Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Helmets - the definitive thread.. ** Mod Note - Please read Opening Post **

17980818385

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,396 ✭✭✭cletus


    I would always wear a helmet if I'm out for a long cycle at the weekend, say.

    But if I'm going to the shops, or a spin around Naas at lunch time or in between classes, I'd never put on a helmet.


    No real reasoning on my behalf for this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭TheAnalyst_


    Never wear one. They look dumb.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Each to their own, but given their intended purpose that would be pretty much bottom of my list of reasons for not wearing one.

    Caliper and disc brakes are ugly to varying degrees, but you wouldn't catch me riding a pure fixie on the roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭fiacha


    I always wear one. I already look like a prat in lycra so adding a helmet to the outfit doesn't bother me :D

    I don't expect it to work miracles, but I'll always wear PPE if there is a chance of it reducing / preventing injury in certain situations. Same goes for working with tools , chemicals etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,396 ✭✭✭cletus


    That might be part of it. If I'm pulling on bib shorts and a jersey, I'll put on a helmet too. If I'm tucking the right leg of my jeans into my sock to go for a bit of a meander, or get some milk, it won't even cross my mind.

    I might pull on a cycling cap, but that's just pure affectation 🤣



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,830 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    They don't look nearly as dumb as the person lying death on side of the road with their head split open. I have never seen a study that says even if you wear a helmet your are as like as not to have your head split open.

    I never wore a helmet until I say my neighbour lying dead on the side of the road as result of have split her head on a kerb stone about 200m from her home. There was no other car involved, it is believed she just clipped the edge of parked car and went splatter into the footpath. She was the mother of three young children and was just on the way to the shops.

    Now everyone on my street wear a helmet when they out on their bikes.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭TheAnalyst_


    How dumb do think poeple look split in two under the wheel of a truck?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭fiacha


    Nope, I don't feel the need for fall / impact protection when out walking. I do believe that there is a far greater risk of a head injury if I have a fall or collision while on the bike so it makes perfect sense to me to wear a helmet.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,497 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    my behaviour sounds similar to many above - i wear one when out on the bike for the sake of a bike ride (which usually last an hour or more) but if i'm running an errand, i don't. more likely



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,845 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Strange how people who witness gory car crashes don't suddenly become enthusiastic converts to wearing crash helmets in the car.



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,571 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal



    More pedestrians have been killed this year then cyclists or escooter users combined several times over, there's certainly a benefit to be had.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,396 ✭✭✭cletus


    Well, you're extrapolating from data we don't have. How many pedestrians were struck and not killed, how many cyclists were struck and not killed, how many had helmets on, what's the ratio of pedestrians to cyclists, and how does that compare to the ratio of deaths between the two etc.


    You can't just say helmets have saved lives because more pedestrians than cyclists were killed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭fiacha


    All of these pedestrian fatalities were as a result of head injuries that could have been prevented by wearing a helmet ? Do you have anything to support your claim ? If so, you should be going to the media and Gov highlighting it. Fair play to you for putting all that work in. Very impressive.

    *added "pedestrian" to clarify which fatalities I was referring to.

    Post edited by fiacha on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,881 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    I know a helmet saved my daughter from a serious dash on her head when she fell off and hit the curve.

    They do offer protection, but not going to protect you from eveything.


    Why do professional cyclists wear them or have to wear them?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,497 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Most people won't argue that if you're going to hit your head, that you'd be better off without a helmet than with one. The question is that is the focus on them while cycling (which has to be the only everyday activity where wearing one is considered de rigeur by the public at large) justified?

    Anecdotally speaking, I know more people who died of head injuries while hillwalking than I know who suffered the same fate cycling (the number of people I know is one, FWIW). And I know more cyclists than I do hillwalkers. And I'm certainly not arguing that hillwalkers should wear helmets.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,497 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Why do professional cyclists wear them or have to wear them?

    Comparing racing cycling - where average speeds would probably be more than double the average commuting cyclist speed - while also doing so in bunch sprints, etc., is not a comparison which stretches very far. Like comparing mandatory safety equipment used in Motorsport which is not required in a family car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭fiacha


    IMO we are all responsible for our own personal safety. As long as your decision doesn't put someone else at risk, then do what you want.

    If helmet / hi-viz requirements were introduced tomorrow, how long would it be before it stopped being enforced regularly ? I rememeber seeing a good few commuters being stopped for a few weeks after the cycling specific fines came in, but I haven't seen it happen since. Do others see cyclists being stopped at all ?

    I'd much rather see the Gov put focus on highly visible and consistant enforcement of the existing regulations relating to all road users. However that will involve an increase in the number of Gardai (and a kick up the hole for the existing ones that don't bother enforcing the current laws :D), so unlikely to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    If we're holding up pro cycling as the gold standard of safety for the rest of us, you probably don't want to consider the requirements for F1, Rallycross or any other professional motor sport...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Like the gardai I saw cruise through the amber-turning-red lights on my lunch break a few minutes ago? Nobody gives a s**t about road safety, if we're honest. Which is what p!sses cyclists off about being lectured to by motorists, the RSA and the Gardai.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,942 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    IMO we are all responsible for our own personal safety.

    That is a widely incorrect statement because it ignores the fact that while one can do everything to protect their personal safety, they cannot get others to follow suit. This is why some drivers will deliberately take chances with my safety because they are prioritising their convenience (or in some cases it is just plain old malice).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭fiacha


    You left a bit of my comment out.

    "IMO we are all responsible for our own personal safety. As long as your decision doesn't put someone else at risk, then do what you want."



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,942 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I didn't really. I am being responsible for my safety and my decision is not putting someone at risk.

    What your statement is doing is still putting the onus for my safety on me and ignores the reality that because we've allowed a piss poor level of road traffic enforcement to develop, people driving feel that they can treat me on a bike with disdain knowing that they will get away with it. If I did choose to report them, there is a very high probability that nothing will happen because I didn't die or something.

    You are assuming that everyne else will drive with due care and attention when we know that they are allowed not to.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,005 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Actually, there are several, maybe not using your evocative language but at a population level, wearing helmets and not wearing helmets makes no noticeable difference to head injuries.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,005 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Seen a lad stopped for cycling on the pavement in Wexford the other day. Over the moon as he was dropping me with ease. It was south of the town with no pedestrians so no real danger but good to see it was being enforced.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,005 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    An interesting thing here though, any safety professional worth their salt will tell you PPE is the last ditch attempt to make an activity acceptable in terms of risk. Cycling is more than acceptable in terms of risk without it in most scenarios, hence why if you done a risk assessment properly, you'd find the need for a helmet would not really come into it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,845 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Why do professional drivers wear crash helmets and fire retardant suits?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,005 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,381 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,666 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    I'd be like others - wear one when I'm going for a spin, don't bother if I'm nipping to the shops in civvies. Bicycle helmets are designed for single impact of falling off (as in average runners daughter's case below), rather than the usual collision with someone driving a vehicle where it is multi-impact.

    Why do Pro's have to wear them? Well in part it was a knee jerk reaction, part because some countries made it mandatory for racing, and now because it's serious sponsorship for the sport. It wasn't a groundswell of evidence.



Advertisement