Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

PK@rte.ie (again). The All New (Patrick Kielty) Late Late Show Thread

19899101103104336

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Sad to say that this forum is full of people whinging about shows they feel compelled to hate-watch.

    Even though I preferred his predecessor I still hope Kielty gets a fair whack of the stick in The Big Chair



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭supereurope


    After two promising shows, it feels like the LLS went back around 10 steps tonight. An RTE canteen face in the form of PJ Gallagher followed by two really unfunny people. Emma Doran was a guest on the LLS back in March this year. Not even nine months between appearances. Both she and her companion (I didn't catch his name) were awful. Admittedly, I switched over when Andy Cole came on because I have no interest in football, but returned, then gave up once I realised the next guest was just someone with a book to plug. It's a shame, but then Gay had dud editions too. Hoping for a better show next week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,740 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Not sure why..mainly work ..but haven't really tuned in for a few weeks.

    But it seems the initial positivity has died a bit here ?

    How is he doing , I was hoping for him to do well...but watching this evening , this strange faces and forced laugh ..is a bit grating?

    I'll give it another go ..the thread too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,276 ✭✭✭✭ted1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭Brian Scan


    ..

    Post edited by Brian Scan on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Someone posted about Alex Ferguson being a good “father figure” to his players in this thread but I can’t find it so I’ll post my response here:

    Ferguson was only a father figure to his players if they were useful to Manchester United.

    Compare the blow ups he had with Beckham and Keane: they were jettisoned as soon as they stood up to him and when their powers on the pitch were waning (yes, even Beckham. In 2003 he wasn’t the player he was just a few years earlier), but when those same players were at their pomp Ferguson was happy to deal with whatever tantrums they had to dish out. And there were plenty from both.

    Even more damningly compare how Ferguson treated Paul McGrath to Jack Charlton.

    When McGrath was struggling with his alcoholism did father figure Fergie put his arm around McGrath and try to help him out? No, Ferguson forced him out of the club and even tried to pay off McGrath so that McGrath would retire altogether.

    That’s in stark contrast with Jack Charlton who would literally tuck McGrath into bed when McGrath couldn’t play after a heavy drinking session. Charlton did everything he could to save McGrath from himself, he would even have bouncers waiting outside McGrath’s room to stop him from sneaking out.

    A father figure guides his boys to greatness, yes, but he also protects them when they need it. Ferguson used to chew his players up and spit them out when he was finished. That’s not what a father figure does. He exploited his players and dumped them when they were no longer useful.


    Source on the McGrath story:

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/alex-ferguson-mcgrath-manutd-offer-29510898.amp



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,711 ✭✭✭Heroditas


    How is PJ an RTE canteen face? He works for Nova



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    That's why he's great , in ireland we leave them playing until they decide to retire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭Brian Scan


    That might be why he's great, but it's also why he's not really a father figure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,982 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Just a few comments on three common criticisms in the thread.

    Z LIST

    Every actor/performer won't be at the top of their profession but they may be a good guest. One of the most interesting men I ever met was an actor who worked in Hollywood for years. He was always in supporting roles and his name would be well down the credits. He made a good living and had some great stories to tell.

    CANTEEN GUESTS

    Every TV/Radio station cross promotes their wares. It makes sense from a commercial point of view to keep their own presenters in the limelight. A chat show or magazine type programme is an ideal vehicle to introduce talent to a wider audience.

    FLOGGING SOMETHING

    Almost everyone on chat shows is flogging something. It might be their latest album or tour. It could be a play, a movie or a book. Some are there to promote a charity event or a cause they support. Almost all those show business people doing their stuff on the LLS or G Norton etc would rather be somewhere else. They are there for work not fun.

    Post edited by elperello on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,886 ✭✭✭wandererz


    Watched the Two Johnnies on there own show last week.

    What a bit of fresh air.

    Thoroughly enjoyed it compared to the LLS.

    Can't stand Kielty's voice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Sorolla


    I looked at the Daniel O Donnell interview from last week again last night and it was a great interview with great chemistry between Kielty and Daniel.


    Tubridy had Daniel on the show millions of times and not once was it funny.


    one interview with Kielty and Daniel comes across as very good craic and well able to make fun of himself.


    Kielty is playing a blinder



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 905 ✭✭✭techman1


    Thank god Kielty got the LLS at the end of it all, last night wasn't great but there is the whole unpredictability again now, the end bit where Kielty rings the telephone competition winner to be met with initial whisper and deep breathing was funny. Can you imagine what it would be like with Claire Byrne at the helm, she is definitely not chat show host material, RTE dodged a bullet there. Hopefully the penny has dropped that current affairs and light entertainment don't mix



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,264 ✭✭✭amacca


    Can't disagree with that but a lot of the performers on the LLS aren't particularly interesting (many the opposite in fact) and have appeared too many times before


    If they introduced a 5 year limit on reappearances it would go a long way to improving things...


