Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

15996006026046051428

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Well it goes back to 1933.

    Would the Nazi's have treated the Jews better if the Jews were a bit nicer?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    So you are in favour of keeping civilians locked up in Gaza in the midst of a war zone?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Israel and Egypt have agreements on the border crossing. Israel actually inspects all the aid trucks in Israel before they drive along the border to the crossing under the eyes of the IDF. It could very well be the case Egypt won't allow anyone leave across the border unless Israel approve. Certainly prevents Hamas fighters known the Israel to cross into Egypt to escape the IDF.

    Israel controls what goes into Gaza, it's not a stretch to say they control what/who leaves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    A 2 state solution is the only realistic solution at the moment, but one has to get rid of Hams first for this to gain traction.

    Anti-Semitism in the Palestinian world must also be challenged, as well as Islamophobia in the more extreme elements of Israeli society.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    9/11 change everything since Camp David.

    Israel was more than happy to build walls and watch the rest of the Arab world tear itself apart.

    Syria, the emergence of ISIS, Iraq, Iran, and even Suadi under MBS, these places are volatile and ready to explode at a moment's notice. As I said, the world has moved on and its much more unstable now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    This isn't true. See my post above.

    You are confusing it with the Kerem Shalom Crossing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,367 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The do nothing no achievements moaner brigade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Have you convinced yourself that all these lads involved in the diplomatic negotiations with Israel to try to get the Irish citizens on the list to leave - diplomats on both on the Irish side and the Israeli side - haven't realised what you know, which is that it is nothing to do with Israel?

    Or perhaps all the reports and mentions of said negotiations and interactions are simply more antisemitic Western media and political fearmongering and hate-rousing?


    One might have imagined that the Israeli diplomatic service would be quite busy at the minute. You wouldn't think they'd just not bother telling the Irish diplomats - "ah shure that's nothing to do with us" rather than wasting everyone's time.

    Or perhaps the Israeli diplomats don't know as much about that area as you do. Have you ever considered offering your services as an expert on the region to them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,031 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Are you saying that these people are members of Hamas, because we've been told for 4 weeks that that is all Israel is targeting.

    Or are you acknowledging that Israel is breaking article 33 of the Geneva convention? Which is it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭Sir_Name


    He's not - below extract from Reuters.

    Aid trucks drive through the Egyptian border gate at Rafah before heading more than 40km (25 miles) to the Egyptian-Israeli crossing of Al-Awja/Nitzana for inspection, as agreed in negotiations with Israel. Trucks return to Egypt empty, with the aid reloaded onto separate trucks for delivery into Gaza.

    Israel refuses to allow fuel into Gaza, saying it could be used by the Hamas militant group for their military goals.

    During past conflicts aid was mainly delivered from Israel, and the U.N. aid operation for Palestinians has been run through Israel since the 1950s.

    The United Nations has pushed for Israel to open its Kerem Shalom crossing, near where Israel, Gaza and Egypt meet.

    Who controls the Rafah crossing and why is it so important to Gaza? | Reuters



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I can dismiss your opinion with evidence as you offer no alternative evidence to the contrary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,031 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    The years from 1991 to pre-9/11 were golden years of relative global peace and order.

    The first World Trade Centre bomb attack, Rawanda massacre and the war in the former Yugoslavia took place within this timeframe as well as ongoing attacks on US ships and other interests as a response, and precursor to the 9/11 attacks. The Somalia civil war started in 1991.

    It obviously wasn't the same as WW2 or anything like that but its false to suggest that that period was anything like the 'Golden Years' you paint them to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,065 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Doesn't really change the point.

    Just the last sentence.


    Socialist leaning groups like the PLO are the product of western education and colonial influence.


    They are in the past because that influence has been replaced.


    No one person could alter that path.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The article says this.

    Although Israel does not directly control the Rafah crossing, it monitors all activity in southern Gaza from Kerem Shalom military base, and other surveillance.


    What that article is also alluding to is how and what goods are allowed into Gaza.

    I never said Israel doesn't have a say in this.

    But Israel doesn't get a say on who leaves Gaza.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭Sir_Name


    Agreed he was not. There is more than one article even from the Times of Israel of culpability and complicity on Netanyahu behalf. A blind man could see it based off these actions and you can bet your life that if this was to happen today in Ireland, USA, UK etc there would be calls for justice.

    Rallies organized by Likud and other right-wing groups featured depictions of Rabin in a Nazi SS uniform, or in the crosshairs of a gun.[2][3] Protesters compared the Labor party to the Nazis and Rabin to Adolf Hitler[5] and chanted, "Rabin is a murderer" and "Rabin is a traitor".[8][9] In July 1995, Netanyahu led a mock funeral procession featuring a coffin and hangman's noose at an anti-Rabin rally where protesters chanted, "Death to Rabin".[10][11] The chief of internal security, Carmi Gillon, then alerted Netanyahu of a plot on Rabin's life and asked him to moderate the protests' rhetoric, which Netanyahu declined to do.[8][12] Netanyahu denied any intention to incite violence.[2][3][13]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,393 ✭✭✭✭suvigirl


    Ward that the Israelis have never started and have always only defended themselves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    You were already given a Reuters article above. You should also contact Reuters to offer your Middle East expertise consultancy services. Either their journalists are wrong, or probably just antisemitic???


