below for anyone interested. I remember looking at some rucks stats around the 6 Nations time and, perhaps not surprising, but Bundee had the highest rucking numbers of our backs. Not to the extent of surpassing the forwards (altho this was just ruck numbers).




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,675 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    There's such a thing as planning for the future.

    No doubt the best current15 and some reserves should always be there but you have to introduce younger players to international rugby. If you brought three prospects in for each game that would help a lot.

    You get to see what you've got without seriously hurting the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    you won't have any future if you keep losing games.

    Throwing 3 prospects into each game for the sake of it would end up a disaster for Ireland in all probability. Losing games and ranking, but of course the coach would also be fired



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,675 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    It's three coming off the bench, not starting. It's not like they'll be miles behind what's on the bench.

    Let's use Coombes as an example.



Advertisement
Advertisement