    Something new might have happened to the guests in that five years, they might have developed in some way and the LLS might have to hunt around for more interesting (if not higher up the celebrity pecking order) guests



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,332 ✭✭✭TheRiverman


    I like Patrick Kielty, but a big problem stiil remains, the quality of almost all the guests is awful. Last night was very,very poor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭supereurope


    He's done plenty of work with RTÉ...might not be doing anything at Montrose at the moment, but would have plenty RTÉ contacts. He's not someone who's had his entire career with private broadcasters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭supereurope


    I made a point similar to your first point a few weeks back, though my example was people who would have been A-listers 30 years ago and whose star has now faded. You're absolutely right, you don't need to be an A-lister to be a good guest, but there's a difference between the Z-listers in your example and the Z-listers like Shane Daniel Byrne from last night, who should be avoided. He was terrible, as was Emma Doran.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,618 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Pretty crazy they can't get any guests, that they have to go to the RTE Canteen, or jump on Andy Cole who happened to be in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,711 ✭✭✭Heroditas


    He's done work for TV productions commissioned by RTE, big difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    If someone went walking the streets looking for interesting guests they'd find them



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Yeah Irish comedians on talk shows with scripted material is embarrassing mostly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,711 ✭✭✭Heroditas


    I think we're near the top of the consumption "leaderboard" in Europe. Shocking stat



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭Hyperbollix



    Paul McGrath wasn't one of Ferguson's "boy he wanted to guide to greatness" - He was an established senior player already at Man United for four years when Ferguson arrived as manager. The club had a very deep rooted and problematic drinking culture at the time, which Ferguson could see had to be rooted out first before any actual progress could be made on the pitch. Paul McGrath was only one of many who got the boot from the club in the mid to late 80's as Ferguson went about improving the standards. With 30 plus years of hindsight, yes he could have handled it differently and tried to weed out the arseholes taking the piss to the well intentioned players who needed personal help but we have to remember he was the new manager in a new club and he had to start getting results quickly. 9/10 people in his position would go with the new broom approach and try to ship out the deadwood and bring in his own picks.

    Over the next 26 years, Ferguson always petted his star players who were an asset to the club and tried to do all he could to keep them sweet. Eric Cantona being the prime example. And if they could no longer keep the standards that were set, were unwilling to or were just over the hill, he would move them on. So what. That's what he's paid to do as manager. Keep a winning team. He proved over three decades, he knew what he was doing.

    Where Ferguson was an actual father figure was with youth players. I could name you dozens of young players who went thru the United academy system and didn't quite make the grade. Guys the Nevilles, Scholes, Beckham etc played with but ultimately weren't good enough. None of them were booted out the door with a kick in the arse. Ferguson and the club always did their best to sort them out with new clubs and moves that suited them and their families. Many such ex players spoke of being in contact with Ferguson for years after being at the club, getting advice and his input on their careers.

    As for Jack, I think he may have been posthumously sainted without me knowing but he was just as ruthless and unforbiding as Ferguson when it came to his philosophy. He may have helped McGrath, but McGrath would play the way Jack wanted, so Jack did his best to accommodate him. Was Jack as lenient to Dave O Leary, or Liam Brady? Two hugely talented players who would walk into practically any first team in the world, but whose international career was axed under Jack because they wouldn't tow the line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,982 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I'm not sure that a 5 year rotation would work given the small pool of potential guests available.

    With the current "light entertainment" focus there is less scope for regular guests than there would be with a panel discussion type set up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,982 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I suppose you are always going to get a few guests per season who just don't work out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,264 ✭✭✭amacca


    That small pool is potentially the problem and one of the only ones they might be able to fix.


    There has to be something other than the usual circle jerk candidates that keep getting trotted out


    Include one shock jock type pick or something off the beaten track occasionally....there has to be entertaining interview able guests outside the canteen and usual circuit that are willing and don't cost the earth no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 Herxules


    Poor Kielty is struggling big time.

    The opening on Friday was painfully cringe. The "I've No Tickets" thing....to think he had to actually print off those and place them inside his jacket and behind. Immature isn't the word..

    Someone needs to tell him it's not a comedy gig, you can't do the same material every night. How many times is he going to do the "X has written to me"

    Not sure if anyone noticed, the interview with Andy Cole was pre-recorded. I was thinking there was something off with the camera switching and then when he introduced the band after Cole, it panned to an overhead view and Cole wasn't there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Everyone noticed and we know about prerecorded interviews



Advertisement