    CAN U.S. CITIZENS AND DUAL NATIONALS LEAVE GAZA?

    The Qatar-mediated deal allows for limited evacuations of foreign passport holders. A list was agreed between Israel and Egypt, a Western official said.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,031 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I'm convinced that nobody truly believes this lie, some will pretend they do, but they know what the reality is.

    We've had all sorts of claims made on here like those who voice up for the lives of Palestinians are antisemitic, and holocaust deniers, and pro-Hamas etc etc etc.

    This is just another one of them seeking to absolve the most military powerful country in the region as it carries out the genocide it's leaders said it would.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    A spokesperson for the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said it was "working round the clock to ensure all British nationals in Gaza who want to leave are able to".

    "This involves submitting all details of British nationals and eligible dependants to the Israeli and Egyptian authorities. The authorities then review all cases and give permissions to cross."

    There's 2 sides to the border, in order to get to the Egyptian side, Hamas would have to let you through, but at the Egyptian side there seems to be a list Israel and Egypt approve. So Hamas can prevent people from leaving Gaza and Egypt and Israel prevent you from entering Egypt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I guess it is similar to how Cromwell only defended his country against the savage Irish attackers................. 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,836 ✭✭✭Nermal


    Just two posts above yours was a post 'arguing on the side of Hamas', suggesting that Israel was exaggerating the barbarity of the attacks and/or was responsible for them.

    Most of the rest of the thread is taken up by people arguing that the actions of Israel and Hamas are in some way morally equivalent, or that those of Israel are worse.

    All of this constitutes 'arguing on the side of Hamas'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    It's quite clear at this stage (well it was said from the outset) that Israel are obviously just going to stretch out their window for killing as many Palestinians as possible.

    They will ignore the growing international calls for as long as they can, and brazen it out until they are actually stopped by the US. Even then, all the US can do is temporarily stop their money and military aid flowing in, so they'll get to continue on after that's stopped until it is about to run out. Then they can hold their hands up and say "we are sorry US, we didn't mean it. Please start giving us money again" and we'll go back to the start of the cycle.


    And nothing ever happens, nothing happens at all

    The needle returns to the start of the song

    And we all sing along like before



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,257 ✭✭✭crusd


    Undermining the PLO to the advantage of Hamas was a deliberate strategy of Likud.

    https://thehill.com/opinion/international/4268794-the-symbiotic-relationship-between-netanyahu-and-hamas/


    Further, there were three “mini wars” with Hamas during Netanyahu’s last 14 years as prime minister. There was a not-so-tacit agreement between Hamas and Netanyahu that, after each round of fighting, Israel would allow funds from Qatar and elsewhere to flow back to Hamas. This was against the recommendation of much of his own security establishment. As has been seen, those funds were used by Hamas to build tunnels and stockpile weapons rather than build internal infrastructure for the people of Gaza.

    The Israeli security apparatus often wanted to go after the leadership of Hamas in a concerted way during many of these mini-wars. They were kept from doing so by Netanyahu — because he needed Hamas as his foil against the PA. He had no long-term strategic objectives, only short-term political ones.


    With Hamas in power in Gaza, coupled with a deliberately emaciated PA in the West Bank, Netanyahu could claim there was no Palestinian partner for negotiation, and he could continue to crisscross the West Bank with settlements.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The Articles of War website continues to give some hard analysis of the allegations of war crimes. A pity it doesn't seem to allow links. From a recent article about ambulances:

    "Ambulances have regularly been used by armed groups to carry out attacks and transport weapons. In 2011, in Iraq, insurgents used ambulances packed with explosives to attack police buildings. In 2016, ISIS used two ambulances in a coordinated suicide attack in Samarra and Tikrit that killed over 25 people. The ICC has recent experience investigating perfidy and treacherty. As part of its preliminary examination into Afghanistan the Prosecutor of the ICC concluded that the Taliban has potentially committed the war crime of killing or wounding treacherously a combatant adversary (art. 8(2)(e)(ix)), citing the example in 2011 of the Taliban using an ambulance to carry out a suicide attack on the Afghan National Police training centre in Kandahar that killed 12 officers and injured others (para. 156). Similarly in 2018, the Taliban drove another ambulance laden with explosives into the government and business district of Kabul detonating it and killing over 100 people and injuring over 235 others. The ICRC has noted that the misuse of ambulances by fighters, “gravely compromises the neutrality of health-care providers,” an abuse of trust, that has “serious consequences in terms of public perceptions, effectiveness and security.”"

    From reading the whole article, the ambulance incident definitely involved a war crime, possibly on both sides. If Hamas was using the ambulances to carry weapons and soldiers to attack the IDF, that is a war crime. If the IDF didn't give specific warnings about the ambulance in advance, even if it was carrying weapons and soldiers, that is a war crime.

    What was truly horrifying from the article though, was the scale of attacks on ambulances in other conflicts:

    "From 2016 to 2017 alone, 243 ambulances were attacked in Syria with the Syrian government responsible for 123 and Russian forces damaging or destroying 60 others."

    Where is the outrage from Paul Murphy et al about this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,689 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    thick.png


    Further to my point yesterday here's another hard leftist who's got it all figured out. These people are so thick it's unreal.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,042 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    The beaker people are coming to take back wickow



Advertisement